1. BREAKING NEWS IN THE BEAR BROOK MURDERS CASE!
    Three of the Jane Does have been IDENTIFIED!

    CLICK HERE FOR DETAILS!
  2. A GUILTY verdict has been reached in the McSTAY murder trial!
    Click here for more information
    Dismiss Notice
  3. No Parole for Cop Killers is an ODMP program that makes it easy for you to urge parole boards to deny parole to convicted cop killers.
    In less than one minute, generate and mail a letter to parole boards with scheduled hearings for convicted cop killers.
    You can also subscribe to parole alerts.

    http://www.odmp.org/noparole

    Dismiss Notice
  4. Keeping Children and Adults Safe
    Click Here for more information!
    Dismiss Notice
  5. What do you do if you have a loved one missing?
    In this section, you will find tips on what to do and not do.
    Easily find organizations that you can contact for help.
    Click here for more information
    Dismiss Notice
  6. “We can't help everyone, but everyone can help someone.”
    Our mission: Working together to help locate the missing, name the unidentified
    and discuss true crime cases within an intellectual, safe and respectful Internet community.
    *~*~*~*Don't forget, we are on Facebook! www.facebook.com/CrimeWatchersNet*~*~*~*~*
    CLICK HERE FOR FORUM SUPPORT
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Welcome to Crimewatchers.net! We are happy to have you with us.
Please let any staff member know if you need assistance. We're here to help! (If you aren't a member, please join us today. We'd love to meet you!)
Dismiss Notice
Crimewatchers.net opened on April 26, 2015 with the purpose of making a difference in getting the word out for the missing, unidentified, and justice for victims. Let us know if you have a case you'd like us to feature here, on Twitter &/or Facebook. Contact email: CrimewatchersCW@gmail.com

UK Jack the Ripper - 1888

Discussion in 'Europe: Cold Cases' started by Lily, Jul 15, 2015.

  1. GarAndMo49

    GarAndMo49 Not A Sheeple

    Yeah, I really liked Sugden's presentation! He was so rational & objective, and wasn't focused on "revealing the Ripper", so to speak. I'm not sure if I'll ever be absolutely convinced that I can opine on a suspect. Chapman was a paradox, for sure, but I wouldn't dismiss him. Nor would I get stuck on him as THE ONE, IYKWIM.
     
    Akoya, Lily and Cousin Dupree like this.
  2. Lily

    Lily Bronze Member

    Oh, I do know, G&M, lol... I'm finding some interesting parallels between JtR and some of the crimes and suspects surrounding the Black Dahlia case, atm. Very similar lust-murders, in the Elizabeth Short case, the murders of Otto Wilson & also some horrific unsolveds in Oklahoma city in the 70's-80's. I can't help seeing JtR as someone very similar to these more modern killers. Plus, in the Dahlia case, so many suspects... and many of them good ones, too!

    The rational, objective books always win my vote.. the "solved it!" ones always seem to be so flawed, when examined closely.
     
    GarAndMo49, Akoya and spike like this.
  3. Cousin Dupree

    Cousin Dupree Platinum Member

    GarAndMo49, Paradise, Akoya and 2 others like this.
  4. spike

    spike Bronze Member

    Paradise, Akoya and Cousin Dupree like this.
  5. Cousin Dupree

    Cousin Dupree Platinum Member

    :waiting:
     
    Paradise, Akoya and spike like this.
  6. spike

    spike Bronze Member

    :sneaking:
     
  7. Akoya

    Akoya Bronze Member

    @Lily - thank you so much for this thread. I read every word. I have nothing to add for the Ripper because I've never really studied him. That just might change. Thanks so much.
     
  8. SheWhoMustNotBeNamed

    SheWhoMustNotBeNamed Administrator Staff Member

    Does a new genetic analysis finally reveal the identity of Jack the Ripper?

    Forensic scientists say they have finally fingered the identity of Jack the Ripper, the notorious serial killer who terrorized the streets of London more than a century ago. Genetic tests published this week point to Aaron Kosminski, a 23-year-old Polish barber and a prime police suspect at the time. But critics say the evidence isn’t strong enough to declare this case closed.

    The results come from a forensic examination of a stained silk shawl that investigators said was found next to the mutilated body of Catherine Eddowes, the killer’s fourth victim, in 1888. The shawl is speckled with what is claimed to be blood and semen, the latter believed to be from the killer. Four other women in London were also murdered in a 3-month spree and the culprit has never been confirmed.

    This isn’t the first time Kosminski has been linked to the crimes. But it is the first time the supporting DNA evidence has been published in a peer-reviewed journal. The first genetic tests on shawl samples were conducted several years ago by Jari Louhelainen, a biochemist at Liverpool John Moores University in the United Kingdom, but he said he wanted to wait for the fuss to die down before he submitted the results. Author Russell Edwards, who bought the shawl in 2007 and gave it to Louhelainen, used the unpublished results of the tests to identify Kosminski as the murderer in a 2014 book called Naming Jack the Ripper. But geneticists complained at the time that it was impossible to assess the claims because few technical details about the analysis of genetic samples from the shawl were available.

