Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Summer_Breeze said:
Defense has rested its case. Judge is dismissing jurors until tomorrow morning.
Click to expand...

@Olenna said that the conventional wisdom is that the defense rests today. Karen walks tomorrow.

My observation: Karen was able to afford a great defense. A person represented by a public defender would probably end up in prison.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
@Olenna said that the conventional wisdom is that the defense rests today. Karen walks tomorrow.

My observation: Karen was able to afford a great defense. A person represented by a public defender would probably end up in prison.
Click to expand...
Good thing it was somebody that could afford a good attorney to get to the corruption going on here I think they did not expect her to fight this so hard and that she would just accept she did it and plea out.
 
Guess Who said:
Good thing it was somebody that could afford a good attorney to get to the corruption going on here I think they did not expect her to fight this so hard and that she would just accept she did it and plea out.
Click to expand...

I hope the FBI puts who really did it on trial.

At the very least, we've gotten a window into the alcoholic drunk driving, good ol' boy network. Also, I'm sure Proctor is gone. Hopefully without pension.
 
Last edited:
An observer on "Closing Arguments" is saying the defense experts had one juror mouth "What.".

The observer believes it was because the defense expert was confusing.

IMO, it could have been realizing what a bunch of:poop: the prosecution was expecting them to believe, and now this makes sense.

Also, the defense was allowed to say they didn't pay those experts. However, they couldn't say they were being paid by the FBI.

To me, it's simple. The video was inverted intentionally. I wouldn't argue about why. All that matters is they did it. The only why, is because they thought it would help the prosecution. 'Nuff said. Mic drop.
 
VP said he monitors two separate CourtTV message boards. Both are separate from one another. He said it's the first time he's ever seen this, but both boards agree with each other, within 1%. One board has Karen innocent by 86%, and the other 87%.

He said no defendant has ever come close to those numbers.
 
Let's wait for the jury to decide. But if she is found innocent, will LE reinvestigate more to the point?

86/87% would be roughly only one juror finding her guilty.
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
Let's wait for the jury to decide. But if she is found innocent, will LE reinvestigate more to the point?

86/87% would be roughly only one juror finding her guilty.
Click to expand...

I think you are misinterpreting that. 86% and 87% on each board think she's innocent.

The 86 and 87% has nothing to do with the number of jurors. It's the odds she's innocent.
 
Last edited:
Cousin Dupree said:
An observer on "Closing Arguments" is saying the defense experts had one juror mouth "What.".

The observer believes it was because the defense expert was confusing.

IMO, it could have been realizing what a bunch of:poop: the prosecution was expecting them to believe, and now this makes sense.

Also, the defense was allowed to say they didn't pay those experts. However, they couldn't say they were being paid by the FBI.

To me, it's simple. The video was inverted intentionally. I wouldn't argue about why. All that matters is they did it. The only why, is because they thought it would help the prosecution. 'Nuff said. Mic drop.
Click to expand...
Yep. No injuries that match being hit by a car started my questioning of what really happened then add the very purposely manipulated video, fur whatever reason it was 100% manipulated, did it for me that they were 100% covering something up. That 100% gives me reasonable doubt.
 
www.nbcboston.com

Karen Read trial: Jury done deliberating for the day after closing arguments

The jury’s deliberations in the Karen Read murder trial will continue into a second day. Closing arguments were delivered Tuesday, and the jury began deliberating shortly before 1:30 p.m., after receiving instructions from Judge Beverly Cannone. The jury was sent home for the day about 4:23 p.m...
www.nbcboston.com www.nbcboston.com

By Munashe Kwangwari • Published 40 mins ago • Updated 26 mins ago​


<snip>

The defense and prosecution will each be given one hour for their closing arguments. After, we expect the jury to be given instructions by the judge before they are released to deliberate.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I think you are misinterpreting that. 86% and 87% on each board think she's innocent.

The 86 and 87% has nothing to do with the number of jurors. It's the odds she's innocent.
Click to expand...
No I understood it. I just applied the same odds ie 86/87% to the 12 jurors which could mean approx 10 would think her innocent and 1 guilty with 1 undecided ie 100%÷12 = 8.33% per juror so about one and a half jurors could think she is guilty.
 
Tresir said:
No I understood it. I just applied the same odds ie 86/87% to the 12 jurors which could mean approx 10 would think her innocent and 1 guilty with 1 undecided ie 100%÷12 = 8.33% per juror so about one and a half jurors could think she is guilty.
Click to expand...

That's illogical. The %ages are based on ALL jurors finding her innocent. It means 86/87% see her walking away.

If you're trying to put it into an individual juror %age, then it seems you're saying it will be nothing but, a hung jury.
 
Tresir said:
No I understood it. I just applied the same odds ie 86/87% to the 12 jurors which could mean approx 10 would think her innocent and 1 guilty with 1 undecided ie 100%÷12 = 8.33% per juror so about one and a half jurors could think she is guilty.
Click to expand...
That's not what they are saying though. That's comparing apples and oranges.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,069
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom