Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think this is what I'm thinking of. Not a house across the street, but gaps in O'Keefe's ring video.

O'Keefe's was "conveniently" missing the times that would show her in his driveway and when they were looking at the possible damage. Just like some of the other videosv were missing when she drove by that might show the damage she had or didn't have.
 
O'Keefe's was "conveniently" missing the times that would show her in his driveway and when they were looking at the possible damage. Just like some of the other videosv were missing when she drove by that might show the damage she had or didn't have.

Ring could only analyze what they were sent.
 
Whose ring camera footage does this belong to? The party address?

Canton Deputy Police Chief Tom Keleher lives across the street from Brian Albert on Fairview Road.
Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.32.16-PM.png


Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.32.11-PM.png

Keleher’s Ring camera would’ve picked up video of O’Keefe’s body that night.
Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.35.29-PM.png

However, he told police that conveniently did not capture anything of value. It was not subpoenaed.
 
Canton Deputy Police Chief Tom Keleher lives across the street from Brian Albert on Fairview Road.
Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.32.16-PM.png


Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.32.11-PM.png

Keleher’s Ring camera would’ve picked up video of O’Keefe’s body that night.
Screen-Shot-2023-04-17-at-11.35.29-PM.png

However, he told police that conveniently did not capture anything of value. It was not subpoenaed.
Which would be Investigating 101.
 
There are 869 different forms of lying, but only one of them has been squarely forbidden. Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.

Mark Twain
 

By Lauren Melendez • Published 23 mins ago • Updated 2 mins ago​


Controversial testimony is expected to continue Monday morning when the Karen Read trial resumes.

The last person to take the stand Friday will be the first to testify -- that's Trooper Joseph Paul, a crash reconstruction expert with Massachusetts State Police. His testimony so far has caused some tension in the courtroom.

He answered questions during a heated cross examination about what he makes of a controversial video showing Read backing into John O'Keefe's vehicle, which was parked at her home.

The defense says it's what caused her taillight to crack, adding that police had something to do with O'Keefe's death and then framing Read for murder.

The prosecution argues that Read's SUV was damaged after she backed it into O'Keefe on Fairview Road in Canton, Massachusetts, killing the Boston cop.


Trooper Paul explained Friday why he believes the potential collision in the video could not have damaged Read's SUV as the defense says.

“So if the taillight breaks it should leave some sort of scratching, maybe a dent, some sort of damage to the vehicle should have occurred.”

Read's defense pointed out the trooper never did a test where he backed a Lexus against a Traverse and said he "misread almost every piece of data collected in the investigation."

Everything happened without the jury there, as Judge Beverly Cannone asked for a preview of this new testimony, but Paul will be back on the stand Monday morning.
 
Anybody subscribe to the Boston Herald?

I do not, but the article will be posted on Howie Carr show website later. Probably tomorrow.

 


Massachusetts State Police Trooper Joseph Paul continues his testimony​

Paul was the first witness on Monday, resuming his testimony from Friday. He began by answering several questions from Assistand District Attorney Adam Lally about how he believed O'Keefe was killed.

Lally finished his questioning shortly before 9:30 a.m. and defense attorney Alan Jackson began cross examining the witness.

Jackson asked who it was who assigned the case to Paul and who briefed him on the case. Paul said he was given a summary by a crime scene photographer he knew who was at the scene.

The defense also asked Paul how he knows when the scratches on Read's car happened, noting that there are many ways in which a car can get dinged or scratched. Jackson asked if it was possible that all the scratches on the SUV happened before Jan. 29, 2022, Paul said it was not possible.

On several occasions, Jackson accused Paul of being evasive, including one exchange where Jackson was trying to ask how he learned about the events of Jan. 29, 2022.

"The crime scene talked to you," Jackson said to Paul at one point, incredulous.

"Yes," Paul said.

"DId the crime scene tell you anything else?" Jackson replied.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,089
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom