Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Chain of custody only begins when the police take control of an object. Then they need to bag it and put on where it was bagged, the time it was bagged, the date it was bagged, then seal it so it will be obvious if anyone opened the bag. Then every time it's handed off the information about who handed it off and to who, needs to be recorded. All items should have been bagged separately. This was not done. There is no way to confirm what the cops say is true.
So how do you know it was not done?
 
They were wadded up together and there is no record of who bagged them, who separated them and set them out to dry. Were they set out in a secured area? Who bagged them after they were dry?

This type of evidence handling would get you drummed out of the police academy.
It's documentated who collected and bagged them and they were received in a secure area of the police station where only two officers had access and from that point, it was one of those two officers who handled the evidence.
 
This account from the trial details the chain of custody of the evidence.





Testimony resumed Wednesday in the murder trial of Karen Read, who stands accused of backing her SUV into her boyfriend and leaving him for dead in Canton in January 2022.

stands accused of backing her SUV into her boyfriend and leaving him for dead in Canton in January 2022.


Read, 44, of Mansfield, allegedly rammed her vehicle into John O’Keefe after dropping him off outside a Fairview Road home early on Jan. 29, 2022 following a night of bar hopping and heavy drinking. She returned to the scene hours later with two other women and found O’Keefe’s snow-covered body on the front lawn, repeatedly yelling “I hit him” in the presence of first responders, witnesses have testified.


Attorneys for Read say she’s being framed and that O’Keefe entered the Fairview home, where he was fatally beaten in the basement before his body was planted on the lawn.

Catch up on the Karen Read trial, in 60 seconds
Here’s a rundown of some of the key witnesses who’ve testified so far.

Here’s how testimony unfolded on Wednesday.


4 p.m. — State Police investigator testifies that Read has six drinks at first bar

Prosecutor Adam Lally showed a still photo from Ring footage showing Read pulling out of O’Keefe’s driveway shortly after 5 a.m. on Jan. 29, with apparent damage to her right taillight visible. Yuri Bukhenik, a State Police investigator, told Lally he went to McCarthy’s pub, the first bar Read and O’Keefe went to, on Feb. 1.


Bukhenik said investigators collected video footage from the establishment and he identified still photos of Read and O’Keefe talking at the bar. He pointed out a “vase-style cocktail glass” near Read at the bar.

Lally played additional footage of O’Keefe walking into McCarthy’s with his friend, Michael Camerano. Bukhenik said the timestamp of the bar’s video footage was 12 minutes “behind real time.”


When Read enters the bar, O’Keefe waved at her as she made his way to him and put an arm around her while they talked, Bukhenik said. The video showed Read taking a cocktail glass from the bartender about seven minutes after she enters, he testified. She received a second drink about 15 minutes after that and later received a “shot glass beverage” that she poured into her cocktail glass, he said.


She later “receives another shot glass beverage” and puts that in her cocktail glass for a fourth drink, Bukhenik said. She is later captured on the footage receiving another “tall cylindrical cocktail glass” as well as another shot, which she placed inside the cocktail, for drinks five and six.


The video later showed Read and O’Keefe leaving the bar. Read had “a tall, cylindrical glass in her hand,” Bukhenik testified.

Lally then handed Bukhenik a document that contained the transaction receipts from McCarthy’s that night and asked him to whom they pertained. The first was opened under the tab for Karen A. Read, Bukhenik said, and a charge for $52.80 was paid using O’Keefe’s credit card. Lally asked Bukhenik if both receipts included orders of Tito’s vodka, and he confirmed that they did.


Bukhenik said investigators also gathered evidence from the Waterfall Bar & Grille, where Read and O’Keefe went after McCarthy’s. Video showed O’Keefe leaving at 12:11 a.m. holding a cocktail glass in his right hand, Bukhenik said.

Lally then played video showing O’Keefe walking into the second bar with Read, who greets a group that is already inside. At 11:39 p.m., the video shows Read taking a drink and consuming it, Bukhenik testified. The judge then ended testimony for the day.


3:15 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Prosecutor Adam Lally played a lengthy video clip of the SUV arriving at the garage. In the footage, police appear to photograph the interior and exterior of the SUV, including the damaged taillight. They also appear to clear snow from the area before putting yellow caution tape around the vehicle.


”We’re establishing a perimeter around the vehicle with yellow tape in order to” advise people “to stay away from the” SUV, Bukhenik testified.

Asked if he or fellow investigator Michael Proctor touched or manipulated the right taillight at any time, Yuri Bukhenik said “no, we did not.”


He said Proctor executed a search warrant on the SUV on Feb. 1. The next day, the SUV was taken to the Milton police station. Bukhenik said Canton police had “recused themselves” from conducting interviews by then, and once the SUV had been processed the department needed the spot in their sally port. The vehicle was moved to Milton for safekeeping, he said. On Feb. 2, he said, “I noted the taillight [had been] removed and the evidence collected.


Bukhenik testified that State Police also sought Ring camera footage from O’Keefe’s home in Canton.

No death investigations are a “one-man show,” Bukhenik said, adding that the probes are a “team effort” with troopers in his unit.

”We conduct interviews with two people,” either two troopers, or a trooper and a local detective, Bukhenik said.


He said Proctor was the “case officer” on the Read investigation and that Proctor wrote the affidavit for the warrant for the security footage from O’Keefe’s home. Authorities obtained the footage and reviewed it, Bukhenik said.

”It was presented in a sequential order,” he said of the video footage.


After a sidebar Lally played video taken from O’Keefe’s Ring camera.

One daytime clip from before the snowstorm shows Read backing her SUV out of O’Keefe’s driveway, making a slight turn near his car parked in the back of the driveway.

A second clip from 5:07 a.m. on Jan. 29 shows Read backing out of the driveway under heavy snow and darkness. The SUV appears to come close to O’Keefe’s vehicle, again parked in the back of the driveway. Bukhenik said investigators later saw no damage to O’Keefe’s vehicle or any debris on the ground near it.


The defense has asserted that Read may have hit O’Keefe’s vehicle when she backed out of the driveway on the morning of Jan. 29, providing an alternate theory for the taillight damage.

As the SUV completes its turn and starts pulling away, the video shows visible damage to the taillight. Additional footage was played of Read and her father pulling into O’Keefe’s driveway later in the day. Read’s brother is shown clearing snow off parts of her vehicle in O’Keefe’s driveway. Asked by Lally if he saw Read’s brother clearing snow from the right passenger taillight area in the footage, Bukhenik said, “I did not.


2:45 p.m. — Asked about the damage to her SUV, Read said, “I don’t know, it happened last night,” investigator testifies.

Yiri Bukhenik, a State Police investigator who went with fellow investigator Michael Proctor to Read’s parents house in Dighton on Jan. 29, said police introduced themselves and told Read they wanted to know what she remembered from the night before. They asked her “to walk us through” the past 24 hours, he said.


