Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Guess Who said:
fire hydrant???

Your arm can travel more than 24 mph and the car still weighs the same. You would also have bruises, no matter which way you did it. Also a backing vehicle that could have enough momentum to shatter like that by hitting his arm would also make impact to other parts of his body and the tail light pieces would all fall near the point of impact, not scattered all over the yard and road. If you want to say they followed him, there would be fragments embedded in and on his clothing, yet there were none AND no tissue or blood on the pieces. It simply did not happen that way. Physics prove this. Very simple physics, at that. For those pieces to fly like that, there is no way for her to only be traveling at 24 mph. In a high speed impact, sure.
Click to expand...
It's not comparable no matter how fast you arm is moving. The heavy motor vehicle moving at 24mph is a lethal force. Your arm moving at speed, eg to smack your kid, is not.

What killed him was the head injury, ie. whatever he was forced back and fell onto.

Also there were taillight pieces embedded in his clothing. Did you not know that?
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
It was a mistrial, that's why it doesn't matter. This is a new trial, new jury who hopefully have never heard of Karen Read or her boyfriend.
Click to expand...
That was pretty much said in a recent hearing. I've actually watched the hearings and while I actually stopped listening to the one guy drone on in one of them, I have seen about all of the recent ones. Even then I could hear him but was doing dishes lol. Even D supporters in the comments were like shut up already. I though HAVE listened to hours of such. I admit when I haven't or haven't read links. Guaranteed some have not even watched the last trial.. I couldn't but I went looking for it when I could.

No one in here would even respond about the testimony of the niece, nephew or family.

I have watched as I said every recent hearing.

It's going to be a far different trial than the first.

And Jackson is lucky he was not sent back to Cali.

But then that would delay the case as the D is now trying to do.

Such Kool-aid out there.
 
Tresir said:
It was a mistrial, that's why it doesn't matter. This is a new trial, new jury who hopefully have never heard of Karen Read or her boyfriend.
Click to expand...
And her own pricey lawyers did not choose to poll the jury. Hey, she has a chance later on, ineffective counsel.
 
Regina said:
Well, I wasn't sure whether you even knew what I said, let alone what I meant, lol.

Re gag order, it's as though the judge heard you, lol and indeed, it's about damned time.
Click to expand...
It is about damned time.

Jackson and Karen on during Superbowl weekend was not a wise move. THen at the last hearing they act like none of it is caused by them, etc. Then atty little (purposely not capitalized) was saying constantly the third party culprits on what they knew was live streamed? Uhm what?

Personally you and I don't always agree on cases and we know it lol but we do on some, and Baldwin and Rozzi and Jackson and Little and team could take a page out of the atty for the KY sheriff. Not saying I buy it but he's way smarter and actually on top of his case... So farrrr anyhow that's my opinion.

Jackson et al should be out of a law license.

But before anyone goes on, Protor should be darned well out of a job too.

I had to go looking for some testimony in the last trial...
 
Tresir said:
DM article about the gag order.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Shaking judge dramatically ends Karen Read's murder trial hearing

Karen Read faces a second murder trial starting April 1, accused running over Boston police officer John O'Keefe with her SUV on January 29, 2022.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

Brennan said 'the ongoing, deliberate, purposeful poisoning of the potential jury pool is not only wrong and unfair, it needs to be stopped'.'

An order limiting extrajudicial statements of counsel is both appropriate and necessary to ensure a fair and impartial trial and finds that no reasonable, less restrictive alternative to the order is available.'

However, Read will still be free to say whatever she wants, which she celebrated by saying 'I like talking. I like to reveal the truth' after the hearing.
Cannone last month dramatically ended proceedings with a shaky courtroom outburst, citing 'evidence' she said changes everything.
The evidence related to claims the defense may have secretly paid expert witnesses who the jury believed were working independently.
'The implications of that information may have profound effects on this defense and defense counsel,' she told the court.
Click to expand...
Lol and note it is the P saying the jury pool is being poisoned. It's always the D saying that while they are the ones doing it.

She could legitimately have taken the D attys off the case.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
If you have Max streaming, there is a series called "Body in the Snow". It's all about this case. There are free ways to watch it. If you don't have Max. You'll have to Google for how. They've dropped two episodes so far. I'm just about to watch episode one.
Click to expand...
You brought me into this case, I've watched, and I've heard both sides. And came to my own conclusion. For instance Proctor needed to go but KR is gulty. I've even though though and have always said it that she is overcharged, I think personally she intentionally hit him but that's impossible imo to be sure of, but she hit him and left him at minimum.

So I' am not all one way on all and never have been but this is a manufactured defense story just like Delphi trying to use that stuff.
 
Tresir said:
It's not comparable no matter how fast you arm is moving. The heavy motor vehicle moving at 24mph is a lethal force. Your arm moving at speed, eg to smack your kid, is not.

What killed him was the head injury, ie. whatever he was forced back and fell onto.

