CO SUZANNE MORPHEW: Missing from Chaffee County, CO - 10 May 2020 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

A Chaffee County woman is missing after a neighbor said she went out for a bike ride Sunday and never returned, sparking a search involving more than 100 emergency personnel.

The Chaffee County Communications Center received a report on Sunday at 5:46 p.m. regarding a missing woman in the area of County Road 225 and West Highway 50.


Anybody who has information on Morphew’s whereabouts is asked to call the Chaffee County Sheriff’s Office at 719-539-2596 or Chaffee County Crime Stoppers at 719-539-2599.


1589412136362.png


edited by staff to add media link
 
Last edited:
By going by this theory of it's not the defense's job, why would any defense put up any witnesses or professionals that dispute the prosecution's theory? That makes absolutely no sense. Why would anybody at all need to hire a defense attorney if their job is not to defend you? Should the defendant just sit at the table and take it without an attorney? What's the defense attorney's job if it isn't to defend their client?
Look at Delphi. Even though I find outlandish and much pieced in ways they can't fit or prove, RA's defense NAMED THE REAL KILLERS and claim to KNOW who they are. Iris has failed Barry in she isn't trying to find the real one. Surprised he isn't having a fit over the fact but then maybe her kisses keep him mollified.
 
And an AA only provides a very small portion of their evidence. It's basically the Cliff Notes version of events.

Some are buying it hook, line and sinker. Just as the defense dreamed.
She twisted it and they bought it, I don't have time right now but when I came in yesterday I saw an article posted saying this was a match to a rapist. Per Iris of course. NOT a partial match, NOT to someone else. And a couple here are quoting her or buying it and bringing back that old FALSEHOOD. If I ever get time to catch up I will respond to that EXACT defense garbage shared here as if truth if and when I come across it again. Old garbage. You probably already did for all I know.

Iris has not tracked down the DNA owner nor has she tried to bust JL's alibi. BECAUSE there is no end result that will help them, she is just doing the lazy work of twisting and insinuating and to date hasn't been in the thick of a THING Of a trial. I think her firm claims one they ever won that went to trial. The remainder are all deals.
 
Who says they have no record he was near there? They very well could have and not put it in the AA because at the time they didn't think it was relevant. The AA is still valid. The facts in it have not changed one little bit. The only thing that has changed is she has now been found. Nothing changes in the original AA. Nothing. Any new one will just have more info in it. They very much did the right thing in dropping charges when they did or he might have went through the entire trial without her being found and the defense still shouting "no body - no proof". They sure can't do that now and they very well might have data showing he was there in that very spot and now they can tie it all together.
All it would take is finding the bikini or a shard to be HUGE. Plus I have to wonder about what IN good friend has to say about where she was found since Barry took him hunting south of Salida....

KInd of like LISK once people SAW who it was...

Here once they see where she was found, those that know Barry...
 
If you were innocent, wouldn't you insist on it? Of course you would! We all would. Otherwise why hire an attorney at all?
Yes, I would be screaming from the rooftops if they were not turning over every rock. The thing is they don't dare as they are dead ends so they stick to the lazy twisting, insinuating, etc.
 
Tell me then how the defense became aware of it if it was not provided?
I don't know if they did, but I am guessing they came across it by accident or in a later filing perhaps. There's a lot we don't know about this.

Has anyone on here read all the PCA and the AA?
 
Last edited:
She twisted it and they bought it, I don't have time right now but when I came in yesterday I saw an article posted saying this was a match to a rapist. Per Iris of course. NOT a partial match, NOT to someone else. And a couple here are quoting her or buying it and bringing back that old FALSEHOOD. If I ever get time to catch up I will respond to that EXACT defense garbage shared here as if truth if and when I come across it again. Old garbage. You probably already did for all I know.

Iris has not tracked down the DNA owner nor has she tried to bust JL's alibi. BECAUSE there is no end result that will help them, she is just doing the lazy work of twisting and insinuating and to date hasn't been in the thick of a THING Of a trial. I think her firm claims one they ever won that went to trial. The remainder are all deals.
Maybe those of us questioning should just stop posting. Perhaps that would make you happy.

