MI DANIELLE STISLICKI: Missing from Farmington Hills, MI - 2 Dec 2016 - Age 28 *ARREST*

1641676104135.png

Farmington Hills police are searching for a missing 28-year-old woman who was last seen Friday in Southfield.

Danielle Stislicki's vehicle was left at her home in the area of Halsted and Grand River in Farmington Hills, even though she was last seen in Southfield.



MEDIA
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Michigan Supreme Court will not hear prosecutor's appeal on evidence in Stislicki murder​

The state’s highest court will not let Floyd Galloway’s prosecutors re-assert that sexual assault evidence can be used to prove he murdered a missing Farmington Hills woman.

The Michigan Supreme Court issued an April 27 order that denied the request to appeal “because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this court.”

Oakland Circuit Judge Phyllis McMillen and the Michigan Court of Appeals already have ruled that the assault evidence should not be used to prove the premeditated murder of Danielle Stislicki, 28, because the two cases involved facts too dissimilar.
There’s evidence that he sexually assaulted her that can’t be brought to court? Is that what I’m reading? Or are they saying they can’t prove there was a sexual assault? Actually, that makes sense since she’s still missing.
 
There’s evidence that he sexually assaulted her that can’t be brought to court? Is that what I’m reading? Or are they saying they can’t prove there was a sexual assault? Actually, that makes sense since she’s still missing.
The assault was against another woman.

Michigan Supreme Court could review Danielle Stislicki's murder case​

State Attorney General Dana Nessel’s legal team has not banished its hopes of using Floyd Galloway’s sexual assault on an apparent stranger as evidence against him in the murder case of Danielle Stislicki,.
From this link:

Now serving up to 35 years in prison, Galloway, 34, of Berkley pleaded guilty to sexually assaulting a runner at the Livonia park.

Michaels has countered that the Hines Park case and Stislicki’s murder case are too dissimilar to be used in the same trial.

The Hines Park runner was a stranger.
 

Murder trial for missing Dani Stislicki delayed to 2022; defense attorney needs more time​

Danielle Stislicki’s family must bear another annual passing of her disappearance without the resolution of a trial.

Oakland County Circuit Judge Phyllis McMillen pushed back the trial to early 2022 after defense attorney Ellen Michaels relayed that she needed more time to pursue materials that could help her defend Floyd Galloway.

She told McMillen during a July 26 hearing that she has been seeking possibly pertinent emails from the City of Farmington Hills case through the Freedom of Information Act.

“Based on my review of what I was given (and) based on my years of experience, it seemed there had to be more out there related to the investigation,” Michaels said. “Because the police reports themselves seem to be more of a narrative summary than necessarily a step by step."

McMillen advised Michaels to tighten her FOIA request or perhaps file a FOIA suit. But she granted Michael’s request for more time to prepare for the high-profile murder trial concerning a body that has not been found.
 

‘Justice for Danielle Stislicki’: Family wants answers as murder trial faces delays​

Family members of Danielle Stislicki are speaking out about her mysterious disappearance and the fight for answers.

Her family is preparing for trial and acknowledging that they may never find her body. But they will not stop fighting for justice.


“We are at the point where we just want closure,” Sackleh said.

There have been many delays in Galloway’s murder trial. There have been new lawyers, the coronavirus pandemic and Galloway’s attorney has complained about not receiving all the needed documentation. That complaint could delay the Jan. 4 trial date that is scheduled.
 

‘Justice for Danielle Stislicki’: Family wants answers as murder trial faces delays​

Family members of Danielle Stislicki are speaking out about her mysterious disappearance and the fight for answers.

Her family is preparing for trial and acknowledging that they may never find her body. But they will not stop fighting for justice.


“We are at the point where we just want closure,” Sackleh said.

There have been many delays in Galloway’s murder trial. There have been new lawyers, the coronavirus pandemic and Galloway’s attorney has complained about not receiving all the needed documentation. That complaint could delay the Jan. 4 trial date that is scheduled.
I get so sick of victim's families having to put up with all of the delays and more while criminal defendants and counsel get all the time in the world at the drop of a hat. They do not have her body and they can't even at least conclude the quest for justice and try to move to a new stage of attempting to cope with all of this. Jmo.
 

Will info from lie detector test Floyd Galloway took be used in Danielle Stislicki murder case?​

Will the results of a polygraph test that Floyd Galloway took be admissible in the trial against him? Galloway is facing charges in connection with the murder of Danielle Stislicki.

