Epstein, Maxwell et al: exposed in child sex trafficking

0_Epstein.jpg

Do we have a Jefferey Epstein thread?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Nobody was murdered in this case, AFAIK. Lori and Chad were triple (possibly quadruple) murderers plus attempted murder of a fifth and had the choice of being tried together or separately. I have no idea why Maxwell was not actually named in the NPD but it could be she had already left Epstein at that point and the wording was like it was so as not to name her but it still covered her IMO. But the ones who replaced her were actually named but they never got charged at all. The whole case doesn't make sense to me. But hey, thats the grounds for the appeal so we will see. I understand what has happened because i have been following it.

I disagree we have discussed it much before because the appeal was only submitted in March.

Anyway, those not interested, just scroll and roll because I plan to follow the appeal and report anything valid.
I apologize, I'm sorry. Didn't want it to come off the way it likely did.

You definitely or someone should post on any appeals as they are new.

I was talking about the NDA having been discussed in depth and so for me, I feel like I am just saying what I already have but I didn't mean to imply you shoudln't post the appeals or what their basis is, etc.

I maybe yes, should just not respond to that part.

I'm not sure I have no interest although I likely said I don't, I mean knowing there is one and what the basis is I would probably read but overall I'm mostly interested in any decisions. Like I said, I just do not like the two of them and maybe had my fill.

Again, sorry was the cause or part of your post about scrolling, etc.
 
@Tresir
Here is a link to NY Federal Appeals Court Second Circuit. When a written decision is published you will be able to see it posted. I will still have to log into the court system to print the document but at least you have a better link than relying on MSM for updates. Hope this helps while we wait.

Thanks Kdg. That's useful.

I also want to point out that Maxwell must pursue all appeals before she can be considered for the programme i posted about re UK jail. So, another reason she may be doing this.
 
Last edited:
I apologize, I'm sorry. Didn't want it to come off the way it likely did.

You definitely or someone should post on any appeals as they are new.

I was talking about the NDA having been discussed in depth and so for me, I feel like I am just saying what I already have but I didn't mean to imply you shoudln't post the appeals or what their basis is, etc.

I maybe yes, should just not respond to that part.

I'm not sure I have no interest although I likely said I don't, I mean knowing there is one and what the basis is I would probably read but overall I'm mostly interested in any decisions. Like I said, I just do not like the two of them and maybe had my fill.

Again, sorry was the cause or part of your post about scrolling, etc.
No problemo.
 
Ok i just read this article about Weinstein's NY appeal. Part of what helped him win his appeal sounds similar to what happened in Maxwell's trial - ie allowing someone to testify who wasn't a victim.

In Maxwell's trial, two of the four victims who testified were actually over the age of consent in the locations the assaults took place. (the witness from the UK and the witness from New Mexico.)

I am not sure I actually know what all the appeal grounds are in the Maxwell case, except that they are hoping for the NPA to apply, but IMO this Molineux witness appeal ground could apply too.



The link is paywalled and very detail but i have copied this small section that summarizes it.

"Central to the decision to overturn the conviction was something called “Molineux witnesses,” which refers to witnesses in a trial who are allowed to testify about criminal acts that the defendant has not been charged with committing.


During the Weinstein trial, prosecutors sought to persuade jurors that he had a long history of using his prominence as a Hollywood producer to lure young women to hotel rooms and sexually assault them. They did this by calling other women to the stand who said Mr. Weinstein had assaulted them, including Dawn Dunning, Tarale Wulff and Lauren Young. Mr. Weinstein was not charged with assaulting those women, but Justice James Burke allowed them to appear for the prosecution as Molineux witnesses, also known as “prior bad act” witnesses."

The pdf link below has more detail if you wish to download and read it.

 
Last edited:
Thanks @kdg411 for the heads up. Also ......

Maxwell's lawyer indicated she will now take the appeal against her conviction to the US Supreme Court.
"We are obviously very disappointed by the court's decision and we vehemently disagree with the outcome," Arthur Aidala said in a statement.
"We are cautiously optimistic that Ghislaine will get the justice she deserves from the Supreme Court of the United States."
 
Last edited:
Thanks @kdg411 for the heads up. Also ......

Maxwell's lawyer indicated she will now take the appeal against her conviction to the US Supreme Court.
"We are obviously very disappointed by the court's decision and we vehemently disagree with the outcome," Arthur Aidala said in a statement.
"We are cautiously optimistic that Ghislaine will get the justice she deserves from the Supreme Court of the United States."

