PAUL & MAGGIE MURDAUGH: South Carolina vs. Alex Murdaugh for Double Homicide of wife & son *GUILTY*

1623728103817.png
This case is being kept pretty quiet, no major details released to speak of (other than it does say there were two different guns used), but no info regarding who found them, who called 911, very little else.

Of interest, the grandfather died just a few days after these murders and it sounds as if he was ill from various articles so probably not unexpected. I think of the typical motives, did grandpa have a big estate? How big in the overall family of grandpa's on down? They sound like a pretty well known family and a powerful one in their state, more on that in the article.


 
Last edited by a moderator:
That is not calling him a murderer.
I dont think I said they called him a murderer did I ? I was using the "alleged" and the "accused" adjective as an example. Court TV could have added "alleged" or "accused" but they didn't- what they said they stated as fact. They could have said "allegedly" lied about his relationship with Maggie and Paul but they didn't. I don't remember him saying this in his testimony but could have missed it.
 
They were treating him with kid gloves. They HaVE proved he used his shots alliances with LE to his advantage. I'm just disappointed that they haven't connected all that together to make sure the jury understands that.

They also got him to admit how easily he got agitated while in the depths of his addiction.
Sorry I don't understand what you mean by " shots alliances with LE to his advantage".
 
There are no legal grounds for him to sue because Alex admitted in court that he is a liar and lies by omission. In the particular stream cuz was watching the commentators tend to make statements to draw in the public to their viewership. This is why I watch the trial to form my own opinion without bias.

Alex Murdaugh is not getting out of jail, ever, if he's found not guilty or there's a hung jury in the murder case. There are a LOT of additional lawsuits regarding his financial crimes that he's already admitted to.
I guess that being branded a liar is better than being a convicted murderer. Regarding the financial crimes, his banker is still out of jail so far, despite being convicted. Are they being prosecuted separately do you know?
 
I found this article from January that discusses his financial crimes - (supposedly the motive for the murders). The attachment would not load for me as it is based on geo location, but it is supposed to be details of his indictments/charges.

 
Ah that makes sense then. Mind you, all lawyers use alliances with LE to their advantage, don't they?
he purposefully displayed his deputy badge in a very visible location whenever he was interacting with them. It was obvious that he was doing it, yet he says it was "accidental" that he had it displayed with the visible part hanging out of his pocket. It was far from accidental the way it was hanging. He always "accidentally" had it in visible places on other occasions, yet conceded that he did use it to his advantage in some conditions...but supposedly not these particular incidences. Yeah, right. The way they are designed, it is not accidental to have it showing if you are placing it IN your pocket.
 
Has he been criminally charged with the financial crimes? I am not up to speed on that. I believe the banker is doing time but not sure exactly what financial stuff he or AM has been charged with. The banker was on the witness list but I don't think he has been called.

ETA he has been convicted on 6 counts and is out on bail awaiting sentence I just reminded myself. I read this a few days ago and meant to post it on here.

I notice only "a banker" is mentioned in the headlines rather than the banker's name yet AM's name is mentioned in the headlines.
Yes, Alex Murdaugh has been criminally charged for his financial crimes.

 
I guess that being branded a liar is better than being a convicted murderer. Regarding the financial crimes, his banker is still out of jail so far, despite being convicted. Are they being prosecuted separately do you know?
Absolutely! From watching him testify his demeanor about financial misdeeds appears easier for him to admit guilt. Maybe in his mind those are easier to forgive than murder.
 
I read along a lot. I just saw this.


IMO, that is salacious. Judge Newman gives lots of breaks for the jury and if at any time they appear uncomfortable he gives them a break.

After listening to the entire trial, I don't doubt some are upset and/or emotional. The brutality of the murders was shown in autopsy photos to the jury only and I'm glad they are under seal.

This jury is being tasked with a complex case with very limited physical evidence. Whatever decision they come up with won't be easy.
 
he purposefully displayed his deputy badge in a very visible location whenever he was interacting with them. It was obvious that he was doing it, yet he says it was "accidental" that he had it displayed with the visible part hanging out of his pocket. It was far from accidental the way it was hanging. He always "accidentally" had it in visible places on other occasions, yet conceded that he did use it to his advantage in some conditions...but supposedly not these particular incidences. Yeah, right. The way they are designed, it is not accidental to have it showing if you are placing it IN your pocket.
What's the point of having a badge if he doesn't show it ? Aren't lawyers all a part of the whole Law Enforcement umbrella? At police stations in the UK there is always a duty solicitor available. So police and solicitors (lawyers) have to work side by side in many situations.
 
What's the point of having a badge if he doesn't show it ? Aren't lawyers all a part of the whole Law Enforcement umbrella? At police stations in the UK there is always a duty solicitor available. So police and solicitors (lawyers) have to work side by side in many situations.
He admitted on the stand to showing his solicitor badge for special privileges.

In the US lawyers are NOT under the law enforcement umbrella.
 
Absolutely! From watching him testify his demeanor about financial misdeeds appears easier for him to admit guilt. Maybe in his mind those are easier to forgive than murder.
I don't see how killing his wife and youngest son would solve these financial problems. Could someone elaborate how that would work? He is still going to have those 99 charges and 15 indictments, isn't he, so how will they go away?
 
IMO, that is salacious. Judge Newman gives lots of breaks for the jury and if at any time they appear uncomfortable he gives them a break.

After listening to the entire trial, I don't doubt some are upset and/or emotional. The brutality of the murders was shown in autopsy photos to the jury only and I'm glad they are under seal.

This jury is being tasked with a complex case with very limited physical evidence. Whatever decision they come up with won't be easy.
From what I have watched, I do really like this judge. He's not dramatic and seems very fair in applying actual law
 
What's the point of having a badge if he doesn't show it ? Aren't lawyers all a part of the whole Law Enforcement umbrella? At police stations in the UK there is always a duty solicitor available. So police and solicitors (lawyers) have to work side by side in many situations.
You are not to use it for special privileges as he was doing, even though they do and he admitted to doing so. He just won't admit to doing so for this particular time and when he went to the hospital after Paul's wreck.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,092
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom