AHMAUD ARBERY: Georgia vs Greg & Travis McMichael & William Bryan for murder *GUILTY*

www.jacksonville.com

Mother seeks justice after son shot while jogging in Brunswick, pair involved in killing not arrested

It’s been over two months since a young black man jogging in Brunswick, Ga., was gunned down by two white men...
www.jacksonville.com

1588813454918.png 1588813480378.png
Mother seeks justice after son shot while jogging in Brunswick, pair involved in killing not arrested

It’s been over two months since a young black man jogging in Brunswick, Ga., was gunned down by two white men who said they thought he was a possible burglar.

Ahmaud Arbery’s mother wants to know where is the justice.

“I just think about how they could allow these two men to kill my son and not be arrested, that’s what I can’t understand,” Wanda Cooper told news partner First Coast News.

A police report states about 1 p.m. Sunday, Feb. 23, Glynn County officers responded to Satilla and Holmes drives where shots were fired. They found Arbery, 25, dead on the scene.

Gregory McMichael, who worked several years for the Brunswick Police Department before serving as an investigator in the Brunswick District Attorney’s Office, told police there were several break-ins in the neighborhood. He said he saw Arbery running down Satilla Drive and asked his son Travis McMichael to help him confront him.

McMichael and his son got a shotgun and handgun because they “didn’t know if Arbery was armed or not.”

The father and son got into their truck and drove down Satilla toward Burford Drive. Gregory McMichael stated when they arrived at Holmes Drive, they saw Arbery running down Burford, according to the report.

Gregory McMichael told police they attempted to cut off Arbery and shouted “stop, stop, we want to talk to you.”

McMichael pulled up next to Arbery, and Travis McMichael got out of the truck with the shotgun. According to statements, that’s when the father said Arbery attacked his son and the two men started fighting over the shotgun. Travis McMichael fired a shot and then a second shot.



ktla.com

After video appears to show black jogger gunned down by 2 white men in coastal Georgia, family demands arrests

The fatal shooting of a black man — apparently recorded on video in February and posted online Tuesday by a local radio station host — will go to a grand jury in coastal Georg…
ktla.com ktla.com

After video appears to show black jogger gunned down by 2 white men in coastal Georgia, family demands arrests

The fatal shooting of a black man — apparently recorded on video in February and posted online Tuesday by a local radio station host — will go to a grand jury in coastal Georgia, according to a district attorney.

Elements of the disturbing video are consistent with a description of the shooting given to police by one of those involved in the incident.

Ahmaud Arbery, 25, was jogging in a neighborhood outside Brunswick on February 23 when a former police officer and his son chased him down, authorities said. According to a Glynn County Police report, Gregory McMichael later told officers that he thought Arbery looked like a person suspected in a series of recent break-ins in the area.

After they chased down Arbery, McMichael told police, Arbery and McMichael’s son Travis struggled over his son’s shotgun. McMichael said two shots were fired before Arbery fell to the street, the report said.


S. Lee Merritt, an attorney for the Arbery family, said in a statement that the two men involved in the chase “must be taken into custody pending their indictment.”

Gov. Brian Kemp said the Georgia Bureau of Investigation has offered resources to Durden for his investigation. “Georgians deserve answers,” Kemp tweeted.

Kemp also retweeted the GBI’s post that Durden “formally requested the GBI to investigate the death of Ahmaud Arbery.”
 

Attachments

  • 1588813857428.png
    1588813857428.png
    101.5 KB · Views: 2
Click to expand...
Howell said:
I see what you're saying. He was killed obviously, but I think he's the perpetrator. Should a bank robber shot dead by police be called a victim?

It's not an assumption to call him a criminal. 1)He has a record, 2)He was trespassing, and 3)He attacked McMichael. These are all known facts.
Click to expand...

These are facts known after he was murdered, the McMichels didn't know this when they killed him. He had no outstanding warrants at the time he was killed and had no drugs in his body. I'm sure you're not saying that if someone has a past criminal history (minor) it's ok for peeps to stalk him with guns and kill him? Not to mention, that they didn't know his past. as this information was released AFTER his murder. And, it is NOT a fact that McMichael shot him in self-defense. Arbery had the full right to defend himself from peeps following him in a threatening manner with guns.
 