Those who have read the AA please provide a page number(s) where the DNA evidence is mentioned.

Thank you.
 
read it and you will find it. I can't search it on my kindle.
Roundpeg doesn't remember it in there and the judge sanctioned them for excluding the car DNA information prompting the case withdrawal. Basically the prosecution has f***ed up the case. Not unlike Delphi it seems, although the defence are at fault there.
 
Last edited:
More detail about the omitted DNA. This article may have been posted before but it shows that the prosecution knew about the car DNA.



In a high-profile case that has already seen numerous and sometimes odd twists and turns over the past three years, including crucial judicial sanctions, a judge agreed to dismiss all charges against Barry Morphew, without prejudice, just nine days before he was to stand trial for the first-degree murder of his wife and mother of their two daughters, Suzanne Morphew.

Prosecutors, who can re-file charges in the future, filed a motion to dismiss the indictment minutes before a pre-trial conference on April 19, 2022, with D.A. Linda Stanley writing they need to investigate further and believe "we are close to discovering the victim's body." Stanley also cited the court's decision to exclude "several key expert witnesses initially endorsed. Without this crucial evidence and without the victim's body, the People cannot move forward at this time in good faith."

Barry Morphew and daughters
Barry Morphew, alongside his daughters, walks out of the Fremont County Courthouse in Colorado, a free man after all charges against him are dismissed on April 19, 2022.KKTV
"First I want to say that Mr. Morphew not only was presumed innocent and still is presumed innocent, he is innocent," Morphew's attorney, Iris Eytan, said at a press conference after the charges were dropped. In response to the State pointing to the need to find Suzanne's body, she said, "Forever they have stated that they don't need a body — that a body is irrelevant. But you need to know, that in this case, there has been not a single ounce of physical evidence that has been found connecting Mr. Morphew to this … alleged crime."


Since Barry Morphew's arrest, his defense attorneys had asked Judge Ramsey Lama, multiple times, to dismiss the charges against him. Over the past several months, they pressed the judge to issue severe sanctions on the prosecution for failing to turn over potentially exculpatory evidence ahead of trial. And the judge imposed damaging sanctions, including barring 11 of their 16 endorsed expert witnesses — among others, experts in DNA, vehicle data and a cell phone data analyst, as punishment for violating discovery rules. In all, the Court excluded 14 of the prosecution's expert witnesses. The judge found that DA Stanley and her team repeatedly missed deadlines and failed to turn over important information, writing, "The People's actions amount to negligent and arguably, reckless disregard" for their discovery obligations.

In earlier filings, prosecutors said that the Court did not find willful misconduct associated with any discovery violations, noting "ultimately the sanctions imposed greatly damage the People's case, tantamount to dismissal, for late disclosures that were not greatly prejudicial, but rather technical in nature."

"48 Hours" correspondent Peter Van Sant updates the case in "The Suzanne Morphew Case: Nothing is What It Seems," airing Saturday, July 1 at 10/9c on CBS and streams on Paramount+.

When Suzanne Morphew, a Colorado mother of two girls, vanished on Mother's Day in May 2020, authorities wondered if she'd been abducted or if her husband Barry — whom she had threatened to divorce — might have killed her.

Investigators never expected the case would have so many bizarre twists and turns and eventually involve a chipmunk alibi, a tranquilizer gun, a "talking" truck, mystery DNA and a spy pen right out of a James Bond film.

"This case is incredibly unique," says Aya Gruber, a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. "When you started to dig a little bit deeper, nothing is what it seems."

Barry and Susanne Morphew
Barry and Susanne MorphewFACEBOOK
Gruber studied thousands of pages of public documents from the prosecutor, investigators and defense attorneys.

Suzanne was reported missing on May 10, 2020. She'd been alone that day because her daughters, Macy, 16, and Mallory, 20, were off on a church-sponsored camping trip and planned to return home later that Mother's Day.

At the same time, Barry Morphew told investigators he had left the home early in the morning to drive to a job site some three hours away. He said the last time he saw his wife of 25 years was when she was sleeping in their bed.

After Suzanne was officially reported missing by a neighbor, investigators began to examine Barry's story. Friends and relatives told investigators that the marriage was troubled, and agents found a deleted text from Suzanne to Barry on his phone that read: "I'm done. I could care less what you're up to and have been for years. We just need to figure this out civilly."

