Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:

By Munashe Kwangwari and Marc Fortier • Published 4 hours ago • Updated 31 seconds ago​


<snip>

Defense presents its closing argument​

Jackson began to present his closing argument shortly before 10:15 a.m.

"Look the other way, look the other way -- four words that sum up the commonwealth's entire case," he said. "Conflict of interest doesn't matter, look the other way. Late night calls and Google searches... inverted videos and butt dials galore, just look the other way. That's what they want. That's what they are counting on. But the incontrovertible fact is you have been lied to in this courtroom."

He told jurors there was a coverup in the case, and the case "picked their patsy" and decided to pin O'Keefe's death on Read.

"If you don't have actual evidence, throw everything against the wall and see what sticks," Jackson said. "Drag her through the mud and make sure you attack her character. And that's exactly what the commonwealth did."

He also talked about how all the testimony showed that O'Keefe and Read were "a loving couple," right up until she dropped him off at 34 Fairview Road on the night of his death.

"If an argument with a loved one is a motive for murder, folks, we're all in trouble," Jackson said.

He also spoke about the powerful Albert family, owners of the Fairview Road home where O'Keefe's body was found, and how their influence in town impacted the trial.
 
Defense closing arguments underway.
Rachael Harris Popcorn GIF by Lucifer
 

Updated: 9:26 AM EDT Jun 25, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 11:11 Jackson concludes his statement and prosecutor Adam Lally immediately rises to start his closing argument.
  • 10:53 a.m. Jackson tells the jury they were intentionally deceived by the inverted video of the SUV shown during the trial.
  • 10:50 a.m. The juror who'd been looking down is now looking at Jackson as he describes the video of the SUV at the Canton PD garage.
  • 10:45 a.m. Jackson describes a "blue wall" that he says Trooper Proctor constructed to protect other people in the case.
  • 10:42 a.m. Jackson shows an image of the video of Read's SUV backing out of O'Keefe's driveway. Says the taillight was cracked but not broken when he says it came into contact with another vehicle.
  • 10:39 a.m. "That makes no sense," Jackson says about why Read tried to call O'Keefe 53 times during the time when the prosecution says she'd already killed him.
  • 10:38 a.m. Karen Read listens as Jackson describes her waking up in a panic to discover O'Keefe was missing.
  • 10:32 a.m. Jackson is now demonstrating what he imagines was a 22-second phone conversation between Brian Albert and Brian Higgins on the night O'Keefe died.
  • 10:27 a.m. The juror looking at the floor is now looking up at the ceiling. His arms are folded.
  • 10:25 a.m. One of the jurors glances over at Jen McCabe on the opposite of the courtroom as Jackson talks about her.
  • 10:23 a.m. All of the jurors are looking at Jackson, except one man who is closing his eyes, now looking at the floor.
  • 10:20 a.m. "If an argument with a loved one is a motive for murder, folks, we're all in trouble," Jackson says.
  • 10:19 a.m. As Read's attorney talks about the prosecution "dragging her through the mud", Lally clasps his hands, sighs and looks ahead.
  • 10:17 a.m. As the jurors look at Jackson, they see Colin Albert, Jen McCabe, Brian Albert and Kerry Roberts behind him.
  • 10:16 a.m. "They'll show you a video and tell you left is right and right is left," Jacksons says referring to the "mirrored" video of the Canton Police garage.
  • 10:14 a.m. This is Jackson's most direct reference so far to an alleged "cover up" in this case. Jurors are all looking at him as they listen.
  • 10:13 a.m. "Look the other way," Jackson says as he begins his closing argument. He says that's what the prosecution wants. Tells them they've been lied to.
  • 10:11 a.m. Outside, my colleague reports the jury bus has left with one passenger on board. The judge reminds jurors closing arguments are not evidence, asks the jurors to put their notes away and just listen.
  • 10:10 a.m. Judge welcomes remaining jurors back into courtroom. The judge thanks them for their patience. Says a juror has been dismissed for a reason personal to her. Says no impact on the others.
 

