All I think is that there are more avenues that need exploring. As I've said I'm sure more than one person was involved. I want THEM all caught not just a sacrificial lamb.
Why send RL? He had a gun, as did at least one of the others, but perhaps a 5'4" man wouldn't seem intimidating. At their ages they were probably close to 5'4" themselves, or they didn't think he could control two girls. I don't know.
This isn't the first case where we don't know exactly what happened. We don't know what happened in the Murdaugh case, just theories, but enough to convict. We don't know how Heuermann did his killings, but there is enough evidence to convict him.
So, nobody has all the answers. KK said he told the cops what happened, but they don't believe him. It doesn't fit the evidence. Supposedly the person who said they saw a muddy and bloody guy never said bloody in his first interview. From the beginning I felt there was something off about this. I think they may be trying to make the case against RA fit their theory.
Do they have RA's DNA? I've never heard if they did or not.
I haven't ruled out others as you know, in what capacity, I'm not sure, just knowledge or actually being there but that would be Kline and possibly RL and not sure on other in the pedo thing. I still dance with many a theory but I have not added Os. I just don't have or see any reason to but I'm never like never say never, but it just doesn't work. Meaning all the Os the defense name and SAYS did it, and wow is that stupidly bold, does not work for me.
I would NOT call RA a sacrificial lamb. Here we are with sacrifice again and that makes him sound like he is innocent or at least the most innocent of the bunch and I don't buy hat for a second.
Yes I want all caught IF there is an "all" but it all has to start somewhere and I believe it started more likely wth Kline and pressuring him and getting him put away and next is RA. THAT makes a lot more sense to me. Not that these things ever make total sense as we don't know all but it juts gels a whole lot better.
With Murdaugh, I feel pretty sure I know exactly what happened but I could leave a possibility someone else was in the know or helped but feel mostly not, it was Alex. In CB LI case , it iIS CB I feel BUT I have not ruled out his wife, etc. or group things in their life and with others but that doesn't necessarily mean the murders, maybe so, maybe not. BUT I do feel they have the KEY guy in each and possibly the only. And that is where you start and where you pressuer and they then may flip on others... RA isn't flipping on others, they are trying to remove him with nothing to back him up. If they wan the Os involved then they need a whole lot more than saying oh there is no evidence he is an O or ever has been, just take our word for it.
I see all you are seeing with the muddy and bloody etc. And with other questions. I think you and many would find such if wanting to in every case. I think if I were just driving and passed a guy that was muddy or bloody and I never expected to see either as I was having a fine day or had my mind on other things like needing to get groceries, someone in either state would all of a sudden do to my brain wow, why is that guy so stained, dirty, wet, muddy or bloody, etc.? I wonder where he has been and what he has been doing. And at that point to you wouldn't leap to murder necessarily at all. We all know blood in clothing when not that minute fresh starts going an brownish red or reddish brown and depending on color of the clothing even more so looking brown... Did she see it on his face or on dark jacket and jeans, etc.? I truly think that is one detail to not get hung up on (defense will of course, that is natural) but simply that she saw a wet or drying dirty guy WALKING down the road in the right time frame.
I don't know what would have changed to try to now make a patsy after five years. They have suffered year after year of not doing so and a lot of questions, criticisms and frustration amongst themselves and with the public of WHY they can't find this guy....He would be a patsy imo only IF they manufactured that he said he was at the bridge that day but they DID NOT. RA himself puts himself there and there is the problem with that theory. That is the FLY in THAT ointment. He admits to it because of many a reason, he KNOWS he was seen and he KNOWS what he was seen wearing, etc. as Olenna pointed out in a recent post. OF COURSE after he worried quickly and OF COURSE he had fear of getting caught and OF COURSE he knew he was there and worried he would be fast arrested and so he GOES to them FIRST, hey, I was there, can I help, I didn't see much of note but want to help... I think somehow he also knew who to contact or how to or knew the one who REALLY ruined things, the DNR guy... Et., etc.
All this said, I think we all feel something is off, Roundpeg recently said it, I feel it, you feel it, etc. but I think it has a lot to do with we don't know all, there has been a LOT of speculaion through the years, this came out of the blue, a totally unknown man to us, etc. He77 the Kline sh*t kind of gobsmacked too. I do think something is missing like another person or just enough info for us o answer a lot of unanswered questions and I think we will get more if this ever gets anywhere like to trial. Again, I'd like to know about RA's full day and interviews of his family, employier,etc. Sounds minor but these seemingly mundane details matter. Did he call in sick to work that day for instance? Tell wife and daughter go enjoy the day shopping in another city and blow some bucks and send them off? What would you think if just a total hypothetical if these things were true? What would you think if family came home to him washing clothes and in all their years he had never used the washer? What would you think if he told them when he got back, he'd have some project done and be ready to take them to dinner or have dinner waiting and it was clear he hadn't done any such thing ALL DAY? Just a bunch of hypotheticals.
This was a Monday. That could be his typical day off since retail, one can't assume Monday through Friday. I am in retail and I work every weekend (by choice or it would be ever other) and THurs/Fri are my normal days off BUT they can't always provide that either.
IF my memory serves his daughter would still be in high school so she had the day off just like A & L and I THINK his wife was Walmart and it would make sense that as much as they could they orchestrated days off each week together perhaps but with a secretive lying husband like I had he may have done just the opposite. This is how they get their time to pull their stuff. But I am sidetracking.
THis mundane stuff will tell a lot JUST FOR ONE THING. Prosecution is close lipped and not sharing anything they don't have to. And TRUST THIS, defense filed nothing that is in evidence that would IMPLICATE Allen. This is a cherry picked very one sided filing that you and others are letting take over.
Why can't you think of it this way? They NEED that search thrown out because not just the gun and ballistics BUT other things are HARMFUL for their client. It is a BIG DEAL they get it thrown out and so that is going to take a LOT of smoke and mirrors and a BIG TO DO/ a BIG HURRAH effort.
I will never get time but in the Kouri Richins case the prosecution blasted back and turned the tables big time.