Evidence in the Suzanne Morphew case Evidence in the Suzanne Morphew case
But 10 days after Suzanne disappeared, agents were pulled in a different direction when they found a so-called spy pen belonging to Suzanne. The spy pen has a long battery life and is designed to look and write like an ordinary pen.

But it has one extra feature: it is voice-activated and records conversations. Suzanne had acquired it, she told a friend, because she suspected Barry was having an affair and she hoped to use the pen to gather evidence. But the plan backfired.

Investigators listened to what the pen had recorded and, although there was no evidence of Barry having an affair, they say they heard "intimate" conversations between Suzanne and someone named Jeff.

It was another twist in a case filled with them.

Without knowing who Jeff was or his location when Suzanne went missing, they could not eliminate him as a person or interest. It took FBI agents six months before they uncovered his identity: Jeff Libler, a man both Suzanne and Barry knew from their Alexandria, Indiana, high school. Jeff and Suzanne had had a one-time fling after graduation, and she'd reached out to him in 2018 after the Morphews moved to Colorado with a Facebook message that read simply: "Howdy stranger."

"And from that moment they had talked almost every single day nonstop," said Ashley Franco, a reporter for KKTV, the CBS affiliate in Colorado Springs, who has covered the story from the beginning.

That was enough to ignite a nearly two-year love affair. Jeff had a wife and six children. He lived in Michigan and claimed to be there with his family on the day Suzanne vanished.

Agents eventually discovered the lovers had spoken to each other for dozens of hours, often communicating via secret accounts on WhatsApp and LinkedIn. Jeff also admitted that they met for romantic rendezvous in New Orleans, Florida, Texas, Michigan and Indiana.

After Suzanne disappeared in May 2020, Jeff did not contact authorities. Instead, agents say, he deleted the accounts where he had communicated with Suzanne.

"What he did was delete all his social media accounts that he had used to communicate with Suzanne," says Gruber. "He's got a lot to lose if revelations of this affair come out."

Jeff reportedly told agents he did not want to tarnish Suzanne's memory, but he also told them he worried that he'd lose his wife, children and job. He also worried he might be considered a suspect. "He asks the agents, 'Am I a target?'" says Gruber.

After agents confronted him, he did cooperate, providing a sample of his DNA and passwords to the deleted accounts. Investigators eventually were able to retrace the couple's steps and recovered texts by tapping into the iCloud accounts of Jeff and Suzanne.

Jeff was able to provide receipts for a home goods store he'd visited in Michigan on the day Suzanne vanished and he was eventually cleared.

Investigators still had their suspicions about Barry Morphew. They never uncovered any evidence that he was having an affair, but investigators found his actions on that Mother's Day weekend to be suspicious.

Morphew property
Cell phone records appear to show Barry Morphew's phone pinging all around the house on May 9. When asked about this unusual phone activity, Barry told investigators he was running around the property shooting chipmunks, which Barry says were a constant nuisance.CHAFFEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
They asked Barry why his phone seemed to be pinging all around his house on the day before Mother's Day and he told them he must have been out shooting chipmunks, which he said were a constant nuisance at the house.

It was perhaps the world's first chipmunk alibi, but Barry stood by it, saying he'd shot 85 chipmunks in the two years he owned that Colorado house.

"And then that confession to shooting chipmunks becomes a major piece of incriminating evidence against him," says Gruber.

Van Sant asked why. "Because [agents are] saying, 'Well, you know, now he's admitting to having run around the house. And this is a ridiculous explanation, so it must be the explanation of a guilty person,'" says Gruber.

What's more, there was no evidence of any chipmunk shootings around the house and neighbors did not recall hearing any type of disturbance during that period of time.

Cases sometimes turn on the smallest of things and, in this case, agents seized upon just such a small item.

Morphew evidence
Investigators discovered this clear plastic needle cap in the Morphew family's dryer.CHAFFEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
Agents had found a small clear plastic cap in the family's dryer that they believed was from a syringe used to inject chemicals into a tranquilizer dart. Barry acknowledged he knew how to inject chemicals into a dart and that he'd shot many deer for trophies and so he could get their antlers. His garage was filled with deer heads and a pile of antlers. However, there was no working tranquilizer gun found in the home and authorities say Barry's DNA was not on that plastic cap.