Updated: 9:26 AM EDT Jun 25, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 12:13 a.m. Lally concludes his closing argument with a quote from John Adams. The judge tells him time is up then allows him to say his final sentence.
  • 12:09 a.m. Jackson's closing argument included references to tyranny and justice. He complimented the jurors for their civic duty. Lally's closing is more of a recitation of evidence he presented at trial.
  • 12:06 a.m. Jackson's notes were printed and in a binder. Lally's notes are handwritten on a yellow legal pad.
  • 12:02 a.m. Lally mockingly asks if Brian Albert was such a "criminal mastermind" why did he leave O'Keefe on his own front yard.
  • 11:59 a.m. Lally says the reason the "magic hair" and the glass were still on the bumper is because the SUV was caked in snow and ice.
  • 11:57 a.m. "I know it was a lot of testimony about snow," Lally says. But he says there was a purpose to that. Says O'Keefe had no snow under him when he was found. Says that indicates how long he'd been there.
  • 11:55 a.m. Lally says Read did not take off her shoes when she arrived at O'Keefe's house with McCabe and Roberts even though that was O'Keefe's rule. Lally says she knew didn't have to because she knew O'Keefe was dead.
  • 11:52 a.m. Lally has notes in front of him but seems to be talking off the cuff for part of his argument. Jackson stuck closer to his script.
  • 11:50 a.m. Lally says Read repeatedly asked at the scene "Is he dead?" because he says she was looking for confirmation.
  • 11:46 a.m. Read leans over and whispers something to Jackson. Now she takes a breath mint and folds her arms in front of her.
  • 11:44 a.m. Lally says Read tried to call O'Keefe 53 times and called several other people but never called 911.
  • 11:41 a.m. Read is looking down at a document in front of her. Now she looks up at the ceiling.
  • 11:36 a.m. Jurors seem to have the same expressions as during Jackson's closing argument. The juror with his head down earlier is doing the same now.
  • 11:34 a.m. Lally says Read was the first to spot O'Keefe in the snow because he says she'd already gone back to the scene that morning.
  • 11:28 a.m. Lally shows more of the timeline and starts playing the voicemail messages she left.
  • 11:26 a.m. Lally is now showing what he says was the Read's SUV's route to 34 Fairview Road.
  • 11:25 a.m. The jurors are all looking at the timeline on the screen. A couple are leaning forward. One has to lean to the side to see around Lally.
  • 11:23 a.m. Read is not looking at the timeline being shown to the jury. Instead, she is writing a note that she then passes to Jackson.
  • 11:22 a.m. Lally's timeline shows that Read had nine drinks that night between 8:58 p.m. and 10:54 p.m.
    11:19 a.m. Lally is showing this timeline about what he says happened leading up to O'Keefe's death.
  • 11:18 a.m. Lally says Proctor's text messages are inexcusable but provide no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up.
  • 11:15 a.m. "Little things matter," Lally says. He encourages the jurors to pay attention to the evidence.
  • 11:12 a.m. "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him," Adam Lally says as he begins his opening arguments, citing what first responders say they heard Read say at the scene.
 
Last edited:
That's illogical. The %ages are based on ALL jurors finding her innocent. It means 86/87% see her walking away.

If you're trying to put it into an individual juror %age, then it seems you're saying it will be nothing but, a hung jury.
I am converting the percentages to jurors. It's quite simple if the public view is mirrored by the jurors.
That's not what they are saying though. That's comparing apples and oranges.

No it is what I am saying. Its called statistics. The 10 believing innocent (87%,) would likely convince the 1 guilty and the undecided. If they don't change their mind then they would ask the Court to accept a majority verdict. It's not unusual at all so I don't really know what the fuss is about. It's how juries work.
 