God knows how they'll rule.
 
Thanks @kdg411 for the heads up. Also ......

Maxwell's lawyer indicated she will now take the appeal against her conviction to the US Supreme Court.
"We are obviously very disappointed by the court's decision and we vehemently disagree with the outcome," Arthur Aidala said in a statement.
"We are cautiously optimistic that Ghislaine will get the justice she deserves from the Supreme Court of the United States."
I'll see if I can dig up the website for SCOTUS rulings. I know they aren't hearing any new cases this calendar year but I'm not sure if next year's calendar had been made available. If I find it though I'll keep you in the loop.
 
I'll see if I can dig up the website for SCOTUS rulings. I know they aren't hearing any new cases this calendar year but I'm not sure if next year's calendar had been made available. If I find it though I'll keep you in the loop.
Thanks kdg. Well i guess this year is nearly over after all. Our clocks change next week.
 
Haven't searched for anything on scotus appeal but i am now thinking she will likely get a pardon as she has friends in high places.

Watch this space.

That would draw a line under it and ensure she keeps quiet about it probably.

After all of the Deutsch Bank and JPM settlements this would not surprise me one bit.
 
Last edited:
I am going to post some links about Staley, the ex JPM/Deutsche/Barclays executive who recently was fined by the FCA in the UK. Some of the Jane Doe's are suing these banks but of course it is very difficult to try and follow this in the media. So i am parking these dates and links to some articles here to try and make sense of it at a later date, when i have time to review it all.

Jul 2019 Epstein arrest

Aug 2019 Epstein found hanged in cell

Jul 2020 Maxwell arrest - convicted 2022


May 2021 (Covid recesssion)


Nov 2022




Feb 2023

Jes Staley emails !!!!! See text at end.


March 2023


May 2023


July 2023

JPM document link to follow if/when i can find it.


Sept 2023



Feb 2024


Doe 1 et al v. United States of America, No. 1:2024cv01071 - Document 19 (S.D.N.Y. 2024)


It was ruled in August 2024 that the victims have to resubmit this without anonymity. (What delaying BS is this?)

Nov 2024


There will be a hearing on this in March 2025 apparently. Cannot access the full article. The Reuters link below is accessable though and the text has been copied into post #1886. (See how difficult it is to track anything down about this?)



Feb 2023 text copied below.
Please use the sharing tools found via the share button at the top or side of articles. Subscribers may share up to 10 or 20 articles per month using the gift article service. More information can be found here.
Jes Staley’s emails with Jeffrey Epstein revealed in New York

