Yeah, maybe. I can't say all is rock solid. Not over yet but seems it isn't depending on how jurors see it. Not sure about all. There are cases I say count on the jury and others worry and Daybell is one. I am not saying that here if you notice. I do in many. And I don't mean the jury can't be counted on, what I mean is yes, they may see reasonable doubt or some may. Again case isn't over nor all witnesses yet up but based on what isn't the case, but what is known and talked of that is known, it may not be rock solid. However, much of that comes from a defense info flooding campaign and so I do wait to see what all there is.
Exactly! There is so much doubt that these guys created themselves. All of the "butt dialing", deleted calls, texts, etc all of the non investigating of nearly any basic thing. They have made the doubt themselves. I can't answer who did what for sure at all and would have to find her not guilty by that alone.
Believe it or not, I agree with every bit of this. Not sure about the last part if enough exists to find her guilty or not despite that but every bit you said before that yes they caused. I DO think she did it but they caused the less than solid case at least where their part is concerned in many respects. There are experts and such to be heard yet and all but I have never disagreed that this bunch has not done things or done some that don't help but again I'd include Karen as part of that kind of bunch until it split. She would do similar too and probably did.
John had been taking care of his niece and nephew since 2013 and he dated Read for only about the last 18 mos of his life.
Based on your expertise, was there a search made of the same phrase at 10:33am?The search was absolutely made at 2:27. The database would log that as it happened and will not be overwritten. Apple has structured the safeguarding around a db-wal file which is where this search would have been stored.
Reference
28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL)
28.3. Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) # Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) is a standard method for ensuring data integrity. A detailed description can be …www.postgresql.org
*(fyi .. my expertise is SQL database & C+ programming within software development)
Yeah I THOUGHT that was the case, kids there first and not the longest relationship between them. It was a reconnect though wasn't it in the sense of he was someone she had known prior.
Yes, Karen Read's full forensic download was done on her & John O'Keefe's phone.
10:33? I haven't heard any testimony regarding a search done at this time. Will you elaborate or provide context as to where this information is?
They haven't been presented in court yet.
Right, (and her hysteria continued at the hospital) but my point was that the officers on the scene that morning hadn't jumped to conclusions about anything or anyone.
Well, the defense didn't point it out (lol!) but it was on the record that they presented on cross on day 16.
I never said they were saying she killed him. I know of the "fight" theory and that is what I refer to and I don't buy it.
So she was cool as a cucumber then you believe? That would be strange as well.
Okay and is it KNOWN to Joe Public? Or as most prosecutions do, evidence and investigation has been kept quiet as to what is contained in such. The defense isn't going to have publicly shared anything that would actually hurt her in any records and for sure not from hers.
So the public doesn't know the full extent of what is in their phone records yet and never been shared?
So what is it you were able to see? That there was a search at that time and it was a search for the same or what? Curious.
Since I've been watching the trial, I haven't watched any videos including TikTok and stopped reading articles or tweets. (I don't think I've ever seen so much bias surrounding a case.)