JOSHUA "JJ" VALLOW, TYLEE RYAN, TAMMY DAYBELL, & CHARLES VALLOW: State of Idaho/Arizona vs. Lori & Chad Daybell *GUILTY*

1580704661510.png

Police seem to be no closer to finding 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 17-year-old Tylee Ryan than they were when this story began months ago.

Since that time, the story has gained international attention as it’s taken twists and turns involving a purported cult, dead spouses, delusions of divinity and preparing for the end of the world. Despite all the angles, and the ever-growing number of people related to the case, the facts remain essentially the same as when it was first announced.

The two children remain missing and the parents, Lori (Vallow) Daybell, and her new husband, Chad Daybell, refuse to disclose their whereabouts to police. Both have been named persons of interest in the disappearance of the children. Law enforcement is also investigating the deaths of the Daybells’ previous respective spouses, Charles Vallow and Tammy Daybell, though neither Chad nor Lori have been named suspects in those cases.

Written timeline of events
  • April 3, 2018 - Tylee Ryan's father, Joseph Ryan, dies. Death ruled heart attack.
  • December 2018 - Chad Daybell & Lori Vallow make first appearance on Preparing a People podcast.
  • February 2019 - Charles Vallow files for divorce from Lori, claiming she viewed herself as a god preparing for the second coming, and she would kill him if he got in her way.
  • February - April 2019 - Lori disappears for nearly two months, leaving her children with others.
  • June 2019 - Lori's niece demands a divorce from her husband, who says she shares similar beliefs to her aunt.
  • July 11, 2019 - Charles Vallow shot and killed by Lori's brother Alex Cox. Shooting initially ruled self-defense.
  • August 2019 - Lori moves to Rexburg, Idaho with kids
  • September 3, 2019 - Joshua "JJ" Vallow enrolled in school
  • September 23, 2019 - JJ last attended school
  • September 24, 2019 - Lori unenrolls JJ from school, saying she would be homeschooling him.
  • September 2019 - Tylee also seen in September, but it's unclear when and where (she had graduated early)
  • October 2, 2019 - Lori's niece's ex-husband was shot at, missing his head by inches. Shooter was driving a vehicle registered to Charles Vallow.
  • October 9, 2019 - Tammy Daybell, Chad's wife, called 911 and said a masked man shot at her with a paintball gun.
  • October 19, 2019 - Tammy Daybell dies, death is ruled natural
  • October 25, 2019 - Tylee, or someone using her phone, texts a friend
  • Late October / Early November 2019 - Chad Daybell & Lori Vallow get married
  • November 26, 2019 - Welfare check requested for JJ at the request of extended family - police are told he is in Arizona with family, but he is not
  • November 27, 2019 - Police return to serve a search warrant, finding the Daybell's gone
  • December 12, 2019 - Lori's brother, who had shot her ex-husband, dies mysteriously in Arizona
  • December 20, 2019 - Search for JJ and Tylee goes public
  • December 30, 2019 - LE says Lori knows where her children are but will not cooperate
  • January 25, 2020 - Chad & Lori are located in Hawaii, served with a notice that she must produce the children within 5 days
  • January 30, 2020 - Lori fails to produce JJ and Tylee

1580705763474.png



edited by staff to add new media link
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Monday 21st April 2025
Morning

REFRESH FOR UPDATES
Lori Vallow Daybell is on trial in Maricopa County, Arizona, on one charge of conspiracy to commit the murder of Charles Vallow, her fourth husband. Nate Eaton is live in the courtroom with updates. Please excuse any typos. Times listed below are in Mountain Standard Time, so they are an hour behind Idaho. (Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time.) The most recent updates are at the top.


Standard Time, so they are an hour behind Idaho. (Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time.) The most recent updates are at the top.



11:30 a.m. Jury leaves. Lori asks that the exhibit with her interview be admitted for appealate purposes. Prosecution does not object.

11:28 a.m. We will take lunch until 12:45 p.m. Closing arguments will then begin.

11:27 a.m. Jurors cannot communicate with anyone about the case. All 12 must agree on the verdict and must be unanimous. The foreperson will fill out the form and sign it. Judge shows the jury a sample verdict form. An official form will be given to the jury when they are ready to deliberate.

11:26 a.m. Judge says jury must follow instructions and refer to them to answer any questions. Should any jurors have a question for the judge, the question form should be utilized. Judge will consider the questions before answering in writing as quickly as possible.

11:25 a.m. All jurors must agree on the verdict. A verdict form will then be completed and handed over to the court. The foreperson will not read any verdict to the court – that will be done by the court. Judge tells the jury to set their deliberation schedule and then advise the courtroom assistant. The case should only be discussed when all jurors are together.

