MO LISA IRWIN: Missing from Kansas City, MO - 3 Oct 2011 - Age 10 months

Lisa was last seen at her home in the 3600 block of North Lister Avenue in Kansas City, Missouri on October 3, 2011. Her mother, Deborah Bradley, put her to bed in her crib with her pacifier, blanket and some toys.

Deborah last saw her daughter at either 6:40 or 10:30 p.m. (Accounts differ.) That evening, she was also caring for the Lisa's two older half-brothers, who were asleep in another room. She later admitted she'd been drinking wine that night and had gotten drunk. She was also taking prescription medication for anxiety.

Lisa's father, Jeremy Irwin, an electrician, came home from work at approximately 4:00 the next morning and they discovered Lisa was gone. Several lights in the house were on, Lisa's bedroom window was open, the front door was unlocked and three cellular phones were reportedly missing.

Lisa's parents called 911 to report her disappearance shortly at 4:00 a.m. An extensive search of the immediate area turned up no sign of the baby.

Authorities stated Lisa's mother and father were less than cooperative with the investigation, something Deborah and Jeremy denied. They were engaged to be married at the time of Lisa's disappearance, although Deborah was still legally married to another man, and had a six-year-old son by him.

Deborah and her husband had been separated for about four years by 2010, and he was serving in the Army. Her husband stated he didn't believe Deborah would have harmed Lisa or been involved in her disappearance.

Three different witnesses saw a man walking down the road about three miles from Lisa's home at approximately 4:00 a.m. that night, carrying a baby dressed only in a diaper. It's unclear whether the sightings are connected to Lisa's case.

Authorities haven't named any suspects in the child's disappearance. Her parents have stated they believe she was abducted from her home late on October 3 or early on October 4, possibly by a person who wanted to raise a baby. Lisa's case remains unsolved.


NCMEC -

Have you seen this child? Lisa Irwin

Missing From: KANSAS CITY, MO. Missing Date: Oct 3, 2011 12:00:00 AM. Lisa's photo is shown age-progressed to 7 years. She was last seen at home on October 3, 2011 at approximately 6:00 p.m. Lisa has a birthmark on her right thigh. She was last known to be wearing purple pants and a purple shirt...

www.missingkids.org

NamUs -

The National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs)

By bringing people, information, forensic science and technology together, NamUs helps resolve cases.

www.namus.gov

Charley Project -

Lisa Renee Irwin – The Charley Project

Wikipedia -

Disappearance of Lisa Irwin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Lisa has a birthmark on her right outer thigh. Two of her bottom teeth had erupted by the time of her disappearance, and she had a small bug bite under her left ear. Her nickname is Pumpkin Pie. She was last known to be wearing purple pants and a purple shirt with kittens on it.

LISA IRWIN is still missing from Kansas City, MO since 3 Oct 2011. She was only 10 mos. old when she disappeared.

Lisa was last seen at her home in Kansas City, Missouri. Her mother, Deborah Bradley, put her to bed in her crib with her pacifier, blanket and some toys. She later admitted she'd been drinking wine that night and had gotten drunk. She was also...

www.crimewatchers.net

 

[Regina]

It did lead to "jersey" and his girlfriend. That's exactly how they got inserted into the case was cell phone data.

Right but that's where the investigation stalled and I can't wrap my head around why- that with such a good lead, it led nowhere.

 

[Guess Who]

Right but that's where the investigation stalled and I can't wrap my head around why- that with such a good lead, it led nowhere.

Funny how jersey and the other guy ( I think DANE? that info is buried waaaaaaay back in the brain folds from years ago) were both always around and unemployed up until this happened and somehow were both gone "hunting" for a week immediately after. Both "hunting" out of town with no transportation of their own (both do have a history of auto theft though) nor any source of income other than petty theft to go "hunting" for a week.

 

[Regina]

Funny how jersey and the other guy ( I think DANE? that info is buried waaaaaaay back in the brain folds from years ago) were both always around and unemployed up until this happened and somehow were both gone "hunting" for a week immediately after. Both "hunting" out of town with no transportation of their own (both do have a history of auto theft though) nor any source of income other than petty theft to go "hunting" for a week.

I never knew much of anything about "Jersey" and I don't think I knew anything at all about that other guy.
All I remember is that Megan said she shared her phone with others.

 

[Guess Who]

I never knew much of anything about "Jersey" and I don't think I knew anything at all about that other guy.
All I remember is that Megan said she shared her phone with others.

Dane (fairly certain I have the name right) was the guy using her phone when the call from the stolen phone was made to it.

Let me also add anther little tidbit.. the yard that the neighbor first reported seeing some guy carrying a baby went to is also the same yard jersey was in charge of watering while the owner of that house was out of town. That same yard has a gate at the back of it that leads directly to the townhouse megan and dane were staying at. Directly.

Oh, yeah, the dumpster that was on fire is also right there where the gate lets out, too.

I can not get passed that all of those connections at the very time she disappeared in that group and not connecting this group of people to this somehow.

 

[Guess Who]

Dane (fairly certain I have the name right) was the guy using her phone when the call from the stolen phone was made to it.