Also there were taillight pieces embedded in his clothing. Did you not know that?
Click to expand...
And one has to believe like 20 things to make the D and KR's thing work. Plus the theory only came LATER.
 
www.yahoo.com

Prosecutors say data from Turtleboy’s phones will show Karen Read’s ‘consciousness of guilt’

A Norfolk Superior Court justice ruled that data on the blogger's phones could be introduced into the evidence in the murder case.
www.yahoo.com www.yahoo.com

Data on two cellphones belonging to Aidan Kearney, the Worcester-based blogger known at Turtleboy, will be allowed into evidence in the Karen Read murder case and prosecutors say texts between the two will show Read’s “consciousness of guilt,” according to a new court filing.

Judge Cannone denies Karen Read’s request to add ‘Turtleboy’ attorney to defense team

Norfolk Superior Court Associate Justice Adam L. Sisitsky approved a motion introduced Thursday by special prosecutor Hank Brennan, who asked the court for permission to access the phone records, alleging collusion with Read to intimidate witnesses.

ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
“The court orders the Norfolk County District Attorney’s Office to produce from the two previously identified cell phones,” the filing stated.

Kearney’s lawyer, Tim Bradl, countered in court, “The fact that they communicated cannot be basis for a criminal investigation.”

The cellphones were seized through search warrants issued in connection with two criminal cases against Kearney, who is accused of intimidating individuals who are either witnesses or related to witnesses in the Read case.

Massachusetts blogger ‘Turtleboy’ blows kiss at camera during latest court appearance

Massachusetts blogger ‘Turtleboy’ blows kiss at camera during latest court appearance
Prosecutors say data on the phones from April 1, 2023, through Oct. 5, 2023, show that Read shared defense theories, materials, and other evidence from her case through secure messaging apps.

ADVERTISEMENT
Advertisement
“Such communications included witness information, home addresses, grand jury minutes, autopsy photographs,” the prosecution stated in the filing. “An inference can be made that the parties encouraged Mr. Kearney to personally attack witnesses and their family members with a sole purpose to embarrass, intimidate, harass, and deter these individuals from testifying.”

The filing added, “The Commonwealth intends to use the data concerning certain communications found on Mr. Kearney’s phones relating to such alleged witness intimidation — in light of the Defendant’s ongoing communications with Mr. Kearney - as evidence of the Defendant’s consciousness of guilt.”

The court’s approval also indicated that the prosecution can use any communication between Kearney and witnesses involved in the Read case including Matthew McCabe, Jennifer McCabe, Brian Albert, Christopher Albert, Colin Albert, Juliana Albert, Michael Proctor, and Elizabeth Proctor.

Prosecutors can also review pictures or videos “depicting evidence of intimidation of a witness of any witness or family members of a witness involved in the murder of John O’Keefe.”

e0e47469fc85bd1aa45ae26dbdc4d1bb

Read is accused of hitting O’Keefe, her Boston police officer, with her Lexus SUV in Canton on Jan. 29, 2022, and leaving him to die after a night of drinking. The defense has sought to portray Read as the victim, saying O’Keefe was actually killed inside the Albert family home at 34 Fairview Road in Canton and then dragged outside and left for dead.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
I hope the defense asks if he took the cracked taillight and broke it apart.
Click to expand...
And then inserted pieces into his torn clothes? A bit far fetched. The clothes were retrieved and bagged immediately at the hospital so at what point did he insert the taillight fragments into them? The car wasn't even seized till the day after.

This is just a drunken woman trying to get away with murder.
 
Cousin Dupree said:
If you have Max streaming, there is a series called "Body in the Snow". It's all about this case. There are free ways to watch it. If you don't have Max. You'll have to Google for how. They've dropped two episodes so far. I'm just about to watch episode one.
Click to expand...
I don't know how they are allowed to make and broadcast shows like this. Here it's not allowed to even discuss a case in the papers sub judice.

www.pinsentmasons.com

The sub judice rule and contempt of court

www.pinsentmasons.com www.pinsentmasons.com

From the link, this bit is interesting. I didn't know this.


"In the case of Baby P, a 17 month old boy who died in 2007 as a result of injuries sustained from repeated abuse, the names of the child, his mother and boyfriend were published on numerous blogs and social networking sites by users who were either choosing to deliberately breach reporting restrictions or were unaware of the sub judice rule. Site moderators were kept occupied removing references to the individuals' identities which were posted by users as well as attempting to ascertain whether the details had been indexed or cached before they were removed from the forum.

In respect of user-generated content, most sites follow the 'notice and take-down' approach whereby publishers remove potentially-unlawful content quickly upon receiving notification.

Some sites also use automated monitoring. In 2006, the New York Times used technology to block British visitors to its website so that it could report on a terrorism trial. The material used in the report was believed to be sub judice in Britain. However, advice should always be sought in individual cases to confirm that any such automated measures are appropriate."
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,064
Messages
251,636
Members
1,002
Latest member
Alana09890
Back
Top Bottom