Judge Beverly Cannone told jurors they were about to hear statements Read “allegedly made” during the interview. Cannone said the jurors must determine whether any statements she gave were made voluntarily.

Bukhenik said that he asked Read to recount any events that occurred.


”She stated that she was willing to answer our questions,” he said. She said she didn’t want to go into “too much detail,” which he said he understood since she had just been through a traumatic event.

Read told authorities that she and O’Keefe had fought on the morning of Jan. 28 “over what the niece and nephew” had for breakfast, and that she met O’Keefe that night at McCarthy’s pub, where she drank “vodka soda.”


Read said she “did not” leave McCarthy’s with a beverage and that he did not get into any verbal or physical altercations with anyone there or at the Waterfall bar where they went next.

He said Read indicated she later “dropped Mr. O’Keefe off” on Fairview Road. She “stated she did not” see him walk into the Alberts’ house. Read said she made a three-point turn and left, Bukhenik said.


Asked about the damage to her SUV, Read said, “‘I don’t know, it happened last night,’” Bukhenik testified.

Read indicated she was “having stomach issues,” which was why she didn’t want to go into the Fairview home, where an afterparty was being held.

”She stated that when she woke up, she began looking for Mr. O’Keefe ... and began CPR on Mr. O’Keefe” when “she found him in the snow,” Bukhenik said. He said Read also said O’Keefe was bleeding from the nose and mouth and that both his eyes were swollen.


Bukhenik said he asked Read to give a step-by-step recounting of the three-point turn and what she did next.

“At that point was the interview terminated?” Lally asked.

“Yes it was,” Bukhenik said. Once it ended, he told Read that authorities would be seizing her phone and her vehicle.


Bukhenik said a truck came to tow Read’s SUV, and investigators later learned there was security video footage from the driveway of the Dighton home.

Lally later played video of Read’s SUV pulling into the driveway on the afternoon of Jan. 29, with Read exiting the passenger side and her father getting out of the driver’s side.


“I observed the defendant and her father at the rear right taillight” gesturing toward it in the footage, Bukhenik said.

He viewed video footage of the SUV being placed on a flatbed truck and pointed out a “white light” emanating from the damaged right taillight.

Bukhenik said he and Proctor followed the tow truck from Dighton to the Canton police station.


“The vehicle was unloaded and put into a heated sally port” at the station, Bukhenik said.

Inside the garage, the temperature rose above freezing and the snow “began to melt off of the vehicle,” he said.

2 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Yuri Bukhenik said after the lunch break that O’Keefe’s clothing was initially placed in one bag at the hospital.


When they got back to the evidence room, the items were laid out on butcher’s paper and “allowed to dry naturally because they were soaking wet,” he said.

He told prosecutor Adam Lally the plastic pieces later recovered at Fairview Road were never placed in the same bag as any of O’Keefe’s clothing.


Bukhenik said investigators from crime scene services arrived at the hospital on Jan. 29 to photograph O’Keefe’s body. He identified photos of O’Keefe’s body when Lally handed them to him.

Judge Beverly Cannone told jurors they were about to see photos that could be considered “graphic” and that they “must separate any emotional reaction” from their assessment of the evidence.


The photos of O’Keefe’s body were then displayed on the monitor.

”I observed the swelling of the eyelids,” Bukhenik said, as well as the slight laceration on his nostril and eyelid. He said he also observed the cuts on O’Keefe’s arm, as well as additional wounds on his “bicep, shoulder area.”


Bukhenik said he asked for police in Dighton police to respond to the address of Read’s parents as he and Michael Proctor, the lead investigator, drove there from the hospital. They arrived around 2:30 p.m. and waited for a “significant amount of time” for a local officer to arrive.


He said they requested the presence of uniformed officers in part because he felt it would be difficult for the Reads to identify him and Proctor as law enforcement, based on how they were dressed.

Bukhenik said Read’s vehicle was in the driveway.

”I observed a damaged rear right taillight fixture,” Bukhenik said. Pieces of the taillight were missing.


Read’s father directed the officers to the garage door, since the front door couldn’t be opened because so much snow had fallen, Bukhenik said.

Proctor stayed outside with the vehicle, Bukhenik said. He said he did not see Proctor or any other officer touch the vehicle at any time.


Inside the home, Read was sitting on the couch in the living room with her laptop open and her phone resting nearby, he said. Read’s mother was also there, Bukhenik said. He said the conversation was “polite, courteous” and the troopers at the time were in the “information-gathering” phase of the investigation.


1 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Yuri Bukhenik said he has been involved in more than 500 death investigations, many involving head trauma.

He said O’Keefe had sustained “bruising to the eyelids of his face.” His face was swollen and discolored.

”I also observed a cut to his nostril, and [one to] an eyelid, which was very small in size,” Bukhenik said.


He said O’Keefe had “abrasions to his upper forearm and lower bicep area” on his right arm.

”Each abrasion appeared to me to be linear and concentrated in a specific location on the arm,” he said, adding that the wounds were “concentrated” a few inches above and below the elbow.


Bukhenik said he and State Police investigator Michael Proctor then went to Read’s parents’ home in Dighton after learning she was there.

Bukhenik then removed O’Keefe’s torn gray sweatshirt from an evidence bag and, with gloves on, displayed it for jurors. He also removed O’Keefe’s orange T-shirt from an evidence bag and displayed that for jurors, followed by the sneaker recovered from the hospital.


Bukhenik then removed O’Keefe’s jeans and belt from another evidence bag and briefly displayed them. Judge Beverly Cannone called a half-hour lunch recess shortly after 1 p.m.

12:30 p.m. — The next witness is State Police Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik

Bukhenik, an investigator in the Read case, briefly recounted his time in the Marine Corps before he moved to civilian law enforcement.


He said he was on call as a supervisor on the morning of Jan. 29, 2022. He said the on-call detective that morning was Trooper Michael Proctor, whom he supervised.

The on-call schedule is generally compiled about a month in advance, Bukhenik said.

He said he got a call around 6:44 a.m. informing him that “there was a body in [a] snowbank in Canton.”


Bukhenik said he called Proctor and “advised him to contact Canton police.”

He said he told Proctor he would begin “shoveling out” and that they met at the Canton police station around 9:15 a.m.

Bukhenik said he drove in his personal truck because it had four-wheel drive, which was better for the inclement weather. Proctor was in the parking lot when Bukhenik arrived at the station and they walked in together, he said.


He said they went to the detectives’ unit and spoke to Sean Goode, a Canton police sergeant, for about 25 to 30 minutes. Bukhenik said he learned the victim was “Mr. John O’Keefe” and that he had been taken to a Brockton hospital, as had Read.

Witnesses have said Read was taken to the hospital after making “suicidal statements” at the crime scene.


Bukhenik said he and Proctor proceeded to the Canton home of Matt and Jennifer McCabe. McCabe’s sister and her brother-in-law Brian Albert lived at the Fairview Road home where O’Keefe’s body was found near the curb. Bukhenik said they first spoke with Jennifer McCabe, then her husband Matt, then Albert, who had come to the home. Each interview was conducted separately, Bukhenik said.


From there, the investigators went to the emergency department at Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton, where they saw “Mr. O’Keefe’s body” on a gurney, with his clothing “a couple of feet away at the foot of the bed.”

He said that after viewing O’Keefe’s body, the troopers identified the clothes and placed them into evidence bags.


Bukhenik said troopers notate who located an item of evidentiary value, as well as the time and place of recovery.

O’Keefe’s clothing was on the floor at the hospital and “soaking wet,” he said.

The clothing included jeans, plaid boxers, a black Nike sneaker, an orange T-shirt, and a gray long-sleeved shirt, he said.


”I also recognized, due to the aroma and visual observations, traces of vomit on the clothing,” Bukhenik said. “Once we went through the clothing we collected each item and put it into a large evidence bag.”

He said the items were double-bagged and he asked that paramedics check the ambulance for O’Keefe’s other sneaker. Witnesses have testified that O’Keefe’s other shoe was found upside down and buried under snow, flush against the curb on Fairview Road.


12:15 p.m. — Crime lab specialist testifies under cross-examination

Read lawyer Alan Jackson asked if Christina Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, examined the drinking glass, the glass pieces from Read’s bumper, a group of nine pieces of glass recovered at the crime scene at Fairview Road in Canton, and a separate, single piece of glass found there. Hanley said that was accurate.


She said she compared the drinking glass to the nine pieces of glass found at the scene where O’Keefe’s body was found. Some pieces “did not match the cup,” Jackson said. “Correct,” Hanley said.

”None of the items on the bumper were deemed to match the cup, correct?” Jackson asked.


“Correct,” Hanley said.

She told Jackson the single piece of glass found at Fairview also did not match the cup.

”You tested the single piece of glass ... against the nine pieces of glass,” Jackson said. “And they did not match, correct?”

”There was no physical match,” Hanley said.


Jackson asked if the cup was “not found to match any items” on the bumper.

”That is correct,” Hanley said.

Jackson also asked if the single piece of glass found at Fairview did not match the cup or the other nine glass pieces found at the scene.

”In other words, it stands alone,” he said.


”That’s correct,” Hanley said.

On redirect, Hanley told prosecutor Adam Lally the drinking glass matched six pieces of glass found at Fairview Road. Hanley concluded her testimony and the lawyers went to sidebar.

11:15 a.m. — Christina Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, is the next witness


Prosecutors next called Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab. Hanley said she has worked at the lab for about 16 years and described her educational and professional background.

Hanley said she currently works as a supervisor in the lab’s trace unit, which examines and compares evidence such as paint, fibers, hair, glass, tape, and other miscellaneous items, among other functions.


Hanley said she has examined glass “numerous times” in various cases involving crimes such as “a hit-and-run” or a breaking and entering. She said she encounters a “variety” of different types of glass in the course of her work.

In the Read case, she said she examined an “apparent drinking glass” and the “clear apparent glass pieces recovered from the bumper of a vehicle.” The drinking glass appeared to have “broken, irregular edges,” she testified.


Witnesses have said Read pulled a drinking glass out of her pocket when she entered a bar on the night of O’Keefe’s death.

The glass found on the bumper of Read’s SUV “consisted of five clear pieces ... all with broken or irregular edges,” she said.

Hanley said she examined the glass microscopically. She said she checked to see if there was a physical match between the pieces; some matched and some did not, she testified.


The items that did match, she said, “were at one time together as one unit.”