A former FBI agent performed a polygraph on Galloway. Now a judge must decide if the information taken from the polygraph can be used against him.

The story starts in December of 2016, seven days after Stislicki went missing after leaving her Southfield office. According to court documents, a polygraph operator and former FBI agent by the name of James Hoppe did something a little unusual.

Hoppe called his personal friend and then chief of police of the Troy police, Gary Mayer, and relayed details he said he had learned during Galloway’s polygraph test.

Galloway was a former security guard where Stislicki worked. As police investigated her disappearance, Galloway became a person of interest. Search warrants were executed on his home, car and cell phone.

Galloway hired an attorney and according to court documents, that attorney hired Hoppe to do a polygraph test, also known as a lie detector test, on Galloway.

Documents state that Hoppe shared the polygraph information with former Troy police chief Gary Mayer and then Mayer contacted Farmington Hills police chief Chuck Nebus.

“Chief Nebus typed up a standard form tip sheet they use in all these cases,” prosecutor Danielle Russo Bennetts said. “These officers then go out to a location and recover property belonging to miss Stislicki.”

Nebus termed the tip anonymous.

“Who knew what and when they knew it is very much something we need to explore,” Galloway’s attorney Ellen K. Michaels said.

Galloway’s defense attorney wants that information dismissed based on a violation of attorney-client privilege.
 
Retired police chiefs testify about controversial tip in Danielle Stislicki investigation
Danielle Stislicki was missing a week when Chuck Nebus, then police chief for Farmington Hills, received a call from a personal friend and professional colleague.

Troy Police Chief Gary Mayer had received a tip with specific locations regarding how and where the 28-year-old woman’s keys, Fitbit, cellphone and body could be found.

Police only found the keys and Fitbit where the tipster said they would be — near Grand River Avenue’s intersection with M-5, near Stislicki’s apartment at the Independence Green complex.

That December 2016 tip raises concerns about possible violations of attorney-client privileges related to confidential communications.

The tipster was a polygraph operator and Mayer’s friend but working for an attorney already representing Floyd Galloway, a person of interest in Stislicki's disappearance. Mayer wouldn’t divulge the controversial source with Nebus, and Nebus chose to work with the tip because of intense pressure to find Stislicki.

An Oakland County judge is now reviewing testimony about the law enforcement communications.
 
Family waits as controversial tip sparks criticism, threatens Stislicki murder case
Danielle Stislicki’s parents have suffered several years not knowing what happened to their daughter while the man charged with her homicide so far has escaped a trial.

Their wounds may deepen depending on the outcome of an ongoing Oakland County Circuit Court hearing that seems focused on a controversial tip that yielded evidence, but not a body, and spurred Floyd Galloway’s accusations of government malfeasance.

If a judge agrees with Galloway and his attorney, granting their wish to quash evidence from the tip and dismiss the case, the prison inmate and convicted sexual assaulter could fathom release as soon as 2033.

For now, Galloway's hopes hinge on the hearing, continuing June 13, that alluded to why Oakland County didn’t pursue charges after investigating Stislicki’s vanishing in 2016 and the pain to which the Stislickis may be suffering.

On May 3, the first day of the evidentiary hearing, Richard and Ann Stislicki watched defense attorney Ellen Michaels question retired police chiefs from Troy and Farmington Hills, along with Farmington Hills police officers, about a tip that ultimately came from a polygraph operator working for Galloway’s attorney. Michaels claims law enforcers worked to “actively obscure” the source of the tip.

Michaels pointed toward criticism raised by former prosecutor Jaimie Powell Horowitz — now a judge in Oak Park’s 45th District Court — that Stislicki’s case was "grossly mishandled by officials seeking only to protect their own interests."

The hitch is the tip given to Gary Mayer, Troy’s police chief, a week after Stislicki’s Dec. 2, 2016, vanishing. He then shared the tip with Farmington Hills’ Police Chief Chuck Nebus but Mayer protected the polygraph operator's confidential status. That led to Horowitz filing her brief to reveal the name.

MORE AT LINK
 

Battle over evidence continues in Danielle Stislicki murder case​

The Floyd Galloway trial announced a significant delay on Monday (June 13). Galloway is the man charged with murdering Danielle Stislicki.

The question everyone is wondering about is evolving around key evidence, and will it be admitted in the case?

I spent the day in court Monday listening to both sides fight for and against a tip given in the case, which led to Stislicki’s keys and Fitbit findings.

But the question is, was that tip handled the right way?


The next hearing about this tip and the collected evidence will be on June 24.