Even so, investigators developed a theory that Barry had shot Suzanne with a tranquilizer gun and then chased her around the house before she passed out. They found a door frame that was broken and suspected there had been a confrontation.

Agents also tapped into a new investigative tool called digital vehicle forensics. They pulled data from his Ford truck's many computers and got the truck to "talk" to them. They learned that when Barry said he was sleeping, the truck's doors were opening and closing.

He was arrested and charged with first-degree murder and other crimes in May 2021. Suzanne's body has not been found and prosecutors presume she is dead. Barry eventually pleaded "not guilty."

But at the eleventh hour, there was one more twist revealed for the first time publicly at a preliminary hearing to determine if there was enough evidence for probable cause.

Prosecutors admitted at a hearing held in the summer of 2021 that their own forensics team had uncovered DNA evidence that threatened to destroy their case against Barry. State technicians had found DNA on the glove compartment of Suzanne's car that partially matched an unknown male connected to three unsolved sexual assault cases in three different cities.

Barry Morphew and Jeff Libler were excluded from that DNA sample which meant there was a chance Suzanne had fallen into the hands of a sexual predator. "This DNA discovery is so significant," Gruber said. "All of a sudden, the seemingly implausible becomes more possible."
 
Last edited:
More detail about the omitted DNA.



In a high-profile case that has already seen numerous and sometimes odd twists and turns over the past three years, including crucial judicial sanctions, a judge agreed to dismiss all charges against Barry Morphew, without prejudice, just nine days before he was to stand trial for the first-degree murder of his wife and mother of their two daughters, Suzanne Morphew.

Prosecutors, who can re-file charges in the future, filed a motion to dismiss the indictment minutes before a pre-trial conference on April 19, 2022, with D.A. Linda Stanley writing they need to investigate further and believe "we are close to discovering the victim's body." Stanley also cited the court's decision to exclude "several key expert witnesses initially endorsed. Without this crucial evidence and without the victim's body, the People cannot move forward at this time in good faith."

Barry Morphew and daughters
Barry Morphew, alongside his daughters, walks out of the Fremont County Courthouse in Colorado, a free man after all charges against him are dismissed on April 19, 2022.KKTV
"First I want to say that Mr. Morphew not only was presumed innocent and still is presumed innocent, he is innocent," Morphew's attorney, Iris Eytan, said at a press conference after the charges were dropped. In response to the State pointing to the need to find Suzanne's body, she said, "Forever they have stated that they don't need a body — that a body is irrelevant. But you need to know, that in this case, there has been not a single ounce of physical evidence that has been found connecting Mr. Morphew to this … alleged crime."


Since Barry Morphew's arrest, his defense attorneys had asked Judge Ramsey Lama, multiple times, to dismiss the charges against him. Over the past several months, they pressed the judge to issue severe sanctions on the prosecution for failing to turn over potentially exculpatory evidence ahead of trial. And the judge imposed damaging sanctions, including barring 11 of their 16 endorsed expert witnesses — among others, experts in DNA, vehicle data and a cell phone data analyst, as punishment for violating discovery rules. In all, the Court excluded 14 of the prosecution's expert witnesses. The judge found that DA Stanley and her team repeatedly missed deadlines and failed to turn over important information, writing, "The People's actions amount to negligent and arguably, reckless disregard" for their discovery obligations.

In earlier filings, prosecutors said that the Court did not find willful misconduct associated with any discovery violations, noting "ultimately the sanctions imposed greatly damage the People's case, tantamount to dismissal, for late disclosures that were not greatly prejudicial, but rather technical in nature."

"48 Hours" correspondent Peter Van Sant updates the case in "The Suzanne Morphew Case: Nothing is What It Seems," airing Saturday, July 1 at 10/9c on CBS and streams on Paramount+.

When Suzanne Morphew, a Colorado mother of two girls, vanished on Mother's Day in May 2020, authorities wondered if she'd been abducted or if her husband Barry — whom she had threatened to divorce — might have killed her.

