Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Trooper testifies that data from Karen Read’s SUV was ‘consistent with’ pedestrian strike​

Story by Travis Andersen
• 26m

3:50 p.m. — Judge sends jurors home, keeps Trooper Paul on the stand

Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the weekend shortly before 3:50 p.m.

She said Trooper Joseph Paul would remain on the stand, apparently for voir dire out of the presence of jurors.

3:36 p.m. — Trooper Paul testifies that crash test dummy was fully visible from inside SUV at distance of at least five feet

State Police Trooper Joseph Paul, who is assigned to the agency’s collision analysis and reconstruction section, said there were “no obstructions” between the SUV and the dummy during the testing.

At a distance of at least five feet, Paul said, the dummy was fully visible from his vantage point inside the SUV.

A video clip then played on the monitor of the SUV moving in reverse during the testing. Paul said the Lexus had an antilock brake system. ”It doesn’t leave visible tire marks” in a crash, Paul said. “The tires never fully lock up.”

Antilock brakes also make “no screeching of the tires” in crashes, Paul said.

3:27 p.m — Trooper Paul testifies about cameras ‘working properly’ in Read’s SUV

Joseph Paul said Read’s Lexus SUV also has an overhead camera. As the driver approaches an object, Paul said, a light will flash and the driver will hear a beeping sound.

As the driver gets closer to the object, the beeping gets louder with more frequency, he said.

”Everything seemed to be working properly” in Read’s SUV when he tested it on Feb. 1, 2022, Paul said.

He said a “punching bag dummy” was placed behind Read’s SUV along the “right rear” side during the testing. From inside the vehicle, Paul said, “it would have been visible” on Read’s cameras as the SUV went in reverse.

3:20 p.m. — State Police crash expert testifies O’Keefe appeared to have been hit in ‘sideswipe manner’

State Police Trooper Joseph Paul, who is assigned to the agency’s collision analysis and reconstruction section, said John O’Keefe appeared to have been hit in a “sideswipe manner” and was projected to the left, so the SUV would not have traveled over him.

Paul said a pedestrian’s center mass is along the chest area. On Feb. 1, 2022, he said, he conducted forward and rear acceleration braking tests on the SUV, as well as a check of the Lexus’s cameras to conduct a “visibility analysis.”

He said that analysis was conducted during the daytime hours. Read allegedly struck O’Keefe during the predawn hours under cover of darkness.

”A lot of times when it’s an intentional act visibility is not an issue,” Paul said, explaining why the analysis wasn’t conducted at night. Paul also identified a photo of the SUV’s “infotainment system,” which contains the rearview cameras for drivers when they’re moving in reverse. He also identified the push-button starter in the interior of the Lexus.

3:01 p.m. — Trooper Paul testifies that data set from Read’s SUV is ‘consistent with’ pedestrian strike

Trooper Joseph Paul said he reviewed possible travel routes from 34 Fairview Road to O’Keefe’s home on Meadows Avenue in Canton where Read traveled after dropping him off.

Paul said he labeled the triggering events as A and B, and that A occurred first. He said event A lasted about 10 seconds, with the SUV traveling at 9.9 m.p.h., slowing down and then going back up to around 6 m.p.h. Paul said it appeared the vehicle was “slowing down and making a U-turn” at that point.


He said event B showed the vehicle hitting speeds of 24.2 m.p.h. He said the data indicates the accelerator pedal was pressed down at 74 percent. He said the data shows the vehicle “was in drive” and slowed down to zero m.p.h. and then moved in reverse.

Paul the steering wheel angle “does not change much” during that seconds long interlude. ”It’s still fairly straight” as it moves backward at a top rate at 24.2 m.p.h., Paul said. He said the data set is “consistent with” a pedestrian strike, as the speed of the SUV went from 24.2 mph to 23.6 m.p.h. in less than second. O’Keefe’s injuries, Paul said, were also “consistent with a pedestrian collision.”
 
Trooper Paul also testified that the sideswipe manner caused Mr. O'Keefe to spin around, broken tail light scratched his arm, and he fell and hit his head on the curb?? Did I hear that correctly?
 
View attachment 22232 View attachment 22236

To hopefully put an end to the shoe discussion the picture on the left is the one found at the scene which was presented in court by Trooper Brian Tully.

*(since this thread can sometimes move a bit fast I apologize if some links and/or images have been removed with trying to keep on topic of the case against Karen Read)
It's that not a definite black sole in the one in the snow? That's sure what I see.
 

