CA MAYA "MAY" MILLETE: Missing from Chula Vista, CA - 7 Jan 2021 - Age 39 *ARREST*

1611514556445.png 1611514579918.png 1611514599167.png

Maya “May” Millete, 39, was last seen Thursday evening in her Chula Vista home near the San Miguel Ranch area, according to her loved ones. Family and friends said her car is still at her home and her phone has been going to voicemail since her disappearance.

Hospitals, jails and morgues have been contacted by the woman’s kin, but they said she has not been found at any of those locations.


Maya and Larry Millete are high school sweethearts married for 21 years with three children — ages 4, 9, and 11.

Maya has been missing from her Chula Vista home since last week. Millete says they had argued the night before.

"We had problems this year, up and downs," Millete told ABC 10News.

He said his wife has left before for the night to blow off steam, but he became worried when she didn't show up for their daughter's birthday on Sunday.

"If she didn't have her car, a friend would have to pick her up. That's the only reason I was like, 'maybe she's wine tasting or hiking with a friend,'" says Millete.

Maya works as a defense contractor at Naval Base San Diego and didn't show up for work on Monday.

"I called her boss, she didn't even log in. And that's the other alarming part, because work for her is like a party ... that's her outlet," Millete says.

Millete says he will continue to search, anxiously waiting.


 
Last edited by a moderator:

Judge refuses to allow husband of missing Chula Vista woman to talk directly with their children​

A Chula Vista man whose wife remains missing more than two years after vanishing from her home was denied a request Thursday to modify a protective order prohibiting him from contacting his three children.

Shortly after his arrest in October 2021, a court order was issued prohibiting Larry Millete from speaking with his children, now ages 13, 11, and 6.

Chula Vista Superior Judge Enrique Camarena denied the request and said that even if he imposed some restrictions, Millete’s prior violations of court orders “doesn’t give me too much confidence that he would abide by my order in any event.”

Millete’s defense attorney, Bonita Martinez, had asked the judge to consider altering the order. In court Thursday, Martinez told Camarena the ongoing restrictions were harming the emotional and mental wellbeing of her client and his children.

Martinez said the children have said they want to speak with their father. Currently, communications between Millete and the children are first reviewed by a court-appointed guardian ad litem, who redacts certain portions before passing letters on to the children and vice versa.

The attorney said not being able to communicate directly with his children has left Millete “engulfed in anguish” and is hindering his ability to help her in his defense for the upcoming murder trial.

Deputy District Attorney Christy Bowles opposed the modification,saying that Millete initially violated the protective order in late 2021 by making “hundreds” of phone calls to the children. Another judge limited Millete’s phone privileges at the jail when prosecutors brought up the issue.

Bowles said since then, Millete has attempted to make 66 phone calls by using other inmates’ pin numbers. Two of those calls got through to his father, and the prosecutor said Millete urged his father, “Don’t use my name,” indicating he was aware he was circumventing the court order.

Judge refuses to allow husband of missing Chula Vista woman to talk directly with their children​

A Chula Vista man whose wife remains missing more than two years after vanishing from her home was denied a request Thursday to modify a protective order prohibiting him from contacting his three children.

Shortly after his arrest in October 2021, a court order was issued prohibiting Larry Millete from speaking with his children, now ages 13, 11, and 6.

Chula Vista Superior Judge Enrique Camarena denied the request and said that even if he imposed some restrictions, Millete’s prior violations of court orders “doesn’t give me too much confidence that he would abide by my order in any event.”

Millete’s defense attorney, Bonita Martinez, had asked the judge to consider altering the order. In court Thursday, Martinez told Camarena the ongoing restrictions were harming the emotional and mental wellbeing of her client and his children.

Martinez said the children have said they want to speak with their father. Currently, communications between Millete and the children are first reviewed by a court-appointed guardian ad litem, who redacts certain portions before passing letters on to the children and vice versa.

The attorney said not being able to communicate directly with his children has left Millete “engulfed in anguish” and is hindering his ability to help her in his defense for the upcoming murder trial.

Deputy District Attorney Christy Bowles opposed the modification,saying that Millete initially violated the protective order in late 2021 by making “hundreds” of phone calls to the children. Another judge limited Millete’s phone privileges at the jail when prosecutors brought up the issue.

Bowles said since then, Millete has attempted to make 66 phone calls by using other inmates’ pin numbers. Two of those calls got through to his father, and the prosecutor said Millete urged his father, “Don’t use my name,” indicating he was aware he was circumventing the court order.
What would he need to say to his children that coudn't be monitored? He can profess to love them, be a responsible parent who keeps them out of it and talks of their wellbeing, how they are doing, etc. all of which shoudn't bother him a bit and would make him look good.

But it may hinder his defense, he needs private access, etc. BULLCRAP.

Them wanting to talk to him, if true means nothing, it means they were told to listen to him, not say anything that could hurt him and want to check with dad.

These kids should be with Maya's family. As far as Larry's parents, if all I recall is correct, they are or will be lucky if not charged at some point OR facing a civil suit as in Roberta Laundrie and criminally as in Aidan Fucci's mother. At MINIMUM Larry's dad for sure. Imo.
 

Trial for Larry Millete in murder of his wife, Maya, pushed to next year​

The Chula Vista man accused of murdering his wife, May “Maya” Millete, appeared in court again on Monday, asking a judge to delay his trial until next year citing issues funding his defense.


The proceedings were scheduled to begin later this year on Oct. 10 following several delays. However, Millete’s defense requested that the hearing again be pushed, this time into early next year.

During Monday’s hearing, Millete’s defense attorney, Bonita Martinez, asked for the additional time to prepare for the start of the trial due to her client experiencing some symptoms or physical illness and an impending inability to pay for her services.

According to Martinez, the defendant had requested the appointment of a conservator to handle the shared assets of Millete’s family, as well as support some ongoing costs. She said she’s hoping some of that financial support will result in getting additional funds to put towards the cost of the case.

The request was approved by the judge hearing the case, Enrique Camarena, setting the start date for the trial on Jan. 16, almost three years to the date that Maya disappeared.