Investigators never expected the case would have so many bizarre twists and turns and eventually involve a chipmunk alibi, a tranquilizer gun, a "talking" truck, mystery DNA and a spy pen right out of a James Bond film.

"This case is incredibly unique," says Aya Gruber, a law professor at the University of Colorado at Boulder. "When you started to dig a little bit deeper, nothing is what it seems."

Barry and Susanne Morphew
Barry and Susanne MorphewFACEBOOK
Gruber studied thousands of pages of public documents from the prosecutor, investigators and defense attorneys.

Suzanne was reported missing on May 10, 2020. She'd been alone that day because her daughters, Macy, 16, and Mallory, 20, were off on a church-sponsored camping trip and planned to return home later that Mother's Day.

At the same time, Barry Morphew told investigators he had left the home early in the morning to drive to a job site some three hours away. He said the last time he saw his wife of 25 years was when she was sleeping in their bed.

After Suzanne was officially reported missing by a neighbor, investigators began to examine Barry's story. Friends and relatives told investigators that the marriage was troubled, and agents found a deleted text from Suzanne to Barry on his phone that read: "I'm done. I could care less what you're up to and have been for years. We just need to figure this out civilly."

Evidence in the Suzanne Morphew case Evidence in the Suzanne Morphew case
But 10 days after Suzanne disappeared, agents were pulled in a different direction when they found a so-called spy pen belonging to Suzanne. The spy pen has a long battery life and is designed to look and write like an ordinary pen.

But it has one extra feature: it is voice-activated and records conversations. Suzanne had acquired it, she told a friend, because she suspected Barry was having an affair and she hoped to use the pen to gather evidence. But the plan backfired.

Investigators listened to what the pen had recorded and, although there was no evidence of Barry having an affair, they say they heard "intimate" conversations between Suzanne and someone named Jeff.

It was another twist in a case filled with them.

Without knowing who Jeff was or his location when Suzanne went missing, they could not eliminate him as a person or interest. It took FBI agents six months before they uncovered his identity: Jeff Libler, a man both Suzanne and Barry knew from their Alexandria, Indiana, high school. Jeff and Suzanne had had a one-time fling after graduation, and she'd reached out to him in 2018 after the Morphews moved to Colorado with a Facebook message that read simply: "Howdy stranger."

"And from that moment they had talked almost every single day nonstop," said Ashley Franco, a reporter for KKTV, the CBS affiliate in Colorado Springs, who has covered the story from the beginning.

That was enough to ignite a nearly two-year love affair. Jeff had a wife and six children. He lived in Michigan and claimed to be there with his family on the day Suzanne vanished.

Agents eventually discovered the lovers had spoken to each other for dozens of hours, often communicating via secret accounts on WhatsApp and LinkedIn. Jeff also admitted that they met for romantic rendezvous in New Orleans, Florida, Texas, Michigan and Indiana.

After Suzanne disappeared in May 2020, Jeff did not contact authorities. Instead, agents say, he deleted the accounts where he had communicated with Suzanne.

"What he did was delete all his social media accounts that he had used to communicate with Suzanne," says Gruber. "He's got a lot to lose if revelations of this affair come out."

Jeff reportedly told agents he did not want to tarnish Suzanne's memory, but he also told them he worried that he'd lose his wife, children and job. He also worried he might be considered a suspect. "He asks the agents, 'Am I a target?'" says Gruber.

After agents confronted him, he did cooperate, providing a sample of his DNA and passwords to the deleted accounts. Investigators eventually were able to retrace the couple's steps and recovered texts by tapping into the iCloud accounts of Jeff and Suzanne.

Jeff was able to provide receipts for a home goods store he'd visited in Michigan on the day Suzanne vanished and he was eventually cleared.

Investigators still had their suspicions about Barry Morphew. They never uncovered any evidence that he was having an affair, but investigators found his actions on that Mother's Day weekend to be suspicious.

Morphew property
Cell phone records appear to show Barry Morphew's phone pinging all around the house on May 9. When asked about this unusual phone activity, Barry told investigators he was running around the property shooting chipmunks, which Barry says were a constant nuisance.CHAFFEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
They asked Barry why his phone seemed to be pinging all around his house on the day before Mother's Day and he told them he must have been out shooting chipmunks, which he said were a constant nuisance at the house.

