DAUNTE WRIGHT: Minnesota vs. former officer Kim Potter for manslaughter in Minneapolis shooting *GUILTY*

1618802053231.png
In response to this article. 1. I have been pulled over for it. 2. There is information that he was pulled over for expired tabs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So if the car wasn't titled in Daunte's name, how did they realize he had a warrant just buy the tag?

Potter is not looking good on the stand.
Potter testified that she wouldn't have necessarily pulled over the vehicle for expired temp tags due company policy stating delays with the dmv in Minnesota. Once Officer Luckey obtained the drivers name & dob is when the warrant came to light, so to speak.
 
Can someone help ..

according to the criminal complaint

Charge: Manslaughter - 2nd Degree - Culpable Negligence Creating Unreasonable Risk
Minnesota Statute: 609.205(1), with reference to: 609.205
Offense Level: Felony Maximum Sentence: 10 YEARS AND/OR $20,000
Offense Date (on or about): 04/11/2021

I don't see an ammended charge so is this what Potter's being charged with?

In this article it states that the charge was amended however I must be overlooking it.

Can anyone help?
 

“It was really damning when she got the video of the freeze frame of her with her hand on what appeared to be her weapon as she was still standing by and about to come in,” Baker said. “I think she did a great job of impeaching her.”

Baker said if the jurors had begun deliberating shortly after Potter’s testimony, her emotional display might have had more of an effect. He said having the weekend between her testimony and closing arguments gives jurors some distance.

Legal experts said Potter’s testimony wasn’t as strong as they expected it to be.

Baker said the defense spent too much time on the justification for the traffic stop, and there wasn’t enough focus on the moments when she pulled out her gun instead of her Taser. Baker said Potter didn’t provide any explanation of what she did at that moment, something he called “problematic for the defense.”

Halberg added on Friday: “I thought today was going to be the knockout punch. But that was not the case.”
 
Can someone help ..

according to the criminal complaint

Charge: Manslaughter - 2nd Degree - Culpable Negligence Creating Unreasonable Risk
Minnesota Statute: 609.205(1), with reference to: 609.205
Offense Level: Felony Maximum Sentence: 10 YEARS AND/OR $20,000
Offense Date (on or about): 04/11/2021

I don't see an ammended charge so is this what Potter's being charged with?

In this article it states that the charge was amended however I must be overlooking it.

Can anyone help?
First-degree manslaughter in this case means prosecutors allege that Potter caused Wright’s death while committing a misdemeanor — the “reckless handling or use of a firearm so as to endanger the safety of another with such force and violence that death or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable.”

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleges that she caused his death “by her culpable negligence,” meaning that Potter “caused an unreasonable risk and consciously took a chance of causing death or great bodily harm” to Wright, while using or possessing a firearm.

Neither charge requires prosecutors to prove Potter intended to kill Wright.

The attorney general’s office added the first-degree manslaughter charge after it took over the case, though it fell short of the murder charge that Wright’s family and activists wanted.


They confirmed these charges on the news I watched this am.

 
First-degree manslaughter in this case means prosecutors allege that Potter caused Wright’s death while committing a misdemeanor — the “reckless handling or use of a firearm so as to endanger the safety of another with such force and violence that death or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable.”

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleges that she caused his death “by her culpable negligence,” meaning that Potter “caused an unreasonable risk and consciously took a chance of causing death or great bodily harm” to Wright, while using or possessing a firearm.

Neither charge requires prosecutors to prove Potter intended to kill Wright.

The attorney general’s office added the first-degree manslaughter charge after it took over the case, though it fell short of the murder charge that Wright’s family and activists wanted.


They confirmed these charges on the news I watched this am.

ty! So, it's not either/or, correct? ie Can she be found guilty on both?

I don't know why she testified tbh.
 

“It was really damning when she got the video of the freeze frame of her with her hand on what appeared to be her weapon as she was still standing by and about to come in,” Baker said. “I think she did a great job of impeaching her.”

Baker said if the jurors had begun deliberating shortly after Potter’s testimony, her emotional display might have had more of an effect. He said having the weekend between her testimony and closing arguments gives jurors some distance.

Legal experts said Potter’s testimony wasn’t as strong as they expected it to be.

Baker said the defense spent too much time on the justification for the traffic stop, and there wasn’t enough focus on the moments when she pulled out her gun instead of her Taser. Baker said Potter didn’t provide any explanation of what she did at that moment, something he called “problematic for the defense.”

Halberg added on Friday: “I thought today was going to be the knockout punch. But that was not the case.”
What I saw before they broke for lunch, she was a horrible witness, especially during cross. She came across as too defensive and really dumb when asked about her taser and weapons training. She kept saying she didn't know when her training was and really didn't know what she learned. When the state pointed out the dates and what she signed that she had learned in the course, she said if you say so, that's probably right. Over and over, she said this.

I couldn't watch after lunch, but will try and look up tomorrow. I really want to see the defense re-direct.
 
What I saw before they broke for lunch, she was a horrible witness, especially during cross. She came across as too defensive and really dumb when asked about her taser and weapons training. She kept saying she didn't know when her training was and really didn't know what she learned. When the state pointed out the dates and what she signed that she had learned in the course, she said if you say so, that's probably right. Over and over, she said this.

