I've been mostly silent in my thoughts on this case, but there is definitely something wrong here. Did Karen Read hit JOK with her car? Maybe.. If she did, I don't believe it killed him.
All IMHO.
+ Scratches on the arm of JOK did not come from a broken tail light. Too linear, parallel , spacing of the wounds and between the wounds would discount this theory. Wounds to the head are not convincingly attributable to a being hit by a vehicle. He was a fairly tall man. Even if he was on his knees, his back would have had to been to the vehicle, and he would have had to have other bodily wounds in addition to the back of his head, if one is trying to claim that his head wounds were directly from being hit by a vehicle.
+ Members of the police agencies have been penalized for less than stellar police work, or not following procedure. Purposeful, uninformed or sloppy is very much open for critique.
+ Police involved in other cases are mostly the same as involved in this one. Fed investigation has led to murder charges of a police officer, in a different case which either points to incompetence or malfeasance. Either way these officers should not be involved in any other investigations till all has been cleared up.
+ There is an active Fed investigation, and many of the witnesses in the JOK/Karen Read trial have been called before a FED grand jury.
+ Evidence was discluded that perhaps should not have been. Other evidence has been completely obscured. (Bulkhead from 34 Fairview, Fed investigation, Proffers, Collin Albert calling a friend (girl, from Canton) looking for an alibi ...alleged information from Fed investigation/grand jury. Alleged
+ TWO Fed hired ARCA investigators say that JOK was not hit by vehicle. Not allowed to fully testify due to ongoing Fed investigation. I was floored that they were testing throwing a glass at the vehicle, cannon testing_ Why? Hopefully more to come on that.
+ Testing not performed on the actual arm wounds of JOK. No, it didn't kill him, but would have been circumstantial evidence, and add weight (or not) to two experts' testimony regarding wounds.
+ Tail light was in fact ruined/destroyed in sally port, per police and technician testimony. Along with all the other questionable sally port evidence and testimony.
+ Testimony from Guarino must be thrown out. IE - He testified in Sandra Birchmore investigation that deleted messages could not be recovered. FBI recovered 32,000 (+) messages from Farwell and Birchmore using Cellebrite software. (thank you
@kdg411 for your explanations). Tie is relevant to testimony in KR trial due to searches that were discounted from witness phones.
+ Brian Higgins, ATF agent, was at 34 Fairview until 1:30 AM. Proffer from FEDs. Why is he not being scrutinized. He had motive.
There are more reasons for me, personally, to be skeptical, but I don't think it will make a difference to people's opinions. Accepting what Feds vs. local say in Sandra Birchmore case, but not in the KR case is puzzling to me. It wasn't murder, but I cannot reconcile the jury voting unanimously it wasn't murder, hung on manslaughter, voting unanimously on leaving the scene of accident. I also cannot reconcile that if the Feds believed she was not guilty that they let her go through all this turmoil. Unless she and her lawyers were in on a sting. WTH???
Yes, another conspiracy, all my own.
Fire away!!! Hahaha. Love you all.