11:24 a.m. Judge says a jury foreperson will be chosen from amoungst the group. His/her opinion does not matter more than the other jurors and they all are equal. The foreperson will make sure the discussions are open and free so all jurors can participate.

11:23 a.m. Deadly weapon means anything designed for a lethal use including a firearm. Judge explains what deadly physical force means.

11:22 a.m. Judge explains what an accomplice is, what aggravated assault means and what “act” means.

11:21 a.m. Lori is following along with an instruction packet in front of her on the defense table. Treena Kay is also following along.

11:17 a.m. If the state fails to carry the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt, the jury must find Lori not guilty.

11:14 a.m. Judge explains what self-defense means and when the use of deadly physical force is justified.

11:13 a.m. Judge says all the alleged participants should be considered in determining whether a conspiracy existed. Lori and Alex are both named in the charge.

11:12 a.m. To prove a conspiracy, you don’t have to show a formal meeting or an official agreement, judge explains. One may become a member of a conspiracy without full knowledge of all the details of the conspiracy.

11:11 a.m. Crime requires the person caused the death of another person, acted with premeditation and worked with a co-conspirator.

11:10 a.m. All evidence must be considered to determine if the defendant committed the act. The state need not prove motive, but jurors can consider motive or lack of motive. Lori is charged with conspiracy to commit first-degree murder.

11:07 a.m. Jury must start with the presumption that the defendant is not guilty. The state’s proof must be beyond a reasonable doubt – “they must be firmly convinced of the defendant’s guilt.”

11:06 a.m. Judge tells jurors law enforcement officer testimony should not be considered higher than other testimony simply because they are an officer. Judge says the defendant need not produce any evidence and her decision not to produce evidence is not evidence of guilt. The defendant is not required to testify and that choice cannot affect their deliberation.

11:05 a.m. Judge tells jurors they can accept everything a witness says or just part of it.

11:04 a.m. Judge continues reading instructions. “The state has charged the defendant with a crime. A charge is not evidence. The state has charged the defendant with a crime. The state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.” Judge says Lori’s decision to represent herself should not affect the jury’s decision in determining facts.

11:03 a.m. We are now streaming here.


11:02 a.m. Judge says any testimony stricken from court record must not be considered. If something was objected and sustained, jurors should not consider. Many jurors following along with the instructions. Each of them has their own packet.

11:01 a.m. Judge begins reading jury instructions. He tells them to determine the facts only by what was given in court – evidence and witnesses only. “You are the sole judges of what happened.” He tells them all instructions must be considered.

11 a.m. A reminder – there are 14 jurors. Two women and 12 men. Judge reminds jury that the prosecution rested on Wednesday. Then he says it’s time for the defense. Lori says, “The defense also rests, your honor.” None of the jurors have a visible reaction.

10:59 a.m. Judge is back in the courtroom and jurors are being brought in.


10:43 a.m. Judge says jury instructions are being copied. When the jurors are here and the copies are ready, court will resume.

10:42 a.m. Lori asks if the interview that was admitted can be replaced with the entire interview. Judge says no. Lori asks why not. He says there is a significant amount of hearsay in the interview. Judge says, “Anything else?” Lori is clearly irritated and responds, “That’s it.”

10:40 a.m. Lori claims the prosecution said they were admitting her entire interview with Det. Ynclan but the actual exhibit is around 20 minutes (far shorter than the actual interview). Lori says this could create a problem if the jury believes it was the entire interview. Judge says the state has rested and this issue could have been raised on cross.

10:39 a.m. Lori has questions about the exhibit and the judge says she could have cross-examined Ynclan about it but she didn’t and now it’s too late to bring up the issue.

10:35 a.m. Lori says she has two issues she wants to bring up. She asks how the alternate juror process will go. Judge says two numbers will be drawn after closing arguments and those people will be the alternates. Twelve will then go back and deliberate. If one of the 12 is unable to deliberate, an alternate will be brought back. Lori has another question about an exhibit – her interview with Det. Ynclan. She wonders about the entire interview being admitted or just the snippets. Judge says it’s just the snippets played in court that were put together into one exhibit. Portions have been redacted.

10:34 a.m. Prosecution has no further corrections to make to the jury instructions. Lori has no changes. Judge asks Lori if she plans to rest today. She says yes. When jury comes in, Lori will tell them she is resting. Judge will read jury instructions. We will then break for about an hour and closing arguments will happen this afternoon.

10:32 a.m. Judge just said jurors were told to be here at 11 a.m. today so we may be waiting a little bit. Before we walked into the courtroom, I saw several jurors in the building.

10:31 a.m. Judge says a few modifications have been made to jury instructions. The judge’s assistant just reminded someone in the gallery that eating is not allowed in the courtroom.