I couldn't watch after lunch, but will try and look up tomorrow. I really want to see the defense re-direct.
I thought the State did a great job of showing the bodycam frame by frame where she grabs her gun & aims it. She didn't show emotion or feeling until that video. She knew she was wrong then and now. Her attorney on redirect doesn't ask her about pulling the wrong weapon & left it up in the air for the jury to decide.

Let me know what you think after you watch it.
 
What I saw before they broke for lunch, she was a horrible witness, especially during cross. She came across as too defensive and really dumb when asked about her taser and weapons training. She kept saying she didn't know when her training was and really didn't know what she learned. When the state pointed out the dates and what she signed that she had learned in the course, she said if you say so, that's probably right. Over and over, she said this.

I couldn't watch after lunch, but will try and look up tomorrow. I really want to see the defense re-direct.
which is exactly what i've been saying all along about lack of training and she has now confirmed that they basically have had none with the taser. They should have enough training that they develop muscle memory of what is where and how to use them. IF they had much training at all, she would at least be able to remember some of it.
 
Well, crap. Just checked my calendar and I have a call with a client scheduled for 10am my time on Monday (she's in EST). Gonna text her tomorrow and say hey can we do Monday afternoon instead? Our catch up calls are always when we're both available and she's a good friend. I love being self-employed! :)
 
I thought the State did a great job of showing the bodycam frame by frame where she grabs her gun & aims it. She didn't show emotion or feeling until that video. She knew she was wrong then and now. Her attorney on redirect doesn't ask her about pulling the wrong weapon & left it up in the air for the jury to decide.

Let me know what you think after you watch it.
What was the paper she had in her hand during the frame by frame? I think the defense is just basing the whole case on that she was justified in shooting Daunte and just leaving the whole taser mistake out.

It would be great if someone could find and post all the vids from Friday. PAGING @Cousin Dupree :)
 
What was the paper she had in her hand during the frame by frame? I think the defense is just basing the whole case on that she was justified in shooting Daunte and just leaving the whole taser mistake out.

It would be great if someone could find and post all the vids from Friday. PAGING @Cousin Dupree :)

I haven't been feeling well, I'll see what I can do.
 
What was the paper she had in her hand during the frame by frame? I think the defense is just basing the whole case on that she was justified in shooting Daunte and just leaving the whole taser mistake out.

It would be great if someone could find and post all the vids from Friday. PAGING @Cousin Dupree :)
Potter grabbed what appears to be a proof-of-insurance card with her left hand and transferred it to her right hand.
 
I watched her testimony. I don’t know hardly anything about this case, but @kdg411 filled me in on some. I still do not understand why in the world she didn’t take the plea. Just from her own testimony, I can see her being guilty of manslaughter.
 


Her testimony about the incident begins at ~25 mins

Watched the vid, but warning that I am a horrible note taker.

Emotional breakdown at 41:50 (he told me I shot him), him being Daunte

Cross begins at 47:50 talking about all her training. About 1:20 cross begins talking about pulling over the car. About 2:32 is after the lunch break. Re-direct is at 2:43 and recross at 2:50.

Random thoughts: WTH is Dr. Miller, did he testify? Gonna look it up. Re: the outstanding DVI, did anyone ask the female passenger her name to see if she was the victim of the DVI? I only watched part of her testimony.

Again, IMO, Potter was a horrible witness and her attorneys were just as bad. The judge seems very fair and has such a soothing, kind voice. Closing statements begin at 9 am CST tomorrow.
 
Watched the vid, but warning that I am a horrible note taker.

Emotional breakdown at 41:50 (he told me I shot him), him being Daunte

Cross begins at 47:50 talking about all her training. About 1:20 cross begins talking about pulling over the car. About 2:32 is after the lunch break. Re-direct is at 2:43 and recross at 2:50.

Random thoughts: WTH is Dr. Miller, did he testify? Gonna look it up. Re: the outstanding DVI, did anyone ask the female passenger her name to see if she was the victim of the DVI? I only watched part of her testimony.

Again, IMO, Potter was a horrible witness and her attorneys were just as bad. The judge seems very fair and has such a soothing, kind voice. Closing statements begin at 9 am CST tomorrow.
Dr. Miller testified in this clip from 6:57 - 1:29:30

 
First-degree manslaughter in this case means prosecutors allege that Potter caused Wright’s death while committing a misdemeanor — the “reckless handling or use of a firearm so as to endanger the safety of another with such force and violence that death or great bodily harm to any person was reasonably foreseeable.”

The second-degree manslaughter charge alleges that she caused his death “by her culpable negligence,” meaning that Potter “caused an unreasonable risk and consciously took a chance of causing death or great bodily harm” to Wright, while using or possessing a firearm.

Neither charge requires prosecutors to prove Potter intended to kill Wright.

The attorney general’s office added the first-degree manslaughter charge after it took over the case, though it fell short of the murder charge that Wright’s family and activists wanted.


They confirmed these charges on the news I watched this am.

I will say and think it should be said that his family and activists wanting a murder charge as the article states is overboard. I don't see any reason whatsoever to believe this fits a murder charge in the sense they are talking.

If I had to predict an outcome, it would be guilty of the 2nd degree charge. She may have a slim chance of a hung jury.

I wanted to see more of this trial but only caught a bit here and there in the first day or two and then the other day I caught a few minutes of her testimony but then had things going on and couldn't see the rest but I think what I have seen or read, 2nd degree is the likely outcome.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,509
Members
965
Latest member
tanya
Back
Top Bottom