PAUL & MAGGIE MURDAUGH: South Carolina vs. Alex Murdaugh for Double Homicide of wife & son *GUILTY*

1623728103817.png
This case is being kept pretty quiet, no major details released to speak of (other than it does say there were two different guns used), but no info regarding who found them, who called 911, very little else.

Of interest, the grandfather died just a few days after these murders and it sounds as if he was ill from various articles so probably not unexpected. I think of the typical motives, did grandpa have a big estate? How big in the overall family of grandpa's on down? They sound like a pretty well known family and a powerful one in their state, more on that in the article.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
This got turned over this month? This long after the murders?
Yeah, that's odd or seems to be doesn't it...? Maybe the PI had to be sure to clear it with her client and ensure all was ethical, above board, etc. to share it...?

Why did is it only in the days before? I guess maybe they decided to surveil only up to a certain date? But if you already had a camera in place, why not leave it...? As you never know what you may catch...
 
Yeah, that's odd or seems to be doesn't it...? Maybe the PI had to be sure to clear it with her client and ensure all was ethical, above board, etc. to share it...?

Why did is it only in the days before? I guess maybe they decided to surveil only up to a certain date? But if you already had a camera in place, why not leave it...? As you never know what you may catch...
there might have been a date the surveillance had to end per warrant for it. A lot of times there is a specific time frame it is listed for.
 
there might have been a date the surveillance had to end per warrant for it. A lot of times there is a specific time frame it is listed for.
If the PI was under any warrant at all. Here in our state they wouldn't need a warrant, so long as the camera wasn't on their private property. Like on a tree by the roadside, near driveway, etc.
 
If the PI was under any warrant at all. Here in our state they wouldn't need a warrant, so long as the camera wasn't on their private property. Like on a tree by the roadside, near driveway, etc.
The PI also could have just decided he was done surveilling and it just happened to be prior to this even when he decided to pull it. That would all depend on his contract with the people that hired him. A lot of time those too have time constraints for multiple reasons, usually $$, but could also be prior commitments.
 
The PI also could have just decided he was done surveilling and it just happened to be prior to this even when he decided to pull it. That would all depend on his contract with the people that hired him. A lot of time those too have time constraints for multiple reasons, usually $$, but could also be prior commitments.
Yeah it could have been a lot of things. They could have had word Paul would be at Moselle on those dates, they could have just tried to pick a best couple of day window, etc. They could have pulled the camera for use somewhere else or maybe it even quit working. I do doubt there was a warrant. PIs work without knowledge by anyone when they can although sometimes they will let LE know they are working in an area just so cops don't respond to reports of an odd guy or car sitting somewhere half hidden lol.

I've actually worked for several and our guys at my one job got licensed and did the class too and I've even done just a bit of it myself...
 
Yeah it could have been a lot of things. They could have had word Paul would be at Moselle on those dates, they could have just tried to pick a best couple of day window, etc. They could have pulled the camera for use somewhere else or maybe it even quit working. I do doubt there was a warrant. PIs work without knowledge by anyone when they can although sometimes they will let LE know they are working in an area just so cops don't respond to reports of an odd guy or car sitting somewhere half hidden lol.

I've actually worked for several and our guys at my one job got licensed and did the class too and I've even done just a bit of it myself...
I had overlooked at the time it was a PI that did it, but yes, a lot of the times it has a window.
 
I had overlooked at the time it was a PI that did it, but yes, a lot of the times it has a window.
Our guys used to do a lot of work comp surveillance. You know, they take a day or two here or a few hours trying to catch the person working, moving furniture, cutting wood, anything they are limited from doing or advised not to do. My one on occasion would even sit in a tree with a camera with a good zoom lens etc.

The rural kind of redneck types can be tough as they often live somewhere private, treed, rural, dirt road, dead end, etc. And they ALL know the vehicles from their not that populated area so anyone new or a different vehicle sticks out like a sore thumb...

One time the same guy was following someone at a fair distance to not alert and after awhile he lost him and the next thing he knew there in his rearview was the guy on his bumper following him and NOT A HAPPY camper... It got a bit dangerous and hairy...

I have a few other stories lol but don't want to go too O/T.
 
Lawyers for the estate of Mallory Beach say that a video camera in place to gather evidence for a civil lawsuit may have captured evidence directly related to the homicides of Maggie and Paul Murdaugh, according to court documents.

Videos taken by a private investigator as part of a civil lawsuit over the death of Murdaugh family friend Mallory Beach are now in the hands of the State Law Enforcement Division that is investigating the homicides ,

When contacted for comment, both SLED and the AG’s Office said they could not comment, confirm or deny details of an open investigation. When contacted by The Hampton County Guardian for comment, Capelli said that she could not comment until the video evidence is turned over to the court.

 
I'm probably way off but I'm actually wondering if the delay in this camera footage was because of not knowing if all in LE or the justice system there can be trusted.... I mean if one thinks about it, it was another case where there was no trust of Murdaughs for which the camera was placed to catch a/the Murdaughs doing something wrong, probably Paul drinking or some such... Why would they trust handing over the footage before ensuring it goes into the right hands, perhaps is documented and published in the papers...

Just a thought... I don't think it is too farfetched in this case...
 
From the article in post #328:

SLED now has copies of previously unknown video footage taken of the entrance to the Murdaugh family's Colleton County property, They were killed in June. This is now something like 9, 10 months later... Closing in on a year...
 
I'm probably way off but I'm actually wondering if the delay in this camera footage was because of not knowing if all in LE or the justice system there can be trusted.... I mean if one thinks about it, it was another case where there was no trust of Murdaughs for which the camera was placed to catch a/the Murdaughs doing something wrong, probably Paul drinking or some such... Why would they trust handing over the footage before ensuring it goes into the right hands, perhaps is documented and published in the papers...