10:29 a.m. Defense advisory attorneys just walked in. Lori’s investigator is seated at the main defense table. Lori just walked in dressed in a navy pant suit. She is carrying a paper document holder. Judge Justin Beresky is on the bench.

10:28 a.m. Every seat is full and several members of the public (around two dozen) were turned away. No seats left.

10:27 a.m. Treena Kay is at the prosecution table with her paralegal and Det. Nathan Duncan. Defense attorneys and Lori Vallow Daybell are not yet in the courtroom.

10:24 a.m. We are inside the courtroom now. Kay Woodcock, Gerry Vallow, and Susan Vallow are all here.

10:14 a.m. Video from today can be found here.

10:09 a.m. Here is the schedule for today. Video will be delayed 30 minutes, except for the verdict when Judge Justin Beresky is allowing a 5-minute delay.

ein monday schedule


10:07 a.m. Just saw Brandon Boudreaux walk into a private room near the courtroom. Madison County Sheriff Ron Ball is also here from Rexburg.

10 a.m. Waiting to get into the courtroom for day 9 of Lori Vallow Daybell’s trial. If all goes as planned, the jury will begin deliberating this afternoon. I stayed at a hotel next to the Maricopa County courthouse last night. Below is a photo I took from my window around 5 a.m. of the line for the trial. Lots of people here today – some flew in, others drove many hours.

courthouse crowd

READ LIVE UPDATES WATCH TRIAL HERE
 
Last edited:
Wednesday.
Totally possible as well. I think they will just need a full day after a bit today but I guess we will see.

I'll bet you a fish and chips dinner out. Do you have Venmo lol? I do if you end up owing me. We don't have much for fish and chips around here though so it may have to be something else on my end. Sadly. :D
 
I dozed off yet again for no good reason.

I saw the early part of her arguing over the interview, and her telling the jury she rested. I must have slept through the jury instructions. Did I really miss anything? i'm sick of going back and watching things quite honestly. At least it wasn't closings as I really want to see all of those.

I did read through the tweets on jury instructions, doesn't appear missed any big thing?
 
I dozed off yet again for no good reason.

I saw the early part of her arguing over the interview, and her telling the jury she rested. I must have slept through the jury instructions. Did I really miss anything? i'm sick of going back and watching things quite honestly. At least it wasn't closings as I really want to see all of those.

I did read through the tweets on jury instructions, doesn't appear missed any big thing?
No. You can read it 5 posts up if you want. Post 8862. Closings starting shortly but I guess there will be a delay.
 
No. You can read it 5 posts up if you want. Post 8862. Closings starting shortly but I guess there will be a delay.I
I did read it when I woke up. I just wanted to know if there was anything not said that I missed that honestly was worth going back to watch. I didn't think so. I heard enough jury instructions hashed out and heard other ones in the other conspiracy trial, etc. so thank you. I really didn't want to go watch what I missed.

I get kind of stupid sometimes and feel since I've seen all of this trial I need to go catch any little part I missed but as to jury instructions, I think I can let that go then. I did read the tweets.
 
Monday 21st April 2025
Afternoon (Closing Arguments)

REFRESH FOR UPDATES
Lori Vallow Daybell is on trial in Maricopa County, Arizona, on one charge of conspiracy to commit the murder of Charles Vallow, her fourth husband. Nate Eaton is live in the courtroom with updates. Please excuse any typos. Times listed below are in Mountain Standard Time, so they are an hour behind Idaho. (Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time.) The most recent updates are at the top.


Standard Time, so they are an hour behind Idaho. (Arizona does not observe Daylight Saving Time.) The most recent updates are at the top.


3:14 p.m. We will be in recess until we hear from the jury.

3:13 p.m. The jurors will now speak about this case for the first time to anyone in over two weeks. Judge says if there is a burden of guilt, the state will proceed with an aggravation phase of the trial.



3:12 p.m. Judge’s staff sworn in to protect the jury. They will now be walked out and begin deliberations.

3:10 p.m. Judge explains that two jurors will be picked as alternates. Jurors #14 and #5 will be the alternates. Both men. They will be on standby in case another juror has a problem.



3:09 p.m. Treena wraps up by talking about the insurance and concludes. Closing arguments are done.

3:07 p.m. Treena reminds the jury of Lori’s religious beliefs – that she was exalted, didn’t have to repent. “Of course she thought she was Nephi.” “Physical evidence on Charles and at the scene shows us he was executed. The state has met its burden because even if you somehow believe that Charles actually had that bat and it wasn’t staged like the rest of the scene…that second shot is not justified for self-defense. Arizona law does now allow you to execute a man on the ground.”

