Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 

[Guess Who]

Well they are getting a do over right? So they can get it right this time hopefully. If they don't, then they have to expect the same result or even an acquittal.

And the defense has sooooooo much more, too.

 

[Guess Who]

I think it probably was by the emergency services and those who heard her afterwards, like JO's niece, for instance. I wonder if it is any of her texts? Did they publish her texts? I know i have heard about a couple like the 'where r u you? U pervert JO."

We can watch for these things in the retrial.

I'm specifically talking about all the people at the scene that supposedly heard her utter those words. Did they not do any witness interviews for those people (investigation 101) or did it not happen? We'll never know now because it isn't documented anywhere. You know, by the very person that was the self proclaimed record keeper that also didn't log any of the "evidence" he turned in.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

And the defense has sooooooo much more, too.

Especially if they get to depose witnesses before the trial for the civil matter.

The FBI will hopefully sniff everything out by then

 

[Tresir]

I have found transcripts of her texts and voicemails plus pictures from his autopsy showing the various injuries. For now i think it best to wait for the retrial before posting anything though.

 

[Guess Who]

I have found transcripts of her texts and voicemails plus pictures from his autopsy showing the various injuries. For now i think it best to wait for the retrial before posting anything though.

They are all up thread, too.

 

[Tresir]

They are all up thread, too.

Ok. Here is a copy of the statement of case and statement of fact that was given to the GJ, as I understand. I have so far only read about the first 10 pages but it is very detailed.
49 pages altogether. Scroll and roll if you have read/seen it before.

Pages 10 -13 are the pages that record the arrival at the party location by KR and JO and the return to look for him later. The mention of the witnesses hearing her saying "I hit him" several times is on page 13. A screenshot of page 13 is below and that statement is at line 10.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.insideedition.com/sites/default/files/inline-files/Karen%2520Read%2520Higgins.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwiCy_e0jqKIAxUPlP0HHQHdIisQFnoECBUQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3Ml8FrtycU9XFvyJsLjJCk

 

[Guess Who]

Karen Read and Sandra Birchmore cases cast doubt on Massachusetts police and prosecutors (nbcnews.com)

 

[Cousin Dupree]

Tomorrow on 20/20 they're interviewing Karen Read.

 

[Tresir]

America's happiest murder suspect?

Karen Read's amazingly tone-deaf remarks ahead of new murder trial

The Massachusetts professor appeared outside the Dedham courthouse where she has been accused of murdering her Boston police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe

www.dailymail.co.uk

"Karen Read compared her trial for the murder of cop boyfriend John O’Keefe to the ‘Vietnam War’ as she lapped up the adulation from fans who gathered to support her.

The Massachusetts professor appeared outside the Dedham courthouse where she has been accused of leaving the Boston police officer to die in the snow after running him over on a bitterly cold night in January 2022.

Read, 44, was dubbed ‘America’s happiest murderer’ as she smiled and giggled her way through a case that was declared a mistrial in July."

Continued at link....

 

[Cousin Dupree]

After watching the 20/20 show, my seester is convinced that Karen did it. I tried to tell her about the Sally Port video, but she didn't understand what I was saying. So I just emailed her this link:

Karen Read Murder Trial Week 6: The Prosecution Gets Forensical. And May Have Just Nuked Their Own Case.

Here's the link to the most recent update, which includes links to all the previous ones. So far, I've been trying to present these posts in a more or less chronological order. In keeping with the way...

www.barstoolsports.com

 

[Guess Who]

After watching the 20/20 show, my seester is convinced that Karen did it. I tried to tell her about the Sally Port video, but she didn't understand what I was saying. So I just emailed her this link:

Karen Read Murder Trial Week 6: The Prosecution Gets Forensical. And May Have Just Nuked Their Own Case.

Here's the link to the most recent update, which includes links to all the previous ones. So far, I've been trying to present these posts in a more or less chronological order. In keeping with the way...

www.barstoolsports.com

She definitely doesn't do herself any favors, but maybe we would know if she did it or not if they had did an actual investigation. That, by itself, gives me reasonable doubt. They were definitely hiding something.

 

[Cousin Dupree]

She definitely doesn't do herself any favors, but maybe we would know if she did it or not if they had did an actual investigation. That, by itself, gives me reasonable doubt. They were definitely hiding something.

I haven't watched it yet.

 

[Guess Who]

I haven't watched it yet.

I just saw a glimpse of it but have also seen her on other stuff.

 

[Summer_Breeze]

 

[Guess Who]

As they should

 

[Tresir]

As they should

From the tweet -

"The defense has argued that charge should be dropped because jurors in her first trial reported they agreed to find her not guilty of that charge before a mistrial was declared. Read's lawyers have said that violates her double jeopardy protections"

I don't believe it is double jeopardy as the mistrial was on all the charges, not just a mistrial on certain charges. I think this was discussed upthread.

 

[Guess Who]

From the tweet -

"The defense has argued that charge should be dropped because jurors in her first trial reported they agreed to find her not guilty of that charge before a mistrial was declared. Read's lawyers have said that violates her double jeopardy protections"

I don't believe it is double jeopardy as the mistrial was on all the charges, not just a mistrial on certain charges. I think this was discussed upthread.

I'm most cases, if they are voting not guilty on any of the charges, those charges are found not guilty. Now, if she was found not guilty on those charges, it would 100% be double jeopardy if they charged her again on those. That's the way it is supposed to work and that's what her very valid argument is about. The judge should have done exactly that and did not. A mistrial on all charges should only be if there was no agreement on ALL charges.

 

[Tresir]

I'm most cases, if they are voting not guilty on any of the charges, those charges are found not guilty. Now, if she was found not guilty on those charges, it would 100% be double jeopardy if they charged her again on those. That's the way it is supposed to work and that's what her very valid argument is about. The judge should have done exactly that and did not. A mistrial on all charges should only be if there was no agreement on ALL charges.

When the judge gave that decision, the jury had not revealed that though had they? Or am i remembering wrong? I'll check back upthread.

 

[Guess Who]

When the judge gave that decision, the jury had not revealed that though had they? Or am i remembering wrong? I'll check back upthread.

I'm sure she knew what it was because that's her job. If not, then she did the same kind of job the prosecution did, as in, she didn't do her job.

 

[Tresir]

I'm sure she knew what it was because that's her job. If not, then she did the same kind of job the prosecution did, as in, she didn't do her job.

From what i remember, they just told her they were deadlocked. But maybe i am remembering wrong.

Also, with the meaning of double jeopardy, I thought it generally means you cannot be charged again, if you have been found not guilty. She has not been found not guilty by the court.

So it is correct for her to stand trial again. The charges may be reduced or altered though.