I’m told whatever side loses is planning on appealing.
 

Farmington Hills police chief vows to #FindDani amid 'worst circumstances'​

Farmington Hills Police Chief Jeff King was a detective lieutenant when Richard and Ann Stislicki lost touch with their daughter Danielle, a 28-year-old woman living in the Independence Green apartments.

There were searches for Danielle’s body, enough tips for three-ring binders, post-midnight calls with an Oakland County prosecutor regarding warrants and still no trace of her.

So much has passed, including King’s promotion to chief. But the case continues to torment.

“I don’t know when, but we’re going to find her,” the chief said. “Not being able to get those answers for the Stislickis hurts. It does. It hurts all of us.
 

Attorney for Danielle Stislicki’s accused killer wants more files from AG, asks judge to make it happen​

The attorney for Danielle Stislicki’s accused killer, Floyd Galloway, said she won’t decide on calling witnesses to testify about leaked polygraph findings and their effects on the case until an Oakland County judge rules on her request for additional related information from prosecutors at the Attorney General’s Office.

Attorney Ellen Michaels filed a motion Friday in Oakland County Circuit Court, asking Judge Phyllis McMillen to enforce a request for documents on what transpired at the AG’s Office after the leaked information made its way there.

Floyd Galloway returns to court for hearing in Danielle Stislicki murder case​

Floyd Galloway returned to court Friday morning for a hearing in the Danielle Stislicki murder case.

This was Galloway’s first court appearance since the two sides battled over his polygraph test results. That hearing was adjourned.
 

Judge denies defense’s motion in Stislicki murder case; next court date scheduled​

Galloway’s attorneys were requesting the judge to wave prosecutors’ privileged information and materials, arguing that it’s possible they don’t have access to all of the discovery relevant to the case. The Oakland County Circuit Court judge denied the defense’s motion Wednesday and said she felt confident that the attorneys are in possession of all necessary materials and that they have been for at least one year.

Prosecutors at the hearing called the defense’s move “textbook fishing,” despite the discovery having been turned over some time ago.

The motion comes amid an ongoing battle over evidence between the prosecution and defense. In June, a defense attorney argued that there has been a “long-term and widespread campaign to keep information from the defense.” A tip stemming from a polygraph test taken by Galloway has specifically caused controversy within the case.

The next court date has been tentatively scheduled for Oct. 12, and is subject to change. It is currently unclear exactly what this convening will include. The defense has been asked to file any desired motions regarding evidence suppression within the next four weeks.
 

Attorney for Danielle Stislicki’s accused killer tells judge leaked polygraph calls for case to be dismissed​

The attorney for Danielle Stislicki’s accused killer, Floyd Galloway Jr., has asked for a dismissal of the case, due to evidence reportedly obtained from information leaked from Galloway’s polygraph test.

At a court hearing Wednesday morning, defense attorney Ellen Michaels told Oakland County Circuit Judge Phyllis McMillen that the leaked polygraph findings have “tainted the case so much (that Galloway) cannot have a fair trial.”

After hearing arguments from Michaels, as well as Assistant Attorney General Danielle Russo Bennetts who is prosecuting the case, McMillen said she will make her decision by next week. Both sides said they will file with the Court of Appeals if the judge’s ruling doesn’t go their way, but for now the trial is scheduled to start on Nov. 28.

Galloway, 35, took the lie detector test in late 2016 on the advice of his attorney at the time — not Michaels — a few days after Stislicki went missing and he became a person of interest. The polygraph operator, former FBI agent James Hoppe, subsequently contacted Troy’s police chief at the time, Gary Mayer, to share details on what he said he learned from Galloway’s test — violating attorney-client privilege.
 
I'd be amazed if this trial proceeds in November. Feel so bad for her family.

The polygrapher tainted this case likely forever. Even on conviction this is definitely going to be riddled with appeals I'd imagine.
 
I'd be amazed if this trial proceeds in November. Feel so bad for her family.

Trial for Floyd Galloway, charged in murder of Danielle Stislicki, delayed to 2023​

The trial for Floyd Galloway Jr, the man accused of killing Danielle Stislicki almost six years ago, will not head to trial this fall as originally scheduled after the judge in the case pushed the case back to the spring of 2023.

The trial for Galloway as pushed back to March 23 by Judge Phyllis McMillen, a little more than a week after the most recent motion hearing. The delay does not come as a surprise as Galloway's attorneys have challenged different pieces of evidence that were obtained from a leaked polygraph test that Galloway took shortly after he was arrested.
 

