Then he lied when he stated it was a true representation of what happened. It's really that simple. If he knew it was reversed and he testified that it was correct, there is no other option other than he lied about it.
HE might not know why it was inverted, but he sure knew it was inverted and basically said it wasn't when he was asked.
Video, updates: New evidence shown as detective’s testimony continues in Karen Read trial
A detective who supervised the investigation into the death of John O’Keefe will take the stand in the Karen Read murder trial on Thursday.www.yahoo.com
A number of people pointed out yesterday that the sallyport video appeared flipped. Bukhenik confirms it’s “inverted” but he says he doesn’t know why
Or ask if it actually shows up like that on the video feed on a daily basis.
Re John's Ring camera, I don't know anything about minutes, just of events we know took place but don't show on the video.
Again, the video was only made by the prosecution and not by Ring and that's where the problem is is with that video.
I wouldn't expect him to know why and I believe him that he doesn't.
Well, here I am again unable to understand at all where you coming from, lol!
This article better explains the issue with the inverted footage and it's issue. It also explains how the video is inverted but the time stamps aren't, which definitely suggests tampering. It also points out missing minutes ,(again with missing time on stuff turned over to the defense pattern developing).
Karen Read Murder Trial Week 6: The Prosecution Gets Forensical. And May Have Just Nuked Their Own Case.
Here's the link to the most recent update, which includes links to all the previous ones. So far, I've been trying to present these posts in a more or less chronological order. In keeping with the way...www.barstoolsports.com
Ring provided a LINK and not the video that the prosecution made. Ring says they're data shows no manipulation of data or missing minutes from the info provided to the prosecution on the LINK they provided to the prosection. That only can mean that the prosecution did not provide that info on the disc the prosecution provided to the defense. Funny how the only info not provided could have either proved the story of what really happened or not.
Yeah, I hadn't caught that the video was reversed but the time stamps weren't.
I had seen rumblings of that part and it just gets chalked up to nearly everything that has been presented so far by the prosecution only tells part of a story and the parts that are the most important are mysteriously "missing". Again, at the very least, it shows total sloppiness, but most likely shows deception. They have created all the reasonable doubt themselves by these actions. To me, by actually bringing this to court like this, shows a certain comfort level from them for deception. Waaaaaay too comfortable.
There hasn't been a Ring rep nor any other witness who's testified yet as to what Ring said.
And no Ring representative is on the witness list.
So?
In most trials the company that was subpoenaed for records would be called by the prosecution to testify which helps authenticate the records. ie gives the records credibility and authenticity
I think the reason the objection was sustained is because it wasn't Bukhenik who'd communicated with Ring.