Danny Masterson Charged with Three Counts of Rape "By Force or Fear" *GUILTY 2 of 3*

masterson.jpg



Danny Masterson Charged with Three Counts of Rape "By Force or Fear"
If convicted on all counts, the That '70s Show actor could face 45 years to life in prison.
By Anthony Breznican
June 17, 2020


Actor Danny Masterson has long been accused of acts of sexual violence, and on Wednesday the That ’70s Show actor was finally arrested after being charged with the rapes of three women in separate incidents dating back to 2001 and 2003.

Los Angeles County District Attorney Jackie Lacey's office charged the 44-year-old with three counts of "rape by force or fear." "If convicted as charged, the defendant faces a possible maximum sentence of 45 years to life in state prison," the district attorney's office said in a statement.

The complaint accuses him of raping a 23-year-old woman in 2001. He is also charged with committing two other assaults in 2003, one against a 28-year-old woman in April, and another against a 23-year-old woman between October and December of that year.



The case will be prosecuted by Deputy District Attorney Reinhold Mueller of the Sex Crimes Division, who stated that all of the alleged rapes occurred at the actor's Hollywood Hills home.

Prosecutors noted that they declined to file sexual assault charges against Masterson in two other cases, "one for insufficient evidence and the other based upon the statute of limitations for the crime alleged."


Masterson has been held on $3.3 million bail. He is represented by defense attorney Thomas Mesereau, who previously represented Bill Cosby, Michael Jackson and Mike Tyson against sex crime charges. In a statement to the Associated Press, Mesereau insisted that Masterson is innocent.

“We’re confident that he will be exonerated when all the evidence finally comes to light and witnesses have the opportunity to testify," the attorney said. “Obviously, Mr. Masterson and his wife are in complete shock considering that these nearly 20-year old allegations are suddenly resulting in charges being filed, but they and their family are comforted knowing that ultimately the truth will come out,” Mesereau said. “The people who know Mr. Masterson know his character and know the allegations to be false.”

The criminal complaint doesn't name the victims, but the timeline of the accusations matches those of four women who accused Masterson of sexual assault in 2016 and 2017 as part of the #MeToo movement. Last year, they sued Masterson, along with the Church of Scientology, to which he belongs, alleging that the powerful and secretive organization stalked and intimidated them for coming forward with their police reports. Masterson and Scientology officials all denied wrongdoing.

Masterson responded to the suit with a statement: “This is beyond ridiculous. I’m not going to fight my ex-girlfriend in the media like she’s been baiting me to do for more than two years. I will beat her in court—and look forward to it because the public will finally be able [to] learn the truth and see how I’ve been railroaded by this woman. And once her lawsuit is thrown out, I intend to sue her and the others who jumped on the bandwagon for the damage they caused me and my family.”

In the lawsuit, the women each claim Masterson forced himself on them or took advantage of them when they were intoxicated and unable to consent.

Masterson is set to be arraigned on Sept. 18.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So now he's proving his is an irresponsible gun owner and can't account for NINE. NINE!!! Now, if you owned a collection of 10 guns and couldn't account for 1 of them, I could maybe give him a pass, but NINE out of ten! How do you lose track of 90% of your guns?
You don't. It's such an obvious lie. I'm always misplacing things. But I am quite sure I would NOT misplace a gun. I misplace my vape or keys. Sticky notes, Pens.
 
Plus, he better hope that anybody he gave them to didn't use them in a crime or gave them to somebody that committed a crime. It's possibly on him until he can prove otherwise if they were.
If he was stupid, But did it smartidly. He would have made them "Ghost guns". Won't divulge where they are. You won't find them. Unless they can follow a trail of who he gave them to. But if that person did that. They are gone. No direct provable evidence. Gone.
 
Yes. I wouldn't think they would have him free. He is dangerous.
Good to know! He didn't get a chance to do anything and his wife divorced him immediately after sentencing.

Now I wonder if we'll find out he's signed over all his assets to her prior to the filing??? Otherwise, why wait until he was sentenced to file?
 
So disappointing and absolutely disgusting!!!!! I will say he did do the absolutely right, Best thing for his daughter in giving full custody to his ex wife. A 9 year old is already effected by her father not being around. She was kept away from it as much as possible. But I am sure she heard some things. And kids are MEAN!!! I knew a kid that was teased because his brother died. I never understood that. That's so wrong. How is that funny?. It was in elementary even. I told my mom. She was stunned too. Kids are ALWAYS stuck in the middle. And effected in some way. Whether it's living arrangements, A step parent, Divorce, A parent dying, A parent going to prison etc. Their development years. Every child doesn't get to enjoy being one. But they ALL DESERVE TOO! I hope she has a happy life.
 
Good to know! He didn't get a chance to do anything and his wife divorced him immediately after sentencing.

Now I wonder if we'll find out he's signed over all his assets to her prior to the filing??? Otherwise, why wait until he was sentenced to file?
Yeah. I think "Scientology" Was only able to go so far here. But enough to be involved and F up things. Which helped with conviction. IMO. They have a wonderfully long history of getting away with. Well, Murder. That's what I look for in a church.
 
They were tracked and that is how they know he had 10. What can't be tracked is if he gave them to others and didn't bother to fill out any paperwork. This is 100% on Masterson and not politicians. He is the one that broke the "tracking" of them.
I don't remember who I lent 9 of them to. I don't remember names. I don't remember is always such a convenient excuse. There have been plenty of cases where evidence has been lost. But I agree with you. He wanted them to vanish.
 
and/or he bought them for people that legally couldn't buy them.


We had someone straw buy an AR-15 that was used to kill a firefighter. Some nutjob set his house on fire, when the fire department showed up he shot and killed one. I can't remember for sure, but I think he'd killed his sister and then set the house on fire.
 
They were tracked and that is how they know he had 10. What can't be tracked is if he gave them to others and didn't bother to fill out any paperwork. This is 100% on Masterson and not politicians. He is the one that broke the "tracking" of them.
Who tracked them, the Court or LE? So then how do we know if he had any illegal ones, this wasn't due to a search or anything? I i admit no time to have read the links earlier or now, just got home.

What is the significance of them? To the court? And to him, I'm sure they aren't his only assets I wouldn't think... Were they evidence? Did he put them up for bond or something?
 
Yep. Real question. We all know that money and power can get you extensions on these things and I just haven't paid enough attention to this one to know if he is or not. I sure would hope he wasn't given this much time.
No one should be given any time on conviction. Ever. They are now a guilty man. Our perp's atty tried to ask and the judge shut it down immediately as judges should. It is one thing that did go right. Any judge that grants such a thing should be taken off the bench imo. There is also never a more likely time they will flee or suicide as now they know their freedom is over and they are headed to the big house.
 
No one should be given any time on conviction. Ever. They are now a guilty man. Our perp's atty tried to ask and the judge shut it down immediately as judges should. It is one thing that did go right. Any judge that grants such a thing should be taken off the bench imo. There is also never a more likely time they will flee or suicide as now they know their freedom is over and they are headed to the big house.
The big house. :LOL: What would you like for your last meal Mr. Cagney?. TOP OF THE WORLD MA!!!!
 
and/or he bought them for people that legally couldn't buy them.
I can't think of a single good reason he'd do that, why? He'd just be asking for trouble if registered to him but found to be used in a crime. Or if even a felon was found in possession of one registered to him. They should check to see if he reported them stolen though and tried to collect insurance. That I could believe but probably unlikely too with how well known his name is...Maybe he pawned them to get himself some hookers with $$ the wife didn't know about. I mean his rapes became a bit harder to pull off and count on no one talking so he'd need some new outlet. I am being half facetious of course.

More likely they are hidden. Who would be dumb enough to do that for him?

I don't now. How does the Court know they are gone, did the Court have them or cops? Maybe I am going to have to read the article but I thought I did read one and none of that was said but not sure if I did or not. Tired brain.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,685
Members
966
Latest member
pizzalover
Back
Top Bottom