Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Simply put and understated, the verdict is disappointing but unfortunately, not surprising.
For me, Read's guilt was (still is) obvious and the only question for me was whether she remembered what happened (although I'm now convinced she does).
 
Simply put and understated, the verdict is disappointing but unfortunately, not surprising.
For me, Read's guilt was (still is) obvious and the only question for me was whether she remembered what happened (although I'm now convinced she does).
Why did he not have ANY injuries associated with being hit by a car?
 
I don't think he didn't.
How's that though? He had absolutely no lower body injuries. If you think those scratches on his arm were caused by plastic, why was there absolutely no tissue or blood found on any of the taillight pieces?

Where are his injuries caused by being hit and then presumably thrown 30 ft away? There would at least be some kind of major bruising on the impact area. The only bruising was in his head and we know her car didn't levitate over 6 ft in the air.
 
Why do you think that changes so much.
Prejudicial comments. Read will probably sue her. She has just effectively got off the charge. They won't be able to charge her now. She wasn't even accused or charged with murder anyway, but no fault manslaughter, which the jury could not even agree she was guilty of that lower charge.
 
Last edited:
How's that though? He had absolutely no lower body injuries. If you think those scratches on his arm were caused by plastic, why was there absolutely no tissue or blood found on any of the taillight pieces?

Where are his injuries caused by being hit and then presumably thrown 30 ft away? There would at least be some kind of major bruising on the impact area. The only bruising was in his head and we know her car didn't levitate over 6 ft in the air.
I think I saw there was a report that stated he had no injuries below his head except for those arm scratches IIRC. It did describe the head injuries, which could have come from a vehicle if he was passed out on the ground though, I guess.
 
I think I saw there was a report that stated he had no injuries below his head except for those arm scratches IIRC. It did describe the head injuries, which could have come from a vehicle if he was passed out on the ground though, I guess.
Then how did that crack her taillight if he was in the ground? And is he was in the ground, his did they come up with him getting thrown 30 ft?
 
And why would a high ranking officer across the street delete his ring video without handing it over for any reason, let alone an investigation if the possible murder of a fellow officer? That makes absolutely no sense. They would be glad to hand that over whether they thought it held evidence or not on that scenario, not delete it within hours.
 
Then how did that crack her taillight if he was in the ground? And is he was in the ground, his did they come up with him getting thrown 30 ft?
You mean "on" the ground I presume not "in" right? I had not heard the 30ft thing was fact. Wasn't that just based on the alleged 24mph? He had no injuries at all below his neck except for the arm scratches. Being thrown 30 feet would come up with broken bones and he didn't have any. Perhaps his head was run over though.

AFAIK the taillght crack was from her reversing and hitting O'Keefe's vehicle when she returned to scene later.

22nd July is when the court will meet to discuss next steps. They could drop the murder part and just leave the manslaughter in any new charges or try for a plea deal.


"There could be a plea deal. She can also appeal this case in addition to that, showing that there wasn't enough sufficient evidence to convict her so there should not be another trial," Fiandaca said. "And then the DA can decide on the charges and decide to maybe get rid of that second-degree murder charge if they think that was the problem, and that may have been the reason why the jury couldn't come to a decision."
 
Last edited:
You mean on the ground I presume not in fight? I had not heard the 30ft thing was fact. Wasn't that just based on the alleged 24mph? He had no injuries at all below his neck except for the arm scratches. Being thrown 30 feet would come up with broken bones and he didn't have any. Perhaps his head was run over though.

AFAIK the taillght crack was from her reversing and hitting O'Keefe's vehicle when she returned to scene later.

22nd July is when the court will meet to discuss next steps. They could drop the murder part and just leave the manslaughter in any new charges or try for a plea deal.

It came up on testimony from the prosecution expert. He 100% did not fly 30 ft after being hit at 24 mph and not sustain at last a bruise.
 
And why would a high ranking officer across the street delete his ring video without handing it over for any reason, let alone an investigation if the possible murder of a fellow officer? That makes absolutely no sense. They would be glad to hand that over whether they thought it held evidence or not on that scenario, not delete it within hours.
Did anyone ask him that during the trial?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,048
Members
969
Latest member
SamiraMill
Back
Top Bottom