Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
GrandmaBear said:
Hard to say. Personally I think both sides should have given a bit and reached a deal. I do think she was overcharged, well not that she was overcharged necessarily but others would have gotten this pled down if they were in the same boat, part of me does believe they are making an example of her. She knows she did it and should have faced it, admitted to it, shown remorse and made a deal.

I've never seen anything so ridiculous. His poor parents, family, niece and nephew. This is the Karen Read show, PERIOD, it is like there was no victim nor any victim's family members. That is so disgusting and it's one thing to thinks she is innocent but to STILL show no sympathy for him or his loved ones is SICK. Yet that's what goes on. She should not have even been DRIVING NOR DRUNK.

Yet she's this sympathetic character. :vomit:
Click to expand...

Why would you take a plea if you're innocent? I wouldn't.
 
Tresir said:
Look back up the thread and you will find it. Search for "I hit him, I hit him!"
Click to expand...
Then you look up when the prosecution was asked where it was in any documentation. It was not on any witness statement at all not was it in any notes that were taken that night or at any time in their "investigating". None. Zilch. Nada
 
Tresir said:
Well if you are right, she will just get manslaughter. Facts like the fact that his shoe and shards of the taillight were found buried under the snow near the kerb where he lay and also found on his hoodie.
Click to expand...

So if it's a fact that the video was deliberately altered. Why would it make it manslaughter? Why wouldn't it prove she's being falsely accused?
 
Cousin Dupree said:
Just watch the testimony and cross. That's all you need to do.
Click to expand...
I am not watching an out of date trial that resulted in a mistrial. Nothing i have so far seen has convinced me she is innocent and neither you or Guess Who want to provide links. I have provided links to statements I make. Unless it is opinion. IMO she was drunk and did it and she said she did it. End of. She should just take a plea and get it over with.
 
Tresir said:
Well if you are right, she will just get manslaughter. Facts like the fact that his shoe and shards of the taillight were found buried under the snow near the kerb where he lay and also found on his hoodie.
Click to expand...
Lol, some are saying she is innocent and not even guilty of manslaughter. Unreal. Imo.
 
They supposedly based their entire non investigation on her supposedly saying she got him. How utterly incompetent, at best, were they that they didn't even bother to document that from any witness that supposedly heard her say it.

They didn't document that statement even once from any of them???

Oh, come on!
 
Tresir said:
I am not watching an out of date trial that resulted in a mistrial. Nothing i have so far seen has convinced me she is innocent and neither you or Guess Who want to provide links. I have provided links to statements I make. Unless it is opinion. IMO she was drunk and did it and she said she did it. End of. She should just take a plea and get it over with.
Click to expand...

So stop bringing up stuff from a very flawed/corrupt investigation. It was all brought up in trial.

Let's just let it go until the new trial, unless it's new evidence or evidence not presented in court.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
So if it's a fact that the video was deliberately altered. Why would it make it manslaughter? Why wouldn't it prove she's being falsely accused?
Click to expand...
She's not being falsely accused, because she admitted she hit him. What do you think was deliberately altered in the video that could change that fact.

I dont believe she intended to hit him necessarily, but she was driving drunk and hit him, which makes it manslaughter.
 
GrandmaBear said:
Watch the testimony and cross of all witnesses. Do not pick and choose. Just my suggestion.
Click to expand...

I haven't watched it all, but did see discussions every night on the happenings of the day, on CourtTV. If someone questions a piece of evidence then I'll refer them to the actual testimony for that.

The best answer is for those who didn't follow the trial in anyway, shape or form to go back and watch the trial themselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,045
Messages
247,634
Members
992
Latest member
lifeofthespider
Back
Top Bottom