3:05 p.m. “When they got rid of him, they did it by planning it. There is no reason Alex Cox went over to this defendant’s house with a loaded gun and waited for Charles Vallow to come inside – held there by this defendant using a cell phone. That is conspiracy, that is planning, that is premeditated. You can absolutely watch that whole interview. That’s why the state included it for you. What you will see if Lori Vallow does not cry, she is not truthful, her timeline is absolutely wrong, she tells the detective it’s quick, it’s 12 minutes, she wants you to believe that the police could understand all of this that day.”



3:04 p.m. Treena: “The defendant wants you to pretend when she is talking about Charles for months, agreeing to her brother killing him, having people tell her that it’s wrong, having people know that they’re planning something, that those words don’t mean exactly what they are. WE got rid of him.”

3:03 p.m. “The execution of Charles Vallow is not a family tragedy. There is nothing you can say to try to construe it in any way to make that a family tragedy. This case is about the defendant, not Alex Cox. He is involved in it because he’s a co-conspirator. We are not here to determine his guilty, albeit it’s quite obvious.”

3:02 p.m. “Only you get to decide. The state put up witnesses that had zero knowledge of a conspiracy. The state did not show you evidence of an agreement to commit murder. They showed you evidence of a family tragedy. Then they showed you the sad effects of a family torn apart because of that tragedy.” Lori finishes and walks away. Treena will now give a rebuttal.

3:01 p.m. Lori says when I’m done, the state will get up and rebut everything she has said because it’s their job to prove she committed a crime. “If you have not seen the evidence that leaves you firmly convinced that I have committed this very crime, then the state failed to show you the evidence that you need…because I did not commit this crime. The only interview the state admitted into evidence is mine, so I encourage you to go watch it.”

2:59 p.m. Lori says she was shocked Charles changed the life insuranace policy, but she was not angry. She says Charles was providing for their family and she had no motive to change that. Lori brings up Nephi – “this was the state’s evidence to murder over self-defense and it is utterly ridiculous.” Lori says in Mormon culture, Nephi signifies strong faith, courage. Treena objects as testifying. Judge sustains. Lori says state is trying to retrofit a crime that doesn’t exist. “This event was not a crime. It was a tragedy. Don’t let them turn my family tragedy into a crime.”

2:58 p.m. Lori says the two-minute period in the house changed their lives forever. Treena objects as testifying. Judge tells Lori not to testify about things not entered in as evidence. “How can you decide for another person if they feel threatened?” Treena objects. Judge allows it. “Why does the state want to blame someone for this tragic event? What evidence did the state show you in this trial that I wanted hard to come to my husband? We learned in this trial I was praying for my husband even though we were having maritial issues.”

2:56 p.m. Lori says Chandler Police were ineffective. They did not swab her hands, Tylee’s hands, Alex’s hands for gun powder residue. They didn’t test the floor board, the tile, Charles’ shirt. They did not search any of the cars on the scene and did not test the fun until 5 years later. “The Chandler Police Department treated this like it was – self-defense. On July 11, this was self-defense.”

2:55 p.m. Lori says law enforcement did not give them instructions to stay in town and they were not given further instructions. “Under Arizona law, I have the right to self-defense. Tylee has the right to self-defense. Tylee has the right to self-defense.” Lori says this was not planned or expected – it was shocking.



2:54 p.m. Lori asks why the state didn’t show all the evidence. Treena objects. Judge, annoyed, says, “Again, sustained. The jury can only consider what was admitted into evidence.”

2:53 p.m. Lori says Det. Duncan testified that the walk-thru was not recorded and nobody wrote a report about it “even though this would be crucial evidence for you, the jury, to have.” Treena objects and judge sustains as Lori keeps talking. Judge says jury can only consider testimony and evidence admitted into the trial.

2:52 p.m. Lori says “we learned” that Tylee, Alex and Lori were taken back to the house in a police van and directed to return back later when the scene was cleaned up. “We learned in this trial that we did as directed.” Lori says they did not return to the house so Alex could do a walk-thru. Many detectives were present during the walk-thru with Alex. Lori lists off the detectives.

2:51 p.m. Lori says she, Alex and Tylee did not know their interviews were being recorded. Lori says Alex’s phone was taken by police and no digital copy was taken by Chandler Police. Lori says Alex’s phone was returned the same day with no further inquiry. Lori says after her interview, she and Tylee were introduced to a victim’s advocate.

2:51 p.m. Lori says several witnesses testified their memory was better six years ago. Lori says Tylee and Alex were also interviewed, but those interviews were not shown. Treena objects. Lori keeps talking. Judge sustains the objection and says jury can only consider what was admitted as evidence.

