Letcher County, KY Sheriff arrested in shooting death of District Judge

1726796854367.png
Sheriff Mickey Stines was arrested after surrendering himself to police. The shooting occurred in the judge’s chambers about 3 p.m. this afternoon (September 19).
Stines allegedly walked into the judge’s outer office, told court employees and others gathered there that he needed to speak with District Judge Kevin D. Mullins alone. The two then went into the inner office, closed the door and those outside heard shots. Stines walked out with his hands up and surrendered to police.

Court employees were on the sidewalk outside the courthouse in shock following the shooting. Stines was handcuffed in the foyer of the courthouse. Officials expected the investigation to continue for several more hours.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
How old is the daughter?
There is a pic of her in the courtroom with her mother that i saw in one of the articles. I'll see if i can find it to post.

Here it is, from the Journal and Courier upthread.

Shawn “Mickey” Stines had a preliminary hearing at Morgan County District Court. Oct. 1, 2024

Supporters of Shawn “Mickey” Stines sat behind him at his preliminary hearing at Morgan County District Court.Oct. 1, 2024



Supporters of Shawn “Mickey” Stines sat behind him at his preliminary hearing at Morgan County District Court. Oct. 1, 2024
 
Last edited:
The DM article confirms the sheriff's daughter was interviewed and that three phones were seized.

"Stamper confirmed in court that Stines' daughter has been interviewed by police. The interview took place in the presence of her mother.

Three cell phones in total are currently at a forensic lab being downloaded and will form part of the investigation.

Police allege Stines walked into the judge's outer office, told court employees he needed to speak to Mullins alone, then proceeded to shoot him once they entered the inner office.

Stines then walked out with his hands raised and surrendered to officers, who placed him in handcuffs. He was charged with one count of first-degree murder."
 
The DM article confirms the sheriff's daughter was interviewed and that three phones were seized.

"Stamper confirmed in court that Stines' daughter has been interviewed by police. The interview took place in the presence of her mother.

Three cell phones in total are currently at a forensic lab being downloaded and will form part of the investigation.

Police allege Stines walked into the judge's outer office, told court employees he needed to speak to Mullins alone, then proceeded to shoot him once they entered the inner office.

Stines then walked out with his hands raised and surrendered to officers, who placed him in handcuffs. He was charged with one count of first-degree murder."
Mom was present, she's definitely a minor.
 
Ok the law in Kentucky changed in 2018.


"Just because someone is 16 or older doesn’t mean they are automatically able to consent to sexual activity or intercourse. In 2018, Kentucky passed new legislation that made it illegal for individuals to have sex with 16 or 17-year-olds if they were more than ten years older than them."
 
Ok the law in Kentucky changed in 2018.


"Just because someone is 16 or older doesn’t mean they are automatically able to consent to sexual activity or intercourse. In 2018, Kentucky passed new legislation that made it illegal for individuals to have sex with 16 or 17-year-olds if they were more than ten years older than them."
That’s how it is in Oregon. The 16 or 17-year-old has to be quite a bit younger than the adult.
 
That’s how it is in Oregon. The 16 or 17-year-old has to be quite a bit younger than the adult.
Ok so if anything untoward had been going on, what would be the penalty for that?

How many states have this law and which states?
 
However, if you a minor and aged 16 or 17 you cannot just have sex with anyone in Kentucky. See below full article for explanation.

( In this case, if anything had gone on it could be considered Rape in the Third Degree ie.
  • Rape in the Third Degree: this is charged with someone aged 21 or older has sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 16, or when someone 10 years older than a 16-year-old or a 17-year-old engages in sexual intercourse with them. It is a D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in jail. )


From the link :-

What Is the Age of Consent in Kentucky?​

The age of consent can be a difficult subject to navigate, particularly in “Romeo and Juliet” relationships where a teenager gets involved with someone in their early 20’s. In 2018, Kentucky updated its age of consent law, drawing a bright line as to when teens can consent to sex — and how old is too old for their sexual partners.

What is the Age of Consent in Kentucky?

Yet some aspects of Kentucky law are confusing, like the fact that 17-year-olds can engage in sex with someone 10 years their senior, but can only legally marry someone up to 4 years older than they are (and only with permission of the court). Learning more about the changes to Kentucky law from a Lexington sex offense lawyer can help keep you out of trouble.

Legal Age of Consent in Kentucky Is 16​

Under Kentucky law, a person must be 16 years old to consent to a sexual act. However, it is critical to understand that this does not mean that anyone aged 16 or older can consent to sexual activity with any other person. A person under the age of 18 is a minor under Kentucky law. As a result, there are restrictions who a 16-year-old can consent to have sex with under a relatively recent Kentucky law.

On July 14, 2018, Kentucky Revised Statute (KRS) 510.020 went into effect. Under KRS 510.020(3), 16 and 17-year-olds cannot engage in sexual acts with anyone who is more than 10 years older than they are. There is an exception to this law for persons who are legally married to each other (i.e., a person can consent to sexual activity with their spouse, even if he or she is more than 10 years older than they are). However, Kentucky law regarding the marriage of minors also changed in July 2018.

Under KRS 402.020, no one under the age of 18 may legally marry in Kentucky, except that a 17 year old may petition a district or family court to obtain permission to get married. If the intended spouse is more than 4 years older than the minor, then the petition will be denied.

Legal Age of Consent in Kentucky Is 16

If effect, this means that a 16-year-old can consent to sexual activity, but only if the person is 26 or younger. Under Kentucky’s new marriage laws, a 17-year-old could consent to sex with a person up to 27 years of age, but would be prohibited from marrying anyone older than 21 years old.

What Is Consent?​

The topic of consent has received a fair amount of attention in both local and national news. It can be a difficult concept, particularly in the heat of the moment. In this specific situation, however, “consent” is relatively simple.

The “age of consent” means that a person is of an age that he or she can legally decide whether or not to engage in sexual activity with another person. In other words, it is a legal concept that sets an age by which a teenager can decide whether to consent to sex (with this “consent” being the more complicated type).

What is Consent?

The age of consent is important, as it is the basis for statutory rape laws. Statutory rape is what is known as a strict liability crime. To be convict a person of statutory rape, the prosecutor does not need to show that the defendant used force, violence or coercion.

The only determining factor is the age of the alleged victim and the age of the defendant. That is why it is vital to understand age of consent laws, particularly as they have recently changed in Kentucky.

Penalties for Sex Offenses in Kentucky​

Penalties for Sex Offenses in Kentucky

In Kentucky, the crime of statutory rape falls under the state’s rape, sexual abuse, and sodomy laws. If you are charged with a sex offense, particularly one involving a minor, it is critical to contact a Lexington sex offense lawyer as soon as possible. In addition to the consequences listed below, if you are convicted of a Kentucky sex crime, you will be required to register as a sex offender.

If you violate the age of consent laws in Kentucky, you may be charged with one of the following offenses:

  • Rape in the First Degree: this is charged when a person has sexual intercourse (penetration) with a minor under the age of 12. It is an A felony, punishable by 20 to 50 years in jail.
  • Rape in the Second Degree: this is charged with someone 18 or older has sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 14. It is a C felony, punishable by 5 to 10 years in jail.
  • Rape in the Third Degree: this is charged with someone aged 21 or older has sexual intercourse with someone under the age of 16, or when someone 10 years older than a 16-year-old or a 17-year-old engages in sexual intercourse with them. It is a D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in jail.
  • Sexual Abuse in the First Degree: this involves sexual contact (touching) with a child under the age of 12, or when anyone aged 21 or older has sexual contact with someone under the age of 16. In the first situation, it is a C felony, punishable by 5 to 10 years in jail. In the second situation, it is a D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in jail.
  • Sexual Abuse in the Second Degree: when a person between the ages of 18 and 21 has sexual contact with someone under 16, this may be charged. It is an A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail.
  • Sodomy in the First Degree: this is charged when a person engages in oral or anal sex with a person under the age of 12. It is an A felony, punishable by 20 to 50 years in jail.
  • Sodomy in the Second Degree: this is charged when a person aged 18 or older engages in oral or anal sex with a person under the age of 14. It is a C felony, punishable by 5 to 10 years in jail.
  • Sodomy in the Third Degree: aged 21 or older engages in oral or anal sex with a person under the age of 16. It is a D felony, punishable by 1 to 5 years in jail.
Given the steep penalties for sexual offenses in Kentucky, it is critical to know the law regarding age of consent. If you have been charged with a crime, contact a Lexington sex offense lawyer as soon as possible.
 
Last edited:
That’s how it is in Oregon. The 16 or 17-year-old has to be quite a bit younger than the adult.
But do we even know that there might be an innocent reason she had his number? Like maybe her trusted adult that wasn't her parent? I need more info before I assume they had any kind of thing going on. Hopefully he didn't just jump to conclusions.
 
