JOSHUA "JJ" VALLOW, TYLEE RYAN, TAMMY DAYBELL, & CHARLES VALLOW: State of Idaho/Arizona vs. Lori & Chad Daybell *GUILTY*

1580704661510.png

Police seem to be no closer to finding 7-year-old Joshua “JJ” Vallow and 17-year-old Tylee Ryan than they were when this story began months ago.

Since that time, the story has gained international attention as it’s taken twists and turns involving a purported cult, dead spouses, delusions of divinity and preparing for the end of the world. Despite all the angles, and the ever-growing number of people related to the case, the facts remain essentially the same as when it was first announced.

The two children remain missing and the parents, Lori (Vallow) Daybell, and her new husband, Chad Daybell, refuse to disclose their whereabouts to police. Both have been named persons of interest in the disappearance of the children. Law enforcement is also investigating the deaths of the Daybells’ previous respective spouses, Charles Vallow and Tammy Daybell, though neither Chad nor Lori have been named suspects in those cases.

Written timeline of events
  • April 3, 2018 - Tylee Ryan's father, Joseph Ryan, dies. Death ruled heart attack.
  • December 2018 - Chad Daybell & Lori Vallow make first appearance on Preparing a People podcast.
  • February 2019 - Charles Vallow files for divorce from Lori, claiming she viewed herself as a god preparing for the second coming, and she would kill him if he got in her way.
  • February - April 2019 - Lori disappears for nearly two months, leaving her children with others.
  • June 2019 - Lori's niece demands a divorce from her husband, who says she shares similar beliefs to her aunt.
  • July 11, 2019 - Charles Vallow shot and killed by Lori's brother Alex Cox. Shooting initially ruled self-defense.
  • August 2019 - Lori moves to Rexburg, Idaho with kids
  • September 3, 2019 - Joshua "JJ" Vallow enrolled in school
  • September 23, 2019 - JJ last attended school
  • September 24, 2019 - Lori unenrolls JJ from school, saying she would be homeschooling him.
  • September 2019 - Tylee also seen in September, but it's unclear when and where (she had graduated early)
  • October 2, 2019 - Lori's niece's ex-husband was shot at, missing his head by inches. Shooter was driving a vehicle registered to Charles Vallow.
  • October 9, 2019 - Tammy Daybell, Chad's wife, called 911 and said a masked man shot at her with a paintball gun.
  • October 19, 2019 - Tammy Daybell dies, death is ruled natural
  • October 25, 2019 - Tylee, or someone using her phone, texts a friend
  • Late October / Early November 2019 - Chad Daybell & Lori Vallow get married
  • November 26, 2019 - Welfare check requested for JJ at the request of extended family - police are told he is in Arizona with family, but he is not
  • November 27, 2019 - Police return to serve a search warrant, finding the Daybell's gone
  • December 12, 2019 - Lori's brother, who had shot her ex-husband, dies mysteriously in Arizona
  • December 20, 2019 - Search for JJ and Tylee goes public
  • December 30, 2019 - LE says Lori knows where her children are but will not cooperate
  • January 25, 2020 - Chad & Lori are located in Hawaii, served with a notice that she must produce the children within 5 days
  • January 30, 2020 - Lori fails to produce JJ and Tylee
www.eastidahonews.com

The latest timeline in the cases of Lori Vallow and Chad Daybell - East Idaho News

REXBURG — Police seem to be no closer to finding 7-year-old Joshua "JJ" Vallow and 17-year-old Tylee Ryan than they were when this story began months ago.
www.eastidahonews.com www.eastidahonews.com

1580705763474.png



edited by staff to add new media link
www.crimewatchers.net

Are Chad Daybell and Lori Vallow Daybell serial killers? Has their doomsday cult finally ended? Keep up-to-date on this bizarre case!

Keep up-to-date on this case at Crimewatchers.net!
www.crimewatchers.net www.crimewatchers.net
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Kimster said:
She’ll probably have to get new attorneys just because they’re going to have to deem her and insolvent and give her public defenders again. Idaho taxpayers wouldn’t be too keen on paying for her attorneys in Arizona.
Click to expand...
Yeah I'm curious to see. I think she is about due for a stunt or mental health exam. I mean now she knows she is going to prison and even if she felt she had good chances on appeal, there is more sh*t raining down on her.... Maybe she's stay stoic and not pull anything but there just isn't any chance in sight for her now imo so we shall see...

She definitely will get a new team imo. Few attorneys are licensed in very many states and if they are it is generally a neighboring state. I could see someone in Idaho more easily also licensed in Wyoming or MT or WA for instance...

Although if a Mormon attorney, maybe I'm wrong. There seem to be a few states the religion all travels to or has homes in, etc. so maybe the attys. do the same, some of them. My top thoughts are CA, UT, ID and AZ and I've seen enough to know it isn't unique... And not saying there aren't a few other states as well. Arias travel, wasn't that AZ to CA, CA to AZ and another one or two with the conferences or whatever they were. In Kenzie Lueck, CA to UT. Lori's family did the same, etc. with CA at one point and AZ and Colby even has went from UT to AZ etc. So maybe Archie is licensed in AZ, haven't seen anyone bring it up in the news if she would need new attorneys or not, interested to find out...
 
Adam says plan to kill Joe by Lori and Alex. He says it is odd that when Lori desperate for money Joe dies and he leaves her $50k and Tylee got $2k...

Huh...?

I have watched Adam's interview(s) before back in the past but hmm does my memory fail or is this all new?

All seem to be coming out of the woodwork now... Lori is FAR from done answering for her crimes I'm thinking....

 
Kimster said:
I think it’s indicative of how obvious it is that she was guilty. In the cases where there’s opposing discussions about verdict, they usually keep pretty quiet. Have we ever heard from a juror in the Casey Anthony case?
Click to expand...

GrandmaBear said:
Yeah they'd have to explain how they all voted innocent and why...
Click to expand...

I saw one juror interviewed in the Anthony case. He said they all thought George was hiding something.

simon cowell facepalm GIF
 
GrandmaBear said:
Well I'm confused then. Roundpeg's post says she WAS already charged a year ago for it.

Vallow was charged on 2/24/22. The late Allister Adel was the county attorney at the time

So the way I am reading the part you posted is that there are going to be ADDITIONAL "new charges" for Mr. Boudreaux's attemped murder.
Click to expand...
I think they must mean indicted by the GJ in Feb '22. I certainly had not heard about that.
 
Tresir said:
I think they must mean indicted by the GJ in Feb '22. I certainly had not heard about that.
Click to expand...
Well then news really worded it wrong or "accidentally" for interest and sensation.

And your post is worded like this and I take that as a "quote"----
plan to hit her with new charges over Mr Boudreaux’s attempted murder.

Charges not ONE charge for his attempted murder but plural.

It may be just a case of news with tiny little "mistakes" trying to grab the attention of people who pick up on it which is exactly what it is doing with me...
 
Kimster said:
I was watching a talking head recently, who was going on and on and on about Charles being Lori‘s first husband. I switched programs. Obviously the guy didn’t know the case as well as I did. Why watch?
Click to expand...
That's what I thought at first with this one and yet the other two never corrected him and he went on to clearly know it was her "nephew" and not her brother. Of course nephew meaning "niece's" husband which isn't exactly correct either but...

Linda had a couple of things wrong on West last night too. Not picking and not saying mistakes can't be made but these more national "news" type programs well they have a LOT more viewers and teams to help so I'd expect them to get it right...

Have to laugh though at what you said, who was it that thought Charles was her first? Lol that is DEFINITELY not someone who knows the case.
 
Guess Who said:
They don't want to have to admit that they just were sick and tired of being sequestered.
Click to expand...
And the fact that the prosecution didn't prove the case without the defense creating reasonable doubt. AND sequestration. i think several things played in here. 12 jurors don't agree on such without failure to prove the case imo.

We all know she did it, but the evidence was not there for the jury imo. i don't doubt there were jurors who wanted to convict her but couldn't give a strong enough evidence basis to argue it with the others. Jmo.
 
GrandmaBear said:
And the fact that the prosecution didn't prove the case without the defense creating reasonable doubt. AND sequestration. i think several things played in here. 12 jurors don't agree on such without failure to prove the case imo.

We all know she did it, but the evidence was not there for the jury imo. i don't doubt there were jurors who wanted to convict her but couldn't give a strong enough evidence basis to argue it with the others. Jmo.
Click to expand...

I wish I had been sequestered, the food would be a lot better.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I wish I had been sequestered, the food would be a lot better.
Click to expand...
Our jury wasn't sequestered but got to order in each day, not leave for lunch. I don't know that they had a lot of choices, small town our county seat is in but it smelled pretty darned good on occasion... We don't see many days long trials much less murder trials so they probably arranged the best stuff they could for them... There was a golf course/supper club in town and a couple of other choices...
 
Still watching and again, so impressed, I think they had a serious jury that really wanted to do the best job in either direction they could.

True with him at least...
 
Kimster said:
I was able to listen to this interview while doing no brainer work. He sounds like the kind of juror I would always want serving in our courts!
Click to expand...
Sounds like he has served more than once. Probably because he truly listens and weighs things.

Long day here. I watched a few things. I THINK that's the case.

He is so well worth watching and yes if I was in trouble or wanted a conviction, either way, I'd want him as a FAIR juror...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,033
Messages
244,098
Members
982
Latest member
TonyGutter
Back
Top Bottom