Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Some lawyers have said this on stuff I've watched: The prosecution is making the defense's case for them. I agree. Especially when it comes to Proctors testimony. It'll be interesting to see what the guests say on "Closing Arguments" tonight. Especially about the suicide comment.
 
Proctor had 340 videos, strangely, none of them show the back taillight while being towed to the Sallyport garage. Well, none of them he released.
 
It's so easy to mistype 4:16 when you meant 5:30.

simon cowell facepalm GIF
Plus when your excuse is "using a template" it doesn't change each entry.
 
And they both had each others phone numbers on their phones.
That "might" have happened later. We don't know. I have many contacts in my phone for work of people I'll*probably* never have another interaction with but keep them in because there is a chance I will and then I know who it is when they call.

My question would be how far back does their interaction go. If before, then yes, they were probably friends.
 
Am I wrong, or did Buhkenic acknowledge that the video was inverted and Proctor said it wasn't?

If so, why didn’t the defense point that out?

Is Proctor subject to recall?
 
Am I wrong, or did Buhkenic acknowledge that the video was inverted and Proctor said it wasn't?

If so, why didn’t the defense point that out?

Is Proctor subject to recall?
Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.

Proctor said the video he saw 'recently' was accurate and wasn't mirrored. However he also said the time stamp at the bottom was in yellow. The video admitted into evidence was a blue time stamp. Also, this video was supplied by Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty.
 
Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.

Proctor said the video he saw 'recently' was accurate and wasn't mirrored. However he also said the time stamp at the bottom was in yellow. The video admitted into evidence was a blue time stamp. Also, this video was supplied by Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty.
"Recently" as in probably the last few weeks when he was supposed to not be watching anything to do with the trial since he is a witness being called to testify.
 
Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.

Proctor said the video he saw 'recently' was accurate and wasn't mirrored. However he also said the time stamp at the bottom was in yellow. The video admitted into evidence was a blue time stamp. Also, this video was supplied by Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty.

Still, the defense should have questioned that.

Perhaps they'll call him back.
 

By Matt Fortin and Glenn Jones • Published 27 mins ago • Updated 27 mins ago​


The unprofessional conduct Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor has admitted to on the stand in the Karen Read murder trial is now set to impact another high-profile homicide case he's connected to.

The attorney representing Brian Walshe — the Cohasset man accused of killing his wife, Ana, in early 2023 — has told NBC10 Boston he plans to file a motion over possible questionable conduct that names Proctor.

Proctor has been on the stand testifying in the Read trial this week. He is the case officer, the same role he had in the Walshe murder investigation. Proctor has been accused by Read's defense team of playing a part in an intricate frame job — a claim vehemently denied by Proctor and state prosecutors.

Proctor did testify to making several insulting comments about Read in text messages during the early days of the investigation into John O'Keefe's death — comments that included remarks about her health condition, and calling her a "c---."

Walshe's defense attorney, Larry Tipton, told NBC10 Boston that he has not yet concluded there is any investigator bias involving his client, but what he’s heard in the Read case has raised his suspicions. His motion will name Proctor, Tipton said, as well as any other investigator implicated in the Read case.

NBC10 Boston has reached out to the Norfolk District Attorney's Office, which is prosecuting both the Read and Walshe cases, for comment. The office has not responded with a comment.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,092
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom