CA KRISTIN SMART: Missing from San Luis Obispo, CA - 25 May 1996 - Age 19 *PAUL FLORES GUILTY*

1580612677226.png

Kristin was last seen on May 25, 1996. Her nickname is Roxy. FOUL PLAY IS SUSPECTED.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Smart was a freshman architecture major at California Polytechnic State University (Cal Poly) in San Luis Obispo, California in 1996. She departed from an off-campus party and headed for her dormitory at approximately 1:30 and 2:00 a.m. on May 25, 1996. At the party, Smart was acting as if she was intoxicated or under the influence of drugs. When she left the gathering, she was having trouble walking.

Smart was accompanied by a female acquaintance and another student from the university, Paul R. Flores, when she left the party. Her friend separated from Smart and Flores at the intersection of Perimeter Road and Grand Avenue on the college campus.

Flores allegedly told Smart's friend that he would see Smart to her home. She was last seen walking north on Grand Avenue with Flores, towards Muir Hall, her dormitory. Smart has never been heard from again. She was not carrying any identification, cash or personal belongings at the time she vanished.

NCMEC - NamUs - Doe Network -

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Paul Flores, convicted killer of Kristin Smart, moved prisons after 2nd attack​

The man convicted of killing California college student Kristin Smart has been transferred to a new prison after he was attacked twice.

Paul Flores is now at the California State Prison Corcoran in Kings County, state records show.

He was previously at Pleasant Valley State Prison in Coalinga where he was attacked twice in eight months.

In August, he was slashed in the neck by another inmate in a prison yard. He returned to the prison after being hospitalized for two days. The second attack by another inmate happened in the recreation yard in April.
 
Because his a spoiled privileged brat who thinks the world should just give him what he wants or he will take it and dad will cover up for him to save him and helped him become such and most criminals in prison don't come from such a background. I'd like to think it is for her sake but I think more likely he doesn't know how to get along and never had had to learn, in all walks of life. Dad should be in prison too, jury was too soft there. Proof and evidence though I guess is another thing but note again another CA case. Just glad he is serving HIS time. I don't count on CA juries. Ever almost. Although a fair amount get it right. All this is jmo.
 

By Jeanette Bent
June 14, 2024 6:30 PM
Published June 14, 2024 5:22 PM

ARTICLE WRITTEN BY KATHERINE WORHAM FROM KSBY

MONTEREY COUNTY, Calif. (KSBY-TV) -- Convicted killer Paul Flores appeared in Monterey County Superior Court via Zoom for his restitution hearing on Wednesday.


In October 2022, Flores was found guilty of murdering 19-year-old Kristin Smart when the two were students at Cal Poly back in 1996.

The Smart family, including Kristin's mother, father, brother and sister, testified during Wednesday's hearing. They spoke about the financial impact they've faced since Kristin's disappearance, such as travel expenses for searches and court appearances, hiring a private investigator, putting up billboards, and other expenses.

The judge is expected to make a decision Monday morning regarding how much Flores will owe the family in restitution.

Flores is currently serving a sentence of 25 years-to-life at Corcoran State Prison in Kings County. He was moved there from Pleasant Valley State Prison on June 6 after being attacked by other inmates twice in less than a year.

Flores, 47, is eligible for parole in August 2037, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
 

By Jeanette Bent
June 14, 2024 6:30 PM
Published June 14, 2024 5:22 PM

ARTICLE WRITTEN BY KATHERINE WORHAM FROM KSBY

MONTEREY COUNTY, Calif. (KSBY-TV) -- Convicted killer Paul Flores appeared in Monterey County Superior Court via Zoom for his restitution hearing on Wednesday.


In October 2022, Flores was found guilty of murdering 19-year-old Kristin Smart when the two were students at Cal Poly back in 1996.

The Smart family, including Kristin's mother, father, brother and sister, testified during Wednesday's hearing. They spoke about the financial impact they've faced since Kristin's disappearance, such as travel expenses for searches and court appearances, hiring a private investigator, putting up billboards, and other expenses.

The judge is expected to make a decision Monday morning regarding how much Flores will owe the family in restitution.

Flores is currently serving a sentence of 25 years-to-life at Corcoran State Prison in Kings County. He was moved there from Pleasant Valley State Prison on June 6 after being attacked by other inmates twice in less than a year.

Flores, 47, is eligible for parole in August 2037, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.
UNBELIEVABLE, 2037, eligible for parole. Well even so it will be a hard FEW years since he's been attacked twice in less than one year.
 
UNBELIEVABLE, 2037, eligible for parole. Well even so it will be a hard FEW years since he's been attacked twice in less than one year.

"Eligible for parole" is just a saying. You have to apply and prove you're different. I think he'll serve his entire sentence.
 
Unfortunately, the judge came down on him, hardly. <------- pun.

It sucks the family is going to have to fight this every so often.
Yeah, Id call that a life where they never really get to relax as they prepare for each next parole hearing, etc.

At least there's some justice and he has been convicted call it perfect.

Yeah---hardly. Harshly would have been better....
 

Convicted killer of California college student Kristin Smart ordered to pay $350k in restitution​

A California judge ruled Monday that a man convicted of killing 19-year-old college student Kristin Smart in 1996 must pay just over $350,000 to her family for costs they incurred after her death.