By Mike Toole, Victoria D, Kristina Rex
Updated on: June 14, 2024 / 3:26 PM EDT / CBS Boston

Google search of how long to die in the cold​

Jessica Hyde, a digital forensics examiner, was the first witness to take the stand Friday. She works for a company in upstate New York called Hexordia, which specializes in digital forensics training.

The video player is currently playing an ad. You can skip the ad in 5 sec with a mouse or keyboard
Hyde was asked by both the prosecution and the defense to look at time stamps and review Google searches made by Jennifer McCabe.

Earlier in the trial, McCabe, who was with Read while they searched for O'Keefe in the snowstorm, was questioned about a Google search she made that morning. She said Read asked her to look up how long it would take someone to die in the cold after they found O'Keefe's body.

The prosecution said the searches were done at 6:23 a.m. and 6:24 a.m. on January 29, 2022. The defense said the time stamp was actually 2:27 a.m., hours before O'Keefe was found.

Hyde told the court Friday that 2:27 a.m. could be the time the search tab was originally opened or moved. She said the last search in McCabe's phone was at 6:24 a.m.

"What's very special to know about this time stamp is that it's not necessarily the time of the search," she told the court. "I don't see evidence that the term was searched prior to that 6:24 time."

During a brief cross examination, Read's attorney David Yannetti asked Hyde if she could rule out that the owner of the phone conducted a Google search at 2:27 a.m. Hyde said she can't "rule out something that doesn't exist," adding it's the same as asking if there was a search for "pandas," which there is no evidence of.

Crash reconstructionist testifies​

After Hyde finished her testimony, Massachusetts State Trooper Joe Paul took the stand.

He is a crash reconstructionist and described how the testing process works. He said two acceleration and deceleration tests were done on Read's SUV. He added there was no airbag deployment data, something Paul said isn't unusual in a pedestrian crash. From data gathered from the SUV, it shows it went in drive, then reverse, at the time the SUV was in front of 34 Fairview Road, according to Paul. During the trigger event taken down by the SUV's Toyota techstreams software, the SUV slowed down to zero and then up to 24.2 miles per hour.

"It starts off in drive, it's slowing down to zero, and it goes to zero, which is neutral, then it goes into reverse," described Paul. "So it's going straight, it stops, then gets placed in reverse and then it goes in reverse." Paul said the SUV was backing up in a straight line and going about 24.2 miles per hour.

"There's a point in there where it appears to be consistent with a pedestrian strike," said Paul, referring to the sudden change of speed. Paul added O'Keefe's injuries were also consistent with a pedestrian strike.
Oooooo! Now I see why they have such with the 24 mph. Most airbags funny deploy until 25 mph! That's at least the number I have seen on all of our vehicles old and new that had airbags.
 

Trooper testifies that data from Karen Read’s SUV was ‘consistent with’ pedestrian strike​

Story by Travis Andersen
• 26m

3:50 p.m. — Judge sends jurors home, keeps Trooper Paul on the stand

Judge Beverly Cannone sent jurors home for the weekend shortly before 3:50 p.m.

She said Trooper Joseph Paul would remain on the stand, apparently for voir dire out of the presence of jurors.

3:36 p.m. — Trooper Paul testifies that crash test dummy was fully visible from inside SUV at distance of at least five feet

State Police Trooper Joseph Paul, who is assigned to the agency’s collision analysis and reconstruction section, said there were “no obstructions” between the SUV and the dummy during the testing.

At a distance of at least five feet, Paul said, the dummy was fully visible from his vantage point inside the SUV.

A video clip then played on the monitor of the SUV moving in reverse during the testing. Paul said the Lexus had an antilock brake system. ”It doesn’t leave visible tire marks” in a crash, Paul said. “The tires never fully lock up.”

Antilock brakes also make “no screeching of the tires” in crashes, Paul said.

3:27 p.m — Trooper Paul testifies about cameras ‘working properly’ in Read’s SUV

Joseph Paul said Read’s Lexus SUV also has an overhead camera. As the driver approaches an object, Paul said, a light will flash and the driver will hear a beeping sound.

As the driver gets closer to the object, the beeping gets louder with more frequency, he said.

”Everything seemed to be working properly” in Read’s SUV when he tested it on Feb. 1, 2022, Paul said.