Let me also add anther little tidbit.. the yard that the neighbor first reported seeing some guy carrying a baby went to is also the same yard jersey was in charge of watering while the owner of that house was out of town. That same yard has a gate at the back of it that leads directly to the townhouse megan and dane were staying at. Directly.

Oh, yeah, the dumpster that was on fire is also right there where the gate lets out, too.

I can not get passed that all of those connections at the very time she disappeared in that group and not connecting this group of people to this somehow.

For reference:

1 Lisa's house
2 witness that saw a man carrying a baby
3 yard where witness saw man carrying baby entered, which is also the yard that jersey was taking care of while the owner was out of town.
4 where megan and dane were staying
5 dumpster that was on fire that morning a few hours before she was reported missing.

 

[SheWhoMustNotBeNamed]

Missing In A Moment: Baby Lisa

Dr. Phil speaks with Lisa Irwin’s parents as they break their silence, address scrutiny, and confront lingering doubts about their daughter’s disappearance

www.drphil.com

Missing In A Moment: Baby Lisa​

Tuesday, February 4, 2025​

It's a mystery that has haunted a family—and the nation—for years. On October 3, 2011, 10-month-old Lisa Irwin vanished from her home in the middle of the night and has not been seen since.

Her parents, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin, claim their daughter was abducted from her crib, but suspicion and speculation have surrounded the case from the beginning.

In this Dr. Phil exclusive, Deborah and Jeremy break their three-month silence alongside their attorney, Joe Tacopina, to address the intense scrutiny they’ve faced. They insist the media has spread misinformation, further complicating their desperate search for answers. Dr. Phil asks the tough questions: What really happened that night? Why have investigators looked so closely at the parents? And do they believe Lisa is still alive?

As new details emerge, Dr. Phil challenges Deborah and Jeremy to confront the lingering doubts and speculation surrounding the case. Will this emotional conversation bring them closer to the truth—or deepen the mystery of baby Lisa’s disappearance?

Missing In A Moment: Part 2

Dr. Phil continues with Lisa Irwin’s parents as they address scrutiny, inconsistencies, and doubts about their daughter’s disappearance.

www.drphil.com

Missing In A Moment: Part 2​

Wednesday, February 5, 2025​

The mystery of baby Lisa Irwin’s disappearance continues to raise more questions than answers.

In Part Two of this Dr. Phil exclusive, Lisa’s parents, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin, return alongside their attorney, Joe Tacopina, to further defend themselves against public scrutiny and share new details about the night their 10-month-old daughter vanished.

Dr. Phil presses for clarity on the inconsistencies that have fueled speculation: Why did Deborah change parts of her story? What do police really think happened that night? And how do they respond to accusations that they know more than they’re saying?

As tensions rise, Dr. Phil challenges the couple to address the lingering suspicions head-on. With emotions running high, will this conversation finally bring new insight into baby Lisa’s case—or will the mystery remain as baffling as ever?

 

[Guess Who]

Missing In A Moment: Baby Lisa

Dr. Phil speaks with Lisa Irwin’s parents as they break their silence, address scrutiny, and confront lingering doubts about their daughter’s disappearance

www.drphil.com

Missing In A Moment: Baby Lisa​

Tuesday, February 4, 2025​

It's a mystery that has haunted a family—and the nation—for years. On October 3, 2011, 10-month-old Lisa Irwin vanished from her home in the middle of the night and has not been seen since.

Her parents, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin, claim their daughter was abducted from her crib, but suspicion and speculation have surrounded the case from the beginning.

In this Dr. Phil exclusive, Deborah and Jeremy break their three-month silence alongside their attorney, Joe Tacopina, to address the intense scrutiny they’ve faced. They insist the media has spread misinformation, further complicating their desperate search for answers. Dr. Phil asks the tough questions: What really happened that night? Why have investigators looked so closely at the parents? And do they believe Lisa is still alive?

As new details emerge, Dr. Phil challenges Deborah and Jeremy to confront the lingering doubts and speculation surrounding the case. Will this emotional conversation bring them closer to the truth—or deepen the mystery of baby Lisa’s disappearance?

Missing In A Moment: Part 2

Dr. Phil continues with Lisa Irwin’s parents as they address scrutiny, inconsistencies, and doubts about their daughter’s disappearance.

www.drphil.com

Missing In A Moment: Part 2​

Wednesday, February 5, 2025​

The mystery of baby Lisa Irwin’s disappearance continues to raise more questions than answers.

In Part Two of this Dr. Phil exclusive, Lisa’s parents, Deborah Bradley and Jeremy Irwin, return alongside their attorney, Joe Tacopina, to further defend themselves against public scrutiny and share new details about the night their 10-month-old daughter vanished.

Dr. Phil presses for clarity on the inconsistencies that have fueled speculation: Why did Deborah change parts of her story? What do police really think happened that night? And how do they respond to accusations that they know more than they’re saying?

As tensions rise, Dr. Phil challenges the couple to address the lingering suspicions head-on. With emotions running high, will this conversation finally bring new insight into baby Lisa’s case—or will the mystery remain as baffling as ever?

Are these the DR phil interviews from way back then? I can't stand Dr Phil, especially if it's from then.

 

[SheWhoMustNotBeNamed]

Are these the DR phil interviews from way back then? I can't stand Dr Phil, especially if it's from then.

I'm not sure. I didn't watch them. But it was aired this week. (May have been a re-broadcast, not sure.)

 

[Guess Who]

I'm not sure. I didn't watch them. But it was aired this week. (May have been a re-broadcast, not sure.)

It says after 3 months of silence and it's showing old pics so I'm assuming it is. Didn't watch it then, either

 

[Kimster]

Megyn Kelly picked up this case for a 5 part podcast she's doing and it popped up on my YouTube last night. Here's a link to her website, which has links to the podcast. I am now listening via Spotify and haven't finished Part 1 yet, but so far I'm feeling way better about Lisa's mom not being involved in her disappearance. There's a lot to go, however!

See What Lisa Irwin Might Look Like Now from ‘Megyn Kelly Investigates: The Disappearance of Baby Lisa’

Everything you need to know about 'Megyn Kelly Investigates: The Disappearance of Baby Lisa.'

www.megynkelly.com

 

[Guess Who]

Megyn Kelly picked up this case for a 5 part podcast she's doing and it popped up on my YouTube last night. Here's a link to her website, which has links to the podcast. I am now listening via Spotify and haven't finished Part 1 yet, but so far I'm feeling way better about Lisa's mom not being involved in her disappearance. There's a lot to go, however!

See What Lisa Irwin Might Look Like Now from ‘Megyn Kelly Investigates: The Disappearance of Baby Lisa’

Everything you need to know about 'Megyn Kelly Investigates: The Disappearance of Baby Lisa.'

www.megynkelly.com

She had sooooo many things wrong when she was reporting here at the time. Stuff she should have known since she was physically right there.

 

[Kimster]

She had sooooo many things wrong when she was reporting here at the time. Stuff she should have known since she was physically right there.

She pretty much said that at the beginning of the podcast. She said she learned to be a better reporter because of it. Interesting that you saw it, too! I forgot she was reporting on Lisa's case until it popped up on my YouTube feed. (A lot of true crime cases pop up on my feed, which shouldn't be a surprise).

 

[Guess Who]

She pretty much said that at the beginning of the podcast. She said she learned to be a better reporter because of it. Interesting that you saw it, too! I forgot she was reporting on Lisa's case until it popped up on my YouTube feed. (A lot of true crime cases pop up on my feed, which shouldn't be a surprise).

She was awful on it. Lost ALL respect for her as a reporter for it because she if it was so easy to know with the slightest but of very simple research.

 

[Guess Who]

Then, what makes it really bad, is that they just ran with it and let the false info stay without a correction so then we had an entire nation believing what she said.

 

[Kimster]

She was awful on it. Lost ALL respect for her as a reporter for it because she if it was so easy to know with the slightest but of very simple research.

Hopefully she does a better job this time. I'm interested in revisiting the interviews and reports, and that's what she's doing so far.

 

[Kimster]

What really had me intrigued this morning was they brought in a CIA profiler (I think it was CIA) who interviewed Deborah in a different way and Deborah sounded totally innocent to me in that interview. The guy doing it said he went there thinking she was guilty, and she changed his mind after one question.

 

[Kimster]

Another thing that was brought up was that LE led Deborah to believe she failed a lie detector test, but instead she PASSED it. And they played her and Jeremy by saying each of them squealed on the other, which is a popular tactic. But they did it to them for a long time, which may have prompted them to stop "cooperating", which is how it was put out to the media.

So far, I'm thinking a LOT of time was lost looking at Deborah, instead of the report of a man walking around with a baby in the middle of the night.

 

[Guess Who]

Another thing that was brought up was that LE led Deborah to believe she failed a lie detector test, but instead she PASSED it. And they played her and Jeremy by saying each of them squealed on the other, which is a popular tactic. But they did it to them for a long time, which may have prompted them to stop "cooperating", which is how it was put out to the media.

So far, I'm thinking a LOT of time was lost looking at Deborah, instead of the report of a man walking around with a baby in the middle of the night.

And then people faulted them only because they got a legal professor to sit with them and he was so astonished by the way they were treating the family that they shut it down.

 

[Guess Who]

Another thing that was brought up was that LE led Deborah to believe she failed a lie detector test, but instead she PASSED it. And they played her and Jeremy by saying each of them squealed on the other, which is a popular tactic. But they did it to them for a long time, which may have prompted them to stop "cooperating", which is how it was put out to the media.

So far, I'm thinking a LOT of time was lost looking at Deborah, instead of the report of a man walking around with a baby in the middle of the night.

Yes. The man walking with a baby that went into the yard that Jersey was taking care of while the owner was out of town, who's yard backs directly up to where the phone call was made to and then both Jersey and the guy that was in that home, both unemployed with no obvious source of income, both take off on a "hunting trip" for a week immediately after.

 

[Guess Who]

Also, everybody associated with those phones in the thief group have ALL done time for very serious felonies since then.

Nobody in the Lisa's family seems to be involved with any criminal actively, before or after