LIBBY GERMAN & ABBY WILLIAMS: Indiana vs. Richard Allen for 2017 murder of two Delphi girls *GUILTY*

On February 14, 2017, the bodies of Abigail Williams and Liberty German were discovered near the Monon High Bridge Trail, which is part of the Delphi Historic Trails in Delphi, Indiana, United States, after the young girls had disappeared from the same trail the previous day. The murders have received significant media coverage because a photo and audio recording of an individual believed to be the girls' murderer was found on German's smartphone. Despite the audio and video recordings of the suspect that have been circulated and the more than 26,000 tips that police have received, no arrest in the case has been made.[1][2][3]

1581272168478.png

Police have not publicly stated nor released details of how the girls were murdered.[6] As early as February 15, 2017, Indiana State Police began circulating a still image of an individual reportedly seen on the Monon High Bridge Trail near where the two friends were slain; the grainy photograph appearing to capture a Caucasian male, with hands in pockets, walking on the rail bridge, head down, toward the girls.[4] A few days later, the person in the photograph was named the prime suspect in the double-homicide.[5]

On February 22, law enforcement released an audio recording where the voice of the assailant,[7] though in some degree muffled, is heard to say, "Down the hill." It was at this news conference that officials credited the source of the audio and imagery to German's smartphone, and, further, regarded her as a hero for having had the uncanny foresight and fortitude to record the exchange in secret. Police indicated that additional evidence from the phone had been secured, but that they did not release it so as not to "compromise any future trial." By this time, the reward offered in the case was set at $41,000.[5]


1581272119747.png


 
Last edited by a moderator:
He was coming from Peru wasnt he, not his home, i thought?
It doesn't matter imo, but no I think from home.

If one can trust anything he says,, he didn't want to have lunch with sister and mom, why was that anyhow? Is this the sister he allegedly molested. Did it stir up things in him, is the relationship bad? Then he goes home and bundled up in a way that helps cover who he is on a too warm day and goes out with an intent to rape girls after seeing his sister... Just saying...

Personally though I think A & L may have been the intended targets and he somehow knew, BUT I don't know that we will ever have that answer.

I could see the above first scenario though as well...

I think he was taking back roads intentionally and likely drinking more beer on them. It's a common practice of those who drink a lot but he went that way for cover as well, not the more populated part of the trail area nor the one most used, same with the parking, etc. walking back along the tree line, all planned it would seem to me... The bundling up, etc.

And yeah he allegedly was in Peru and it's still hard for me to dismiss the KK thing entirely... I mean we dont' have every minute allotted for by any means and likely never will.

I don't mean the murder time frame but his day prior, after, etc.

You know there's a lot of laws I don't necessarily agree with and quite honestly I think spousal privilege is b.s. Taking the 5th and not incriminating oneself is ONE THING and a whole different subject but spousal privilege is another. You know parents can be made to testify in cases involving their children, children against their parents too, and I wouldn't class the spousal relationship as higher than those relationships, they aren't even blood. JUST an opinion.

Missing things come from imo that lack of her statements or testimony. Personally I think we'd find out she lied at some point. But I think we'd also find out more about that day than they want known. The man has not a hint of any kind of alibi that entire day, not his mother, wife, daughter, sister. They kept that scope entirely narrowed. The D did.

Well not to sidetrack too far here. I have to get moving a bit at least far sooner than I like to. Next to days are early ones and I will be getting ready AND leaving in the dark. I HATE that and that's a first. Today is a ten a.m. But I need at least a couple of hours ideally and I'm less than that or about that already. If I were the type that wanted to fly by the seat of my pants and be out the door in 30 minutes, I suppose there are those that do it but not me. THey also end up at work without some necessary thing, etc.

He entirely changed his tiime frame and we know why. I do think he went to his mother's that morning at some point. I'm not sure it was to actually see her... Most people would stick around for lunch with their family, be happy to have also ran into their sister, etc. and on a day off. I mean if the trails were not a plan then what's the rush, need to go bundle up and get out there, etc. Not that he rushed with the back way but I just mean coudn't do lunch, had an agenda... For being so dependent on mom and wife, funny he wouldn't stay no...

The very way the D limited stricty the scope on daughter, mom and sister is very telling to me. More is known, it just couldn't be brought out imo.

Now I'm just talking with no real point or more so I guess direction so will leave it.
 
Is it possible they could bè negotiating on the sentence behind the scenes? Does that ever happen? Eg if he gave up his appeal rights could he get 45 years ?
That would typically happen before or not at all imo. I'm not sure it could NOT be "tried" but he's convicted now. The time for a guilty plea, waiving appeals in return for a lighter sentence is over as far as I know. Off the top of my head I've never heard of such. Each side will recommend sentences and the reasons why, generally the P, strong sentences, the D asklign for lighter. The families will speak and he will if he wants to.

Let's see who speaks of his behalf if anyone from his own familiy, etc.

If he wants a chnance at the judge showing some leniency, he'll admit to and face and show remorse and speak at the end himself. Basically never happensby most. Plus lol his attys wife and mom won't let him lol.
 
And you believe him? Why would he bundle up on a beautiful day - unless he went home for the box cutter. Also why didn't the D call his mother to verify his alibi and time he left?
Oh I don't believe a word that omes out of the man's mouth, except for his confessions AND a few things that It hink he likely told the truth about as he was worried it could be proven, disproven, someone saw him, etc.

I agree on the mother, why didn't they have her corroborate...? The thing is though it worked either way if he was there, both with his first time frame and his later lying time frame. I do think it "likely" he went to his mom's and he involved both the sister and mom in that (although never verified it) but I'm not sold on it being true either. To me, it isn't the biggest thing though because even if he did go, or did not go, it's what he did after.

I don't have any argument about him getting bundled up. He was way overdressed for a Midwest man on a day like this. So you're doubting he went home and bundled up? Again who knows, but I think that's likely true. I seriously doubt he went to his mother's in all this gear and cover up. If again of course he actually went there.

I have to leave here shortly but we know where he was when it mattered. WE know he WAS bundled up and we know he was somewhere that morning whether at his mom's chilling at home, etc. We know whatk time teh care was on the video and from there on is the time that counts. I'd like to know the rest of course and have corroborated or buested but we re not going to get that. Probably ever. But who knows, the investigators and prosecutors said a bit more than I'd have expected after Lori's conviction and maybe one day we will learn more here as well.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,560
Members
965
Latest member
tanya
Back
Top Bottom