He said a “punching bag dummy” was placed behind Read’s SUV along the “right rear” side during the testing. From inside the vehicle, Paul said, “it would have been visible” on Read’s cameras as the SUV went in reverse.

3:20 p.m. — State Police crash expert testifies O’Keefe appeared to have been hit in ‘sideswipe manner’

State Police Trooper Joseph Paul, who is assigned to the agency’s collision analysis and reconstruction section, said John O’Keefe appeared to have been hit in a “sideswipe manner” and was projected to the left, so the SUV would not have traveled over him.

Paul said a pedestrian’s center mass is along the chest area. On Feb. 1, 2022, he said, he conducted forward and rear acceleration braking tests on the SUV, as well as a check of the Lexus’s cameras to conduct a “visibility analysis.”

He said that analysis was conducted during the daytime hours. Read allegedly struck O’Keefe during the predawn hours under cover of darkness.

”A lot of times when it’s an intentional act visibility is not an issue,” Paul said, explaining why the analysis wasn’t conducted at night. Paul also identified a photo of the SUV’s “infotainment system,” which contains the rearview cameras for drivers when they’re moving in reverse. He also identified the push-button starter in the interior of the Lexus.

3:01 p.m. — Trooper Paul testifies that data set from Read’s SUV is ‘consistent with’ pedestrian strike

Trooper Joseph Paul said he reviewed possible travel routes from 34 Fairview Road to O’Keefe’s home on Meadows Avenue in Canton where Read traveled after dropping him off.

Paul said he labeled the triggering events as A and B, and that A occurred first. He said event A lasted about 10 seconds, with the SUV traveling at 9.9 m.p.h., slowing down and then going back up to around 6 m.p.h. Paul said it appeared the vehicle was “slowing down and making a U-turn” at that point.


He said event B showed the vehicle hitting speeds of 24.2 m.p.h. He said the data indicates the accelerator pedal was pressed down at 74 percent. He said the data shows the vehicle “was in drive” and slowed down to zero m.p.h. and then moved in reverse.

Paul the steering wheel angle “does not change much” during that seconds long interlude. ”It’s still fairly straight” as it moves backward at a top rate at 24.2 m.p.h., Paul said. He said the data set is “consistent with” a pedestrian strike, as the speed of the SUV went from 24.2 mph to 23.6 m.p.h. in less than second. O’Keefe’s injuries, Paul said, were also “consistent with a pedestrian collision.”
Ok. So their theory is that she hit him, but they have her going straight in reverse. That would mean be was standing on the road at the time. If that's the case, how did all these taillight pieces get 6-8 feet into the yard?
 
Last edited:
VP on "Closing Arguments" tonight is saying that on CourtTV's website where people chat about trials it's usually 90% the defendant is guilty. In this case, he's seeing it is shifting to 90% not guilty in this case.

The 2:27am search is what started this whole frame job thing. So if the jurors believe it was entered at 2:27am she's free. If they believe it was entered at 6amish, it would be bad.

However, VP is saying that even if the jury believes it was searched in the morning, there is more than enough evidence to set her free. The prosecution is not providing evidence that will nail her. They are putting more questions into the juries minds about the validity of the evidence the state is presenting. The consensus is that Proctor was a huge failure for the state.

The defense will start their cross on Monday morning. I thought that the defense had already crossed him at the end of the day, but they may have more. The prosecution also has another phone expert that's going to testify.

It's expected that the prosecution will wrap up on Tuesday.
 
If you would see all the blunders they made "investigating" this, you would certainly question these things. The defense hasn't even had their turn yet!
Also in this recent ring camera footage shown, where is O'Keefe if she supposedly hit him with the car?

Plus, where is the ring camera footage of her arriving and him being dropped off and going into the house, more to the point?
 
Also in this recent ring camera footage shown, where is O'Keefe if she supposedly hit him with the car?

Plus, where is the ring camera footage of her arriving and him being dropped off and going into the house, more to the point?
Supposedly he was up near the flag pole 6-8 few from the curb with plastic taillight pieces all around him

All the footage conveniently non existent.
 
Whose ring camera footage does this belong to? The party address?
If you are talking about the one where she backs into his vehicle, I think it's from her apartment. I can't remember. It's not from where he died. Where he died mysteriously has no neighbors with footage or cameras. Or they do, but were never asked for it. You know, the places any law enforcement entity investigating the death of one of their own would ask for immediately.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,089
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom