Well yes, because that's exactly what I've been saying all along. It's obvious because of the time stamp not being inverted. If they had "accidently" sent them an inverted video, ALL of it would be inverted.
I agree with your premise.
It doesn't BUT it shows like they are hanging out on the driver's side, which is basically a lie. Now, why would they present an inverted video but go through all the trouble if editing the time stamps through the entire thing of it meant nothing? What are they hiding to go through that? Why not just present the inverted video with the time stamps also inverted and then try to pass it off as accidental?
I think we are finally at about 99% agreement. Lets not worry about that last 1%. Thank you very much.
It just makes no sense that they did it for no reason. It also makes no sense that it was accidental. Again, at the very least, it shows major, intentional deception. I guess you would have to ask them what they were hiding and why they went through the effort to try to cover it up.
I just want to say thank you for having a discussion with me about this case. I still haven't figured out the why yet and I may never figure it out. But at least we tried, right.
Like I've said all along, the prosecution has done more things to convince me of her possible innocence than the defense has. It's been one thing after another with them that add more questions that answers. They have done nothing but raise reasonable doubt to me with at their deceptiveness. There is no good reason why they would submit that video that way for whatever their reason actually was. They can't claim it was accidental with the work they put into it to make it appear it was actually that way.
I don't have a reason why the video was intentionally inverted. It makes no sense to me at all.
Deception is the only real answer in my book. My guess is to make it appear they were on the driver's side, but it's only a guess and the only one I can come up with that makes it make sense to me
Yes. Motion detectors don't start recording when the motion stops like at the beginning and they don't magically quit in the middle of motion that is happening while it's detecting motion in the frame. It works be different if those people had walked off frame and then reentered but some of it is DURING motion.
It will be another day that I will only be able to glance. Info on what's going on will be MUCH appreciated!
Yes. It's the fact that they intentionally did it for ANY reason should give everyone pause into everything they did.