The items that did match, she said, “were at one time together as one unit.”
Hanley said the drinking glass matched with some of the glass pieces found at the crime scene on Fairview Road. Glass pieces found on the bumper of Read’s SUV were also consistent with glass pieces found at the scene.
Hanley said she also examined trace material recovered from John O’Keefe’s clothing. His clothes had “some clear plastic material, as well as some red plastic material,” she said. Some of the pieces were 1/16 of an inch in length or shorter, she said.
Hanley said the plastic found in his clothes “was found to be consistent in color and instrumental properties with the examined portion from the clear plastic of the taillight.” She said she determined the red plastic from the clothing was consistent in color and appearance with the examined portion of the red taillight.
10:15 a.m. Ashley Vallier resumes her testimony under cross-examination
Read attorney David Yannetti asked Vallier, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, if she examined the debris from John O’Keefe’s shirt. She said “correct.”
She told Yannetti the pieces of plastic she saw weren’t embedded in O’Keefe’s T-shirt and long-sleeve shirt when they came to her lab.
”You never saw those pieces on either, correct?” Yannetti asked.
”I did not,” Vallier said.
Before the pieces came to the lab, “you don’t know who had access to that evidence, correct?” Yannetti asked.
“Correct,” Vallier said.
She identified Trooper Michael Proctor, the lead investigator in the case, as the person who delivered those items to the crime lab on March 14, 2022.
She said “correct” when Yannetti asked if she couldn’t vouch for the chain of custody of the items between Jan. 29 and March 14.
Vallier said one evidence bag contained multiple pieces of red, black, clear, and silver plastic recovered on Feb. 3. The pieces were recovered by a trooper with a surname DiCicco, she said. Yannetti put a photo on the monitor of an evidence bag of additional plastic items recovered by Proctor on Feb. 8. He also displayed a photo of a red piece of plastic.
Yannetti asked if the red plastic piece Proctor found was “quite a bit larger” than the ones DiCicco had recovered days earlier.
”Than some of those pieces, yes,” Vallier said.
She told Yannetti that additional pieces of plastic, which Proctor recovered on Feb. 11 and Feb. 18, also appeared larger than pieces that DiCicco found on Feb. 3.
Yannetti asked Vallier if Proctor was also the person to “hand-deliver” the evidence bags containing the larger plastic pieces.
“Correct,” Vallier said.
”You were then able to piece together the majority of the taillight, correct?” Yannetti said. “It was after that that you were able to do the reconstruction.“
”Correct,” Vallier said.
Yannetti asked if one section of the taillight was “missing completely” and she said “correct,” pointing to a large hole on one side of the reconstructed taillight.
Yannetti asked if Vallier knows whathappened to the missing pieces and she said “I do not.”
On redirect, she told prosecutor Adam Lally that she never saw O’Keefe’s clothes. Vallier said that Maureen Hartnett, another forensic scientist in the lab, had transferred the plastic to her unit for testing. Vallier told Lally all the pieces of taillight she analyzed fit with the taillight housing taken from Read’s vehicle.
She then stepped down and Judge Beverly Cannone called a brief morning recess.
9:10 a.m. — Ashley Vallier resumes her testimony
Vallier, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, testified Monday that she analyzed pieces of apparent plastic and broken taillight found at the scene. Prosecutors say Read’s right taillight shattered when she struck O’Keefe.
On Wednesday, she identified additional photos of red and clear plastic that she analyzed. She identified “little dots” on one piece of clear plastic, which she described as resembling “dimples.” One by one, prosecutor Adam Lally displayed photos of the red and clear shards, and Vallier identified them as pictures that she had taken. She identified one “piece of red and clear ... apparent plastic” in the cache of photos.
Vallier said each item she analyzed was documented separately.
”I look at the photos to see if there are any similarities, dissimilarities,” Vallier said, adding that she also checks to see if any pieces match together. She said she analyzed the plastic pieces from the crime scene with a microscope.
Vallier also identified a separate batch of photos she took of pieces of plastic that appeared to fit together. She compared one larger piece of the taillight, identified as piece A, with other smaller ones. She said piece A fit together with two other smaller pieces.
In another set of colorless pieces of plastic, she said, several “fit together.” Another set of red and colorless apparent plastic pieces included two that “were found to fit together,” Vallier said.
Three pieces in another set also fit together, she testified.
In other sets of apparent plastic, Vallier testified, there were no matches.
Vallier testified that various plastic pieces “were at one time together as a larger unit.”
She identified additional photos of what appeared to be shattered pieces of taillight reassembled, following all of her comparison analysis. The lawyers came to sidebar before the defense began cross-examining Vallier.happened to the missing pieces and she said “I do not.”
On redirect, she told prosecutor Adam Lally that she never saw O’Keefe’s clothes. Vallier said that Maureen Hartnett, another forensic scientist in the lab, had transferred the plastic to her unit for testing. Vallier told Lally all the pieces of taillight she analyzed fit with the taillight housing taken from Read’s vehicle.
She then stepped down and Judge Beverly Cannone called a brief morning recess.
9:10 a.m. — Ashley Vallier resumes her testimony
Vallier, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, testified Monday that she analyzed pieces of apparent plastic and broken taillight found at the scene. Prosecutors say Read’s right taillight shattered when she struck O’Keefe.
On Wednesday, she identified additional photos of red and clear plastic that she analyzed. She identified “little dots” on one piece of clear plastic, which she described as resembling “dimples.” One by one, prosecutor Adam Lally displayed photos of the red and clear shards, and Vallier identified them as pictures that she had taken. She identified one “piece of red and clear ... apparent plastic” in the cache of photos.
Vallier said each item she analyzed was documented separately.
”I look at the photos to see if there are any similarities, dissimilarities,” Vallier said, adding that she also checks to see if any pieces match together. She said she analyzed the plastic pieces from the crime scene with a microscope.
Vallier also identified a separate batch of photos she took of pieces of plastic that appeared to fit together. She compared one larger piece of the taillight, identified as piece A, with other smaller ones. She said piece A fit together with two other smaller pieces.
In another set of colorless pieces of plastic, she said, several “fit together.” Another set of red and colorless apparent plastic pieces included two that “were found to fit together,” Vallier said.
Three pieces in another set also fit together, she testified.
In other sets of apparent plastic, Vallier testified, there were no matches.
Vallier testified that various plastic pieces “were at one time together as a larger unit.”
She identified additional photos of what appeared to be shattered pieces of taillight reassembled, following all of her comparison analysis. The lawyers came to sidebar before the defense began cross-examining Vallier.
 
Last edited:
This account from the trial details the chain of custody of the evidence.




stands accused of backing her SUV into her boyfriend and leaving him for dead in Canton in January 2022.


Read, 44, of Mansfield, allegedly rammed her vehicle into John O’Keefe after dropping him off outside a Fairview Road home early on Jan. 29, 2022 following a night of bar hopping and heavy drinking. She returned to the scene hours later with two other women and found O’Keefe’s snow-covered body on the front lawn, repeatedly yelling “I hit him” in the presence of first responders, witnesses have testified.


Attorneys for Read say she’s being framed and that O’Keefe entered the Fairview home, where he was fatally beaten in the basement before his body was planted on the lawn.

Catch up on the Karen Read trial, in 60 seconds
Here’s a rundown of some of the key witnesses who’ve testified so far.

Here’s how testimony unfolded on Wednesday.


4 p.m. — State Police investigator testifies that Read has six drinks at first bar

Prosecutor Adam Lally showed a still photo from Ring footage showing Read pulling out of O’Keefe’s driveway shortly after 5 a.m. on Jan. 29, with apparent damage to her right taillight visible. Yuri Bukhenik, a State Police investigator, told Lally he went to McCarthy’s pub, the first bar Read and O’Keefe went to, on Feb. 1.


Bukhenik said investigators collected video footage from the establishment and he identified still photos of Read and O’Keefe talking at the bar. He pointed out a “vase-style cocktail glass” near Read at the bar.

Lally played additional footage of O’Keefe walking into McCarthy’s with his friend, Michael Camerano. Bukhenik said the timestamp of the bar’s video footage was 12 minutes “behind real time.”


When Read enters the bar, O’Keefe waved at her as she made his way to him and put an arm around her while they talked, Bukhenik said. The video showed Read taking a cocktail glass from the bartender about seven minutes after she enters, he testified. She received a second drink about 15 minutes after that and later received a “shot glass beverage” that she poured into her cocktail glass, he said.


She later “receives another shot glass beverage” and puts that in her cocktail glass for a fourth drink, Bukhenik said. She is later captured on the footage receiving another “tall cylindrical cocktail glass” as well as another shot, which she placed inside the cocktail, for drinks five and six.


The video later showed Read and O’Keefe leaving the bar. Read had “a tall, cylindrical glass in her hand,” Bukhenik testified.

Lally then handed Bukhenik a document that contained the transaction receipts from McCarthy’s that night and asked him to whom they pertained. The first was opened under the tab for Karen A. Read, Bukhenik said, and a charge for $52.80 was paid using O’Keefe’s credit card. Lally asked Bukhenik if both receipts included orders of Tito’s vodka, and he confirmed that they did.


Bukhenik said investigators also gathered evidence from the Waterfall Bar & Grille, where Read and O’Keefe went after McCarthy’s. Video showed O’Keefe leaving at 12:11 a.m. holding a cocktail glass in his right hand, Bukhenik said.

Lally then played video showing O’Keefe walking into the second bar with Read, who greets a group that is already inside. At 11:39 p.m., the video shows Read taking a drink and consuming it, Bukhenik testified. The judge then ended testimony for the day.


3:15 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Prosecutor Adam Lally played a lengthy video clip of the SUV arriving at the garage. In the footage, police appear to photograph the interior and exterior of the SUV, including the damaged taillight. They also appear to clear snow from the area before putting yellow caution tape around the vehicle.


”We’re establishing a perimeter around the vehicle with yellow tape in order to” advise people “to stay away from the” SUV, Bukhenik testified.

Asked if he or fellow investigator Michael Proctor touched or manipulated the right taillight at any time, Yuri Bukhenik said “no, we did not.”