Monterey County Superior Court Judge Jennifer O’Keefe ordered Paul Flores to make the payments after a hearing last Wednesday, during which the family told the court how much they paid for travel, a private investigator, billboards seeking information, lost wages and a celebration of life gathering.

“It’s demeaning to Kristin’s memory to measure our loss in finances,” her mother Denise Smart told The Tribune of San Luis Obispo after Wednesday’s hearing. “Our loss is Kristin.”

The family had sought about $361,000 in restitution. O’Keefe told the family that they could seek additional restitution if they wish to submit other expenses.

California courts require those convicted of crimes to compensate victims for the expenses that were caused, regardless of a defendant’s ability to pay. The state corrections department collects 50% of prison wages and money deposited in convict’s trust account to pay restitution.


Denise Smart said last week that the family offered to forgo restitution if Flores would tell them where Kristin’s body was. Flores’ attorney, Harold Mesick, said the defense did not know where her remains are. Flores maintains his innocence, Mesick said.

Denise Smart said Monday that the offer remains open.
 

Convicted killer of California college student Kristin Smart ordered to pay $350k in restitution​

A California judge ruled Monday that a man convicted of killing 19-year-old college student Kristin Smart in 1996 must pay just over $350,000 to her family for costs they incurred after her death.

Monterey County Superior Court Judge Jennifer O’Keefe ordered Paul Flores to make the payments after a hearing last Wednesday, during which the family told the court how much they paid for travel, a private investigator, billboards seeking information, lost wages and a celebration of life gathering.

“It’s demeaning to Kristin’s memory to measure our loss in finances,” her mother Denise Smart told The Tribune of San Luis Obispo after Wednesday’s hearing. “Our loss is Kristin.”

The family had sought about $361,000 in restitution. O’Keefe told the family that they could seek additional restitution if they wish to submit other expenses.

California courts require those convicted of crimes to compensate victims for the expenses that were caused, regardless of a defendant’s ability to pay. The state corrections department collects 50% of prison wages and money deposited in convict’s trust account to pay restitution.


Denise Smart said last week that the family offered to forgo restitution if Flores would tell them where Kristin’s body was. Flores’ attorney, Harold Mesick, said the defense did not know where her remains are. Flores maintains his innocence, Mesick said.

Denise Smart said Monday that the offer remains open.
GOOD. He'll never give up the location. And I'd go document and double that amount. He'll never pay it with half his prison wages anyhow. Too bad dad was not found guilty and doesn't have to help pay.
 

Appeal asks court to reverse Paul Flores' conviction for murder of Kristin Smart​

Two years after being convicted of killing Cal Poly freshman Kristin Smart more than 25 years earlier, Paul Flores has filed an appeal, asking the court to reverse or reduce his conviction and seek a retrial.

The 105-page brief was filed Monday with the Second District of the Court of Appeal in Ventura.

It states “a series of errors marred” Flores’ trial, citing each one individually.

The brief, filed by Pleasant Hill attorney Solomon Wollack, argues requests to discharge juror No. 237 during trial were dismissed, leading to Flores not receiving a fair and impartial trial by all 12 jurors.

The brief states the juror “had an emotional midtrial outburst during key prosecution,” “had two other midtrial anxiety attacks which she specifically blamed on defense counsel,” “discussed the case with the bailiff and friends” while also revealing “to the bailiff that her neutrality had begun to waver.”

The document goes on to explain the juror's alleged courtroom behavior. On Sept. 1, 2022, archaeologist Cindy Arrington was sworn in to speak on the findings from a 2021 dig investigation in Flores' backyard. The brief says Arrington was describing the scientific process of human decomposition in soil when juror No. 273 "interrupted to say, 'Your Honor, I need a break'.'" The juror's comment prompted the court to take an immediate recess and was marked by the defense counsel as a "major, major disruption." Flores' lawyer's request for juror No. 273 to be discharged was denied by the trial court after it deemed the juror as capable of keeping an "open mind."

Additionally, the brief says juror No. 273 admitted she knew people who listened to a viral podcast detailing the case, but that she discouraged discussion with those people about the matter. The defense counsel claimed the juror's comment indicated that she had discussed her involvement in Flores' trial and requested her removal for a fourth time. However, the brief states the trial court denied the request, saying that "it would be strange if no one knew why" juror No. 273 had missed an extensive amount of work due to the trial.


The brief goes on to claim the prosecution did not present any evidence showing the murder was premeditated and alleges that the prosecutor used an “especially inflammatory photograph to portray appellant as a sexual predator – though the court did not admit the photograph for character purposes.”

A final argument states “the trial court gave two erroneous instructions on attempted rape of an intoxicated person – used by the prosecutor as a target crime for his (Flores’) first degree felony-murder theory. The misinstructions had the effect of removing the specific intent element of attempt and allowing jurors to find an attempted rape of an intoxicated person so long as a reasonable person would have known Smart was too intoxicated to resist.”

While asking the court to reverse Flores’ murder conviction, Wollock states an alternative request is to reduce the crime to second-degree murder.
 
I'm going to wisely reserve comment on this. Other than to say it's an appeal and the b.s. in it is pretty apparent. Also admittedly not going to read the entire link or go into it.

The intoxicated person and rape thing takes the cake.

By the juror too many have needed an immediate break for countless reasons. I haven't read the link but I'd have my thoughts as to why.

I'll leave it at that.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
2,999
Messages
239,127
Members
958
Latest member
Frederick1337
Back
Top Bottom