Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Tresir said:
According to this it would be involuntary manslaughter.

Involuntary Manslaughter

Free Phone Consultation - Available 24/7 - Call 617.492.3000 - Altman & Altman aggressively represents the accused against charges in Criminal & Crime cases. Involuntary Manslaughter - Boston Criminal Lawyer
criminal.altmanllp.com criminal.altmanllp.com


Involuntary Manslaughter​

Involuntary manslaughter is an unlawful killing caused unintentionally during the commission of wanton or reckless conduct or during the commission of a battery. In this context, “unintentionally” means that the defendant intended to commit the act that caused the death but did not intend to cause the death itself. “Unlawful” means there is no legal excuse for the defendant’s actions.

Examples of wanton or reckless conduct include driving a car in a reckless way, driving a car while intoxicated, playing Russian roulette, and selling heroin. Driving a car negligently (as opposed to wantonly or recklessly) won’t give rise to manslaughter, but it can be enough to give rise to motor vehicle homicide.
Click to expand...

According to the facts, it's a police department railroading.
 
Tresir said:
It is manslaughter if it was accidental. I dont believe it was intentional, but she should not have drank and driven. She should just go for a manslaughter plea deal, if they are willing, but i think they want her to be convicted of murder. I don't think that will fly with a jury, as was seen in the mistrial.

Did the cops investigate it as a murder? Because, as has been stated, they don't seem to have done a very good job.
Click to expand...
Manslaughter cases are investigated as as homicide until proven to be manslaughter. They didn't prove anything at all about anything because they did no investigation at all.
 
Tresir said:
Perhaps he fell down the steps and had other injuries too. It was blunt force trauma right?

She admitted it. I think the taillight, which was already cracked, fell out when the car hit him. The taillight may not have impacted him at all. I do also think there is a possibility more than one car may have hit/run over him too, with all the comings and goings.
Click to expand...
So now you are saying she didn't hit him??? What stairs??!
 
Tresir said:
Perhaps he fell down the steps and had other injuries too. It was blunt force trauma right?

She admitted it. I think the taillight, which was already cracked, fell out when the car hit him. The taillight may not have impacted him at all. I do also think there is a possibility more than one car may have hit/run over him too, with all the comings and goings.
Click to expand...
If the taillight didn't impact him, where did this invites on his arm come from? You are now getting further and further away from her being responsible in your own words
 
Guess Who said:
If the taillight didn't impact him, where did this invites on his arm come from? You are now getting further and further away from her being responsible in your own words
Click to expand...
The abrasions on his arm could have come from anything, the ground, a wall, the car, as he was impacted by the car or from falling over at some point. He actially died of blunt force trauma and hypothermia so those arm injuries were not a cause of his death.
 
Guess Who said:
Manslaughter cases are investigated as as homicide until proven to be manslaughter. They didn't prove anything at all about anything because they did no investigation at all.
Click to expand...
Manslaughter is homicide isn't it? What i am saying is it could have been a mixture of things. He could have fallen over and she could have driven over him.
 
Tresir said:
The abrasions on his arm could have come from anything, the ground, a wall, the car, as he was impacted by the car or from falling over at some point. He actially died of blunt force trauma and hypothermia so those arm injuries were not a cause of his death.
Click to expand...
What blunt force trauma? That on the front AND back of his head? That sure didn't come from her hitting him. He has absolutely no impact damage from being hit by a vehicle.
 
Tresir said:
Manslaughter is homicide isn't it? What i am saying is it could have been a mixture of things. He could have fallen over and she could have driven over him.
Click to expand...
How did she drive over him and have absolutely no proof of that happening? You are doing more to convince me of her not being involved.
 
Guess Who said:
If the taillight didn't impact him, where did this invites on his arm come from? You are now getting further and further away from her being responsible in your own words
Click to expand...
I already said the abrasions on his arm look to me like that is due to being dragged across concrete or against a wall. It certainly is not from a tail light or dog bite as it is too big IMO.
 
Guess Who said:
How did she drive over him and have absolutely no proof of that happening? You are doing more to convince me of her not being involved.
Click to expand...
Because she has no exact memory due to intoxication but appears to still believe she did it. So she probably has a vague recall of hitting him.

What's your version of what happened?
 
Guess Who said:
Wouldn't you if you saw him there and that's the last place you knew he was to be? I sunny understand why she wouldn't have done that.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't be drinking and driving in the first place so it wouldn't come up.
Guess Who said:
What blunt force trauma? That on the front AND back of his head? That sure didn't come from her hitting him. He has absolutely no impact damage from being hit by a vehicle.
Click to expand...
The injuries that caused his death.
 
Guess Who said:
And that's 100% not how they would investigate the presumed murder of another cop. It just doesn't happen like that if they are actually investigating anything they want to solve.
Click to expand...
Why do you think they acted like they didn't want to solve it?
 
Guess Who said:
What blunt force trauma? That on the front AND back of his head? That sure didn't come from her hitting him. He has absolutely no impact damage from being hit by a vehicle.
Click to expand...
Impact on the front and back indicates to me the original impact and the opposite impact as his head hits the ground or a wall, for example. Eg if he had fallen on his hands and knees and the car hit him and then knocked hìm backwards. That's where the LE investigation should come in, to work out the cause of those injuries.
 
Tresir said:
I already said the abrasions on his arm look to me like that is due to being dragged across concrete or against a wall. It certainly is not from a tail light or dog bite as it is too big IMO.
Click to expand...

He wasn't dragged across concrete or hit a wall. The scratches on his arm look like dog bites.
 
Tresir said:
But why? If they want to be sure to get his killer, as Guess Who says that is what LE are usually like, why are they railroading her? Wouldn't that mean the real killer goes free?
Click to expand...

Because the real killer is also a cop. Pin it on her and save the living cop from a murder charge.
 
Tresir said:
Because she has no exact memory due to intoxication but appears to still believe she did it. So she probably has a vague recall of hitting him.

What's your version of what happened?
Click to expand...
Her car nor his body had any proof of her car running over him whether she remembers what happened or not.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,009
Messages
241,023
Members
969
Latest member
SamiraMill
Back
Top Bottom