But do we even know that there might be an innocent reason she had his number? Like maybe her trusted adult that wasn't her parent? I need more info before I assume they had any kind of thing going on. Hopefully he didn't just jump to conclusions.
Have they released the affidavit yet?
 
A little more info in this article.

"A woman employed by the Letcher County Sheriff’s Office voluntarily gave her phone to investigators to be examined, Stamper testified. She was reportedly one of the sheriff’s employees, was present at the Sept. 19 lunch, and received text messages from Stines regarding things that led to the shooting. The phone was also sent for forensic examination.
Stines’ attorney argued that the entirety of the video should be shown, but the Commonwealth rebutted that it was not necessary since the hearing was only to establish probable cause.
He also argued that the charges against Stines should be amended down to manslaughter due to Stamper’s testimony that claimed there was no evidence to show the shooting was planned and was the result of “extreme emotional disturbance.” The Commonwealth objected to this motion, which was ultimately sustained because Mullins was not believed to be armed at the time of the shooting.
According to court documents, the defense established probable cause, and the case is set to be heard by a grand jury."

 
An article about the Judge and his family.


On Sept. 19, 2024, Letcher County Sheriff Shawn "Mickey" Stines, 43, walked into the chambers of District Judge Kevin Mullins and shot him multiple times. The 54-year-old magistrate was pronounced dead at the scene, which resulted in Stines turning himself in to Kentucky State Police.

He reportedly cooperated with authorities and was arrested without incident.

Stines has been charged with first-degree murder and is awaiting trial. Lead county prosecutor Matt Butler had to recuse himself from this case, due to the fact that his wife and Mullins’ wife are sisters. Obviously, this is devastating for their family, who are dealing with a horrific tragedy.
(L-R): Kimberly Mullins and Judge Kevin Mullins; Kevin Mullins's daughters

SOURCE: FACEBOOK/KIMBERLY MULLINS
(L-R): Kimberly Mullins and Judge Kevin Mullins; Kevin Mullins's daughters


Judge Kevin Mullins wife, Kimberly Mullins, was proud to be his spouse.​


While sharing his obituary on her Facebook page, Kimberly said she was proud to be the wife to a man she described as irreplaceable. “Kevin was a lot of things to a lot of people,” she wrote. “But he was everything to me and my girls.”
In his obituary, Kimberly said her husband died in his chambers where he “spent his career working to help people.” This is all the more evident based on what others have said about Mullins in the wake of his death. At a memorial service held in Mullins’ honor, several people spoke of his trailblazing efforts to help those suffering from substance abuse.

He pushed for treatment over incarceration, reported The New York Times.

J. Foster Cotthoff, a district judge in Christian County, said Mullins was “light-years ahead” of other jurisdictions in terms of presiding over cases that involved drug use or addiction.

Kaci Lucas, 34, was one of those individuals on the receiving end of Mullins’ compassion. She found herself before him on multiple occasions until, in 2019, he helped send her to a drug rehabilitation center. She now works at a similar facility and is eternally grateful for all he did.

In 2008, Mullins officiated Randy Billiter’s wedding. The 61-year-old retired coal miner met the judge the previous year, and was struck by how kind he was. “He was always the type of guy that’d help you,” recalled Billiter. “If he could help you, he’d help you.”

Sheriff Stines and Judge Mullins were friends. What happened?​

Stines and Mullins frequently had lunch together at the StreetSide Grill & Bar near the courthouse. In fact, they dined together the day Stines shot Mullins. Then a little before 3 p.m., Stines allegedly “walked into Mullins’s outer office and told court employees that he wanted to speak with the judge alone” reported The Mountain Eagle.

Soon after entering Mullins’ inner office, employees said they heard gunshots.
Article continues below advertisement


Earlier in the week, Stines was deposed in conjunction with an "ongoing federal lawsuit involving a former deputy who coerced a woman to have sex with him in Mullins’ chambers in 2021," per CNN. A lawsuit was filed against Stines and deputy Ben Fields in 2022, by Sabrina Adkins and Jennifer Hill.

The lawsuit claims Fields told Adkins she could "pay the fees associated with an ankle monitor, in exchange for sex." The two allegedly met multiple times after hours in Mullins's office because they were no cameras there.