He said Proctor executed a search warrant on the SUV on Feb. 1. The next day, the SUV was taken to the Milton police station. Bukhenik said Canton police had “recused themselves” from conducting interviews by then, and once the SUV had been processed the department needed the spot in their sally port. The vehicle was moved to Milton for safekeeping, he said. On Feb. 2, he said, “I noted the taillight [had been] removed and the evidence collected.


Bukhenik testified that State Police also sought Ring camera footage from O’Keefe’s home in Canton.

No death investigations are a “one-man show,” Bukhenik said, adding that the probes are a “team effort” with troopers in his unit.

”We conduct interviews with two people,” either two troopers, or a trooper and a local detective, Bukhenik said.


He said Proctor was the “case officer” on the Read investigation and that Proctor wrote the affidavit for the warrant for the security footage from O’Keefe’s home. Authorities obtained the footage and reviewed it, Bukhenik said.

”It was presented in a sequential order,” he said of the video footage.


After a sidebar Lally played video taken from O’Keefe’s Ring camera.

One daytime clip from before the snowstorm shows Read backing her SUV out of O’Keefe’s driveway, making a slight turn near his car parked in the back of the driveway.

A second clip from 5:07 a.m. on Jan. 29 shows Read backing out of the driveway under heavy snow and darkness. The SUV appears to come close to O’Keefe’s vehicle, again parked in the back of the driveway. Bukhenik said investigators later saw no damage to O’Keefe’s vehicle or any debris on the ground near it.


The defense has asserted that Read may have hit O’Keefe’s vehicle when she backed out of the driveway on the morning of Jan. 29, providing an alternate theory for the taillight damage.

As the SUV completes its turn and starts pulling away, the video shows visible damage to the taillight. Additional footage was played of Read and her father pulling into O’Keefe’s driveway later in the day. Read’s brother is shown clearing snow off parts of her vehicle in O’Keefe’s driveway. Asked by Lally if he saw Read’s brother clearing snow from the right passenger taillight area in the footage, Bukhenik said, “I did not.


2:45 p.m. — Asked about the damage to her SUV, Read said, “I don’t know, it happened last night,” investigator testifies.

Yiri Bukhenik, a State Police investigator who went with fellow investigator Michael Proctor to Read’s parents house in Dighton on Jan. 29, said police introduced themselves and told Read they wanted to know what she remembered from the night before. They asked her “to walk us through” the past 24 hours, he said.


Judge Beverly Cannone told jurors they were about to hear statements Read “allegedly made” during the interview. Cannone said the jurors must determine whether any statements she gave were made voluntarily.

Bukhenik said that he asked Read to recount any events that occurred.


”She stated that she was willing to answer our questions,” he said. She said she didn’t want to go into “too much detail,” which he said he understood since she had just been through a traumatic event.

Read told authorities that she and O’Keefe had fought on the morning of Jan. 28 “over what the niece and nephew” had for breakfast, and that she met O’Keefe that night at McCarthy’s pub, where she drank “vodka soda.”


Read said she “did not” leave McCarthy’s with a beverage and that he did not get into any verbal or physical altercations with anyone there or at the Waterfall bar where they went next.

He said Read indicated she later “dropped Mr. O’Keefe off” on Fairview Road. She “stated she did not” see him walk into the Alberts’ house. Read said she made a three-point turn and left, Bukhenik said.


Asked about the damage to her SUV, Read said, “‘I don’t know, it happened last night,’” Bukhenik testified.

Read indicated she was “having stomach issues,” which was why she didn’t want to go into the Fairview home, where an afterparty was being held.

”She stated that when she woke up, she began looking for Mr. O’Keefe ... and began CPR on Mr. O’Keefe” when “she found him in the snow,” Bukhenik said. He said Read also said O’Keefe was bleeding from the nose and mouth and that both his eyes were swollen.


Bukhenik said he asked Read to give a step-by-step recounting of the three-point turn and what she did next.

“At that point was the interview terminated?” Lally asked.

“Yes it was,” Bukhenik said. Once it ended, he told Read that authorities would be seizing her phone and her vehicle.


Bukhenik said a truck came to tow Read’s SUV, and investigators later learned there was security video footage from the driveway of the Dighton home.

Lally later played video of Read’s SUV pulling into the driveway on the afternoon of Jan. 29, with Read exiting the passenger side and her father getting out of the driver’s side.


“I observed the defendant and her father at the rear right taillight” gesturing toward it in the footage, Bukhenik said.

He viewed video footage of the SUV being placed on a flatbed truck and pointed out a “white light” emanating from the damaged right taillight.

Bukhenik said he and Proctor followed the tow truck from Dighton to the Canton police station.


“The vehicle was unloaded and put into a heated sally port” at the station, Bukhenik said.

Inside the garage, the temperature rose above freezing and the snow “began to melt off of the vehicle,” he said.

2 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Yuri Bukhenik said after the lunch break that O’Keefe’s clothing was initially placed in one bag at the hospital.


When they got back to the evidence room, the items were laid out on butcher’s paper and “allowed to dry naturally because they were soaking wet,” he said.

He told prosecutor Adam Lally the plastic pieces later recovered at Fairview Road were never placed in the same bag as any of O’Keefe’s clothing.


Bukhenik said investigators from crime scene services arrived at the hospital on Jan. 29 to photograph O’Keefe’s body. He identified photos of O’Keefe’s body when Lally handed them to him.

Judge Beverly Cannone told jurors they were about to see photos that could be considered “graphic” and that they “must separate any emotional reaction” from their assessment of the evidence.


The photos of O’Keefe’s body were then displayed on the monitor.

”I observed the swelling of the eyelids,” Bukhenik said, as well as the slight laceration on his nostril and eyelid. He said he also observed the cuts on O’Keefe’s arm, as well as additional wounds on his “bicep, shoulder area.”


Bukhenik said he asked for police in Dighton police to respond to the address of Read’s parents as he and Michael Proctor, the lead investigator, drove there from the hospital. They arrived around 2:30 p.m. and waited for a “significant amount of time” for a local officer to arrive.


He said they requested the presence of uniformed officers in part because he felt it would be difficult for the Reads to identify him and Proctor as law enforcement, based on how they were dressed.

Bukhenik said Read’s vehicle was in the driveway.

”I observed a damaged rear right taillight fixture,” Bukhenik said. Pieces of the taillight were missing.


Read’s father directed the officers to the garage door, since the front door couldn’t be opened because so much snow had fallen, Bukhenik said.

Proctor stayed outside with the vehicle, Bukhenik said. He said he did not see Proctor or any other officer touch the vehicle at any time.


Inside the home, Read was sitting on the couch in the living room with her laptop open and her phone resting nearby, he said. Read’s mother was also there, Bukhenik said. He said the conversation was “polite, courteous” and the troopers at the time were in the “information-gathering” phase of the investigation.


1 p.m. — State Police investigator continues his testimony

Yuri Bukhenik said he has been involved in more than 500 death investigations, many involving head trauma.

He said O’Keefe had sustained “bruising to the eyelids of his face.” His face was swollen and discolored.

”I also observed a cut to his nostril, and [one to] an eyelid, which was very small in size,” Bukhenik said.


He said O’Keefe had “abrasions to his upper forearm and lower bicep area” on his right arm.

”Each abrasion appeared to me to be linear and concentrated in a specific location on the arm,” he said, adding that the wounds were “concentrated” a few inches above and below the elbow.


Bukhenik said he and State Police investigator Michael Proctor then went to Read’s parents’ home in Dighton after learning she was there.

Bukhenik then removed O’Keefe’s torn gray sweatshirt from an evidence bag and, with gloves on, displayed it for jurors. He also removed O’Keefe’s orange T-shirt from an evidence bag and displayed that for jurors, followed by the sneaker recovered from the hospital.


Bukhenik then removed O’Keefe’s jeans and belt from another evidence bag and briefly displayed them. Judge Beverly Cannone called a half-hour lunch recess shortly after 1 p.m.

12:30 p.m. — The next witness is State Police Sgt. Yuri Bukhenik

Bukhenik, an investigator in the Read case, briefly recounted his time in the Marine Corps before he moved to civilian law enforcement.


He said he was on call as a supervisor on the morning of Jan. 29, 2022. He said the on-call detective that morning was Trooper Michael Proctor, whom he supervised.

The on-call schedule is generally compiled about a month in advance, Bukhenik said.

He said he got a call around 6:44 a.m. informing him that “there was a body in [a] snowbank in Canton.”


Bukhenik said he called Proctor and “advised him to contact Canton police.”

He said he told Proctor he would begin “shoveling out” and that they met at the Canton police station around 9:15 a.m.

Bukhenik said he drove in his personal truck because it had four-wheel drive, which was better for the inclement weather. Proctor was in the parking lot when Bukhenik arrived at the station and they walked in together, he said.


He said they went to the detectives’ unit and spoke to Sean Goode, a Canton police sergeant, for about 25 to 30 minutes. Bukhenik said he learned the victim was “Mr. John O’Keefe” and that he had been taken to a Brockton hospital, as had Read.

Witnesses have said Read was taken to the hospital after making “suicidal statements” at the crime scene.


Bukhenik said he and Proctor proceeded to the Canton home of Matt and Jennifer McCabe. McCabe’s sister and her brother-in-law Brian Albert lived at the Fairview Road home where O’Keefe’s body was found near the curb. Bukhenik said they first spoke with Jennifer McCabe, then her husband Matt, then Albert, who had come to the home. Each interview was conducted separately, Bukhenik said.


From there, the investigators went to the emergency department at Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton, where they saw “Mr. O’Keefe’s body” on a gurney, with his clothing “a couple of feet away at the foot of the bed.”

He said that after viewing O’Keefe’s body, the troopers identified the clothes and placed them into evidence bags.


Bukhenik said troopers notate who located an item of evidentiary value, as well as the time and place of recovery.

O’Keefe’s clothing was on the floor at the hospital and “soaking wet,” he said.

The clothing included jeans, plaid boxers, a black Nike sneaker, an orange T-shirt, and a gray long-sleeved shirt, he said.


”I also recognized, due to the aroma and visual observations, traces of vomit on the clothing,” Bukhenik said. “Once we went through the clothing we collected each item and put it into a large evidence bag.”

He said the items were double-bagged and he asked that paramedics check the ambulance for O’Keefe’s other sneaker. Witnesses have testified that O’Keefe’s other shoe was found upside down and buried under snow, flush against the curb on Fairview Road.


12:15 p.m. — Crime lab specialist testifies under cross-examination

Read lawyer Alan Jackson asked if Christina Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, examined the drinking glass, the glass pieces from Read’s bumper, a group of nine pieces of glass recovered at the crime scene at Fairview Road in Canton, and a separate, single piece of glass found there. Hanley said that was accurate.


She said she compared the drinking glass to the nine pieces of glass found at the scene where O’Keefe’s body was found. Some pieces “did not match the cup,” Jackson said. “Correct,” Hanley said.

”None of the items on the bumper were deemed to match the cup, correct?” Jackson asked.


“Correct,” Hanley said.

She told Jackson the single piece of glass found at Fairview also did not match the cup.

”You tested the single piece of glass ... against the nine pieces of glass,” Jackson said. “And they did not match, correct?”

”There was no physical match,” Hanley said.


Jackson asked if the cup was “not found to match any items” on the bumper.

”That is correct,” Hanley said.

Jackson also asked if the single piece of glass found at Fairview did not match the cup or the other nine glass pieces found at the scene.

”In other words, it stands alone,” he said.


”That’s correct,” Hanley said.

On redirect, Hanley told prosecutor Adam Lally the drinking glass matched six pieces of glass found at Fairview Road. Hanley concluded her testimony and the lawyers went to sidebar.

11:15 a.m. — Christina Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab, is the next witness


Prosecutors next called Hanley, a forensic scientist at the State Police crime lab. Hanley said she has worked at the lab for about 16 years and described her educational and professional background.

Hanley said she currently works as a supervisor in the lab’s trace unit, which examines and compares evidence such as paint, fibers, hair, glass, tape, and other miscellaneous items, among other functions.


Hanley said she has examined glass “numerous times” in various cases involving crimes such as “a hit-and-run” or a breaking and entering. She said she encounters a “variety” of different types of glass in the course of her work.

In the Read case, she said she examined an “apparent drinking glass” and the “clear apparent glass pieces recovered from the bumper of a vehicle.” The drinking glass appeared to have “broken, irregular edges,” she testified.


Witnesses have said Read pulled a drinking glass out of her pocket when she entered a bar on the night of O’Keefe’s death.

The glass found on the bumper of Read’s SUV “consisted of five clear pieces ... all with broken or irregular edges,” she said.

Hanley said she examined the glass microscopically. She said she checked to see if there was a physical match between the pieces; some matched and some did not, she testified.


The items that did match, she said, “were at one time together as one unit.”
Now do his answers on cross and see what his actual answers are when asked specifics. You keep posting only one side.
 
Now do his answers on cross and see what his actual answers are when asked specifics. You keep posting only one side.
I will post what i find and this is what came up for me in my search. It clearly explains how LE dealt with the clothes and other items.

If you disagree, then you can find and post whatever you wish.
 
None was found from the swab that had no documentation provided. It did not say where on the shirt it was taken from and the shirt was wadded with everything else while wet for days.

That is not true. This is from the link i just posted.

Bukhenik said he called Proctor and “advised him to contact Canton police.”

He said he told Proctor he would begin “shoveling out” and that they met at the Canton police station around 9:15 a.m.