Emails exchanged by former Barclays chief executive Jes Staley and the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein — including pictures of young women — have been revealed in greater detail in a lawsuit filed by the US Virgin Islands against JPMorgan Chase. Newly unredacted portions of a complaint brought by the government of the Virgin Islands, where Epstein had a home, contains excerpts of several of the 1,200 emails between the men from 2008 to 2012, when Staley was Epstein’s private banker at JPMorgan. In July 2010, Staley sent a message to Epstein that read: “Maybe they’re tracking u? That was fun. Say hi to Snow White.” Epstein asked in return: “[W]hat character would you like next?” to which Staley said “Beauty and the Beast”. Epstein replied: “well one side is available”. According to the Virgin Islands, the exchange was referring to young women and girls Epstein was providing. It alleges that the emails demonstrate a “close personal relationship and ‘profound’ friendship between the two men and even suggest that Staley may have been involved in Epstein’s sex-trafficking operation”. The “snow white” email was first reported by the Financial Times in November 2021. The new parts of the lawsuit that were revealed on Wednesday will add pressure on to JPMorgan, which the Virgin Islands says is liable for facilitating Epstein’s sexual abuse by failing to spot and act on red flags. The filing also comes more than a year after Staley resigned from Barclays after seeing preliminary conclusions of an investigation by UK regulators, which examined whether he had mischaracterised his relationship with Epstein as purely professional. Barclays declined to comment. Staley, who worked at JPMorgan until 2013, pressed the bank to keep Epstein as a client despite the disgraced financier’s convictions, the FT has previously reported. Some of the newly released emails suggest Epstein was a controversial customer and was under review at the highest levels of the bank, including chief executive Jamie Dimon. An email the Virgin Islands says was sent in August 2008 read: “I would count Epstein’s assets as a probable outflow for ‘08 ($120mm [sic] or so?) as I can’t imagine it will stay (pending Dimon review).” The complaint also cites emails it alleges show employees at JPMorgan raised concerns about Epstein at various stages. It includes a 2010 email from a member of the bank’s risk management division that read: “See below new allegations of an investigation related to child trafficking — are you still comfortable with this client who is now a registered sex offender?” In a January 2011 review of Epstein’s accounts, the complaint says, the bank concluded there were “no material updates” and noted that “Jes Staley discussed the topic with Jeffrey Epstein who replied there was no truth to the allegations, no evidence and was not expecting any problems”. JPMorgan declined to comment beyond court filings from the bank’s lawyers who have previously characterised the complaint as “meritless”. Staley himself is not a defendant in the lawsuit and has consistently denied knowledge of Epstein’s sexual abuse. Kathleen Harris, a lawyer for Staley, declined to comment. Harris told the FT in 2021 that her client had “no involvement in any of the alleged crimes committed by Mr Epstein, and code words were never used by Mr Staley in any communications with Mr Epstein, ever.” The cache of 1,200 emails — provided by JPMorgan to regulators in the US and UK — also form the core of the UK regulator’s probe against Staley, which he is currently appealing. Another email included in the filing was sent in November 2009, when Epstein was under home confinement in Florida after being released on charges of soliciting a minor for prostitution in the state. The USVI said it was sent while Staley “was presumably visiting Little St James”, Epstein’s private island. “So when all hell breaks lo[o]se, and the world is crumbling, I will come here, and be at peace. Presently, I’m in the hot tub with a glass of white wine. This is an amazing place. Truly amazing. Next time, we’re here together. I owe you much. And I deeply appreciate our friendship. I have few so profound,” Staley wrote. A month later in early December, Staley messaged: “I realize the danger in sending this email. But it was great to be able, today, to give you, in New York City, a long heartfelt, hug.” The next day, Epstein sent an email that contained a picture of a young woman, which remains redacted. Staley replied “don’t tell me a French wine”. Epstein said, “always thoughts of alcohol”. Later in December, Epstein sent another email to Staley that contained only a picture of a young woman, also still redacted. The Virgin Islands alleges that the emails, photos and bank transfers show that JPMorgan “knowingly facilitated, sustained, and concealed the human trafficking network” he operated with transactions made via JPMorgan accounts. The women “trafficked and abused during different intervals between at least 2003 and July 2019, when Epstein was arrested and jailed” received payments “between 2003 and 2013 in excess of $1 million collectively”, the complaint says. Among the recipients were women with “eastern European surnames who were publicly and internally identified as Epstein recruiters and/or victims”, lawyers for the Virgin Islands claimed, including one woman identified in news reports and JPMorgan’s due diligence as having been solicited by Epstein when she was 14 years old, who was paid $600,000. Epstein pleaded guilty to one count of solicitation of prostitution with a minor in 2008 in state court and was registered as a sex offender in the Virgin Islands soon after. He died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on federal charges that he trafficked underage girls. Epstein’s estate reached a $105mn settlement with the Virgin Islands in December. JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank are also being sued by victims of Epstein, who accuse the lenders of aiding sex trafficking by turning a blind eye to suspicious transactions. Copyright The Financial Times Limited 2025. All rights reserved.Reuse this content(opens in new window)CommentsJump to comments section
 
Last edited:
At the moment i just don't know what to say. Just letting it sink in that all these banks knew about this. The FBI knew about this. Ex Presidents knew about this. Who didn't know about this are probably in the minority.
 
Last edited:
Ok this is brand new. Ex Bank of England chief Mark Carney photo surfaces with him and Ghislaine Maxwell, who is an associate of his wife.

He currently wants to run as PM of Canada.

What is it with Epstein, Maxwell, heads of National Banks and Governments ?

(They don't name the guy on the left at all. It looks like Staley to me.)