This occurred over a seven-month period. Hill was sentenced to home confinement for her crimes and said Fields often harassed her and demanded oral sex, then later sexual intercourse, in order to remain out of jail.
Fields was charged with rape and tampering with a monitoring device and received a suspension as part of his plea deal. Unfortunately, Hill passed away, resulting in the criminal charges relating to her case being dropped though her estate is still pursuing the lawsuit. Adkins is also still involved in the lawsuit. At Fields's sentencing she told the court, "My nightmares got so bad I had to go on medicine and probably will be for the rest of my life."
The lawsuit accuses Stines of not properly investigating the allegations lodged agains Fields. Some suspect the shooting is related to these ongoing legal proceedings. According to CBS News, Stines has plead not guilty.
 
Last edited:

Former Sheriff Mickey Stines' murder case moves forward. What to know, timeline of events​

Less than a month since a Kentucky sheriff was arrested at the scene of a district judge's fatal shooting, the murder case against Shawn "Mickey" Stines is now in the hands of a grand jury for a potential indictment.

The then-sheriff, who has since stepped down from his post, is accused of fatally shooting District Judge Kevin Mullins in his private chambers at the Letcher County Courthouse late September. He has pleaded not guilty to the charge of murder, with his attorney hinting at a possible defense strategy just this week.


While the case has moved forward to a grand jury on the charge of murder, Stines' team may be gearing up for a legal defense of manslaughter.

In an interview with People Magazine, Stines' attorney, Bartley, said the shooting "occurred in the heat of passion" and said he believes "the highest level of culpability should be manslaughter based on the partial defense of extreme emotional disturbance."

Stines' next court date has not yet been announced.
 

Facebook​

The Mountain Eagle

erdpnoStosi8m789i0c1984c16a21mm37thagh135itlu851095thl2ug103 ·

LETCHER GRAND JURY INDICTS FORMER SHERIFF IN SHOOTING DEATH OF DISTRICT JUDGE

A Letcher County Grand Jury has indicted former Sheriff Mickey Stines on a charge of murder of a public official in the death of District Judge Kevin R. Mullins.
The indictment, announced at about 2:50 this afternoon, comes two months and two days after Stines walked into Mullins’s chambers behind the Letcher District Courtroom and shot the judge eight times. The entire shooting was captured on a security camera.
The indictment was handed up to Senior Judge Julia H. Adams, who served as circuit judge in Clark and Madison Counties before her retirement.
The indictment gives nearly no details about the crime and the motive is still unknown. Judge Adams was appointed solely for the purpose of receiving the indictment and presiding over the arraignment of Stines, which is set for Monday at noon.
Judge Adams also left room for Stines, 43, of McRoberts, to be released from jail on bond, but warned the bond "will be significant."
"I am disinclined to set 'no bond' in any case," the judge said.
The case against Stines was presented to the grand jury by Commonwealth’s Attorney for the 27th Judicial Circuit
 
Okay I am going to give a cold outside perspective starting with WTF?

I have never seen this case before that I can recall. I nodded off and I don't know if Snitty stepped on the keyboard or what but when I woke up, it was on this case. I've never heard of it nor seen it anywhere but think Lecher is a very appropriate name.Seems there may be a bunch of old leches living in tis county.

I haven't read the links but read all three pages of posts having no idea about it.

And again WTF?

How does ONE THING relate to the next? A lawsuit, a deputy screwing in the judge's chambers, then a daughter of the sheriff it is about...And why is this case not bigger news/ Never heard of it. A lawsuit. But a judge having daughter's number, etc. First impression is a bunch of good ol' boys where doing such things was just fine until someone or something was looked at and then they turn on each other... Seems like cover up even now. Again I am coming in cold and knew NOTHING. I don't do FB, etc. but do YT and have never seen the case before.

And one thing juxtaposed to the next seems to make no sense. Was this over the daughter? Or the lawsuit? or the judge's chambers which HE was not in screwing a woman so she could afford her ankle monitor? Even then it isn't the sheriff either, but a deputy?!

Again I'd say the county is appropriately named.

Abuse of power.

All fine maybe until one's own daughter is involved? Or is that even true?

I've certainly seen the disgusting types in positions of power, haven't we all.

Am I reading it wrong? Others have been here longer. Probably each had something on the other as well and caught out, it was who turned to save self or killed to save self and being found out? Again I haven't read all links but did read all posts and it's very unclear to me what the case really is here. Or who did wrong. Of course killing the judge was wrong. Other than that, I mean, what was it truly about?