Camarena noted, however, that the request to delay was odd, considering Millete had expressed frustration over delays in previous hearings.

In his ruling, Camarena said that he would give Millete and his counsel until the scheduled Oct. 10 hearing to figure out these funding issues and decide whether Martinez will be staying on as his retained attorney or if he would need to have a public defender appointed to his case.
 

Trial for Larry Millete in murder of his wife, Maya, pushed to next year​

The Chula Vista man accused of murdering his wife, May “Maya” Millete, appeared in court again on Monday, asking a judge to delay his trial until next year citing issues funding his defense.


The proceedings were scheduled to begin later this year on Oct. 10 following several delays. However, Millete’s defense requested that the hearing again be pushed, this time into early next year.

During Monday’s hearing, Millete’s defense attorney, Bonita Martinez, asked for the additional time to prepare for the start of the trial due to her client experiencing some symptoms or physical illness and an impending inability to pay for her services.

According to Martinez, the defendant had requested the appointment of a conservator to handle the shared assets of Millete’s family, as well as support some ongoing costs. She said she’s hoping some of that financial support will result in getting additional funds to put towards the cost of the case.

The request was approved by the judge hearing the case, Enrique Camarena, setting the start date for the trial on Jan. 16, almost three years to the date that Maya disappeared.

Camarena noted, however, that the request to delay was odd, considering Millete had expressed frustration over delays in previous hearings.

In his ruling, Camarena said that he would give Millete and his counsel until the scheduled Oct. 10 hearing to figure out these funding issues and decide whether Martinez will be staying on as his retained attorney or if he would need to have a public defender appointed to his case.
Well of course I am going to point out another delayed case. By the defense. And a granted request for delay.

And not the "odd" remark, another game of he is frustrated over delays and wants things to move along but then asks for a delay, a LONG one.

Let's not even get into how maddening it is he as her likely killer is trying to use "their" assets to defend against HER murder by HIM. Allegedly her murderer.

I also have to wonder if his parents have tapped all they own out for him and if so, argument could be made his parents have no money to providei for MAYA'S children and raise them.

Like Morphew and others, they likely kill their wives for one to get all assets and then they try to use the assets to defend with a private attorney against the charge of killing their wife. It's outrageous. Both were married at the time and I think at minimum half of the assets should be frozen UNTIL the women or their bodies are found and UNTIL it is seen what the cause of death was and WHO the perp likely is. It is doing nothing but preserving the missing woman's 1/2 of assets and I think it would be a perfectly LOGICAL and reasonable LAW, etc. to enact if there isn't clear law on it.

He is so disgusting. Proven or not to be her murderer, in my book he is, and he cared less about his wife. Manipulated his children from a jail cell. And more.

So what if he has to get a public defender. They change them out too when they don't like them. And look at Kohberger and what kind of attorney he was provided.

The judge only delayed it three months if I have it right and said they should know by the October date so I'll give it that but here again a delay asked for by the defense, when a defendant said they didn't like the delays...

And a delay GRANTED.
 

Trial date set in case for guardianship of Millete children​

The guardianship case for the Millete children is moving forward, with a trial date now set.


Their three children have been living with Larry’s parents in the Chula Vista home Maya allegedly disappeared from. Maya’s sister, Maricris Drouaillet, filed a case to get custody of the three children. In the meantime, she has court-authorized visitation rights for certain dates and times.

The judge set a trial date for Jan. 5, 2024. It is anticipated to be a five to seven day-long trial with approximately 12 witnesses called. After, there will be a decision about who the legal guardians of the three Millete children should be.


In the hearing, James provided updates on the children’s wellbeing. She shared with the court that the youngest just started first grade. He is in counseling, but he was described as “brilliant and flourishing.”

James and Larry’s attorney Bonita Martinez said the two girls — now in their teens — just went back to school as well. After school, the two are playing basketball and doing taekwondo.

The judge during Tuesday’s hearing did voice concern that the two girls had not been in counseling all summer. They are set to begin counseling sessions at school in the next two weeks, James said.

She added that the summer visitations with Maya’s family have been “rough.” The visitations had to be cut short, James explained, and during a few of the visitations, the girls refused to leave the room. No further details about these visitations were discussed in court.

During the hearing, Martinez requested a delay, but that was met with opposition from Finkbeiner and the judge, Olga Alvarez. Finkbeiner said this case has been going on for far too long and the three children “need and deserve” a plan to move forward.
 
These children have been poisoned towards Maya's family and the judge has allowed it to go on. Larry was doing it prior. The man was still doing it from jail as well. His parents allowed it. And still the children were ordered to be left with is parents. The decision was all couched in terms of what is beset for them and that change was not something they needed and so on each time it was decided. No one can tell me this was best as these are going to be some screwed up manipulated kids whose heads will have been messed with so much they won't ever know how to think for themselves and again they are by now a psychological mess imo. It's sad and if you ask me it cannot be defended (the decision). I'd also point out that these parents raised Larry who is being tried for murder. I could go on.

I truly believe Maya's family would not do the same and would not poison them.

So here the judge has a perfect example in what their lawyer is claiming. There is no reason these children should have any trouble seeing their mother's family but for the brainwashing by the other side.

Let's just say THIS time the right thing is done and guardianship goes to Maya's family. You know there will be problems because the children have been poisoned. It will be neither easy and Larry's parents AND Larry will be raising heck over every little thing and you know will still be interfering and contacting the children. The teen girls will likely run back to the grandparents or run in general.

Maya's family and these kids were unfairly put through hell with the murder of Maya. Then they were put through he77 again by the same man and his family and then a court and judge that did it to them again and again and continues to. The judge responsible for this should be called out and be off the bench and Larry and his parents should be stripped of all rights to the children. Guilt of Larry or conviction has nothing to do with it, they have done enough harm to these children and to the mother's family to merit it if you ask me.

Maybe Maya's family will win this time but then what. I would say they are going to be put through he77 by these children whose fault it is not that they are the way they are. Maya's children will be affected by them and not for the better. It will likely never end and they'll probably be called out each time a child runs away or calls the grandparents, etc. I see nothing good even with counseling that will likely occur at this point. I pray they win and that things can be turned around for these children but their work will be cut out for them. Larry's parents are unfit just based on the fact they let their son run them and the children from jail against orders and are continuing to poison the children. I don't care if someone's in taekwondo.

Again I could go on but what's the point, all know and can see what's been done here. The decisions almost all along re the children have been the wrong ones. And is having and will continue to have a devastating effect on their lives. And a single judge did this to them. So did Larry and his parents but a judge could have removed them from the dirty parties who have been SHOWN to be poisoning them and controlling them.
 

What happened to Maya Millete? Larry's jailhouse interview​

It’s been nearly two years since three children in Chula Vista have seen or spoken with either of their parents. Their mother, Maya Millete, is missing and presumed dead. Their father, Larry Millete, is behind bars, facing a charge of first-degree murder in her disappearance. He’s pleaded not guilty.

Larry has been silent since his arrest in October of 2021 and hasn’t cooperated with police or prosecutors. In the wake of that silence, questions keep building:
  • Where is Maya?
  • If she was murdered, how? And when did that happen?
  • Will prosecutors be able to convince a jury that a suburban father of three, with no adult criminal history, could make his wife vanish without a trace?
Nine months after Maya vanished, shortly after Larry’s arrest, investigative reporter Alexis Rivas requested an interview with Larry. That request went unanswered. But after a San Diego County Superior Court judge ruled Larry must stand trial for murder, a new attempt in July to speak with Larry proved successful.
Over the course of four visits, which included two on-camera interviews, Larry Millete broke his silence to NBC 7 Investigates. Those interviews were conducted against the wishes of his defense attorney Bonita Martinez.

During the first two visits, NBC 7's team established ground rules for the interviews. Larry agreed that no questions would be off-limits.

Larry’s terms were unique. He told us he didn’t want his children to see their father in a jail uniform. He also believed that prosecutors would use video of his facial expressions and body language against him in the upcoming trial. So NBC 7 agreed to only show portions of Larry’s face and body.



Throughout our sessions, Larry told us: The police have it all wrong.

“I know I have, I haven’t done anything,” Larry said.

Alexis: “I'm not coming here with a bias, but I do think the average person would have to believe in an extraordinary set of circumstances to believe you. Why should we?”
Larry: “Because it's [the] truth, and I don't know.”

Alexis: “Did something happen in the heat of the moment?”
Larry: “No comment.”

At first, Larry used the phrase “no comment” a lot, saying he didn’t want to jeopardize his defense at trial.

Larry: “I don’t even want to say anything. But the allegations are outrageous.”
Alexis: “Why would you say they’re outrageous?”
Larry: “Again: I just don’t want to go into detail, because then my words can be twisted.”

Alexis: “What was the last interaction you had with Maya before she vanished?”
Larry: “Um, I just don’t want to comment about that.”

Alexis: “So where do you think Maya is now?”
Larry: “Um, no comment. It’s just, I have speculations but it'll come out during the trial.”
Alexis: “I know you've told me. You think she's still alive, but is that still true?”
Larry: “Yes ma’am. But I'm kind of the guy that's like a pray for the best, prepare for the [worst].”

Alexis: “Something I keep coming back to, because I think, you know how, if Maya is still alive, how did she manage to leave your home without being seen? We have the surveillance video of the last time Maya’s seen coming home that afternoon. How is it possible for her to have left your home? Without any video, any evidence anyone's seeing her?”
Larry: “That will be coming out during the trial. There’s ways, but you don’t want to divulge that information because the DA could use this.”

Alexis: “Well, even if you can't explain how that is possible — how she leaves the home — if she's still alive, how do you explain no financial transactions? No cell phone activity? No evidence of life?”
Larry: “Again, that will come out during the trial. There's a, you know, speculation that the defense has, and I'll just leave that to the trial when that stuff comes out.”

At 5:59 a.m. on Jan. 8, 2021, video surveillance from one of the Milletes’ neighbors captured the Millete family’s Lexus SUV pulling into the street and then backing into the garage. Prosecutors say this happened about six hours after Maya last used her cell phone.

Forty-five minutes later, with the sun coming up, video captured the SUV driving off with Larry and his youngest child inside. The SUV didn’t return to the house until 12 hours later, just after 6 p.m.

Alexis: “Where did you go for 12 hours with your cell phone turned off the day after Maya vanished?”
Larry: “Again: I'd rather not answer that question.”

During the preliminary hearing, a detective testified Larry told him that he took his son to Torrey Pines, but lifeguards told the police they didn’t remember seeing Larry or his son that day. And beach parking lot cameras didn’t spot the SUV.

Investigators say they downloaded data from the SUV’s computer. While it didn’t record the vehicle’s location throughout the day, detectives say someone entered the Millete’s home address into the vehicle navigation system at 3:29 p.m. That’s two and a half hours before Larry and his son returned home – suggesting they may have been driving home from someplace significantly farther than Torrey Pines.

Alexis: “So if you didn’t go there, where did you go?”
Larry: “Not true. I already explained where my son and I went. And the reasons why. So you know for them to try to argue that is just ridiculous.”
Alexis: “Well, why did you turn your phone off? Something detectives say you rarely did.”
Larry: “No. No. Trust me: During trial, that’ll come out. It’s not, it’s not that reason.”

It didn’t take long for Maya’s family to notice she was missing. During the preliminary hearing, her siblings testified that Larry acted like nothing was wrong, so they were the ones to call the police.

Alexis: “Why weren't you freaking out that weekend?”
Larry: “Again, um, people cope, you know, people react and cope in different ways. It's shocking. It's like a shock to the system. And some people freak out, some people stay calm. I just try to, again, keep my composure and try to think things through. And I'm thinking about more of my children. Hey, I don't want them being affected, freaking out. Maybe if I don't freak out, they're not going to freak out. You know?”

In January of 2021, it felt like all of Chula Vista stopped. Everyone was trying to find Maya. And it didn’t take long for people to notice who wasn’t part of public search events.