Trial for Floyd Galloway, charged in murder of Danielle Stislicki, delayed to 2023​

The trial for Floyd Galloway Jr, the man accused of killing Danielle Stislicki almost six years ago, will not head to trial this fall as originally scheduled after the judge in the case pushed the case back to the spring of 2023.

The trial for Galloway as pushed back to March 23 by Judge Phyllis McMillen, a little more than a week after the most recent motion hearing. The delay does not come as a surprise as Galloway's attorneys have challenged different pieces of evidence that were obtained from a leaked polygraph test that Galloway took shortly after he was arrested.
Yep as i said and you posted, would be surprised if it proceeds and isn't delayed and here it is delayed. Seriously what case isn't? One can just expect it any more even without these kinds of issues

Our system needs serious help and change. But who changed it and let it get that way to begin with... It will only get worse. Imo. It does almost daily.
 

Why a judge ruled to suppress key evidence in Danielle Stislicki murder case​

A judge has ruled to suppress key evidence in the Danielle Stislicki murder case because of how it was obtained.


The decision to suppress the evidence surrounds attorney-client privilege. Galloway allegedly made an admission to the person who was conducting a lie detector test on behalf of his then-attorney. That alleged admission made it’s way back to investigators, who used the information to seize key evidence in the case.

Because of how it was obtained, that evidence will not be presented during Galloway’s murder trial. This is a major win for Galloway’s defense. Stislicki’s family said they are “disappointed” in the decision.

What evidence will be suppressed?

Galloway’s attorney at the time had him take a lie detector test. James Hoppe conducted the test, he was so disturbed by what Galloway told him that he shared that information with then Troy police Chief Gary Mayer.

Mayer shared the information with Farmington Hills police Chief Chuck Nebu, who was investigating the case. Nebus had his detectives search for clues, and because of what Galloway shared with the lie detector operator, much evidence was found.

Investigators found Stislicki’s Fitbit, keys and obtained forensic data from cell phones. They also obtained testimony of Galloway being spotted at a nearby Tim Horton’s, surveillance video and phone records from the coffee shop and evidence of a cab ride Galloway took that night from where near where Stislicki vanished.

That evidence will not be presented during trial. A judge ruled that it was seized as a direct result of investigators obtaining privileged information.

The judge concluded that police intentionally intruded on the privileged relationship and used the information to locate and seize evidence. The judge said, “the court finds the actions of the government were outrageous.”

“Judge McMillan sent a message to law enforcement and to the attorney general that outrageous conduct in violation of defendants’ due process rights will not be tolerated,” Galloway’s attorney said.
 

Why a judge ruled to suppress key evidence in Danielle Stislicki murder case​

A judge has ruled to suppress key evidence in the Danielle Stislicki murder case because of how it was obtained.


The decision to suppress the evidence surrounds attorney-client privilege. Galloway allegedly made an admission to the person who was conducting a lie detector test on behalf of his then-attorney. That alleged admission made it’s way back to investigators, who used the information to seize key evidence in the case.

Because of how it was obtained, that evidence will not be presented during Galloway’s murder trial. This is a major win for Galloway’s defense. Stislicki’s family said they are “disappointed” in the decision.

What evidence will be suppressed?

Galloway’s attorney at the time had him take a lie detector test. James Hoppe conducted the test, he was so disturbed by what Galloway told him that he shared that information with then Troy police Chief Gary Mayer.

Mayer shared the information with Farmington Hills police Chief Chuck Nebu, who was investigating the case. Nebus had his detectives search for clues, and because of what Galloway shared with the lie detector operator, much evidence was found.

Investigators found Stislicki’s Fitbit, keys and obtained forensic data from cell phones. They also obtained testimony of Galloway being spotted at a nearby Tim Horton’s, surveillance video and phone records from the coffee shop and evidence of a cab ride Galloway took that night from where near where Stislicki vanished.

That evidence will not be presented during trial. A judge ruled that it was seized as a direct result of investigators obtaining privileged information.

The judge concluded that police intentionally intruded on the privileged relationship and used the information to locate and seize evidence. The judge said, “the court finds the actions of the government were outrageous.”

“Judge McMillan sent a message to law enforcement and to the attorney general that outrageous conduct in violation of defendants’ due process rights will not be tolerated,” Galloway’s attorney said.
While I hate this for the case, wrong was done. I hate even saying that but it is pretty clear. The polygrapher was hired by the defense.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,009
Messages
240,991
Members
969
Latest member
SamiraMill
Back
Top Bottom