I've always said he problem with things like this where both know the dirty deeds of the other and perhaps even aided them, watch out when one big shot gets caught because all will abandon he other and save self because they know what the other knows about them but it also often works both ways. It SOUNDS like a not that atypical good ol' boys bunch with major abuse of power, of woman and if true, of children/minors.

I've read every single post but have not read links to reiterate, and I somhow doubt it would help but would probably further muddy things, judging by the posts which make nothing clear really either. Does anyone know what really happened here or the reasons?. It makes no sense other than figuring there is "snow" here and we have a whole lot of dirty going on. Probably by all?

If anyone wants to fill me in, feel free, I didn't really note any consensus on what is thought is behind it all. Not sure how I've never heard of this one but it's likely tamped down/silenced. Murdaugh also would have been excep for it being pushed out there by someone and the public picking it up. I did before almost anyone had ever heard of it. That's not claiming credit iat all but simply saying that things get tamped down, quieted, hushed as we've seen over the years. Usually cases in which one or more hold positions of power, etc.

And what is the deal with the judge's chambers?? Are these inmates?? Or are they there due to may be probation meeting or something? I mean why do this in the courthouse at ALL and not elsewhere? Not that they should be SA'ing anyone and it is SA when abusing power to make the person do so, or someone in a hard spot needing to get out of such.

This case SHOULD be HUGE news and it is NOT.

Is this really over the sheriff's daughter and the judge or was that to take heat off from elsewhere and deflect attention? However, it seems unlikely because what sheriff wants to go to prison over killing a judge? But is it really what the shooting was over...? Possibly but kind of hard to be sure with the other goings on...

Out of the gate, I'd guess all were dirty. The deputy, the sheriff, the judge BUT who knows... Something probably came down, perhaps the lawsuit that was causing each to look for help from the other but one bailed or turned hoping to save self and maybe one spouted something about the judge and the sheriff's daughter...? Or she told?

It's very unclear what the deal is here, at least to me, and perhaps i should read the links but again it's already so unclear that I don't think it would help.

I think the sheriff most likely had to shut the judge up...? Maybe it's not about the daughter at all? But not really meaning that or sure either. Seems like a man about to lose all and figured silence someone and hope he can come out of it when caught at something...? Or WAS it blind rage over the daughter?

Did the judge know his chambers were being used for SA?

Does anyone know if the sheriff's department is connected to/part of the courthouse here? It is in many places. Same building even quite often...

We had one in a nearby county, probably an hour away I believe I've posted about before. A Fire Chief of a small city, not sure of the population, 5K to 10K probably, married, two kids, with the "perfect" life who was also a deputy in the county. He was SA'ing female county inmates at a spot along the corridor where he knew there were no cameras. It was awful and watching some stand up for him was disgusting, and his expectation of I'd say getting out of it, and his wife's. I mean who'd believe an inmate over a Fire Chief, etc... They had to bring in an outside judge to ensure all was above board and looked so because of the absolute shock and mess it was. That judge and there were plenty of inmates once one was brave enough to tell, told their stories, and the judge left no word unsaid about what the man did. Right up until and after it was by some and of course the man and his wife and others, shock he could be sent to prison, etc. I can't recall but I think it was someone on staff that picked up on it to begin with whether a female inmate hinted at something to her OR she picked up on his ways or some such. It caused quite the divide and it amazed me how many thought no big deal and like either thought that or were in denial because this was their buddy or their husband... he was after all better than an inmate that was in there for something done wrong... To this day, the disgust I felt at that "attitude" when they are the lowest of the low but think selves better, more prominent, etc. I can still "taste" my disgust at some people.

i'm sidetracking but it would seem something on that order is going on here, by more than one though. I could tell stories of my own county, rumors and facts and things getting hushed and disappearing...

I used to think naively like in my 20s and maybe even into my 30s that people went into careers or jobs like these because they cared about justice, wanted to make the world a better place, etc. I really did. And I think SOME do. Initially anyhow. However, I came to realize it's way more common that they do such to feel power, have power, or maybe status or esteem.

So sorry for sidetracking but it relates, and I just don't know who is bad here or what is all true? Clearly the sheriff shot the judge, killed him, and THAT is wrong so sheriff is in the wrong. Was the judge truly dirty and doing the daughter of the sheriff?

Sounds like quite the Peyton Place. On the surface, it would seem like at least a trio doing wrong. The sheriff, judge and the deputy. This case NEEDS attention and sunlight. I swear had the Murdaugh thing not gotten outside that area and picked up attention, somehow it would have all slid under the rug... I'm sure such threats and attempts and influence were made and going on up to some high levels.