Alexis: “We have a huge file of video showing the hundreds of people that search for your wife, every weekend, off of hiking trails and open fields. For some moment, it kind of felt like all of San Diego County was searching for Maya. You weren't. Where were you?”
Larry: “Trust me. Um, the main reasons I didn’t go, where I was getting death threats from almost instantly. After, you know, the situation and we were doing our own thing, but it wasn't like in the limelight. You know, so again: I don't want to answer that question.”
Alexis: “If it was my boyfriend that went missing, I would lose my mind and I would be out there desperate to find him, and why don't I feel that from you?”
Larry: “I’m kinda … I shed tears in private, you know? Again, see, I didn't want to say that because I don't want to embarrass or humiliate our children because this stuff stays out there, and, you know, to hurt someone, they usually use your weaknesses against you.… So, you know, not just because I'm not weeping or crying in public, or on camera, doesn't mean that, you know, I'm not human and I, I don't have feelings, you know.”

A month after the disappearance, police say Larry stopped cooperating with their investigation.

Four months after Maya vanished, a large fire in the Millete’s backyard caught another neighbor’s attention. District attorney investigator James Rhoades testified about what that neighbor witnessed.

“It was approximately 8 p.m. at night, and she felt her windows rattling, so she proceeded to go out into her backyard, and she could see a large fire … with a single male standing by a large fire pit and that she believed it was Larry Millete, and she described the fire as being something to burn stuff, not in a recreational sense,” Rhoades said on the stand.

Police say they later recovered a burned credit card and some papers. At the hearing, Rhoades suggested that Larry may have tried to destroy Maya’s belongings. But in our interview, Larry told us a different story.

“Ma'am. That's normal practice. If you ask my next-door neighbor and my other neighbors, I've been doing [this] since 2013,” Larry said.

Larry told us the family burned junk mail all the time. Not only that, he said the fire was well after police had already searched the Millete home multiple times.

“That wasn’t Maya’s card,” Larry told us. “That was basically one of those, um, you know, those junk mail credit cards…. What evidence can I burn? Then they've already been to, that was after the third search — second or third —they did a fourth one, like a really, another extensive search. So what else can I have burned?”

But in hindsight, Larry acknowledges the optics of how he acted after Maya disappeared left room for suspicion.

Alexis: “What would you do differently?”
Larry: “Maybe I should have been more, you know, um, involved. You know. But again, it was a surreal, shocking moment. You know, thinking, 'OK, maybe there's nothing wrong. Maybe I'm just overreacting.' ”

The prosecutors' evidence against Larry isn’t limited to what happened after Maya vanished. They presented even more material from the months before Maya was last seen alive.

Alexis: “What did you love about Maya?”
Larry: “Oh, she’s kind, beautiful, very intelligent. She’s been my best friend since we were 15. And, um, you know, we just get along…. You know, over 20 years together. I loved her and love her still.”

Larry and Maya were high school sweethearts and married when she was 18. He said he still hopes Maya will come back home.

“I'm willing to do whatever it takes to make her happy, and if it takes 5, 10, 15 years, you know, I'd wait,” Larry told NBC 7.

But in court, family and friends – including Maya’s brother, Jay-R Tabalanza — testified the Milletes’ marriage was on thin ice.

“She didn’t want anything to do with him anymore,” Tabalanza said.

In fact, Maya and Larry separated for several weeks the year before she vanished. Jay-R’s wife, Genesis Tabalaza, testified that Maya told her Larry was prone to violent outbursts.

“She said that when Larry gets angry, he would punch the wall,” Genesis said.

Maya’s co-worker Kristeen Timmers said Maya revealed something even more foreboding.

“Through tears, she told me, ‘I’m afraid Larry will hurt the kids to hurt me,’ ” Timmers testified.

The hearing didn’t just reveal marital fighting. It exposed something Maya kept secret, even from her tight-knit family. District attorney investigator Matthew Grindley testified Maya had an affair with a married coworker named Jamey in the months before she vanished.


MORE AT LINK!
 

What happened to Maya Millete? Larry's jailhouse interview​

It’s been nearly two years since three children in Chula Vista have seen or spoken with either of their parents. Their mother, Maya Millete, is missing and presumed dead. Their father, Larry Millete, is behind bars, facing a charge of first-degree murder in her disappearance. He’s pleaded not guilty.

Larry has been silent since his arrest in October of 2021 and hasn’t cooperated with police or prosecutors. In the wake of that silence, questions keep building:
  • Where is Maya?
  • If she was murdered, how? And when did that happen?
  • Will prosecutors be able to convince a jury that a suburban father of three, with no adult criminal history, could make his wife vanish without a trace?
Nine months after Maya vanished, shortly after Larry’s arrest, investigative reporter Alexis Rivas requested an interview with Larry. That request went unanswered. But after a San Diego County Superior Court judge ruled Larry must stand trial for murder, a new attempt in July to speak with Larry proved successful.
Over the course of four visits, which included two on-camera interviews, Larry Millete broke his silence to NBC 7 Investigates. Those interviews were conducted against the wishes of his defense attorney Bonita Martinez.

During the first two visits, NBC 7's team established ground rules for the interviews. Larry agreed that no questions would be off-limits.

Larry’s terms were unique. He told us he didn’t want his children to see their father in a jail uniform. He also believed that prosecutors would use video of his facial expressions and body language against him in the upcoming trial. So NBC 7 agreed to only show portions of Larry’s face and body.



Throughout our sessions, Larry told us: The police have it all wrong.

“I know I have, I haven’t done anything,” Larry said.

Alexis: “I'm not coming here with a bias, but I do think the average person would have to believe in an extraordinary set of circumstances to believe you. Why should we?”
Larry: “Because it's [the] truth, and I don't know.”

Alexis: “Did something happen in the heat of the moment?”
Larry: “No comment.”

At first, Larry used the phrase “no comment” a lot, saying he didn’t want to jeopardize his defense at trial.

Larry: “I don’t even want to say anything. But the allegations are outrageous.”
Alexis: “Why would you say they’re outrageous?”
Larry: “Again: I just don’t want to go into detail, because then my words can be twisted.”

Alexis: “What was the last interaction you had with Maya before she vanished?”
Larry: “Um, I just don’t want to comment about that.”