It was perhaps the world's first chipmunk alibi, but Barry stood by it, saying he'd shot 85 chipmunks in the two years he owned that Colorado house.

"And then that confession to shooting chipmunks becomes a major piece of incriminating evidence against him," says Gruber.

Van Sant asked why. "Because [agents are] saying, 'Well, you know, now he's admitting to having run around the house. And this is a ridiculous explanation, so it must be the explanation of a guilty person,'" says Gruber.

What's more, there was no evidence of any chipmunk shootings around the house and neighbors did not recall hearing any type of disturbance during that period of time.

Cases sometimes turn on the smallest of things and, in this case, agents seized upon just such a small item.

Morphew evidence
Investigators discovered this clear plastic needle cap in the Morphew family's dryer.CHAFFEE COUNTY DISTRICT COURT
Agents had found a small clear plastic cap in the family's dryer that they believed was from a syringe used to inject chemicals into a tranquilizer dart. Barry acknowledged he knew how to inject chemicals into a dart and that he'd shot many deer for trophies and so he could get their antlers. His garage was filled with deer heads and a pile of antlers. However, there was no working tranquilizer gun found in the home and authorities say Barry's DNA was not on that plastic cap.

Even so, investigators developed a theory that Barry had shot Suzanne with a tranquilizer gun and then chased her around the house before she passed out. They found a door frame that was broken and suspected there had been a confrontation.

Agents also tapped into a new investigative tool called digital vehicle forensics. They pulled data from his Ford truck's many computers and got the truck to "talk" to them. They learned that when Barry said he was sleeping, the truck's doors were opening and closing.

He was arrested and charged with first-degree murder and other crimes in May 2021. Suzanne's body has not been found and prosecutors presume she is dead. Barry eventually pleaded "not guilty."

But at the eleventh hour, there was one more twist revealed for the first time publicly at a preliminary hearing to determine if there was enough evidence for probable cause.

Prosecutors admitted at a hearing held in the summer of 2021 that their own forensics team had uncovered DNA evidence that threatened to destroy their case against Barry. State technicians had found DNA on the glove compartment of Suzanne's car that partially matched an unknown male connected to three unsolved sexual assault cases in three different cities.

Barry Morphew and Jeff Libler were excluded from that DNA sample which meant there was a chance Suzanne had fallen into the hands of a sexual predator. "This DNA discovery is so significant," Gruber said. "All of a sudden, the seemingly implausible becomes more possible."

Judge Patrick Murphy wwas candid in his assessment of the case, saying it could go either way before a jury. He found enough probable cause to put it over for trial but ordered that Barry be released on $500,000 bond, observing that he thought there was not "a fair likelihood" that Barry would be convicted by a jury. Barry entered a plea of not guilty to the charges.

Barry Morphew raised the bond money and is free awaiting trial. Judge Murphy disqualified himself because of a potential conflict of interest involving a witness, and Judge Ramsey Lama was appointed in January 2022. Morphew's trial, which was moved from Chaffee to Fremont County, Colorado, was scheduled to begin on April 28.

Then, on April 19, Stanley and her team filed the motion to drop all charges, without prejudice, until they gather more evidence. But Morphew's attorney, Iris Eytan, argued that the case should be dismissed with prejudice so that it cannot be refiled. The court dismissed the charges without prejudice.
It was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice so they can refile. If they had no viable info, the judge could have easily said with prejudice and they could not refile again, The court left it open for a reason.

Some notes per article:

the Court did not find willful misconduct associated with any discovery violations

Jeff was able to provide receipts for a home goods store he'd visited in Michigan on the day Suzanne vanished and he was eventually cleared.

They asked Barry why his phone seemed to be pinging all around his house on the day before Mother's Day and he told them he must have been out shooting chipmunks, which he said were a constant nuisance at the house....hat's more, there was no evidence of any chipmunk shootings around the house and neighbors did not recall hearing any type of disturbance during that period of time.


and even in this article stating it was a PARTIAL match to the sex assaults:
State technicians had found DNA on the glove compartment of Suzanne's car that partially matched an unknown male connected to three unsolved sexual assault cases in three different cities.