    The new paper lays those out, up to a point. In what Louhelainen and his colleague David Miller, a reproduction and sperm expert at the University of Leeds in the United Kingdom, claim is “the most systematic and most advanced genetic analysis to date regarding the Jack the Ripper murders,” they describe extracting and amplifying the DNA from the shawl. The tests compared fragments of mitochondrial DNA—the portion of DNA inherited only from one’s mother—retrieved from the shawl with samples taken from living descendants of Eddowes and Kosminski. The DNA matches that of a living relative of Kosminki, they conclude in the Journal of Forensic Sciences.

    The analysis also suggests the killer had brown hair and brown eyes, which agrees with the evidence from an eyewitness. “These characteristics are surely not unique,” the authors admit in their paper. But blue eyes are now more common than brown in England, the researchers note.

    The results are unlikely to satisfy critics. Key details on the specific genetic variants identified and compared between DNA samples are not included in the paper. Instead, the authors represent them in a graphic with a series of colored boxes. Where the boxes overlap, they say, the shawl and modern DNA sequences matched.

    The authors say in their paper that the Data Protection Act, a U.K. law designed to protect the privacy of individuals, stops them from publishing the genetic sequences of the living relatives of Eddowes and Kosminski. The graphic in the paper, they say, is easier for nonscientists to understand, especially “those interested in true crime.”

    Walther Parson, a forensic scientist at the Institute of Legal Medicine at Innsbruck Medical University in Austria, says mitochondrial DNA sequences pose no risk to privacy and the authors should have included them in the paper. “Otherwise the reader cannot judge the result. I wonder where science and research are going when we start to avoid showing results but instead present colored boxes.”

    Hansi Weissensteiner, an expert in mitochondrial DNA also at Innsbruck, also takes issue with the mitochondrial DNA analysis, which he says can only reliably show that people—or two DNA samples—are not related. “Based on mitochondrial DNA one can only exclude a suspect.” In other words, the mitochondrial DNA from the shawl could be from Kosminski, but it could probably also have come from thousands who lived in London at the time.

    Other critics of the Kosminsky theory have pointed out that there’s no evidence the shawl was ever at the crime scene. It also could have become contaminated over the years, they say.

    The new tests are not the first attempt to identify Jack the Ripper from DNA. Several years ago, U.S. crime author Patricia Cornwell asked other scientists to analyze any DNA in samples taken from letters supposedly sent by the serial killer to police. Based on that DNA analysis and other clues she said the killer was the painter Walter Sickert, though many experts believe those letters to be fake. Another genetic analysis of the letters claimed the murderer could have been a woman.

    https://www.sciencemag.org/news/201...-analysis-finally-reveal-identity-jack-ripper
     
    Lily, Cousin Dupree, Ladyslug and 2 others like this.
  9. Ladyslug

    Ladyslug Bronze Member

    This is a dodgy one because the suspect at the time was only named by surname no forename was given
    and police said he was in a lunatic asylym by 1891
    several polish jews changed surname and there were others at the same asylym who may have been the origanal suspect
    and mitochondrial DNA can be a good way to rule in or out direct lines
    They would need to prove the link as he had no children
    mitochondrial DNA is very intreasting but with a large family can be passed down to alot of people
     
  10. Dobrev

    Dobrev Former Member

    interesting, to say the least.
    would be great to finally have this case closed.
     
    Cousin Dupree and Ladyslug like this.
  11. Ladyslug

    Ladyslug Bronze Member

    Been having a quick look into the shawl
    2 known descendants of Catherine Eddowes spent 3 days with the shawl in 2007 and the small DNA trace could have come from them
    and the marker that is claim to have been the link is a very common one that a lot of people share

    In 2014, mitochondrial DNA that matched that of one of Eddowes' descendants was extracted from a shawl said to have come from the scene of her murder. The DNA match was based on one of seven small segments taken from the hypervariable regions.[55] The segment contained a sequence variation described as 314.1C, and claimed to be uncommon, with a frequency of only 1 in 290,000 worldwide. However, Professor Sir Alec Jeffreys and others pointed out this was in fact an error in nomenclature for the common sequence variation 315.1C,[56] which is present in more than 99% of the sequences in the EMPOP database.[57]
     
    Lily, Kimster, Cousin Dupree and 2 others like this.
  12. SheWhoMustNotBeNamed

    SheWhoMustNotBeNamed Administrator Staff Member

    Yeah, I'm thinking them saying that this DNA test "matches" a suspect is a bunch of hooey.

    "New DNA testing can't rule out suspect" might be better. But it also can't rule out thousands of others.
     
    Lily, Kimster, Cousin Dupree and 2 others like this.
  13. Ladyslug

    Ladyslug Bronze Member

    there would need to be something that had been kept sealed since the crime to test for anything definitive this long after it happened
     

Share This Page