Alexis: “So where do you think Maya is now?”
Larry: “Um, no comment. It’s just, I have speculations but it'll come out during the trial.”
Alexis: “I know you've told me. You think she's still alive, but is that still true?”
Larry: “Yes ma’am. But I'm kind of the guy that's like a pray for the best, prepare for the [worst].”

Alexis: “Something I keep coming back to, because I think, you know how, if Maya is still alive, how did she manage to leave your home without being seen? We have the surveillance video of the last time Maya’s seen coming home that afternoon. How is it possible for her to have left your home? Without any video, any evidence anyone's seeing her?”
Larry: “That will be coming out during the trial. There’s ways, but you don’t want to divulge that information because the DA could use this.”

Alexis: “Well, even if you can't explain how that is possible — how she leaves the home — if she's still alive, how do you explain no financial transactions? No cell phone activity? No evidence of life?”
Larry: “Again, that will come out during the trial. There's a, you know, speculation that the defense has, and I'll just leave that to the trial when that stuff comes out.”

At 5:59 a.m. on Jan. 8, 2021, video surveillance from one of the Milletes’ neighbors captured the Millete family’s Lexus SUV pulling into the street and then backing into the garage. Prosecutors say this happened about six hours after Maya last used her cell phone.

Forty-five minutes later, with the sun coming up, video captured the SUV driving off with Larry and his youngest child inside. The SUV didn’t return to the house until 12 hours later, just after 6 p.m.

Alexis: “Where did you go for 12 hours with your cell phone turned off the day after Maya vanished?”
Larry: “Again: I'd rather not answer that question.”

During the preliminary hearing, a detective testified Larry told him that he took his son to Torrey Pines, but lifeguards told the police they didn’t remember seeing Larry or his son that day. And beach parking lot cameras didn’t spot the SUV.

Investigators say they downloaded data from the SUV’s computer. While it didn’t record the vehicle’s location throughout the day, detectives say someone entered the Millete’s home address into the vehicle navigation system at 3:29 p.m. That’s two and a half hours before Larry and his son returned home – suggesting they may have been driving home from someplace significantly farther than Torrey Pines.

Alexis: “So if you didn’t go there, where did you go?”
Larry: “Not true. I already explained where my son and I went. And the reasons why. So you know for them to try to argue that is just ridiculous.”
Alexis: “Well, why did you turn your phone off? Something detectives say you rarely did.”
Larry: “No. No. Trust me: During trial, that’ll come out. It’s not, it’s not that reason.”

It didn’t take long for Maya’s family to notice she was missing. During the preliminary hearing, her siblings testified that Larry acted like nothing was wrong, so they were the ones to call the police.

Alexis: “Why weren't you freaking out that weekend?”
Larry: “Again, um, people cope, you know, people react and cope in different ways. It's shocking. It's like a shock to the system. And some people freak out, some people stay calm. I just try to, again, keep my composure and try to think things through. And I'm thinking about more of my children. Hey, I don't want them being affected, freaking out. Maybe if I don't freak out, they're not going to freak out. You know?”

In January of 2021, it felt like all of Chula Vista stopped. Everyone was trying to find Maya. And it didn’t take long for people to notice who wasn’t part of public search events.

Alexis: “We have a huge file of video showing the hundreds of people that search for your wife, every weekend, off of hiking trails and open fields. For some moment, it kind of felt like all of San Diego County was searching for Maya. You weren't. Where were you?”
Larry: “Trust me. Um, the main reasons I didn’t go, where I was getting death threats from almost instantly. After, you know, the situation and we were doing our own thing, but it wasn't like in the limelight. You know, so again: I don't want to answer that question.”
Alexis: “If it was my boyfriend that went missing, I would lose my mind and I would be out there desperate to find him, and why don't I feel that from you?”
Larry: “I’m kinda … I shed tears in private, you know? Again, see, I didn't want to say that because I don't want to embarrass or humiliate our children because this stuff stays out there, and, you know, to hurt someone, they usually use your weaknesses against you.… So, you know, not just because I'm not weeping or crying in public, or on camera, doesn't mean that, you know, I'm not human and I, I don't have feelings, you know.”

A month after the disappearance, police say Larry stopped cooperating with their investigation.

Four months after Maya vanished, a large fire in the Millete’s backyard caught another neighbor’s attention. District attorney investigator James Rhoades testified about what that neighbor witnessed.

“It was approximately 8 p.m. at night, and she felt her windows rattling, so she proceeded to go out into her backyard, and she could see a large fire … with a single male standing by a large fire pit and that she believed it was Larry Millete, and she described the fire as being something to burn stuff, not in a recreational sense,” Rhoades said on the stand.

Police say they later recovered a burned credit card and some papers. At the hearing, Rhoades suggested that Larry may have tried to destroy Maya’s belongings. But in our interview, Larry told us a different story.

“Ma'am. That's normal practice. If you ask my next-door neighbor and my other neighbors, I've been doing [this] since 2013,” Larry said.

Larry told us the family burned junk mail all the time. Not only that, he said the fire was well after police had already searched the Millete home multiple times.

“That wasn’t Maya’s card,” Larry told us. “That was basically one of those, um, you know, those junk mail credit cards…. What evidence can I burn? Then they've already been to, that was after the third search — second or third —they did a fourth one, like a really, another extensive search. So what else can I have burned?”

But in hindsight, Larry acknowledges the optics of how he acted after Maya disappeared left room for suspicion.

Alexis: “What would you do differently?”
Larry: “Maybe I should have been more, you know, um, involved. You know. But again, it was a surreal, shocking moment. You know, thinking, 'OK, maybe there's nothing wrong. Maybe I'm just overreacting.' ”

The prosecutors' evidence against Larry isn’t limited to what happened after Maya vanished. They presented even more material from the months before Maya was last seen alive.

Alexis: “What did you love about Maya?”
Larry: “Oh, she’s kind, beautiful, very intelligent. She’s been my best friend since we were 15. And, um, you know, we just get along…. You know, over 20 years together. I loved her and love her still.”