How to close it? And feel free to ignore this long post. But this kind of thing needs to be taken by news and fully focused on and spotlighted but that's not going to happen. And it's disgusting such still goes on but it does.

Yet I am still left without really knowing what the reason really was here... What is true and what's not. If the judge was really doing the sheriff's daughter behind his back well that's absolutely disgusting, and some bunch of buddies right? But then apparently the sheriff was fine with a deputy SA'ing someone who could not afford an ankle monitor in the judge's chambers. WTF. All at this point seem to be allegations though. No?

So it's KY. How open are they and would FOIAs garner anything at this point... It does need to be HEARD and KNOWN. I sure knew nothing of it.

Yeah, I always end up having at least ONE long one but don't even know how I ended up seeing this one. I still think it was Snitty.

Feel free of course to ignore the rambling. I just didn't in three pages of posts see that anyone is sure of anything which means there is not enough info out there and seems to be an attempt to quiet it, which as we know, is often done for real reasons, share nothing of the investigation, but sometimes done hoping people let it go while it gets swept under the rug...

Yes, I need coffee. Clearly.
 
An article about the Judge and his family.


On Sept. 19, 2024, Letcher County Sheriff Shawn "Mickey" Stines, 43, walked into the chambers of District Judge Kevin Mullins and shot him multiple times. The 54-year-old magistrate was pronounced dead at the scene, which resulted in Stines turning himself in to Kentucky State Police.

He reportedly cooperated with authorities and was arrested without incident.

Stines has been charged with first-degree murder and is awaiting trial. Lead county prosecutor Matt Butler had to recuse himself from this case, due to the fact that his wife and Mullins’ wife are sisters. Obviously, this is devastating for their family, who are dealing with a horrific tragedy.
(L-R): Kimberly Mullins and Judge Kevin Mullins; Kevin Mullins's daughters's daughters

SOURCE: FACEBOOK/KIMBERLY MULLINS
(L-R): Kimberly Mullins and Judge Kevin Mullins; Kevin Mullins's daughters


Judge Kevin Mullins wife, Kimberly Mullins, was proud to be his spouse.​


While sharing his obituary on her Facebook page, Kimberly said she was proud to be the wife to a man she described as irreplaceable. “Kevin was a lot of things to a lot of people,” she wrote. “But he was everything to me and my girls.”
In his obituary, Kimberly said her husband died in his chambers where he “spent his career working to help people.” This is all the more evident based on what others have said about Mullins in the wake of his death. At a memorial service held in Mullins’ honor, several people spoke of his trailblazing efforts to help those suffering from substance abuse.

He pushed for treatment over incarceration, reported The New York Times.

J. Foster Cotthoff, a district judge in Christian County, said Mullins was “light-years ahead” of other jurisdictions in terms of presiding over cases that involved drug use or addiction.

Kaci Lucas, 34, was one of those individuals on the receiving end of Mullins’ compassion. She found herself before him on multiple occasions until, in 2019, he helped send her to a drug rehabilitation center. She now works at a similar facility and is eternally grateful for all he did.

In 2008, Mullins officiated Randy Billiter’s wedding. The 61-year-old retired coal miner met the judge the previous year, and was struck by how kind he was. “He was always the type of guy that’d help you,” recalled Billiter. “If he could help you, he’d help you.”

Sheriff Stines and Judge Mullins were friends. What happened?​

Stines and Mullins frequently had lunch together at the StreetSide Grill & Bar near the courthouse. In fact, they dined together the day Stines shot Mullins. Then a little before 3 p.m., Stines allegedly “walked into Mullins’s outer office and told court employees that he wanted to speak with the judge alone” reported The Mountain Eagle.

Soon after entering Mullins’ inner office, employees said they heard gunshots.
Article continues below advertisement


Earlier in the week, Stines was deposed in conjunction with an "ongoing federal lawsuit involving a former deputy who coerced a woman to have sex with him in Mullins’ chambers in 2021," per CNN. A lawsuit was filed against Stines and deputy Ben Fields in 2022, by Sabrina Adkins and Jennifer Hill.

The lawsuit claims Fields told Adkins she could "pay the fees associated with an ankle monitor, in exchange for sex." The two allegedly met multiple times after hours in Mullins's office because they were no cameras there.

This occurred over a seven-month period. Hill was sentenced to home confinement for her crimes and said Fields often harassed her and demanded oral sex, then later sexual intercourse, in order to remain out of jail.
Fields was charged with rape and tampering with a monitoring device and received a suspension as part of his plea deal. Unfortunately, Hill passed away, resulting in the criminal charges relating to her case being dropped though her estate is still pursuing the lawsuit. Adkins is also still involved in the lawsuit. At Fields's sentencing she told the court, "My nightmares got so bad I had to go on medicine and probably will be for the rest of my life."
The lawsuit accuses Stines of not properly investigating the allegations lodged agains Fields. Some suspect the shooting is related to these ongoing legal proceedings. According to CBS News, Stines has plead not guilty.
I only just noticed this. His wife looks like Stines' daughter.
 
Last edited:
Okay I am going to give a cold outside perspective starting with WTF?

I have never seen this case before that I can recall. I nodded off and I don't know if Snitty stepped on the keyboard or what but when I woke up, it was on this case. I've never heard of it nor seen it anywhere but think Lecher is a very appropriate name.Seems there may be a bunch of old leches living in tis county.

I haven't read the links but read all three pages of posts having no idea about it.

And again WTF?

How does ONE THING relate to the next? A lawsuit, a deputy screwing in the judge's chambers, then a daughter of the sheriff it is about...And why is this case not bigger news/ Never heard of it. A lawsuit. But a judge having daughter's number, etc. First impression is a bunch of good ol' boys where doing such things was just fine until someone or something was looked at and then they turn on each other... Seems like cover up even now. Again I am coming in cold and knew NOTHING. I don't do FB, etc. but do YT and have never seen the case before.

And one thing juxtaposed to the next seems to make no sense. Was this over the daughter? Or the lawsuit? or the judge's chambers which HE was not in screwing a woman so she could afford her ankle monitor? Even then it isn't the sheriff either, but a deputy?!

Again I'd say the county is appropriately named.

Abuse of power.

All fine maybe until one's own daughter is involved? Or is that even true?

I've certainly seen the disgusting types in positions of power, haven't we all.

Am I reading it wrong? Others have been here longer. Probably each had something on the other as well and caught out, it was who turned to save self or killed to save self and being found out? Again I haven't read all links but did read all posts and it's very unclear to me what the case really is here. Or who did wrong. Of course killing the judge was wrong. Other than that, I mean, what was it truly about?

I've always said he problem with things like this where both know the dirty deeds of the other and perhaps even aided them, watch out when one big shot gets caught because all will abandon he other and save self because they know what the other knows about them but it also often works both ways. It SOUNDS like a not that atypical good ol' boys bunch with major abuse of power, of woman and if true, of children/minors.

I've read every single post but have not read links to reiterate, and I somhow doubt it would help but would probably further muddy things, judging by the posts which make nothing clear really either. Does anyone know what really happened here or the reasons?. It makes no sense other than figuring there is "snow" here and we have a whole lot of dirty going on. Probably by all?

If anyone wants to fill me in, feel free, I didn't really note any consensus on what is thought is behind it all. Not sure how I've never heard of this one but it's likely tamped down/silenced. Murdaugh also would have been excep for it being pushed out there by someone and the public picking it up. I did before almost anyone had ever heard of it. That's not claiming credit iat all but simply saying that things get tamped down, quieted, hushed as we've seen over the years. Usually cases in which one or more hold positions of power, etc.

And what is the deal with the judge's chambers?? Are these inmates?? Or are they there due to may be probation meeting or something? I mean why do this in the courthouse at ALL and not elsewhere? Not that they should be SA'ing anyone and it is SA when abusing power to make the person do so, or someone in a hard spot needing to get out of such.

This case SHOULD be HUGE news and it is NOT.

Is this really over the sheriff's daughter and the judge or was that to take heat off from elsewhere and deflect attention? However, it seems unlikely because what sheriff wants to go to prison over killing a judge? But is it really what the shooting was over...? Possibly but kind of hard to be sure with the other goings on...

Out of the gate, I'd guess all were dirty. The deputy, the sheriff, the judge BUT who knows... Something probably came down, perhaps the lawsuit that was causing each to look for help from the other but one bailed or turned hoping to save self and maybe one spouted something about the judge and the sheriff's daughter...? Or she told?

It's very unclear what the deal is here, at least to me, and perhaps i should read the links but again it's already so unclear that I don't think it would help.

I think the sheriff most likely had to shut the judge up...? Maybe it's not about the daughter at all? But not really meaning that or sure either. Seems like a man about to lose all and figured silence someone and hope he can come out of it when caught at something...? Or WAS it blind rage over the daughter?

Did the judge know his chambers were being used for SA?

Does anyone know if the sheriff's department is connected to/part of the courthouse here? It is in many places. Same building even quite often...

We had one in a nearby county, probably an hour away I believe I've posted about before. A Fire Chief of a small city, not sure of the population, 5K to 10K probably, married, two kids, with the "perfect" life who was also a deputy in the county. He was SA'ing female county inmates at a spot along the corridor where he knew there were no cameras. It was awful and watching some stand up for him was disgusting, and his expectation of I'd say getting out of it, and his wife's. I mean who'd believe an inmate over a Fire Chief, etc... They had to bring in an outside judge to ensure all was above board and looked so because of the absolute shock and mess it was. That judge and there were plenty of inmates once one was brave enough to tell, told their stories, and the judge left no word unsaid about what the man did. Right up until and after it was by some and of course the man and his wife and others, shock he could be sent to prison, etc. I can't recall but I think it was someone on staff that picked up on it to begin with whether a female inmate hinted at something to her OR she picked up on his ways or some such. It caused quite the divide and it amazed me how many thought no big deal and like either thought that or were in denial because this was their buddy or their husband... he was after all better than an inmate that was in there for something done wrong... To this day, the disgust I felt at that "attitude" when they are the lowest of the low but think selves better, more prominent, etc. I can still "taste" my disgust at some people.

i'm sidetracking but it would seem something on that order is going on here, by more than one though. I could tell stories of my own county, rumors and facts and things getting hushed and disappearing...

I used to think naively like in my 20s and maybe even into my 30s that people went into careers or jobs like these because they cared about justice, wanted to make the world a better place, etc. I really did. And I think SOME do. Initially anyhow. However, I came to realize it's way more common that they do such to feel power, have power, or maybe status or esteem.

So sorry for sidetracking but it relates, and I just don't know who is bad here or what is all true? Clearly the sheriff shot the judge, killed him, and THAT is wrong so sheriff is in the wrong. Was the judge truly dirty and doing the daughter of the sheriff?

Sounds like quite the Peyton Place. On the surface, it would seem like at least a trio doing wrong. The sheriff, judge and the deputy. This case NEEDS attention and sunlight. I swear had the Murdaugh thing not gotten outside that area and picked up attention, somehow it would have all slid under the rug... I'm sure such threats and attempts and influence were made and going on up to some high levels.

How to close it? And feel free to ignore this long post. But this kind of thing needs to be taken by news and fully focused on and spotlighted but that's not going to happen. And it's disgusting such still goes on but it does.

Yet I am still left without really knowing what the reason really was here... What is true and what's not. If the judge was really doing the sheriff's daughter behind his back well that's absolutely disgusting, and some bunch of buddies right? But then apparently the sheriff was fine with a deputy SA'ing someone who could not afford an ankle monitor in the judge's chambers. WTF. All at this point seem to be allegations though. No?

So it's KY. How open are they and would FOIAs garner anything at this point... It does need to be HEARD and KNOWN. I sure knew nothing of it.

Yeah, I always end up having at least ONE long one but don't even know how I ended up seeing this one. I still think it was Snitty.

Feel free of course to ignore the rambling. I just didn't in three pages of posts see that anyone is sure of anything which means there is not enough info out there and seems to be an attempt to quiet it, which as we know, is often done for real reasons, share nothing of the investigation, but sometimes done hoping people let it go while it gets swept under the rug...

Yes, I need coffee. Clearly.
So the cat is choosing your cases now. LMAO.

Well he chose a good one.

I can't answer many of your questions as it is unknown what the judge or the sheriff knew about the goings on re ankle monitors. I think there is an outer and an inner office in the judge's chambers and the shooting was caught on the camera in the inner judge's chamber, where his office was. We don't know if the outer chamber had cameras. I would imagine not and that maybe that is where the "favours" re the deputy took place IMO. That has already gone to court and I believe the Sheriff was due to give, or already gave, evidence in that case which is ongoing, i believe.

Did you also catch this fact? (from one of the links up thread.)

"Lead county prosecutor Matt Butler had to recuse himself from this case, due to the fact that his wife and Mullins’ wife are sisters."
 
Last edited:

Forum statistics

Threads
3,067
Messages
252,363
Members
1,004
Latest member
jazzyazzgrl
Back
Top Bottom