Last edited:
Howell said:
It wasn't him in ALL of the videos, no. It certainly appears to be him in many of them, and the family attorney has acknowledged that Arbery was there in the past. From Lee Merritt:

"I have chosen to stop questioning the grieving family of Ahmaud Arbery about images from the cameras mounted at the construction site of Larry English as Mr. English himself has said no criminal activity ever took place there and it is clear that Ahmaud was on the premises in the past along with many other people,"

In other words, 'we don't want to talk about this as it might lead reasonable people to question what Arbery's intent may have been while trespassing on the property multiple times'...

It's interesting how the whole "innocent jogger murdered by racists" narrative continues to fall apart as additional information becomes available.
Click to expand...
Per your own quote "no criminal activity ever took place" so we can now just admit that nobody was robbed nor pilfered from that house. No trespassing occurred either if the property owner will not have it looked into.
 
Howell said:
I see what you're saying. He was killed obviously, but I think he's the perpetrator. Should a bank robber shot dead by police be called a victim?

It's not an assumption to call him a criminal. 1)He has a record, 2)He was trespassing, and 3)He attacked McMichael. These are all known facts.
Click to expand...
There is a big, huge, difference between a bank robber, who is typically armed and is obviously there to commit theft, and a man who is trespassing while jogging. In the bank robber scenario, that would would be blatant armed robbery in an occupied dwelling with intent to cause harm (paraphrasing). They are not the same, or even similar, situations, at all.
 
KareBear said:
There is a big, huge, difference between a bank robber, who is typically armed and is obviously there to commit theft, and a man who is trespassing while jogging. In the bank robber scenario, that would would be blatant armed robbery in an occupied dwelling with intent to cause harm (paraphrasing). They are not the same, or even similar, situations, at all.
Click to expand...
He didn't get shot for trespassing. His repeated trespassing only instigated the confrontation. He got shot for attacking a man with a shotgun. If one gets shot while attacking someone with a gun, be it a police officer or private citizen, I find it very difficult to call that person a victim.
 
Howell said:
He didn't get shot for trespassing. His repeated trespassing only instigated the confrontation. He got shot for attacking a man with a shotgun. If one gets shot while attacking someone with a gun, be it a police officer or private citizen, I find it very difficult to call that person a victim.
Click to expand...
again, the only person that can accuse somebody of trespassing is the owner of the property being trespassed upon. The owner is stating that no crime has taken place on his property.
 
Guess Who said:
Per your own quote "no criminal activity ever took place" so we can now just admit that nobody was robbed nor pilfered from that house. No trespassing occurred either if the property owner will not have it looked into.
Click to expand...
That isn't "my" quote, per se. That's a claim from the family attorney, one that is not true.

You seem to have trouble understanding this concept of what constitutes a criminal act. Trespassing is still criminal, even if you don't get caught. Even if you don't steal anything. Even if the owner doesn't feel the need to press charges. So if I repeatedly walk into your house whenever you're not home, that wouldn't be illegal because I didn't steal anything and you didn't see me? Do you not recognize how foolish that sounds?
 
Howell said:
That isn't "my" quote, per se. That's a claim from the family attorney, one that is not true.

You seem to have trouble understanding this concept of what constitutes a criminal act. Trespassing is still criminal, even if you don't get caught. Even if you don't steal anything. Even if the owner doesn't feel the need to press charges. So if I repeatedly walk into your house whenever you're not home, that wouldn't be illegal because I didn't steal anything and you didn't see me? Do you not recognize how foolish that sounds?
Click to expand...
yes, but I can still choose to not prosecute and nobody else can "detain" a person by pointing a shotgun at them for trespassing on MY property. We had a problem house in our neighborhood that was habitually trespassed upon. Since the owner of the hone would not file charges against the known trespassers, the only time cops would come is when they were trespassing upon other properties that the owners would file charges against. Cops have more important things to deal with than somebody looking at somebody else's property without the owner doing anything about it. If it's not posted "no trespassing" by the owner and the owner will not file charges, it's a non crime in their world. As it should be.
 
Here is more from the above link: "
"Real Property
Georgia also defines criminal trespass in relation to real property. It is unlawful to enter someone's land or premises after having been warned by the owner not to or to remain on the property or premises after having been told to leave by the owner. It is also criminal trespass to enter a person's land or premises with the intent of committing any unlawful act. Georgia's criminal trespass law is written so that in addition to trespass on land, entering any kind of vehicle under circumstances that would constitute criminal trespass on land is also criminal trespass."
Even if any of this applied which I do not believe does, it is STILL a misdemeanor.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,466
Members
964
Latest member
ztw1990
Back
Top Bottom