Larry and Maya were high school sweethearts and married when she was 18. He said he still hopes Maya will come back home.

“I'm willing to do whatever it takes to make her happy, and if it takes 5, 10, 15 years, you know, I'd wait,” Larry told NBC 7.

But in court, family and friends – including Maya’s brother, Jay-R Tabalanza — testified the Milletes’ marriage was on thin ice.

“She didn’t want anything to do with him anymore,” Tabalanza said.

In fact, Maya and Larry separated for several weeks the year before she vanished. Jay-R’s wife, Genesis Tabalaza, testified that Maya told her Larry was prone to violent outbursts.

“She said that when Larry gets angry, he would punch the wall,” Genesis said.

Maya’s co-worker Kristeen Timmers said Maya revealed something even more foreboding.

“Through tears, she told me, ‘I’m afraid Larry will hurt the kids to hurt me,’ ” Timmers testified.

The hearing didn’t just reveal marital fighting. It exposed something Maya kept secret, even from her tight-knit family. District attorney investigator Matthew Grindley testified Maya had an affair with a married coworker named Jamey in the months before she vanished.


MORE AT LINK!
I don't even know why he did this interview. He's just making himself look even worse.
 

What happened to Maya Millete? Larry's jailhouse interview​

It’s been nearly two years since three children in Chula Vista have seen or spoken with either of their parents. Their mother, Maya Millete, is missing and presumed dead. Their father, Larry Millete, is behind bars, facing a charge of first-degree murder in her disappearance. He’s pleaded not guilty.

Larry has been silent since his arrest in October of 2021 and hasn’t cooperated with police or prosecutors. In the wake of that silence, questions keep building:
  • Where is Maya?
  • If she was murdered, how? And when did that happen?
  • Will prosecutors be able to convince a jury that a suburban father of three, with no adult criminal history, could make his wife vanish without a trace?
Nine months after Maya vanished, shortly after Larry’s arrest, investigative reporter Alexis Rivas requested an interview with Larry. That request went unanswered. But after a San Diego County Superior Court judge ruled Larry must stand trial for murder, a new attempt in July to speak with Larry proved successful.
Over the course of four visits, which included two on-camera interviews, Larry Millete broke his silence to NBC 7 Investigates. Those interviews were conducted against the wishes of his defense attorney Bonita Martinez.

During the first two visits, NBC 7's team established ground rules for the interviews. Larry agreed that no questions would be off-limits.

Larry’s terms were unique. He told us he didn’t want his children to see their father in a jail uniform. He also believed that prosecutors would use video of his facial expressions and body language against him in the upcoming trial. So NBC 7 agreed to only show portions of Larry’s face and body.



Throughout our sessions, Larry told us: The police have it all wrong.

“I know I have, I haven’t done anything,” Larry said.

Alexis: “I'm not coming here with a bias, but I do think the average person would have to believe in an extraordinary set of circumstances to believe you. Why should we?”
Larry: “Because it's [the] truth, and I don't know.”

Alexis: “Did something happen in the heat of the moment?”
Larry: “No comment.”

At first, Larry used the phrase “no comment” a lot, saying he didn’t want to jeopardize his defense at trial.

Larry: “I don’t even want to say anything. But the allegations are outrageous.”
Alexis: “Why would you say they’re outrageous?”
Larry: “Again: I just don’t want to go into detail, because then my words can be twisted.”

Alexis: “What was the last interaction you had with Maya before she vanished?”
Larry: “Um, I just don’t want to comment about that.”

Alexis: “So where do you think Maya is now?”
Larry: “Um, no comment. It’s just, I have speculations but it'll come out during the trial.”
Alexis: “I know you've told me. You think she's still alive, but is that still true?”
Larry: “Yes ma’am. But I'm kind of the guy that's like a pray for the best, prepare for the [worst].”

Alexis: “Something I keep coming back to, because I think, you know how, if Maya is still alive, how did she manage to leave your home without being seen? We have the surveillance video of the last time Maya’s seen coming home that afternoon. How is it possible for her to have left your home? Without any video, any evidence anyone's seeing her?”
Larry: “That will be coming out during the trial. There’s ways, but you don’t want to divulge that information because the DA could use this.”

Alexis: “Well, even if you can't explain how that is possible — how she leaves the home — if she's still alive, how do you explain no financial transactions? No cell phone activity? No evidence of life?”
Larry: “Again, that will come out during the trial. There's a, you know, speculation that the defense has, and I'll just leave that to the trial when that stuff comes out.”

At 5:59 a.m. on Jan. 8, 2021, video surveillance from one of the Milletes’ neighbors captured the Millete family’s Lexus SUV pulling into the street and then backing into the garage. Prosecutors say this happened about six hours after Maya last used her cell phone.

Forty-five minutes later, with the sun coming up, video captured the SUV driving off with Larry and his youngest child inside. The SUV didn’t return to the house until 12 hours later, just after 6 p.m.

Alexis: “Where did you go for 12 hours with your cell phone turned off the day after Maya vanished?”
Larry: “Again: I'd rather not answer that question.”

During the preliminary hearing, a detective testified Larry told him that he took his son to Torrey Pines, but lifeguards told the police they didn’t remember seeing Larry or his son that day. And beach parking lot cameras didn’t spot the SUV.

Investigators say they downloaded data from the SUV’s computer. While it didn’t record the vehicle’s location throughout the day, detectives say someone entered the Millete’s home address into the vehicle navigation system at 3:29 p.m. That’s two and a half hours before Larry and his son returned home – suggesting they may have been driving home from someplace significantly farther than Torrey Pines.

Alexis: “So if you didn’t go there, where did you go?”
Larry: “Not true. I already explained where my son and I went. And the reasons why. So you know for them to try to argue that is just ridiculous.”
Alexis: “Well, why did you turn your phone off? Something detectives say you rarely did.”
Larry: “No. No. Trust me: During trial, that’ll come out. It’s not, it’s not that reason.”

It didn’t take long for Maya’s family to notice she was missing. During the preliminary hearing, her siblings testified that Larry acted like nothing was wrong, so they were the ones to call the police.

Alexis: “Why weren't you freaking out that weekend?”
Larry: “Again, um, people cope, you know, people react and cope in different ways. It's shocking. It's like a shock to the system. And some people freak out, some people stay calm. I just try to, again, keep my composure and try to think things through. And I'm thinking about more of my children. Hey, I don't want them being affected, freaking out. Maybe if I don't freak out, they're not going to freak out. You know?”

In January of 2021, it felt like all of Chula Vista stopped. Everyone was trying to find Maya. And it didn’t take long for people to notice who wasn’t part of public search events.

Alexis: “We have a huge file of video showing the hundreds of people that search for your wife, every weekend, off of hiking trails and open fields. For some moment, it kind of felt like all of San Diego County was searching for Maya. You weren't. Where were you?”
Larry: “Trust me. Um, the main reasons I didn’t go, where I was getting death threats from almost instantly. After, you know, the situation and we were doing our own thing, but it wasn't like in the limelight. You know, so again: I don't want to answer that question.”
Alexis: “If it was my boyfriend that went missing, I would lose my mind and I would be out there desperate to find him, and why don't I feel that from you?”
Larry: “I’m kinda … I shed tears in private, you know? Again, see, I didn't want to say that because I don't want to embarrass or humiliate our children because this stuff stays out there, and, you know, to hurt someone, they usually use your weaknesses against you.… So, you know, not just because I'm not weeping or crying in public, or on camera, doesn't mean that, you know, I'm not human and I, I don't have feelings, you know.”

A month after the disappearance, police say Larry stopped cooperating with their investigation.

Four months after Maya vanished, a large fire in the Millete’s backyard caught another neighbor’s attention. District attorney investigator James Rhoades testified about what that neighbor witnessed.

“It was approximately 8 p.m. at night, and she felt her windows rattling, so she proceeded to go out into her backyard, and she could see a large fire … with a single male standing by a large fire pit and that she believed it was Larry Millete, and she described the fire as being something to burn stuff, not in a recreational sense,” Rhoades said on the stand.

Police say they later recovered a burned credit card and some papers. At the hearing, Rhoades suggested that Larry may have tried to destroy Maya’s belongings. But in our interview, Larry told us a different story.

“Ma'am. That's normal practice. If you ask my next-door neighbor and my other neighbors, I've been doing [this] since 2013,” Larry said.

Larry told us the family burned junk mail all the time. Not only that, he said the fire was well after police had already searched the Millete home multiple times.

“That wasn’t Maya’s card,” Larry told us. “That was basically one of those, um, you know, those junk mail credit cards…. What evidence can I burn? Then they've already been to, that was after the third search — second or third —they did a fourth one, like a really, another extensive search. So what else can I have burned?”

But in hindsight, Larry acknowledges the optics of how he acted after Maya disappeared left room for suspicion.

Alexis: “What would you do differently?”
Larry: “Maybe I should have been more, you know, um, involved. You know. But again, it was a surreal, shocking moment. You know, thinking, 'OK, maybe there's nothing wrong. Maybe I'm just overreacting.' ”

The prosecutors' evidence against Larry isn’t limited to what happened after Maya vanished. They presented even more material from the months before Maya was last seen alive.

Alexis: “What did you love about Maya?”
Larry: “Oh, she’s kind, beautiful, very intelligent. She’s been my best friend since we were 15. And, um, you know, we just get along…. You know, over 20 years together. I loved her and love her still.”

Larry and Maya were high school sweethearts and married when she was 18. He said he still hopes Maya will come back home.

“I'm willing to do whatever it takes to make her happy, and if it takes 5, 10, 15 years, you know, I'd wait,” Larry told NBC 7.

But in court, family and friends – including Maya’s brother, Jay-R Tabalanza — testified the Milletes’ marriage was on thin ice.

“She didn’t want anything to do with him anymore,” Tabalanza said.

In fact, Maya and Larry separated for several weeks the year before she vanished. Jay-R’s wife, Genesis Tabalaza, testified that Maya told her Larry was prone to violent outbursts.

“She said that when Larry gets angry, he would punch the wall,” Genesis said.

Maya’s co-worker Kristeen Timmers said Maya revealed something even more foreboding.

“Through tears, she told me, ‘I’m afraid Larry will hurt the kids to hurt me,’ ” Timmers testified.

The hearing didn’t just reveal marital fighting. It exposed something Maya kept secret, even from her tight-knit family. District attorney investigator Matthew Grindley testified Maya had an affair with a married coworker named Jamey in the months before she vanished.


MORE AT LINK!
Every single bit is a non answer until they get to the back yard campfire or fire. Then he seems to talk freely. Therefore I am guessing that one is the truth or mainly so as he quits worrying. I fail to see why he bothered with an interview at all, he must have gotten paid or something as all he does is avoid answering or makes excuses. He and Barry Morphew belong in a hole together.
 

Larry Millete gets new defense attorneys, murder trial delayed until Aug. 2024​

The murder trial for Larry Millete, the Chula Vista man accused of killing his wife Maya Millete, will be delayed until next August. Tuesday, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Enrique Camarena Jr. relieved Bonita Martinez as Larry’s attorney, at the request of Martinez. The decision came less than four months before his murder trial was scheduled to begin.

Martinez told NBC 7 Investigates she no longer wanted to represent Larry due to his lack of finances.

During our exclusive jailhouse interview, Larry told NBC 7 Investigates he already paid Martinez more than $200,000. But weeks after that interview, Martinez told NBC 7 that Larry’s case will average $500,000 – which she says he cannot afford.

Larry will now be represented by Liann Sabatini and Colby Ryan with Virtus Law Group, LLP. The judge said that he already met with the new defense attorneys and told them they were expected to complete the case whether they get paid or not, and that he wouldn’t allow the case to be delayed again due to finances.

Sabatini and Ryan did not want to comment on the case to reporters after the hearing. Some of Maya’s family members were at the hearing and also declined to comment.
 

Larry Millete gets new defense attorneys, murder trial delayed until Aug. 2024​

The murder trial for Larry Millete, the Chula Vista man accused of killing his wife Maya Millete, will be delayed until next August. Tuesday, San Diego County Superior Court Judge Enrique Camarena Jr. relieved Bonita Martinez as Larry’s attorney, at the request of Martinez. The decision came less than four months before his murder trial was scheduled to begin.

Martinez told NBC 7 Investigates she no longer wanted to represent Larry due to his lack of finances.

During our exclusive jailhouse interview, Larry told NBC 7 Investigates he already paid Martinez more than $200,000. But weeks after that interview, Martinez told NBC 7 that Larry’s case will average $500,000 – which she says he cannot afford.

Larry will now be represented by Liann Sabatini and Colby Ryan with Virtus Law Group, LLP. The judge said that he already met with the new defense attorneys and told them they were expected to complete the case whether they get paid or not, and that he wouldn’t allow the case to be delayed again due to finances.

Sabatini and Ryan did not want to comment on the case to reporters after the hearing. Some of Maya’s family members were at the hearing and also declined to comment.
So it is unclear, are they public defenders? Apparently not if judge states he won't allow new defense attorneys to bail on case if not paid.

So what are they doing it for, publicity?

OR did they get paid a retainer and judge is warning if that runs out, they can't bail. That would beg the question of if there was more money why they didn't pay the previous attorney more and if the real reason for her bailing was money...

So they get a major delay. MAJOR. I expect the same to happen again which is likely why the judge warned, because he sees it coming...

In the meantime, the lives of Maya'sf family and her kids and custody etc. are on hold and worse for at least a year to come if not more.

That's the reason for my angry face on the post.
 
So it is unclear, are they public defenders? Apparently not if judge states he won't allow new defense attorneys to bail on case if not paid.

So what are they doing it for, publicity?

OR did they get paid a retainer and judge is warning if that runs out, they can't bail. That would beg the question of if there was more money why they didn't pay the previous attorney more and if the real reason for her bailing was money...

So they get a major delay. MAJOR. I expect the same to happen again which is likely why the judge warned, because he sees it coming...

In the meantime, the lives of Maya'sf family and her kids and custody etc. are on hold and worse for at least a year to come if not more.

That's the reason for my angry face on the post.
yeah, something is not adding up to that story. IF they can force a different attorney to not bail after any retainer is eaten up, why not this one that he already has? This version of the story makes absolutely no sense.
 
yeah, something is not adding up to that story. IF they can force a different attorney to not bail after any retainer is eaten up, why not this one that he already has? This version of the story makes absolutely no sense.
Yeah I don't buy it or believe it for an instant. Not to mention no attorney (even though they do and there are many of them who would) would want to be KNOWN to quit over money when the poor guy needs a defense. Something is wrong/fishy here.

I have some thoughts but it would be TOTAL speculation. With no real solid reason to think such... I'll leave those thoughts for now.
 

Chula Vista vigil planned for Maya Millete on Sunday, 3 years since she was last seen​

Three years ago this coming Sunday, a mother of three returned to her home in South Bay.

To mark that grim anniversary, the petite Filipino woman's family and friends are planning to hold a vigil Jan. 7, with supporters asked to begin gathering at 4:30 p.m. A candlelight vigil starts a half-hour later.

Sunday's event — at which organizers are urging people to "Pray for Maya, Pray for the Missing, Pray for Justice" — will be held at Mount San Miguel Park in Chula Vista on Paseo Veracruz, just steps away from Paseo Los Gatos, where the family home was located. Last year at this same time, an event commemorating Maya with a hike was held in the same park, a place she would frequently visit.

"We are approaching the [third] year mark since our dear Maya disappeared," vigil organizers posted on social media. "Since then, we have been grappling with more questions than answers: Where is Maya? How did she just disappear into thin air? What happened to her?

As we await for justice, please join us in a candlelight vigil to honor Maya, and all others who are missing."


Sunset on Sunday is at 4:58 p.m.

1704574093041.png
 

Maya Millete's husband argues constitutional rights violated as he awaits murder trial​

A San Diego County judge denied efforts from Larry Millete’s new defense counsel that would have allowed him to make calls to family members.

Larry is accused of killing his 39-year-old wife, Maya Millete, in January 2021. Her body has never been found. He’s pleaded not guilty. He appeared in the South Bay courthouse in Chula Vista on Monday morning for a status conference. It marked the first court hearing since he switched lawyers last October.

Shortly after Larry’s arrest in October 2021, Judge Dwayne Moring issued a criminal protection order which only allowed Larry to communicate with his children through letters that were first reviewed by a guardian ad litem, which is a court-appointed representative for the children. But prosecutors say Larry forced his parents to let him speak with his kids during phone calls, hundreds of times. In response, Judge Moring widened Larry’s restrictions, allowing only calls to his attorney.

During this morning’s hearing, defense attorney Liann Sabatini asked the judge to modify the order, saying it was a violation of his 1st amendment rights, equal protection rights and 8th amendment rights.

“It’s not right. It’s completely unconstitutional,” Sabatini said. “What jurisdiction does the court have to order him to speak to people he otherwise wouldn’t be speaking to?”

Deputy District Attorney Christy Bowles argued against that, saying Larry had a track record of violating the order, and disagreeing that the order violated any of his rights.

“The people he wants to communicate with are often in the presence of the children,” Bowles said.

Judge Enrique Camarena sided with Bowles, ruling that no changes be made to the protective order. Camarena also cited an example of Larry’s alleged violation of the order. In that instance, prosecutors say Larry used another inmate’s PIN to make hours of phone calls to his children. The judge says Larry’s calls were also inappropriate, saying that he made references to a disturbing film about prison life, which he instructed his children to watch.

“People that want to talk to him have to go in person,” Judge Camarena explained during this ruling. “So I don’t think the constitution, which has existed well before telephonic communication existed, is necessarily affected here.”
 
I finally got around to watching either the 48 Hours or Dateline episode for Maya's case. I didn't think I could dislike Larry more than I already did, but I do!
I don't think I ever watched the 48 Hour thing but Larry is a despicable man and easy to despise and he earned it.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,067
Messages
252,572
Members
1,004
Latest member
jazzyazzgrl
Back
Top Bottom