Then, on April 19, Stanley and her team filed the motion to drop all charges, without prejudice, until they gather more evidence. But Morphew's attorney, Iris Eytan, argued that the case should be dismissed with prejudice so that it cannot be refiled. The court dismissed the charges without prejudice.
 
It was dismissed WITHOUT prejudice so they can refile. If they had no viable info, the judge could have easily said with prejudice and they could not refile again, The court left it open for a reason.

Some notes per article:

the Court did not find willful misconduct associated with any discovery violations

Jeff was able to provide receipts for a home goods store he'd visited in Michigan on the day Suzanne vanished and he was eventually cleared.

They asked Barry why his phone seemed to be pinging all around his house on the day before Mother's Day and he told them he must have been out shooting chipmunks, which he said were a constant nuisance at the house....hat's more, there was no evidence of any chipmunk shootings around the house and neighbors did not recall hearing any type of disturbance during that period of time.


and even in this article stating it was a PARTIAL match to the sex assaults:
State technicians had found DNA on the glove compartment of Suzanne's car that partially matched an unknown male connected to three unsolved sexual assault cases in three different cities.

Then, on April 19, Stanley and her team filed the motion to drop all charges, without prejudice, until they gather more evidence. But Morphew's attorney, Iris Eytan, argued that the case should be dismissed with prejudice so that it cannot be refiled. The court dismissed the charges without prejudice.
That's right - once they have a body, which they now have. They will have to explain that DNA this time though, as everyone knows about it now.
 
I have read the AA dated 4th May 2021 and found nothing about the car DNA or any other DNA in it for that matter.

And that is because they did not discover it till summer '21, after BM's arrest months earlier.

"Prosecutors admitted at a hearing held in the summer of 2021 that their own forensics team had uncovered DNA evidence that threatened to destroy their case against Barry. State technicians had found DNA on the glove compartment of Suzanne's car that partially matched an unknown male connected to three unsolved sexual assault cases in three different cities."

So this discovery and the sanctions against the prosecution experts resulted in the prosecution case dismissal on 19th April 2022. So far, the charges have not been brought again, but the subsequent discovery of Suzanne's remains in Sept 2023 may change that.
 
Last edited:
That AA is all invalid now the case has been dismissed. But the prosecution missed out a lot of evidence from the AA according to the link I posted and that is why the judge threw out the prosecution experts which then led to the withdrawal of the case.
None of the facts that were in it have changed so if they wish to use it or add to it, I am sure they will. Furthermore, they certainly aren't going to get rid of the facts, interviews in it, investigation and so forth.

Also an AA almost never contains everything any more than a probable cause hearing is a trial either.
 
That AA is all invalid now the case has been dismissed. But the prosecution missed out a lot of evidence from the AA according to the link I posted and that is why the judge threw out the prosecution experts which then led to the withdrawal of the case.
I just answered this, seems like a duplicate post. But whatever, okay, I'll add to my answer. NOTHING makes the facts in the AA invalid. Nothing makes evidence in it invalid. Nothing makes interviews and lies magically disappear. NOTHING. Etc., etc., etc., etc. It is the same case it always was only now with a body and likely more evidence. The prosecution maintains all of the facts they have always had, they don't go poof and magically disappear.

You are beating a dead horse on this one. They may redo the AA, they may add to it and they may just copy it and add to it. That's up to them.
 
How are you coming to the conclusion that the AA is now invalid? The FACTS in it have not changed at all. Period. They will amend the info is all. No facts in it have changed.
Their entire case is as valid as it ever was and they can choose to refile at any time they like and use all parts of it if they like. Nothing invalidates the facts and so on.

Honestly anyone who hasn't read all to date is just going to be further behind when they do file again as they'll have all the stuff already known and in the original plus updates, body found and so on. I just now am listening to transcripts of some of the hearings from the first time. Anyone can watch them a Plunder, she reads every word. And is doing it in parts so none are TOO long.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,035
Messages
244,933
Members
983
Latest member
yepugotme2
Back
Top Bottom