Right?! I think it was the very first question that went something like "we understand but what you can you tell us that we don't already know?" Lol!
yes. I waited for it and then missed the first few minutes. later I asked someone if I had missed anything in the first minutes and was told nope just as the rest ended up being.
I know to be honest part of me is disappointed and that plays in but I truly think this was a sheer waste of everyone's time. again they can put out a press release. we are still working on it, building a solid case, yada, yada, yada.
don't announce hours ahead and basically hype something there's no reason to hype.
she did say all cooperated other than Sterns, that is the biggest nugget there was BUT she doesn't say are still are, etc. It was more past tense or they had, not that all 'are".
I care to no end that investigations not be compromised but I also think it wise to give a little bit, something that won't compromise and may even help stir or cause someone to say o way was he there when he said, etc.
yeah I was very disappointed and feel like I wasted a ton of time and then I rewatched it and caught a BIT more detail but still nothing one can pinpoint. She referred to other children, used the word when we arrest those responsible for her murder (not one) or something like that but it all could just be general talk.
I hate to be petty, but her eyelashes need to go. If they're not fake they are mascaraed and curled to the point of ridiculous. I guess I am not happy about the presser as I'm being petty now... Lol.
So I guess let the fodder go on where maybe it will reach where Sterns can turn it around. I think they really, really need to find a balance in all cases. Info brings a lot of talk but it also brings those with intelligence I they know some facts to dispute the b.s. out there.
They shared some in the beginning I wouldn't have expected but CAREFULLY so but BIG THINGS like already thinking her dead in the car video. BUT that was the sheriff's department not this Chief of Police.
I'm just not happy with her right now lol. I never saw the sound checks and Mike checks the first time either lol. On rewatching I did. They all got their day didn't they but then provided qa big bust.
Yeah, I expected to learn at least a bit more and am still irritated nothing came.
On another note, see others will dig if not enough even basic info, I've heard from a few different places now who it seems would have actually found such after not being able to that mom's home is not the same as Jen's home (meaning grandma). One though doubts the party was at grandma's even though there is a pond/water there. And so that no one thinks I am listening to just anyone, one source of some of this is Vinnie which is arguably right MSM, Court TV? I mean that was the rule at JT, MSM and LE are gold standard, no Dailly Maile even (not MSM or allowed) but then there were exceptions to the rule. NO YT unless Gray. And depending on who you were...
Anyhow, I was never a YT person but I think that stuff carries and I've come to realize what great sources there are on there and almost every MSM is trying to catch up and do it as well. Right now I am watching what I could never find myself or have time for a compilation of ALL news sources with recent info on the Riley Strain case.
Anyhow I sidetracked lol. Go figure. dAy off finally and too much to do.
So I am only half listening to what I am listening to as I TRY to accomplish other things. I have to rewatch this one on RIley but dont' know that I will get time. They are doing a total compilation of all the news on it.
I'm very disappointed in Miss or Ms or Mrs. Police Chief lol.
Not fair I know, I want the investigation protected but there's nothing wrong with choosing a harmless tidbit or two... Jmo.
I guess the final thing to add that I forgot and I'm sure you saw too is that she said I think twice, that all people who were close to Maddie are treated as suspects or possible ones (paraphrasing) until no reason not to. All are talked to and dealt with that way. I do believe that, I saw it I our case. Only WHEN they are SURE even the most innocent couldn't be involved, they are not going to have a thing shared with them by LE. It's why imo in some cases, not all, some just don't care to be helpful to the parents or at least give them reason to trust, that they don't share things with family members because they can't be sure who may have knowledge, have done it or been involved.
On that note, Jen is not clear. Grandma probably isn't even because just for one so many family members saw her the day before. Or anyone until sure and even then they will share judiciiously only with devastated famiy they are sure was not involved and they will not share all.
Ours was different it was clear in time and no one was present, etc.
Back to the point, she was saying this is how all cases are treated and pretty much anyone knowing the victim is a suspect and questioned as such at first. Again I' paraphrasing and again that can be taken as general talk all cases but that one I took to mean mom is not in the clear here. That one I feel like without saying so that MOM is not cleared by LE here. but of course she couches it in no one is... SOME though in cases do come out and say that re parents, etc...
Can you still tell it is a day off? I am rambling.
Anyhow, I am not sold it since hearing a few things and talking about them this last day or two, I think mom has some issues here. I don't mean mental health or her, I mean in regards to this case.
I'm not sold but I didn't know this woman said they felt Maddie was killed in the home and as you found it was send in Kissimmee which is different. Little differences, one word, like he picked her up versus was he already there... IF he PICKED her up and mom was the one home with her all night AND they think she was killed at home, that puts mom as front and center as he is and depending on what crime we are talking of, maybe more so or something he certainly could turn on her....
Taking his story is one thing and parroting it as she didn't know the drive eto school details, etc. but covering for him if she knew she was dead is another, big time. AND if she was the one alone with her all night AND called him.
It's like LISK but not. Wife is saying she doesn't believe her hub guilty and giving him benefit of the doubt well their hairs, his and hers, were on some of the victims. If she says he isn't guilty then the next likely perp is HER.
If Jen just lied for him not knowing anything and believing in him, she has put herself in the cross hairs as a suspect as the only other person we know of home with her... Etc.
Anyhow just talking it out as thoughts come. Sorry for the vent lol.
I was VERY disappointed in that presser. And my first day off after a long time seems to be a need to destress and ramble.