Updated: 9:26 AM EDT Jun 25, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 12:13 a.m. Lally concludes his closing argument with a quote from John Adams. The judge tells him time is up then allows him to say his final sentence.
  • 12:09 a.m. Jackson's closing argument included references to tyranny and justice. He complimented the jurors for their civic duty. Lally's closing is more of a recitation of evidence he presented at trial.
  • 12:06 a.m. Jackson's notes were printed and in a binder. Lally's notes are handwritten on a yellow legal pad.
  • 12:02 a.m. Lally mockingly asks if Brian Albert was such a "criminal mastermind" why did he leave O'Keefe on his own front yard.
  • 11:59 a.m. Lally says the reason the "magic hair" and the glass were still on the bumper is because the SUV was caked in snow and ice.
  • 11:57 a.m. "I know it was a lot of testimony about snow," Lally says. But he says there was a purpose to that. Says O'Keefe had no snow under him when he was found. Says that indicates how long he'd been there.
  • 11:55 a.m. Lally says Read did not take off her shoes when she arrived at O'Keefe's house with McCabe and Roberts even though that was O'Keefe's rule. Lally says she knew didn't have to because she knew O'Keefe was dead.
  • 11:52 a.m. Lally has notes in front of him but seems to be talking off the cuff for part of his argument. Jackson stuck closer to his script.
  • 11:50 a.m. Lally says Read repeatedly asked at the scene "Is he dead?" because he says she was looking for confirmation.
  • 11:46 a.m. Read leans over and whispers something to Jackson. Now she takes a breath mint and folds her arms in front of her.
  • 11:44 a.m. Lally says Read tried to call O'Keefe 53 times and called several other people but never called 911.
  • 11:41 a.m. Read is looking down at a document in front of her. Now she looks up at the ceiling.
  • 11:36 a.m. Jurors seem to have the same expressions as during Jackson's closing argument. The juror with his head down earlier is doing the same now.
  • 11:34 a.m. Lally says Read was the first to spot O'Keefe in the snow because he says she'd already gone back to the scene that morning.
  • 11:28 a.m. Lally shows more of the timeline and starts playing the voicemail messages she left.
  • 11:26 a.m. Lally is now showing what he says was the Read's SUV's route to 34 Fairview Road.
  • 11:25 a.m. The jurors are all looking at the timeline on the screen. A couple are leaning forward. One has to lean to the side to see around Lally.
  • 11:23 a.m. Read is not looking at the timeline being shown to the jury. Instead, she is writing a note that she then passes to Jackson.
  • 11:22 a.m. Lally's timeline shows that Read had nine drinks that night between 8:58 p.m. and 10:54 p.m.
    11:19 a.m. Lally is showing this timeline about what he says happened leading up to O'Keefe's death.
  • 11:18 a.m. Lally says Proctor's text messages are inexcusable but provide no evidence of a conspiracy or cover-up.
  • 11:15 a.m. "Little things matter," Lally says. He encourages the jurors to pay attention to the evidence.
  • 11:12 a.m. "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him," Adam Lally says as he begins his opening arguments, citing what first responders say they heard Read say at the scene.

  • 12:02 a.m. Lally mockingly asks if Brian Albert was such a "criminal mastermind" why did he leave O'Keefe on his own front yard.
Maybe because there was no real way to be able to clean the scene AND where would they even dump him without leaving even more evidence of a cover-up?


I think they were confident the snow would cover up footprints and drag marks... And they were right.
 
I am converting the percentages to jurors. It's quite simple if the public view is mirrored by the jurors.


No it is what I am saying. Its called statistics. The 10 believing innocent (87%,) would likely convince the 1 guilty and the undecided. If they don't change their mind then they would ask the Court to accept a majority verdict. It's not unusual at all so I don't really know what the fuss is about. It's how juries work.
But again, that's not the correct parameters in this scenario.
 

By Munashe Kwangwari and Marc Fortier • Published 4 hours ago • Updated 31 seconds ago​


<snip>

Jackson also tried to indicate that ATF agent Brian Higgins, who had been exchanging flirtatious texts with Read, might have gotten into an altercation with O'Keefe, and then the Alberts' dog Chloe could have bitten O'Keefe's arm.