Just a thought... I don't think it is too farfetched in this case...
I have to agree that could be a possibility
 
I have to agree that could be a possibility
Yeah, I know you wondered too why so long and I thought and it still might be clearing it with their client, maybe lawyers, etc. as its purpose was for another case and probably without a warrant but it definitely could be not wanting the footage to "disappear" or be known until this evolved to see if Murdaugh would face any justice as usually the family seems to just walk/skate away....
 
This guy has done several on Murdaugh. I was sharing them and forget how far I was in posting them. This one though I don't think I had. Stop it at 3:08 in and read the article on the screen. Even in the 1950s what they were getting away with even during charges and with government involved is notable in my opinion. Good video. He is easy to listen to and to follow.

 
Alec and Boulware owned several properties together including small islands only accessible by boat... We know about Moselle and the history too of Boulware, Murdaugh and some drug smuggling suspicions and history going back generations but it just never ends... The depth...
 

Richland Co. Makes Stunning Reversal On Release Of Murdaugh Jail Calls.​

Murdaugh’s attorney’s plan to intimidate the government seems to be working … for now.

Just over a week ago, Richland County’s Ombudsman Office — the office that handles Freedom of Information requests for Richland County Detention Center — alerted FITSNews that one of our FOIAs for Alex Murdaugh’s jail calls was ready. They just needed a mailing address.

We provided that within four minutes of their request on April 6. On Thursday afternoon, FITSNews received another notice from this same office that basically said, “Actually, we’ve changed our minds … because of that motion for a preliminary injunction.”

But those jail calls sure are subject to FOIA …​

Federal case law also seems to favor releasing the calls …​

Richland County also favors the release of the calls …​


I certainly understand why Harpootlian and Griffin would want to keep this information under wraps ahead of the one, two, three, four, five … etc. … trials they might need to prepare for.

But we obviously — and strongly — disagree with the county’s decision. As we speak, we are exploring our legal options in response.

 
If the normal way and precedent is to release these records on a FOIA and we ALL know jail phone calls are NOT private and Attorney Alex Murdaugh certainly knew it then WHAT are they doing folding to the threats? Or protecting one of the corrupt in this case of many corrupt yet again...?
 
More Questions about wrongdoing:

In December 2011, two months after the Hakeem Pinckney was taken off of life support , the settlement fund earmarked for his mother paid PMPED more than $35,000 in three separate installments of precise amounts – $12,305.34, $12,310.26 and $10,785.02. A fourth disbursement, was $150,000.

On the same day, Moss, Kuhn and Fleming was paid a total of more than $675,000 from the settlement fund – in addition to the monies disbursed to PMPED and to Murdaugh. Palmetto State Bank was also paid nearly $34,000 from the fund.

More than six years later, in 2017, the fund paid Alex Murdaugh the oddly specific amount of $4,560 – leaving a balance of just over $89,000 in the settlement account. That is the money Murdaugh is accused of embezzling from his former law partners after the firm was paid in May 2017 – depleting the fund.

The extent of the criminal exposure facing the Moss Kuhn law firm (beyond the Fleming indictments, anyway) is not immediately clear, but its founding partner took out a bizarre loan within the last few months on his home Beaufort, S.C.
According to documents obtained by this news outlet, the loan taken out by James H. Moss against his $2.3 million home at 604 Pinckney Street in Beaufort, S.C. is for $1.2 million – with a payoff date of (get this) August 28, 2090.
Moss is 81 years old. He would be just three days shy of his 150th birthday when his loan comes due.
“Why in the world would a successful lawyer at the end of his career need to borrow $1.2 million?” one source wondered.

 

This is the biggest corruption case in South Carolina history …​

The Murdaugh family’s long-standing and quite-real influence over judges, juries, banks, politicians and law enforcement officers in this state make transparency absolutely critical as we navigate uncharted terrain in untangling this complex case.
We don’t know the full scope of alleged crimes.
We don’t know the full list of alleged co-conspirators.
From what FITSNews has repeatedly been told, a lot of people will likely go down with Murdaugh.
If something can be released in accordance with FOIA in this case, then it should be released.
Plain and simple.
We are not talking about a man who is in jail on a simple assault charge trying to talk to his mom.
We’re talking about Richard Alexander Murdaugh, the load-bearing wall in what is shaping up to be the biggest crime and corruption case in the history of South Carolina.
Murdaugh … who has a reputation of being able to “get out of” anything he gets into.
Murdaugh … who is known for exploiting all systems in his and his family’s favor.
Murdaugh … the guy who was already under investigation for obstruction of justice at the time of his wife’s and son’s murders.
Murdaugh … who remains the only publicly named person of interest in those murders, which have yet to produce an arrest.
FOIA exists to protect the public from secret government activity.
And this is why it is in the public’s BEST INTEREST for sunlight to shine on this case from all available angles.
Because, guess what, the county’s sudden change of heart seems to be proof that games are being played. (More proof of games here.)
Though the county has known about the lawsuit for more than a month, they cite the March 1 motion as a reason for their decision to withhold the recordings.
In its letter to FITSNews, the county claims that releasing the recordings would likely open them up to “numerous forms of liability.”
Bender disagrees.
“There’s no liability on the part of the government for releasing it,” he said Thursday night. “I think the federal lawsuit has accomplished what Murdaugh’s lawyers set out to accomplish and that is to intimidate the government to stop it from providing public access to public records.”

 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,117
Members
971
Latest member
Legalamericaneagle
Back
Top Bottom