False.
It's exactly how I remember the actual testimony at trial happening. Not info from a news article - actual testimony.
So where was it testified to as to where it came from and when was it taken? And yes, all the clothes were testified to as being wadded up and handed in wet after a few days. Not sure what you are saying is false there.
It's also courtesy to not state that you will not watch anything from the trial then to request people to once again post something for you that you have stated that you will not watch. It's all posted. We have discussed the very thing as it was happening. You can go back and find it as easily as we can. I'm not wasting any more of my time looking for court links that Summer and KDG so kindly provided for us each day for them to just be blatantly ignored... again.
The message you are responding too explains that i did find two links myself and answered two posts that were other posters' queries. I am not aware i asked you for any links anyway, did I?
See my response to Cuz above. I am not aware you or Cuz have wasted time providing links to me anyway. That's ok as i found them myself.
I guess you probably need to check the trial details which is what you suggested I do. I found it and linked it above.
I read that the sweatshirt with the tear marks on the sleeve was provided for swabbing and testing.
www.boston25news.com
They got rid of the dog right after this happened and "didn't know who had it"
A dog that they had had for, I think, 7 years. I have a reactive dog not even that old now and there is no way I would be getting rid of her for just being as azz to other dogs. She is super sweet to people and especially loves kids. Let alone, not know who had her if there was ever a valid reason to have to surrender her. What coincidental timing, too. Pretty much guaranteed that this dog did not suddenly, after 7 years, just now become dog reactive.
So the Commonwealth just so happened to "lose" the original footage of the sally port video AFTER inviting the defense they had it and to come get a copy of it.
‘Critical issue’: Karen Read lawyers seek $12K reimbursement for fees paid to security camera expert
According to a new defense filing, “All original DVR footage from the relevant date had been destroyed, at best, due to improper preservation by the Commonwealth."
link to the actual filing.
No there isn't. There is a copy of the blatantly altered video that was turned over to the defense AFTER the trial started.
www.cbsnews.com
That John's clothing was collected at the hospital and at the station was layed out to dry and then was sorted where I think where his shirt and jacket was bagged together and his pants and belt and possibly boxers were bagged together until they were sent for testing.
I agree and the pics of the laid out clothes are upthread so that will remain as evidence for the new trial.