"So what happened next? We absolutely know that John was in the house... How long does it take to have a cross word? How long does it take to have a fight? How long would it take for Brian Higgins to say to John, 'You know, your girl's been texting me.' A push, a punch, a fall, pull Chloe off his arm, and now its done."

"And then the panic sets in. It wasn't intended to go that far, but what's done is done."

Prosecution gives its closing argument​

Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally touched on a number of aspects of his weeks-long case during his closing argument.

He said jurors heard during the trial about Read's blood-alcohol content and the fact that she had been drinking, and they heard O'Keefe's DNA was on the drinking glass found at the scene and on the tail light of Read's SUV. And he noted that prosecution witnesses testified there was no evidence of anyone else's DNA on O'Keefe's body that would have indicated any sort of a struggle with anyone else.

Lally closed by quoting John Adams, who once wrote, "Facts are stubborn things. But whatever may be our wishes or inclinations or the dicates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of the facts and the evidence." He said the facts here show that Read drove her vehicle in reverse at 24 mph, for 62.5 feet, causing catastrophic injuries, leaving him incapacitated and in the freezing cold.

Near the start of his statements, Lally also brought up the texts sent by Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor, arguing that while they were inappropriate, they do not negate the investigation or its findings.

"Text messages from Trooper Proctor are unprofessional, they're indefensible, they're inexcusable. However, as distasteful as those messages are in their content, I submit they had no bearing whatsoever, or impact whatsoever, on the integrity of the entirety of the investigation that the Massachusetts State Police collectively — collectively — conducted into John O'Keefe's death."

He closed by quoting John Adams, who once wrote, "Facts are stubborn things. But whatever may be our wishes or inclinations or the dicates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of the facts and the evidence." He said the facts here show that Read drove her vehicle in reverse at 24 mph, for 62.5 feet, causing catastrophic injuries, leaving him incapacitated and in the freezing cold.

"From that facts and that evidence, I would submit ineluctably demonstrates her guilt on each of the indictments before you, and I would ask that you find it so."

"From that facts and that evidence, I would submit ineluctably demonstrates her guilt on each of the indictments before you, and I would ask that you find it so," he said.

Lally finished his closing shortly before 12:14 p.m. Following a quick break, next up is jury instructions, which are expected to last about an hour.
 
Last edited:
I am converting the percentages to jurors. It's quite simple if the public view is mirrored by the jurors.


No it is what I am saying. Its called statistics. The 10 believing innocent (87%,) would likely convince the 1 guilty and the undecided. If they don't change their mind then they would ask the Court to accept a majority verdict. It's not unusual at all so I don't really know what the fuss is about. It's how juries work.
Even by using your parameters, this would be a mistrial at the very least.
Now, if that happens, do you think that the CW would retry her and possibly take the chance of the prosecution to gather even more evidence of corruption and coverup and/or the chance of a different judge that might allow more prosecution evidence in and less of the CW's case?
 
Even by using your parameters, this would be a mistrial at the very least.
Now, if that happens, do you think that the CW would retry her and possibly take the chance of the prosecution to gather even more evidence of corruption and coverup and/or the chance of a different judge that might allow more prosecution evidence in and less of the CW's case?
I've explained what I think. If the jury mirrors those statistics provided and they cannot change the mind of the 12/13% then they will ask the judge to accept a majority ruling. Why do you think it would be a mistrial?
 
I've explained what I think. If the jury mirrors those statistics provided and they cannot change the mind of the 12/13% then they will ask the judge to accept a majority ruling. Why do you think it would be a mistrial?
Well, wouldn't that, by your own statistics, give her a not guilty verdict? Plus, if I'm reading the statute correctly, that has to be brought up by the end of the prosecution ending their closing arguments, which has not happened and we are past that point now.

then we have this


(a) Return​


The verdict shall be unanimous. It shall be a general verdict returned by the jury to the judge in open court. The jury shall file a verdict slip with the clerk upon the return of the verdict.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,068
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom