Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Guess Who said:
They testified that that taillight was the one visible in the video and nobody was near it. It was not the taillight showing in the video as the video shows proctor next to the "other" taillight. When shown correctly, it shows proctor AT the taillight in question. They then why through all the trouble to reverse the video and then dub the timestamps back inverted correctly.

Explain why the would do that if it didn't mean anything.

Where the taillight piece were found are against the laws of physics with their version of what happened. Period.
Click to expand...
The whole trial has already been declared a mistrial. Why would you want false evidence in a video shown again? Wouldn't you rather see an unedited version in a new trial?
 
Tresir said:
It's what other posters have noticed. I havent watched it myself.
Click to expand...
Well, it was that you seem convinced that I wondered what convinced you, so anyway, maybe you'll take my word for it, lol!
Seriously, there was no tampering- the camera works like a mirror, and there was no editing- it records only when motion is detected.
 
Regina said:
Well, it was that you seem convinced that I wondered what convinced you, so anyway, maybe you'll take my word for it, lol!
Seriously, there was no tampering- the camera works like a mirror, and there was no editing- it records only when motion is detected.
Click to expand...
No. If the video was reversed then the timestamp would be reversed, too. It's just that simple. It was proven that it was reversed by people that are familiar with that Sally port, yet the timestamp was not. It also blows their excuse that it was motion sensitive.
 
Guess Who said:
No. If the video was reversed then the timestamp would be reversed, too. It's just that simple. It was proven that it was reversed by people that are familiar with that Sally port, yet the timestamp was not. It also blows their excuse that it was motion sensitive.
Click to expand...
When the mirrored image was reversed, so was the timestamp.
 
Regina said:
Why do you say that video was tampered with?
Click to expand...
Others have alleged that, but i don't know if the court decided that was true as it was declared a mistrial in the end. So there was no resolution of the case and the evidence.

ETA i see i did already answer. Sorry - mind like a sieve.
 
Tresir said:
Others have alleged that, but i don't know if the court decided that was true as it was declared a mistrial in the end. So there was no resolution of the case and the evidence.
Click to expand...
I don't follow nor am I alleging, I'm just sharing what was presented through testimony at trial.
 
Regina said:
I don't follow nor am I alleging, I'm just sharing what was presented through testimony at trial.
Click to expand...
Understand. I didnt watch the trial and have only gone by what is said on here. There is an appeal to dismiss charges going on. I found this but have found no appeal decision so far.

www.rollingstone.com

A Jury Wouldn't Convict Karen Read. Now She Wants Her Charges Dismissed

Attorneys for Karen Read, accused of murdering her boyfriend, argued in Massachusetts' Supreme Court that another trial would be double jeopardy.
www.rollingstone.com www.rollingstone.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,013
Messages
242,026
Members
974
Latest member
elimortonslywir
Back
Top Bottom