2:50 p.m. Lori says most of her police interview was not played in court – just snippets – and asks the jury to watch the entire interview. “It is important for you to determine yourselves my deameanor and not listen to anyone else.”

2:49 p.m. “We learned that we asked for Tylee’s medication from the house, for her panic attack medicine, and it was not given to her. We learned Alex was taken to the Chandler Police Department uncuffed. We also learned that me and my daughter were taken the police department.” Lori mentions Det. Ynclan’s goal was to make “small talk” with them. State objects, judge says jury will determine what the goal was.

2:48 p.m. “Let’s look at what we learned in this trial. We learned a shooting occurred, that 911 was called, that law enforcement was notified, that police and EMS arrived at the scene. We learned that Alex came out of the house and was questioned by police in the driveway.”

2:47 p.m. “If the state fails to carry this burden, you must find the defendant not guilty,” Lori says, referring to several jury instructions. “Every defendant is presumed, by law, innocent. The state’s burden is proof beyond a reasonable doubt.”

2:46 p.m. Lori approaches the podium. “The state of Arizona has a 100% burden of proving that I committed a crime – a grievous crime. Conspiracy to commit first degree premeditated murder of my husband Charles Vallow.”

2:45 p.m. Back in the courtroom. Parties are seated and jurors are in their chairs. Lori Vallow Daybell will now present her closing argument.

2:28 p.m. “The evidence is beyond a reasonable doubt,” Treena says. She is finished. Total time for closing – one hour, 45 minutes. We will be back in 15 minutes.

2:27 p.m. Treena reviews the timeline of the morning – the fact Charles lay dying for 47 minutes before 911 was called. She talks about Lori’s demeanor and the fact we never saw Lori cry.

2:26 p.m. Treena reminds the jury of the evidence – life insurance, trying to drug Charles, her words to Alex, be like Nephi and her words to Chad Daybell.

2:24 p.m. Treena says this was not a case of crime prevention. “You can not shoot him while he’s on the ground.”

2:22 p.m. Judge says we need to have a break unless Treena will be done in the next five minutes. She says she is almost done.

2:20 p.m. Treena says this was not self-defense. Lori took Charles’ phone and kept him inside when she could have given it back and the disturbance would have been over.

2:19 p.m. Treena says Lori felt like she was Nephi – she was justified in killing Charles. “But Lori Vallow is not justified under Arizona law.” Treena reviews the law for non-justification for use of deadly physical force.

2:18 p.m. Treena shows the clip where Lori is at the scene laughing about how they just moved there. “Hi neighbor,” she says with a laugh as Alex is on the curb after an alleged attack.

2:16 p.m. Treena shows other examples where she says Lori’s credibility is questionable. She minimizes her actions of abandoning JJ – how many days, etc. During Ynclan’s testimony, Lori said it was hot in July and she needed shoes to walk her son into school. “As we saw in the Walgreens video, Lori was wearing something on her feet when she entered the store.”

2:15 p.m. Treena now plays a portion of the call Lori made to the life insurance company where she was upset she wasn’t the beneficiary. “Lori was untruthful and exaggerated to Banner Life Insurance.” They didn’t have 5 kids at home – they had 1 child in common, Treena says.

2:13 p.m. “Lori’s actions and statements do not fit the evidence,” Treena says. She shows a slide that says, “Credibility of defendant: Social Security.” She was untruthful two separate times to Social Security. Another slide: “Credibility of defendant: Life insurance.”

2:11 p.m. Treena reviews the jury instruction for credibility. She talks about Lori’s credibility and her demeanor on the day of the crime. “Nonchalant and calm.”

2:10 p.m. Treena shows photos of Lori entering and exiting Walgreens wearing shoes. And then Lori is wearing flip-flops at the scene. Tylee also has flip-flops on.

2:09 p.m. Treena shows close-up photos of Charles and his watch. No damage to his watch, no injuries to the back of his heat, one shored exit wound to his left shoulder.

2:07 p.m. Treena shows the jury photos of the bat. There is no blood on the bat and no damage to the bat. “You have a semi-professional baseball player and he sees someone with a gun and he doesn’t take his head off with it (the bat)? Knock him unconscious with it?” There was no skin, blood, sweat – nothing on the bat.

2:06 p.m. Treena shows “staged crime scene” photos. Charles dead on the ground and another photo of him in the autopsy room. We see the gunshots to his chest.

2:03 p.m. Charles was left handed. Treena plays a clip of Kay testifying. Charles was a left-handed pitcher. Treena plays a clip of Lori during her police interview talking about the bat. Lori said he was holding the bat swinging backward.

2:02 p.m. Treena shows a slide that says “Staging the Scene.” Bat was placed to the right of Charles to look like Charles was using it. Injury to Alex’s head – a small 1 inch cut. Alex used a paper towel to pat and rub the cut. No blood in the scene, no broken mirrors from alleged swinging bat or alleged scuffle. Shoes were left by the door to look like Lori ran out without shoes.

2 p.m. Treena says the defendant provoked Charles by taking his phone and refusing to give it back. “This defendant is the person who set up Charles so that her brother could shoot him,” Treena says. We now see photos of Charles dead on the floor. No CPR was given before the first responders arrived.

1:59 p.m. She plays another part of the interview with Lori. This was just a few hours after Charles died. Lori explains that Charles was screaming at her because she would not give him the phone.

1:58 p.m. Treena now plays a portion of Lori being interviewed by Det. Ynclan the day Charles was shot.

1:57 p.m. Next slide says Alex was like Nephi, but with a gun.

1:55 p.m. Next slide: Charles was in the house for 12 minutes before Lori left in his rental car. Lori and Alex waited 47 minutes after she left the house before calling 911. CPR was not performed on Charles. They wait for Charles to be dead to stage the scene. Lori and Alex talk twice during those 47 minutes.

1:54 p.m. “The defendant wanted her husband killed so bad that she’s willing to let her brother bring over a loaded gun with an unlocked gun case in a house with a 7-year-old autistic child,” Treena says.

1:53 p.m. Treena shows another slide laying out the timeline of events in March 2019, when Charles was no longer Charles and was an evil spirit, up through June and then into July.

1:51 p.m. Treena reminds the jury that Lori was laughing about the neighbors and was acting calm, nonchalant when she got back to the house after Charles was shot. Treena shows a slide that says a conspiracy may be inferred from circumstances showing a common criminal objective.

1:50 p.m. Treena says unlike Nephi, where the murder was justified, “Here, ladies and gentlemen, this murder was not justified.”

1:47 p.m. Treena displays a slide that shows what conspiracy is. A defendant agrees with one or more persons that one of them will engage in certain conduct, and the defendant intends to promote or assist in commission of conduct and would constitute the crime of first-degree murder.

1:46 p.m. While he was on his back, Charles was shot a second time by Alex, Treena says. This defendant and her brother murdered, executed her husband, Treena says. Words and physical evidence all tell you what happened that morning.

1:45 p.m. “When Charles was shot the first time, he did not fall straight back.” Treena says there were no abrasions on the back of his head, but there were abrasions on his knees.

1:44 p.m. Treena shows a photo of Charles lying on the floor with the phrase “Charles was laying on the floor when he was shot the second time.” We see another slide showing a shored wound to Charles Vallow’s left shoulder.

1:43 p.m. Alex fired two shots – and Treena shows the bullet in the floor and the bullet in the wall baseboard.

1:41 p.m. Treena says Alex brought a gun to his sister’s house and then waited for her husband to arrive. “What we see is a very planned out premeditated murder.” Treena shows signs of premeditation on the slide.

1:39 p.m. Treena shows a clip of Adam explaining who Nephi is. A prophet in the Book of Mormon – humble and faithful servant of the Lord who “ended up going to Jerusalem to get these plates back. He was run off, came back and then went back again because the Lord asked him too. When he did, King Laban, who was actually a wicked king, was laying on the ground drunk in front of him and Nephi was told to kill Laban…The spirit, or God, told Nephi to kill him.”

1:35 p.m. Treena shows texts from July 9 with Lori talking with Alex, Summer, and Melani about the plan and mission. More texts on July 10 with Melani wanting to go to a wedding, but Lori says she can’t – it’s more important for her to stay. “Lori gets everyone lined up to help her,” Treena says, referencing more texts on July 9.

1:34 p.m. Treena displays a slide with Christina on the slide and premeditation. Alex said he “just wanted to kill Charles to Lori Vallow” and Lori said she was drugging her husband with her son’s medication.

1:32 p.m. Treena explains what premeditation is – the defendant intended to kill another human being or knew she or a co-conspirator would kill another human being, and that after forming that intent or knowledge, reflected on the decision before killing.

1:31 p.m. Treena talks about the lack of words from Lori after Charles was killed shows she was well aware what was going on. Treena mentions her words to Chad – that Charles changed his life insurance policy. Motive was money and Chad.

1:30 p.m. Words, actions and motives need to be considered, Treena says.

1:28 p.m. There is no resonable doubt as to this defendant’s guilt, Treena says. She shows a slide that says conspiracy to commit first degree murder. First degree murder: 1. caused the death of another person and 2. intended or knew that she or coconspirator would cause the death of another person and 3. acted with premeditation.

1:27 p.m. Treena explains what Burden of Proof means. Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is proof that leaves you firmly convinced of the defendant’s guilt. It is not proof beyond all doubt or all possible doubt.

1:26 p.m. Treena gives an analogy. You’re on a beach and you close your eyes. When you open them, you see fresh footprints. Someone comes by and says, “Did somebody walk by here?” You say, “They must have gone that way based on the footprints.”

1:25 p.m. Treena explains the difference between direct and circumstantial evidence. “Direct is testimony of a witness who saw, heard or otherwise sensed an event. Circumstantial is proof of a fact or facts from which you may find another fact. The law makes no distinction between direct and circumstantial evidence.”

1:24 p.m. Christina testified a progression of Lori’s beliefs becoming more deviated from the LDS religion. She was beginning to go through translation, knew all the women from prior lives and did not need to repent.

1:23 p.m. Treena reminds the jury about Christina Atwood’s testimony. Christina said on multiple occasions, Lori said that Charles was possessed.

1:21 p.m. Lori told “lots of people” that her husband is possessed of an evil spirit named Ned and like Nephi, she can get rid of him, Treena says. She plays another clip of Sarena Sharp saying Lori told her Charles was no longer Charles. Lori used the term “zombie.”

1:19 p.m. Treena plays a clip of Sarena testifying about Lori not needing to repent and her changing physically and spiritually. Another clip of Charles being possessed by an evil spirit called Ned.

1:17 p.m. In 2018, Lori told Adam she was turning into a celestial state. Lori told Adam she did not need to eat and that she had more priesthood authority than the priesthood. Treena plays a clip from Adam’s testimony.

1:15 p.m. Treena shows another slide showing multiple text messages between Chad and Lori. We see the marriage certificate from Sweet Hawaii Wedding between Lori and Chad. Now we see a slide about the “twisted religious beliefs justifying killing Charles.” She did not need to repent, she was in a celestial state, she was above the priesthood, she knew about others who were dark or zombies, she was like Nephi – justified to kill Charles.

1:14 p.m. Treena mentions the fake email account set up pretending to be a woman named Karen Walker asking Chad to come to Arizona to help Charles write a book. Charles found these emails and confronted Chad and Lori about the affair.

1:13 p.m. We are about to start video from the courtroom here.

1:12 p.m. Treena displays a screen that says “Affair with Chad Daybell.” Sarena testified about this and messages from the iCloud show flight screenshots of visits, text messages, and their marriage on Nov. 5, 2019.

1:11 p.m. Lori knew before she went to Social Security how much money she would get after Charles died. “I will still get the $4,000 a month from SS,” she wrote in a text message to Chad. On July 28, Lori continues to be angry about Charles changing the policy, Treena says. That’s when Lori texted Kay about it.

1:10 p.m. Treena displays a slide that says “Lori Vallow’s words show the motive of money” and it’s the texts between Lori and Chad where Chad wonders if the life insurance changed “after he got two bullets to the chest.”

1:09 p.m. “Even in the smallest of things, this defendant exaggerates, minimizes and is untruthful,” Treena Kay says. “Charles Vallow was not accidentally shot. Her brother intentionally shot him. There was no accident about that when you shoot someone twice.”

1:08 p.m. Treena talks about money being the motive. She plays Lori’s call to the insurance company inquiring about the $1 million. She told Robin Smith Scott that Charles had been accidentally shot.

1:07 p.m. The night of July 11, Lori and Chad talk multiple times. Treena says the motives in the case are money, Chad Daybell and religious beliefs (twisted to justify murder).

1:05 p.m. Lori has Charles’ phone the entire afternoon of July 11. She calls Chad, Alex takes photos of the phone and Lori calls the mortuary. None of Charles’ family knows he’s dead at this point. Lori, Alex and Tylee return to the home at 3:11 p.m. That’s when she gives the phone to police.

1:04 p.m. Alex calls Lori at 7:52 a.m. Then he calls her again at 8:06 a.m. Alex calls 911 at 8:36 a.m. Police were advised the shooting just occurred. Police and fire were told CPR was given. Lori returns to house at 8:48 a.m. Lori is interviewed at Family Advocacy Center at 9:40 a.m.

1:03 p.m. An incoming message from Adam to Charles at 7:37 came in. It was not read until 12:13. Charles puts JJ in his rental car. Lori takes Charles’ phone and won’t give it back. Alex shoots and kills Charles. Lori leaves in Charles’ rental car with his phone and wallet.

1:02 p.m. On July 11, Chad “Bubby” texts Lori at 6:06 a.m. They text back and forth. Charles arrives at the house at 7:35 a.m. Adam warned Charles, “They are planning something.” Last outgoing message from Charles was at 7:37 a.m.

