So those witnesses are not part of the voir dire?
Plus when your excuse is "using a template" it doesn't change each entry.It's so easy to mistype 4:16 when you meant 5:30.
That "might" have happened later. We don't know. I have many contacts in my phone for work of people I'll*probably* never have another interaction with but keep them in because there is a chance I will and then I know who it is when they call.And they both had each others phone numbers on their phones.
Maybe not, but I can see her contact info being entered for that purpose.Efferdently, she never ended up baby sitting for them.
There are three witnesses total and two of those are the Federal experts.So those witnesses are not part of the voir dire?
Exactly.Proctor had 340 videos, strangely, none of them show the back taillight while being towed to the Sallyport garage. Well, none of them he released.
Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.Am I wrong, or did Buhkenic acknowledge that the video was inverted and Proctor said it wasn't?
If so, why didn’t the defense point that out?
Is Proctor subject to recall?
"Recently" as in probably the last few weeks when he was supposed to not be watching anything to do with the trial since he is a witness being called to testify.Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.
Proctor said the video he saw 'recently' was accurate and wasn't mirrored. However he also said the time stamp at the bottom was in yellow. The video admitted into evidence was a blue time stamp. Also, this video was supplied by Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty.
Buhkenik testified on direct it was accurate. On cross (the next day) he testified it was mirrored.
Proctor said the video he saw 'recently' was accurate and wasn't mirrored. However he also said the time stamp at the bottom was in yellow. The video admitted into evidence was a blue time stamp. Also, this video was supplied by Canton Police Chief Helena Rafferty.
Did the defense say or do anything about this violation?"Recently" as in probably the last few weeks when he was supposed to not be watching anything to do with the trial since he is a witness being called to testify.
I don't think so... Yet anyway, but I've only been able to glance today. It just came up this afternoon so not really much of a chance yet. I'm betting it's now being investigated though. Possibly even by the FBI.Did the defense say or do anything about this violation?