LILLEY: Carney campaign pushes back on Maxwell photos, says 'they are not friends'​

Online photos showing would-be Liberal leader with late Jeffrey Epstein's ex raises questions for Carney

Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inboxSign Up
Author of the article:
Brian Lilley
Published Jan 10, 2025 • Last updated 1 week ago • 4 minute read
328 Comments

Mark Carney and his wife with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Then-governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney, second from left, attends the Wildness Festival with his wife Diana Fox, far right, and others including Ghislaine Maxwell, second from right, at Cornbury Park in Oxfordshire, England, on Aug. 10, 2013. PHOTO BY ADRIAN SHERRATT /Shutterstock

Article content​

The nascent leadership campaign of Mark Carney is blaming the Pierre Poilievre Conservatives for circulating photos of the global banker with Ghislaine Maxwell, the jailed ex-girlfriend of the late Jeffrey Epstein.

The photos began circulating on social media Monday. It appears the original account to share it is a small anonymous account with few followers and only a few posts over the past few weeks.

The original post pointed to a photo of Carney and his wife Diana Fox Carney standing with Maxwell, the British socialite-turned-sex trafficker and Epstein associate who is serving 20 years in jail.

“This is another example of how Pierre Poilievre and (adviser) Jenni Byrne have always played politics and it shows again how terrified they are to fight Mark Carney,” a source close to Carney told the Toronto Sun when asked about the photos and any association between the Carneys and Maxwell.


“As a child, the woman you reference went to the same high school as Mr. Carney’s wife’s sister. While they have bumped into each other in public settings (including the 11-year-old photos you’ve sent), they are not friends.”


Mark Carney and his wife with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Then-governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney, second from left, attends the Wildness Festival with his wife Diana Fox, far right, and others including Ghislaine Maxwell, second from right, at Cornbury Park in Oxfordshire, England, on Aug. 10, 2013. PHOTO BY ADRIAN SHERRATT /Shutterstock

Several photos from August 2013 show Carney socializing with Maxwell at an event called the Wilderness Festival. Carney had just moved to Britain to take up a new position as governor of the Bank of England after serving five years in the same role with the Bank of Canada.

Stories in British media from 2013 detailed how Carney used an event held at his sister in-law’s estate as a coming-out party.

“The economy’s getting better, the sun’s out … and even the new Bank of England boss is chillaxing,” says the headline of a Daily Mail story published in August 2013.

The story includes a photo of Carney, his wife Diana, and Maxwell lounging in the grass at the Wilderness Festival. The event has been described as “Poshstock,” an event for “well-heeled hippies“ that included a “luxury spa, gourmet food and heated yurts,” all laid out on the grounds of Cornbury Park, the massive estate of Carney’s sister in-law Lady Tania Rotherwick.

Maxwell has been described as an old friend of Rotherwick and a frequent guest at her homes and the Wilderness Festival.

The published photos of Carney and Maxwell show he and his wife relaxing and in casual conversation with the woman who would go on to become a well-known sex-trafficker to the stars. They certainly can’t be dismissed as just two people being caught in the same frame by a paparazzi photographer.


The photos predate Maxwell being charged for her involvement in Epstein’s sex crimes, but after Epstein’s 13 months in prison over 2008-09 for sexual offences that Maxwell was not charged for.

Maxwell is serving 20 years in prison on convictions of sex trafficking related to her decades spent as Epstein’s longtime girlfriend. The accusations included recruiting young girls for sex with Epstein and his celebrity clients.



“From at least 1994, up to and including in or about 2004, Ghislaine Maxwell assisted, facilitated and participated in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom and ultimately abuse victims known to Maxwell and Epstein to be under the age of 18,” a statement from the New York District Attorney’s Office said when Maxwell was convicted in 2022.



While the full list of clients has never been released, she was known to seek out high-profile men in New York and London society. Court documents and public allegations have included the likes of Prince Andrew, an accusation the prince denies.
 
Last edited:
Ok this is brand new. Ex Bank of England chief Mark Carney photo surfaces with him and Ghislaine Maxwell, who is an associate of his wife.

He currently wants to run as PM of Canada.

What is it with Epstein, Maxwell, heads of National Banks and Governments ?


LILLEY: Carney campaign pushes back on Maxwell photos, says 'they are not friends'​

Online photos showing would-be Liberal leader with late Jeffrey Epstein's ex raises questions for Carney

Get the latest from Brian Lilley straight to your inboxSign Up
Author of the article:
Brian Lilley
Published Jan 10, 2025 • Last updated 1 week ago • 4 minute read
328 Comments

Mark Carney and his wife with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Then-governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney, second from left, attends the Wildness Festival with his wife Diana Fox, far right, and others including Ghislaine Maxwell, second from right, at Cornbury Park in Oxfordshire, England, on Aug. 10, 2013. PHOTO BY ADRIAN SHERRATT /Shutterstock

Article content​

The nascent leadership campaign of Mark Carney is blaming the Pierre Poilievre Conservatives for circulating photos of the global banker with Ghislaine Maxwell, the jailed ex-girlfriend of the late Jeffrey Epstein.

The photos began circulating on social media Monday. It appears the original account to share it is a small anonymous account with few followers and only a few posts over the past few weeks.

The original post pointed to a photo of Carney and his wife Diana Fox Carney standing with Maxwell, the British socialite-turned-sex trafficker and Epstein associate who is serving 20 years in jail.

“This is another example of how Pierre Poilievre and (adviser) Jenni Byrne have always played politics and it shows again how terrified they are to fight Mark Carney,” a source close to Carney told the Toronto Sun when asked about the photos and any association between the Carneys and Maxwell.


“As a child, the woman you reference went to the same high school as Mr. Carney’s wife’s sister. While they have bumped into each other in public settings (including the 11-year-old photos you’ve sent), they are not friends.”


Mark Carney and his wife with Ghislaine Maxwell.
Then-governor of the Bank of England Mark Carney, second from left, attends the Wildness Festival with his wife Diana Fox, far right, and others including Ghislaine Maxwell, second from right, at Cornbury Park in Oxfordshire, England, on Aug. 10, 2013. PHOTO BY ADRIAN SHERRATT /Shutterstock

Several photos from August 2013 show Carney socializing with Maxwell at an event called the Wilderness Festival. Carney had just moved to Britain to take up a new position as governor of the Bank of England after serving five years in the same role with the Bank of Canada.

Stories in British media from 2013 detailed how Carney used an event held at his sister in-law’s estate as a coming-out party.

“The economy’s getting better, the sun’s out … and even the new Bank of England boss is chillaxing,” says the headline of a Daily Mail story published in August 2013.

The story includes a photo of Carney, his wife Diana, and Maxwell lounging in the grass at the Wilderness Festival. The event has been described as “Poshstock,” an event for “well-heeled hippies“ that included a “luxury spa, gourmet food and heated yurts,” all laid out on the grounds of Cornbury Park, the massive estate of Carney’s sister in-law Lady Tania Rotherwick.

Maxwell has been described as an old friend of Rotherwick and a frequent guest at her homes and the Wilderness Festival.

The published photos of Carney and Maxwell show he and his wife relaxing and in casual conversation with the woman who would go on to become a well-known sex-trafficker to the stars. They certainly can’t be dismissed as just two people being caught in the same frame by a paparazzi photographer.


The photos predate Maxwell being charged for her involvement in Epstein’s sex crimes, but after Epstein’s 13 months in prison over 2008-09 for sexual offences that Maxwell was not charged for.

Maxwell is serving 20 years in prison on convictions of sex trafficking related to her decades spent as Epstein’s longtime girlfriend. The accusations included recruiting young girls for sex with Epstein and his celebrity clients.



“From at least 1994, up to and including in or about 2004, Ghislaine Maxwell assisted, facilitated and participated in Jeffrey Epstein’s abuse of minor girls by, among other things, helping Epstein to recruit, groom and ultimately abuse victims known to Maxwell and Epstein to be under the age of 18,” a statement from the New York District Attorney’s Office said when Maxwell was convicted in 2022.



While the full list of clients has never been released, she was known to seek out high-profile men in New York and London society. Court documents and public allegations have included the likes of Prince Andrew, an accusation the prince denies.
Makes it impossible to trust anyone in power in this world or in control of banks if you ask me. Disgusting. And it just gets quieted down, every time.
 
Makes it impossible to trust anyone in power in this world or in control of banks if you ask me. Disgusting. And it just gets quieted down, every time.
I know. It's incredible isn't it? I just cannot believe this great big web of financial corruption that has been going on for decades. These people set our bank overdraft and mortgage rates, run our economy and they are all seemingly a bunch of massive sleazeballs. And nobody seems to care about it but they just want it swept under the carpet.

Even trying to search and find out any information on this is difficult. It is suppressed by the search engines when it should be top news.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,060
Messages
249,989
Members
996
Latest member
scngagirl
Back
Top Bottom