TX SUZANNE CLARK SIMPSON: Missing from Olmos Park, TX - 6 Oct 2024 - Age 51 *ARREST*

1728496258852.png 1728496269506.png

Police searching for missing 51-year-old woman last seen Sunday night​

Police are looking for a woman who has been missing since Sunday night.

Suzanne Clark Simpson, 51, was last seen in the 500 block of East Olmos in Olmos Park at around 11 p.m.

Husband of missing Olmos Park woman arrested on family violence charges in Kendall County​

The husband of a woman at the center of a missing persons case out of Olmos Park has been arrested on family violence charges, according to the Kendall County Sheriff’s Office.

Brad Simpson, 53, was booked early Wednesday morning on charges of assault causing bodily injury-family violence and unlawful restraint. His bond amount is still pending.

He was arrested off Interstate 10 East on a frontage Road in Kendall County, Olmos Park police said.

The Olmos Park Police Department and the Texas Department of Public Safety are searching for Simpson’s wife, Suzanne Clark Simpson, who has been missing since Sunday.

During a news conference on Wednesday, Olmos Park Police Chief Fidel Villegas said Brad Simpson is not currently a suspect in his wife’s disappearance at this time.

Suzanne Clark Simpson was last seen around 11 p.m. Sunday in the 500 block of East Olmos Drive, near Shook Avenue. Police said she was wearing a black dress that she went out in that night.

Sergeant Deon Cockrell said the search began in a woods area near Simpson’s home. Roads are closed off as the investigation continues and will be for the next 24 hours, according to police.

Police said there was a disturbance between the Simpsons after they left The Argyle in Alamo Heights between 10 p.m. and 11 p.m. on Sunday.

According to an arrest warrant affidavit, Brad Simpson told officers that at 3 p.m. on Monday, their child’s school called him and advised him that their child had not been picked up from school. Suzanne Clark Simpson typically picks up their child from school, the affidavit states.


Villegas said Brad Simpson was supposed to have an appointment with him about his missing wife, but he was not cooperative and didn’t show up.

Police said they spoke with a neighbor who reported he saw the couple in a physical altercation on Sunday night. He added that he heard screams from a wooded area east of his residence.

Villegas said, to his knowledge, there is no history of domestic violence between the couple, but police are still investigating. However, he said many witnesses reported to police that there had been tension between the family.

Villegas said officers searched that wooded area and found two articles that they’re looking into, but he did not give any details about what those items were. He said he does not want people to try to search for Suzanne Simpson without police supervision.

“We’re very concerned,” Villegas said.

Suzanne Simpson’s cell phone is also missing, according to the chief. He said they’re working on obtaining search warrants to investigate the family’s home and trying to locate the cellphone.

Villegas also said they were looking into other properties that the family owns as well.

Olmos Park police are asking the public for tips in connection with Brad Simpon’s vehicle, a 2019 dark-colored GMC Sierra pickup truck. They are looking for any people who may have seen the truck Sunday night after the family violence incident.


media - SUZANNE CLARK SIMPSON: Missing from Olmos Park, TX - 6 Oct 2024 - Age 51
 
Last edited:
Missing Mom Suzanne Simpson Murder Case: Defendant seeks to suppress evidence
James Cotter, the longtime business partner of Brad Simpson, filed several motions in court Monday amid the ongoing investigation into the murder of Suzanne Simpson. Brad Simpson is accused of murdering his wife, and Cotter is alleged to have assisted him in hiding an unregistered fully automatic firearm during the investigation into Suzanne's disappearance.
Among the filings, Cotter's motion to suppress seeks to exclude any evidence obtained by law enforcement, claiming authorities took him into custody without lawful authority. This motion aims to suppress any statements made to law enforcement and communications obtained during the investigation. An arrest affidavit for Cotter indicates he permitted authorities to review his phone, revealing communications with Brad Simpson about concealing a gun in a pump house. Simpson allegedly apologized for the urgency of the request, telling Cotter, "You're all I got now... social media is destroying me."

Another significant filing is the motion in limine, requesting that prosecutors and investigators refrain from mentioning Cotter's prior convictions or alleged legal violations. Jason Goss, a former prosecutor and now a criminal defense attorney, explained the motion will likely seek to distance Cotter from what Simpson is alleged to have done.

"The motion in limine is important because even though it doesn't say much there, what it's saying is, 'Judge, before trial, we want to have a hearing,'" Goss explained. "I think what they're going to end up specifying is they're really going to try to limit out anything that Mr. Simpson is alleged to have done, because that would obviously really, really, really prejudice Mr. Cotter, right? So you have one defendant that doesn't want anything in his trial having anything to do with somebody alleged to have killed their wife."

The challenge remains in separating Cotter from the investigation into Suzanne Simpson's disappearance, given their intertwined nature.

"If I'm the prosecutor in this case, I'm like, 'Absolutely, you have to give context to why (Cotter's) hiding this firearm here. You have to talk about everything that's going on,'" Goss said. "But of course, the defense is going to say, 'Well, nobody's alleged or proven or shown that this firearm actually did anything over there, or was a part of that case over there, and you could theoretically try it in a silo, and just say, 'This guy has possession of an illegal firearm.'"

Goss said the judge will have to determine whether the prejudicial danger of bringing up any of the facts in Simpson's case in relation to Cotter's case outweighs any relevance and probative value that information could have in Cotter's case.

"What that really means is, if the jury would convict (Cotter), this defendant in this case based upon the alleged actions of another defendant in another case (Simpson), that's not a fair trial," he said. "So basically, the judge will have to make that balance."

Cotter also filed a formal request for evidence, though Goss noted it is unlikely the judge will rule on this motion. However, detailed arguments on the other two requests are expected to be heard as the case develops.
 

Brad Simpson’s motion to quash hearing set for 30 days in connection with wife Suzanne’s murder case​

Brad Simpson, the Olmos Park man charged with murdering his wife last year, made another court appearance on Wednesday morning.

The discovery hearing, originally scheduled for March 12, was held in Judge Joel Perez’s 437th District Court.

Perez had initially set the 30-day window as evidence from the Texas Rangers was still being collected.

On Wednesday, the situation remained unchanged, with state attorneys continuing to gather evidence from the Texas Rangers, who were still conducting their investigation.

Simpson’s attorney said they had enough evidence to proceed with a motion to quash the indictment.

That hearing is scheduled for 9 a.m. on April 22, 2025.
 

It has been six months since Suzanne Simpson was last seen alive. This is where her case stands.​

It has been six months since Suzanne Simpson, the Olmos Park mother of four, vanished. Since then, investigators have charged her husband, Brad Simpson with murder.

It was a case that put a relatively quiet community of Olmos Park into the spotlight.

However, six months later, Suzanne’s remains have not been located. Right now, investigators, prosecutors, attorneys and the family are tight lipped because of a gag order.

However, we do know Brad’s defense team is working to get his indictment thrown out. A motion hearing will be held at the end of the month.

The indictment itself alleges Brad killed his wife and tried to hide a motorized saw that has her DNA on it.


Brad’s next hearing in April 22 at 9 a.m. for the motion to quash the indictment. A trial date has not been set.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,075
Messages
255,053
Members
1,014
Latest member
SaraPlum
Back
Top Bottom