Bukhenik said he drove in his personal truck because it had four-wheel drive, which was better for the inclement weather. Proctor was in the parking lot when Bukhenik arrived at the station and they walked in together, he said.


He said they went to the detectives’ unit and spoke to Sean Goode, a Canton police sergeant, for about 25 to 30 minutes. Bukhenik said he learned the victim was “Mr. John O’Keefe” and that he had been taken to a Brockton hospital, as had Read.

Witnesses have said Read was taken to the hospital after making “suicidal statements” at the crime scene.


Bukhenik said he and Proctor proceeded to the Canton home of Matt and Jennifer McCabe. McCabe’s sister and her brother-in-law Brian Albert lived at the Fairview Road home where O’Keefe’s body was found near the curb. Bukhenik said they first spoke with Jennifer McCabe, then her husband Matt, then Albert, who had come to the home. Each interview was conducted separately, Bukhenik said.


From there, the investigators went to the emergency department at Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton, where they saw “Mr. O’Keefe’s body” on a gurney, with his clothing “a couple of feet away at the foot of the bed.”

He said that after viewing O’Keefe’s body, the troopers identified the clothes and placed them into evidence bags.


Bukhenik said troopers notate who located an item of evidentiary value, as well as the time and place of recovery.

O’Keefe’s clothing was on the floor at the hospital and “soaking wet,” he said.

The clothing included jeans, plaid boxers, a black Nike sneaker, an orange T-shirt, and a gray long-sleeved shirt, he said.


”I also recognized, due to the aroma and visual observations, traces of vomit on the clothing,” Bukhenik said. “Once we went through the clothing we collected each item and put it into a large evidence bag.”

He said the items were double-bagged and he asked that paramedics check the ambulance for O’Keefe’s other sneaker. Witnesses have testified that O’Keefe’s other shoe was found upside down and buried under snow, flush against the curb on Fairview Road.
 
It's documentated who collected and bagged them and they were received in a secure area of the police station where only two officers had access and from that point, it was one of those two officers who handled the evidence.

That is not true. This is from the link i just posted.

Bukhenik said he called Proctor and “advised him to contact Canton police.”

He said he told Proctor he would begin “shoveling out” and that they met at the Canton police station around 9:15 a.m.

Bukhenik said he drove in his personal truck because it had four-wheel drive, which was better for the inclement weather. Proctor was in the parking lot when Bukhenik arrived at the station and they walked in together, he said.


He said they went to the detectives’ unit and spoke to Sean Goode, a Canton police sergeant, for about 25 to 30 minutes. Bukhenik said he learned the victim was “Mr. John O’Keefe” and that he had been taken to a Brockton hospital, as had Read.

Witnesses have said Read was taken to the hospital after making “suicidal statements” at the crime scene.


Bukhenik said he and Proctor proceeded to the Canton home of Matt and Jennifer McCabe. McCabe’s sister and her brother-in-law Brian Albert lived at the Fairview Road home where O’Keefe’s body was found near the curb. Bukhenik said they first spoke with Jennifer McCabe, then her husband Matt, then Albert, who had come to the home. Each interview was conducted separately, Bukhenik said.


From there, the investigators went to the emergency department at Good Samaritan Medical Center in Brockton, where they saw “Mr. O’Keefe’s body” on a gurney, with his clothing “a couple of feet away at the foot of the bed.”

He said that after viewing O’Keefe’s body, the troopers identified the clothes and placed them into evidence bags.


Bukhenik said troopers notate who located an item of evidentiary value, as well as the time and place of recovery.

O’Keefe’s clothing was on the floor at the hospital and “soaking wet,” he said.

The clothing included jeans, plaid boxers, a black Nike sneaker, an orange T-shirt, and a gray long-sleeved shirt, he said.


”I also recognized, due to the aroma and visual observations, traces of vomit on the clothing,” Bukhenik said. “Once we went through the clothing we collected each item and put it into a large evidence bag.”

He said the items were double-bagged and he asked that paramedics check the ambulance for O’Keefe’s other sneaker. Witnesses have testified that O’Keefe’s other shoe was found upside down and buried under snow, flush against the curb on Fairview Road.

Bukhenik is the guy who introduced the deliberately altered video. Anything he says is meaningless.
 
Bukhenik is the guy who introduced the deliberately altered video. Anything he says is meaningless.
Well i do not believe the video was altered. It was just a reverse image video. The car was only in the SallyPort a short time to thaw out before it was taken elsewhere. The info provided on here about the clothes being wet and "wadded up" for days was false as well and so was the info about the dog. There were small pieces of tailight just a couple of millimetres in size lodged in his clothes that fitted into the other broken pieces. Also Read gave conflicting answers on several occasions too. It's my opinion she was drunk and she did it, and knows it only too well. Oh yeah and how did his shoe get buried under the snow along with broken pieces of tailight? That just shows how long he lay there.
 
Last edited:
Well i do not believe the video was altered. It was just a reverse image video. The car was only in the SallyPort a short time to thaw out before it was taken elsewhere. The info provided on here about the clothes being wet and "wadded up" for days was false as well and so was the info about the dog. There were small pieces of tailight just a couple of millimetres in size lodged in his clothes that fitted into the other broken pieces. Also Read gave conflicting answers on several occasions too. It's my opinion she was drunk and she did it, and knows it only too well. Oh yeah and how did his shoe get buried under the snow along with broken pieces of tailight? That just shows how long he lay there.
I would've thought that the only questions would be whether she hit him on purpose or whether she knew she hit him, anyway...
My opinion is that she was in a drunken and blind rage, deliberately hit him with her car, iimmediately left the scene and delusional, believed he was with another woman.
 
Well i do not believe the video was altered. It was just a reverse image video. The car was only in the SallyPort a short time to thaw out before it was taken elsewhere. The info provided on here about the clothes being wet and "wadded up" for days was false as well and so was the info about the dog. There were small pieces of tailight just a couple of millimetres in size lodged in his clothes that fitted into the other broken pieces. Also Read gave conflicting answers on several occasions too. It's my opinion she was drunk and she did it, and knows it only too well. Oh yeah and how did his shoe get buried under the snow along with broken pieces of tailight? That just shows how long he lay there.
I would've thought that the only questions would be whether she hit him on purpose or whether she knew she hit him, anyway...
My opinion is that she was in a drunken and blind rage, deliberately hit him with her car, iimmediately left the scene and delusional, believed he was with another woman.
I think it is well known I never come in here, read here, etc. only very rarely. It has been many months. Only read the last few and agree here 100 percent. My opinion on the case is known I think. I don't deny it may be overcharged for one, nor that there is an investigator who definitely has not been an above board perfect person by a long shot. It does NOT change what Read did and said and the facts that do exist.

she knows and always has full well that she hit him. I took think she was enraged, drunk and did it on purpose and then later panicked to no end. At BEST she hit him by accident and she knows that as well. She is a total liar and after showing the truth right from the start tried to change the story and cover her butt when she realized they REALLY were going to charge her and do so very seriously and she was not just going to walk.

