CO SUZANNE MORPHEW: Missing from Chaffee County, CO - 10 May 2020 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.

The Chaffee County Communications Center received a report on Sunday at 5:46 p.m. regarding a missing woman in the area of County Road 225 and West Highway 50.


Anybody who has information on Morphew’s whereabouts is asked to call the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office at 719-539-2596 or Chaffee County Crime Stoppers at 719-539-2599.


1589412136362.png


edited by staff to add media link
 
Last edited:
And they are allowed to lie to you. They would be much more careful of what they asked you if you have an attorney present and much less likely to lie to you to get your answer.
example: "well, AB said you admitted it to him you did it and placed yourself there" when AB actually said no such thing at all.
I think you can have a 'friend' there instead of a lawyer too. That might be an in between and cheaper option.
 
In the case scenario that I gave you, it doesn’t mean you would ultimately be arrested. They would just immediately handcuff you and question you to determine whether you need to be arrested or not.
In the UK, they can only handcuff you if you are arrested, I believe.
 
I think you can have a 'friend' there instead of a lawyer too. That might be an in between and cheaper option.
no. why would you want a friend there with you and not somebody that knows what they can and can't ask you? What if your "friend" blurts out something stupid? What if they start questioning your friend while that friend is with you and answers honestly to a baited question then they use that against you? Why?
 
In the UK, they can only handcuff you if you are arrested, I believe.
they handcuff you here to detain you. It has nothing to do with being arrested. They definitely would not be doing that just to question you if you had an attorney, I bet, unless they were really arresting you.
 
no. why would you want a friend there with you and not somebody that knows what they can and can't ask you? What if your "friend" blurts out something stupid? What if they start questioning your friend while that friend is with you and answers honestly to a baited question then they use that against you? Why?
As a witness to what LE tell you. Everyone knows that you don't have to answer questions from the police if it could incriminate you. In fact you don't have to answer except to just give your name and address. I wouldn't have an idiot friend who didn't know the score. Eg I would have my hubby who was an ex cop probably.
 
Last edited:
they handcuff you here to detain you. It has nothing to do with being arrested. They definitely would not be doing that just to question you if you had an attorney, I bet, unless they were really arresting you.
The law is not like that here. As I said, you are only hand cuffed if you are arrested for something, not otherwise. I also don't think they can lie to you here.
 
and why does Barry constantly state that everything is for his daughter. Doesn't he have two daughters? It's constantly and consistently "daughter" - singular. Weird. It's also not in context that makes the singular appear correct. Most of the time it should include the lives of both daughters.
Perhaps the eldest is self sufficient now but the youngest isn't. What has that got to do with whether he murdered Suzanne or not. Also, what has the sale of his businesses got to do with her murder either?

Did Suzanne have a life insurance policy? Did they have money problems?
 
Perhaps the eldest is self sufficient now but the youngest isn't. What has that got to do with whether he murdered Suzanne or not. Also, what has the sale of his businesses got to do with her murder either?

Did Suzanne have a life insurance policy? Did they have money problems?
Because he is sounding just like Alex Murdaugh and this completely goes with his lying about absolutely every single thing they asked him. It's 100% multiple people refuting what Barry told cops in all of his interviews.
 
Because he is sounding just like Alex Murdaugh and this completely goes with his lying about absolutely every single thing they asked him. It's 100% multiple people refuting what Barry told cops in all of his interviews.
I don't see what those things like selling his businesses or his house have to do with the murder of Suzanne. Did she have life insurance? Now that would be relevant IMO.
 
I don't see what those things like selling his businesses or his house have to do with the murder of Suzanne. Did she have life insurance? Now that would be relevant IMO.
Read the AA and those questions are all resolved. It's his history of being a lying liar that lies about absolutely anything and everything and using his "faith" (instead of attorney status like AM did) to justify why people should believe him. They did and they all got screwed. Now, history is still repeating itself in his consistently lying about anything and everything...so much so that it is notated on nearly every page of the AA.

Now for those that think he's innocent AND think only the guilty should have an attorney, wouldn't Barry have benefited greatly by having one and not getting caught in all these lies. Lies that an attorney would keep you from making in the first place.
 
How did he bury her in Moffat and when?

If there is all this evidence, why hasn't he been rearrested?
She has either always been there which fits with my main thoughts (although I entertained all over time) and where I usually came back to settle. I leaned toward he made his alibi in Broomfield, staged bike and helmet near home, etc. and in the window of time he had (a lot) went the opposite direction not with his vehicle but hers or one of the girls', etc. He had two windows depending on if you believe she was killed Friday or Saturday and whether you believe it was her or Barry talking to Libler. Like I said, there is a smaller school out there that think it may have been Friday. Sat however is all the key stuff and the AA details it all well. Along with phone records, telemetrics and so much more.

It all fits well with my main scenario in my head throughout although I never expected her to be buried shallowly.

HOWEVER I can also easily believe he moved her and have many reasons that I can believe that as well. I'd like to know what they conclude or find or if they believe she has been there throughout.

As all know, I get little time and I am always asking for someone to fill me in or help if they can BUT admit it and share when I can as well and I admit for instance I haven't read the entire defense filing in Delphi but believe I was first to point it out and start reading the intro. My point is I am never going to tell someone or say you need to go read the 100+ page AA in this case OR be a hypocrite as I haven't read all in other cases, etc. but I AM going to say you are operating without a lot if you haven't read it. Yes, shows have done a full recap etc. of this case or overview but even those just don't have the AA and all it has in it. Barry is guilty of this and if anyone can read it all and not come to that conclusion then they are TRYING to avoid doing so.

As far as rearrest Tresir, it is early days first. Second this is not the same jurisdiction. They identified her fast, I thought that was interesting and amazing... It is believed of course she went "missing" at home or died at home, even the bike ride (fake) was in Chaffee but her body wasn't found there any more than it would have been found in Chaffee if in Broomfield, different county as well.

Can you really tell me in this short of order in your country or ours you see such results and all this fast? Cause of death, tox, forensics and so on?

No offense but you say you followed this case initially then fell off or something, etc. You can't have if you have never even seen BM's appeal video, it is one of the big things along with reward, GFM and FB page that sent people giving the benefit of the doubt off on BM, etc. and suspecting. Then there was nephew Trevor who just like neighbor bike lady I don't know if Barry was manipulating or Trevor knew (I am guessing playing him) having ito leak the bike was found, something about the helmet etc. There is just sooooo much. AA covers a TON but that isn't even all of it.

There is nothing wrong with wanting to give the benefit of the doubt but in this one for almost all people who followed well no way he wasn't responsible for her murder.

I do agree with you on the Os in Delphi, I don't in this one. I have stated flat out here no matter what comes of this, NOTHING will EVER change my mind on this one. And that is because it is all there and so obvious. I don't ever jump to 100 percent basically EVER . I lean but I always leave room to change my mind but not in this one.

The idea that BM is not responsible for SM's death is akin to saying grass has never been green nor the sky blue. For me. But it is based on EVERYTHING.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,035
Messages
244,945
Members
983
Latest member
yepugotme2
Back
Top Bottom