1 p.m. Adam called Alex at 3:22 p.m. Adam texted. No response. Summer messaged Lori that Adam and Zac are going ot a movie. As the night goes on, Adam texts Alex. No response. Lori tells Melani B. at 7:18 p.m. that Alex is at her house. He brings a garbage bag with some clothes and an orange duffle bag with his .45 caliber handgun and gun case. Summer messages Lori that night that she asked Zac and Adam to stay at her house, but Zac was going to Mimi’s and Adam was waiting for Alex to text him back.

12:58 p.m. Alex calls Lori and they talk for 56 minutes on July 9. The next day, Chad called Lori and they talk for 149 minutes. Lori is also texting Melani about the “mission” and to distract Brandon by faking sick. Adam arrives in Phoenix at 12:20 p.m. Sumer messages Lori that Adam and Zac are on teh way from Sky Harbor at 2:38 p.m. Chad calls Lori at 3:06 p.m. and they talk for 30 minutes.

12:57 p.m. 7:22 p.m. on July 9: Lori texts Melani B. “U can’t go tomorrow. It’s coming to a head. This week will change everything. Call me.” Lori also texts Alex. “So the plot thickens. Call me when u can. Getting sleepy…I need to come get the stuff at your house tomorrow. Lots to do. Thank you for standing by me. It’s all coming to a head this week. I will be like Nephi I am told! And so will you.”

12:55 p.m. Treena puts a timeline on the screen to detail the “premeditated execution of Charles Vallow.” June 29 and 30 – Charles learned Lori is having an affair with Chad Daybell. Charles emails Chad about the affair. Charles emails Tammy about the affair. Charles tells Adam about the affair. On July 9, Charles texts Adam he booked him a flight to Phoenix. Adam called Alex about staying with him. Chad and Lori talk three times.

12:54 p.m. Treena tells the jury that anything Lori said during her opening statement was not presented as evidence during the trial.

12:53 p.m. Treena says Lori and Alex used a “twisted religious belief” to get the $1 million life insurance so they could be like Nephi. “Evidence presented at this trial has proved to you beyond a reasonable doubt that this defendant is guilty of conspiracy to commit first degree murder.”

12:52 p.m. Treena reminds jury of Nancy Jo Hancock’s testimony. Nancy Jo went on a date with Charles the night before he was killed. “Charles told her all about Lori. The things she was saying, the things she was doing. She told Charles the night before that he should probably tell Lori that you changed the benficiary.”

12:50 p.m. Treena says Lori’s plan to kill Charles wasn’t just known by her, Chad and Alex. “It was also known by her brother, Adam.” Adam and Charles had planned an intervention for Lori. When Adam learned Charles had been shot and killed by Alex, Adam told his mom, “Lori and Alex conspired to kill Charles.” Treena: “He knew. He was right.”

12:48 p.m. Treena Kay approaches the lectern and stands directly in front of the jury. “July 18 of 2019, just seven days after this defendant and her co-conspirator shot and killed Charles Vallow, the defendant texted Chad Daybell.” Her words tell us she was involved in this killing, Treena say. Motives were Chad and money. “I just got the letter from the insurance company saying I am not the beneficiary. It’s a spear through my heart. Who do you think he changed it to?”

12:46 p.m. Judge is on the bench. He mentions Lori’s request to have an exhibit admitted for appeal purposes only. It won’t go back to the jury during deliberations. Judge asks for jury.

12:45 p.m. Back in the courtroom. Lori is at the defense table chatting with her investigator and drinking from a bottle of water. Treena Kay, her paralegal and Det. Nathan Duncan are at the prosecutor table. Colby Ryan and his wife Kelsee at in the courtroom sitting next to Kay Woodcock.

READ LIVE UPDATES WATCH TRIAL HERE
 
Last edited:
So they seem to running about on time for when it was said. About 15 minutes from now. I want to HEAR closings so glad I shook myself awake.
 
You know, I don't know that I agree with some of our laws and case law. Lori and Chad as we all know were killing people as part of a bigger plan and I don't know that I agree with these things not coming in. Imo Lori in her closing used this all, knowing these things were NOT shared and could not be. She used the system.

I still think it will all come back guilty but I didn't like that she could play this as one incident whatsoever and play the system against itself.

Now if someone robbed a gas station at 20 and then 30 years later killed a family member, of course they don't necessarily relate but in this case ALL these murders do.

I thought Treena got good at the end of her first and was very good in her rebuttal.

I don't like though that Lori could use the holes in the law and their made up story. And yeah, we come back to Chandler not getting right on the ball.

I fell asleep for some minutes of it but went back and watched what I missed. About 10 minutes or so maybe.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,075
Messages
254,941
Members
1,014
Latest member
SaraPlum
Back
Top Bottom