I care less about another defense crafted SM blitz and conspiracy but am waiting for the new trial. Period. I do stay up on it here and there elsewhere. Not one I have made a pet case and never intend to because people are out of control with it and can't see straight imo.

I agree with both of your comments. That's where I stand. And on that note, it has been months, I popped in and I am back out. She deserves to do time. She killed him and I believe knowingly and intentionally and she was enraged. I agree on that totally. That is my core belief. At best she did so, knew it, and it was an accident. AT BEST. But she knows it, knew it, and always has.
 
I think it is well known I never come in here, read here, etc. only very rarely. It has been many months. Only read the last few and agree here 100 percent. My opinion on the case is known I think. I don't deny it may be overcharged for one, nor that there is an investigator who definitely has not been an above board perfect person by a long shot. It does NOT change what Read did and said and the facts that do exist.

she knows and always has full well that she hit him. I took think she was enraged, drunk and did it on purpose and then later panicked to no end. At BEST she hit him by accident and she knows that as well. She is a total liar and after showing the truth right from the start tried to change the story and cover her butt when she realized they REALLY were going to charge her and do so very seriously and she was not just going to walk.

I care less about another defense crafted SM blitz and conspiracy but am waiting for the new trial. Period. I do stay up on it here and there elsewhere. Not one I have made a pet case and never intend to because people are out of control with it and can't see straight imo.

I agree with both of your comments. That's where I stand. And on that note, it has been months, I popped in and I am back out. She deserves to do time. She killed him and I believe knowingly and intentionally and she was enraged. I agree on that totally. That is my core belief. At best she did so, knew it, and it was an accident. AT BEST. But she knows it, knew it, and always has.
Additionally she was drunk too so the charges are appropriate IMO. Now i hope there can be a retrial and a verdict.
 
Additionally she was drunk too so the charges are appropriate IMO. Now i hope there can be a retrial and a verdict.
I do too. That's all I really care about. All the rest of the intentional talk and blitz I care less about.

And yes, she was drunk, Of her arse drunk. Overboard drunk. And angry. And jealous. And in a rage. That's my overall opinion. I will settle for accident but will always believe it was intentional, purposeful and she has always known what she did and her first statements and actions show that. NOTHING has EVER changed that no matter how they try.

Her fan club and groupies can fill her canteen or commissary account and show support outside the prison barred little window if there is one.
 

Karen Read attorneys ready to file a motion to dismiss for ‘extraordinary governmental misconduct’​

Accused murderer Karen Read’s defense team is promising to file a new motion to dismiss her case — this time for “extraordinary governmental misconduct.”

The pending declaration was a footnote in a motion filed this week demanding that the Commonwealth of Massachusetts pay for the costs incurred by an expert, Matthew Erickson, who made a “futile” trip from out of state to analyze security camera footage from the Canton Police Department after being invited by prosecutors to do so.

Upon the arrival of the IT and mobile device forensic analyst at USAForensic LLC to Canton from Phoenix, Arizona, however, the footage was already destroyed, according to the motion.

“Because the Commonwealth failed to preserve the original video evidence, Mr. Erickson’s trip to Massachusetts was futile,” the motion signed by defense attorneys Alan Jackson and David Yannetti states.

“Accordingly, in the interests of justice, this Court should order that the Commonwealth, not Ms. Read, pay the cost of having her expert travel out-of-state to obtain a copy of the video surveillance footage, which the Canton Police Department (an agent of the Commonwealth) failed to adequately preserve.”

The “misrepresentation” came at a “significant expense to Ms. Read,” the motion states: $12,229.57.

However, a footnote on page 2 shows that this is merely an appetizer for a much larger motion.

“A Motion to Dismiss for Extraordinary Governmental Misconduct based on the destruction of this, and other, exculpatory evidence is forthcoming,” the footnote reads. “This motion should not be deemed a waiver of any such claims or issues.”

Motions to dismiss are par for the course in this case that has captured headlines for years.

Ahead of Read’s first trial last year, a document dump revealed a previously sealed 49-page motion to dismiss. This motion was based on alleged failures of the prosecutor’s presentation of the case to the grand jury, which they say was “predicated entirely on flimsy speculation and presumption,” and the victim of “questionable and biased investigation.”

Then came the mistrial, followed by a string of defense appeals, based particularly on the defense’s claims that a number of jurors had said the jury wasn’t actually hung on all three charges against Read, but just one of them — and hadn’t known they could deliver a partial verdict.

Read, 44, of Mansfield, is accused of striking Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe, her boyfriend of two years, with her car and leaving him to freeze and die on a Canton front lawn on Jan. 29, 2022. For that she was indicted on three charges: second-degree murder (Count 1), manslaughter while operating a motor vehicle under the influence (Count 2) and leaving the scene of an accident resulting in death (Count 3).

The jurors allegedly indicated it was only Count 2, OUI manslaughter, they couldn’t reach a decision on and that they were ready to acquit on the others. Because of this, Read’s attorneys say, it would be “Double Jeopardy” to charge her with murder a second time. Norfolk Superior Court Judge Beverly J. Cannone denied that motion and the defense team has since appealed to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court.

Read’s second trial is scheduled to begin on April 16.
 
I would've thought that the only questions would be whether she hit him on purpose or whether she knew she hit him, anyway...
My opinion is that she was in a drunken and blind rage, deliberately hit him with her car, iimmediately left the scene and delusional, believed he was with another woman.
If that was really the case, why did the Commonwealth include a blatantly altered video into evidence, wait until the trial started to produce that video, then have somebody that is in that room on nearly a daily basis testify that is was a true representation of the room and that absolutely nobody was near that tail light?

That video pretty much nails it for me. I was pretty "meh" about her guilt or not and might have chalked it up to dudes too drunk and/or lazy to investigate any cringe 5 until that.

Explain one good reason for them to alter and lie about that video to me.
 
If that was really the case, why did the Commonwealth include a blatantly altered video into evidence, wait until the trial started to produce that video, then have somebody that is in that room on nearly a daily basis testify that is was a true representation of the room and that absolutely nobody was near that tail light?

That video pretty much nails it for me. I was pretty "meh" about her guilt or not and might have chalked it up to dudes too drunk and/or lazy to investigate any cringe 5 until that.

Explain one good reason for them to alter and lie about that video to me.
Imo cover up... but that's just me.... I assume that's your thoughts
 
Imo cover up... but that's just me.... I assume that's your thoughts
I've seen investigations where a cop was murdered. This was not one of those at all.

That video was 100% a cover up.

There is also no documentation of her saying that in their initial "investigation" notations. None. Seems awfully important that multiple people claim she said that that night, yet it is nowhere to be found in any of their case interviews or notes.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,044
Messages
247,617
Members
992
Latest member
lifeofthespider
Back
Top Bottom