CO SUZANNE MORPHEW: Missing from Chaffee County, CO - 10 May 2020 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.

The Chaffee County Communications Center received a report on Sunday at 5:46 p.m. regarding a missing woman in the area of County Road 225 and West Highway 50.


Anybody who has information on Morphew’s whereabouts is asked to call the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office at 719-539-2596 or Chaffee County Crime Stoppers at 719-539-2599.


1589412136362.png


edited by staff to add media link
 
Last edited:
it was. End of story. It covers the dna in the AA.
The defence says it wasn't.

"On the afternoon of May 9, investigators allege in the affidavit, as Suzanne was messaging with Jeff Libler, the man with whom she had been having a multi-year affair, Morphew got back to their home and is thought by investigators to have used a tranquilizer dart to incapacitate Suzanne around 2:44 p.m.
Morphew’s attorneys claim when investigators discovered the dart rifle, it was inoperable and had not been used in a long time. They allege this information, and the DNA evidence allegedly found on the glovebox, was purposely omitted from the arrest affidavit."
 
That AA is all invalid now the case has been dismissed. But the prosecution missed out a lot of evidence from the AA according to the link I posted and that is why the judge threw out the prosecution experts which then led to the withdrawal of the case.
How are you coming to the conclusion that the AA is now invalid? The FACTS in it have not changed at all. Period. They will amend the info is all. No facts in it have changed.
 
The defence says it wasn't.

"On the afternoon of May 9, investigators allege in the affidavit, as Suzanne was messaging with Jeff Libler, the man with whom she had been having a multi-year affair, Morphew got back to their home and is thought by investigators to have used a tranquilizer dart to incapacitate Suzanne around 2:44 p.m.
Morphew’s attorneys claim when investigators discovered the dart rifle, it was inoperable and had not been used in a long time. They allege this information, and the DNA evidence allegedly found on the glovebox, was purposely omitted from the arrest affidavit."
So now not only is the defense not supposed to defend their client but now they can't even read either? Sounds like they are going for a case of ineffective counsel by that logic.
 
How are you coming to the conclusion that the AA is now invalid? The FACTS in it have not changed at all. Period. They will amend the info is all. No facts in it have changed.
I just explained. It has all been discredited now. We have to wait for new charging documents. He is no longer under arrest.
 
Last edited:
So now not only is the defense not supposed to defend their client but now they can't even read either? Sounds like they are going for a case of ineffective counsel by that logic.
The defence and the judge agreed, that's why most of the prosecution experts were disallowed and the case was withdrawn by the prosecution. They had no choice.
 
All we can do is await the new charging documents, if and when they come. I don't think it looks like it will happen soon as they have opened the tip line.
 
Lol. Okay. You go find a case on Libler, good luck with that one.

You are talking not belief but proof and then you mention Libler. That's a belief for you Tresir, there is NO proof against Libler but thee is against Barry. That's a tad bit hypocritical.
You asked me, I answered. If the prosecution are in the bad way they are with 14 out of 16 of their experts banned, they have to go back to the drawing board. That's the reality of what has happened here. We also have to wait for the forensics and results from Suzanne's remains before anything else can progress.
 
I know I would be very, very pizzed at my attorneys if there was evidence that could even possibly put the blame on others if I was innocent and they just went "meh, not my job". They would be fired so fast and the fact that this is not happening speaks volumes. These people you are saying have no obligation literally have my life in their hands and they better be defending me with ALL they're might IF I'm not guilty. If I'm guilty, I'm hoping they do nothing, just like what is happening.
The " that isn't their job" is for the guilty.
There is no case to answer ATM so this is irrelevant.
 
Ok that makes sense.
it's kind of a sad state when every once in a while I just look up the name in my states court records and just know there will be new charges. I'm sadly, very rarely ever wrong. Has spent more of the adult life in jail than out but parents keep providing bail and attorneys so looks like no lessons ever to be learned here.
 
The AA contains facts that will come into any future charge.

The AA has interviews, statements, and a ton of things relating to the investigation into SM's disappearance. If YOU think Barry is innocent then you should know what he has said and lied about, etc. and what statements he has made. You have went on about Jeff Libler without ever reading how and why he was cleared. I get a lack of time, Lord knows I have none but you take positions and state things without admitting you don't KNOW what those who have read it DO KNOW.

All said and meant with respect but you are not on solid ground as you haven't read it or apparently followed the case. You won't watch a solid recap by anyone solid as it is a video and you like print and the AA is print but you won't read that. You'll post tons of other things in print though. Have you read them all? I sure haven't.

You sit here and provide a defense thing but dismiss any prosecutorial thing. There were TONS of interviews and a NUMBER of LE involved. And more.

Just this morning, before work, I read 20 pages, maybe 19, of the charging document you posted in LISK. I may not get back to it who knows. How many did you read? And I am not the self proclaimed print person, my life these days only allows for good solid recaps by those I've found that I trust to share all sides and what is relevant.

Anywho, again no offense, I am sure you know that but just sayin'...
I have already explained that I am not going to waste my time reading an Arrest Affidavit that is no longer valid and is out of date. He is no longer under arrest.

If everyone is so sure of his guilt, why can't the prosecution get things right?

I watched a 9 minute video on LISK and reported about it over on that thread. It was a waste of time. Re the AA for BM, I'll wait for the new one, when/if it comes.
 
Last edited:
I have already explained that I am not going to waste my time reading an Arrest Affidavit that is no longer valid and is out of date. He is no longer under arrest.

If everyone is so sure of his guilt, why can't the prosecution get things right?

I watched a 9 minute video on LISK and reported about it over on that thread. It was a waste of time. Re the AA for BM, I'll wait for the new one, when/if it comes.
but earlier you said you DID read it. post 1199
 
His dna would be already found on items in the household. What are you eluding to on this? I'm not understanding. Everything BM lied about ties him to it. Read just the first 10 pages of the affidavit. Just the first 10! I haven't gotten any further than that and it totally blows everything about his "story" of his version of what happened. Just read the part about the last signs of life of her being at home - not on a bike ride - , BM unexpectedly coming home as she is on her phone with her boyfriend, then poof. No more SM after BMs story of chasing squirrels.
Have you been able to read more than the first 10 pages?
 
I already said it's obvious he did it, but I want to know about DNA.

@Tresir it is the defenses job to follow up on that. The prosecution doesn't have to, but they need to explain why they just let it go.
Defense whined about program to open files and all else and wanted prosecution to do their job for them. I mean this is a self and other described high powered Denver law firm, do it yourself, or get someone to.

By the way Plunder has purchased the hearing transcripts and has been reading them. All documents and word for word. Highlights some of Iris's games/lies pretty well.

Anyhow I was able to listen while getting other things done the other day.

She isn't my first go to but one can't argue transcripts and documents and she DOES a LOT of FOIA and paying for docs that to my knowledge no news org nor anyone else ahd done yet much less covered/provided all word for word.
 
Arrests can take a lonnnnnng time so it only makes sense that a re-arrest would too. Pretty sure it's imminent but just not sure of when.
They have her body now and this time I want and I am sure they do too the entire enchilada. I am content to wait for all of it to come. Looking forward to it.

At minimum, my feeling/gut instinct is there is going to be a connection to Barry with this spot AND with her body, clothing, something with her that ties to Barry and his lies. It is way, way too quiet on that front, Iris would normally continue blowing all over...
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,035
Messages
244,941
Members
983
Latest member
yepugotme2
Back
Top Bottom