AHMAUD ARBERY: Georgia vs Greg & Travis McMichael & William Bryan for murder *GUILTY*


1588813454918.png 1588813480378.png
Mother seeks justice after son shot while jogging in Brunswick, pair involved in killing not arrested

It’s been over two months since a young black man jogging in Brunswick, Ga., was gunned down by two white men who said they thought he was a possible burglar.

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother wants to know where is the justice.

“I just think about how they could allow these two men to kill my son and not be arrested, that’s what I can’t understand,” Wanda Cooper told news partner First Coast News.

A police report states about 1 p.m. Sunday, Feb. 23, Glynn County officers responded to Satilla and Holmes drives where shots were fired. They found Arbery, 25, dead on the scene.

Gregory McMichael, who worked several years for the Brunswick Police Department before serving as an investigator in the Brunswick District Attorney’s Office, told police there were several break-ins in the neighborhood. He said he saw Arbery running down Satilla Drive and asked his son Travis McMichael to help him confront him.

McMichael and his son got a shotgun and handgun because they “didn’t know if Arbery was armed or not.”

The father and son got into their truck and drove down Satilla toward Burford Drive. Gregory McMichael stated when they arrived at Holmes Drive, they saw Arbery running down Burford, according to the report.

Gregory McMichael told police they attempted to cut off Arbery and shouted “stop, stop, we want to talk to you.”

McMichael pulled up next to Arbery, and Travis McMichael got out of the truck with the shotgun. According to statements, that’s when the father said Arbery attacked his son and the two men started fighting over the shotgun. Travis McMichael fired a shot and then a second shot.




After video appears to show black jogger gunned down by 2 white men in coastal Georgia, family demands arrests

The fatal shooting of a black man — apparently recorded on video in February and posted online Tuesday by a local radio station host — will go to a grand jury in coastal Georgia, according to a district attorney.

Elements of the disturbing video are consistent with a description of the shooting given to police by one of those involved in the incident.

Ahmaud Arbery, 25, was jogging in a neighborhood outside Brunswick on February 23 when a former police officer and his son chased him down, authorities said. According to a Glynn County Police report, Gregory McMichael later told officers that he thought Arbery looked like a person suspected in a series of recent break-ins in the area.

After they chased down Arbery, McMichael told police, Arbery and McMichael’s son Travis struggled over his son’s shotgun. McMichael said two shots were fired before Arbery fell to the street, the report said.


S. Lee Merritt, an attorney for the Arbery family, said in a statement that the two men involved in the chase “must be taken into custody pending their indictment.”

Gov. Brian Kemp said the Georgia Bureau of Investigation has offered resources to Durden for his investigation. “Georgians deserve answers,” Kemp tweeted.

Kemp also retweeted the GBI’s post that Durden “formally requested the GBI to investigate the death of Ahmaud Arbery.”
 

Attachments

  • 1588813857428.png
    1588813857428.png
    101.5 KB · Views: 2
I love the not guilty verdicts handed out on some things. I think this proves they considered all charges carefully. I can see where the not guilty verdicts can make sense. Overall, they are all going to get SERIOUS jail time.

(y)
I agree. And I truly think most people take jury duty very seriously.

Bryan while cornering Arbery likely had no idea nor way of knowing Arbery would end up dead. I think the calls for watching the videos, etc. were to determine the two murder charges with Greg McMichael most likely and they only found him guilty of felony murder and not malice murder. Travis was the one with the gun and he shot more than once, etc...

I am going to wait to hear discussion on it but as of now am not sure I agree but I certainly can understand it and don't have a problem with their verdict. They all considered it and were at the trial and I was not.

They did a great job imo.
 
The judge said he'd meet with the jury in a bit. Based on the trial I served on he's going to thank them personally for their service. They may get a certificate officially thanking them. The judge will also tell them what happened when they had been asked to leave the courtroom on a lot of things. The trial I sat on was much shorter so he may not, but I think he'll go over the major things. He may tell them about the alleged Effing N comment that wasn't allowed in.
 
I just only realized they did find Bryan guilty of felony murder, just not the first two counts. I have no questions now--I mistakenly thought they did not convict him of any murder charge.

I already thought the jury did a standout job and now even more so. They very well considered each charge and what it required it appears.
 
The judge said he'd meet with the jury in a bit. Based on the trial I served on he's going to thank them personally for their service. They may get a certificate officially thanking them. The judge will also tell them what happened when they had been asked to leave the courtroom on a lot of things. The trial I sat on was much shorter so he may not, but I think he'll go over the major things. He may tell them about the alleged Effing N comment that wasn't allowed in.
He will also tell them whether they can now talk, etc. I imagine.
 
I agree. And I truly think most people take jury duty very seriously.

Bryan while cornering Arbery likely had no idea nor way of knowing Arbery would end up dead. I think the calls for watching the videos, etc. were to determine the two murder charges with Greg McMichael most likely and they only found him guilty of felony murder and not malice murder. Travis was the one with the gun and he shot more than once, etc...

I am going to wait to hear discussion on it but as of now am not sure I agree but I certainly can understand it and don't have a problem with their verdict. They all considered it and were at the trial and I was not.

They did a great job imo.

The people on the jury I served on did. We had been specifically instructed to not consider penalties for the defendants in our instructions. There was one guy who proposed a way to rule and he used the penalties as a reason as for why on each one. I said: "We can't consider penalties in the deliberations." and he went off on me. I just listened to his :poop: and then said: "Nothing changes the fact that we can't consider penalties in deliberations." He let it go at that point. Later on he made the exact same argument using the exact same reasons and a woman on our jury said: "But we can't consider penalties in our deliberations!" He didn't go off on her.

We ended up ruling like he suggested, but not for penalty reasons, but because they made sense. Just before we left he made a point of thanking us all for serving with him and he appreciated us all and respected us. He shook all of our hands.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,488
Members
965
Latest member
tanya
Back
Top Bottom