Who is the LONG ISLAND SERIAL KILLER? *ARREST JULY 2023*

Who is the Long Island serial killer? This is a general discussion thread about this terrifying case.

Who is the Long Island Serial Killer?

The Long Island serial killer (also referred to as LISK, the Gilgo Beach Killer or the Craigslist Ripper) is an unidentified suspected serial killer who is believed to have murdered 10 to 16 people over a period of nearly 20 years.

www.crimewatchers.net

MEMBER'S ONLY DISCUSSION/DOCUMENTS: https://www.crimewatchers.net/threa...other-sensitive-information.3498/#post-226869

 

[GrandmaBear]

I don't know how we missed it but I only caught that when reading it a second time. So the "divorce" is just a ruse to protect the assets?

I caught that it wasn't final the first read but it wasn't my focus in replying. If I recall right lol. Been on Delphi and stuff this morning.

Well here's my thought--I just realized in Delphi the spousal exception, you can't make a spouse testify against the other spouse... Dont' know if you've been in there yet today but you know one big thing I have wanted to see is what RA's wife has to say on the stand... And I also asked though if she voluntarily gave interviews to LE would they at least be able to be played, etc.? Because it was voluntary?

And then bringing that to this thought, why is this divorce not finalized? Because she does not want to have to testify against CB? Because she HAS info...?

Oh it was always to protect assets or move them. In this case. Now not sure how NY works but here, in a divorce, there'd be a temporary order before final ever does off. And last I knew CB wasn't contesting anything, meaning all would go to A and it's AAA (I loved that new one you came up with)... We know things are liquid as the SC property just got transferred for $1.

I got sidetracked and exhausted last night but was going to go back and check, did you say her and the dog and the son are living at the SC property??? I MISSED that. And never did go check it out.

Right now imo the only reason not to finalize the divorce is not to have to testify against him, etc....

Her move to divorce quickly was always about assets and protecting them, not just for there but for him too, imo, and it would be smart to do it for herself for any spouse of a murderer but it imo was more than that here. We know she did not file because she doesn't want him any longer or thinks him guilty. It's protection of assets so they can't go to a private atty, public defenders can come in, victims' FAMILIES can't sue for anything, etc.

 

[Tresir]

I caught that it wasn't final the first read but it wasn't my focus in replying. If I recall right lol. Been on Delphi and stuff this morning.

Well here's my thought--I just realized in Delphi the spousal exception, you can't make a spouse testify against the other spouse... Dont' know if you've been in there yet today but you know one big thing I have wanted to see is what RA's wife has to say on the stand... And I also asked though if she voluntarily gave interviews to LE would they at least be able to be played, etc.? Because it was voluntary?

And then bringing that to this thought, why is this divorce not finalized? Because she does not want to have to testify against CB? Because she HAS info...?

Oh it was always to protect assets or move them. In this case. Now not sure how NY works but here, in a divorce, there'd be a temporary order before final ever does off. And last I knew CB wasn't contesting anything, meaning all would go to A and it's AAA (I loved that new one you came up with)... We know things are liquid as the SC property just got transferred for $1.

I got sidetracked and exhausted last night but was going to go back and check, did you say her and the dog and the son are living at the SC property??? I MISSED that. And never did go check it out.

Right now imo the only reason not to finalize the divorce is not to have to testify against him, etc....

Her move to divorce quickly was always about assets and protecting them, not just for there but for him too, imo, and it would be smart to do it for herself for any spouse of a murderer but it imo was more than that here. We know she did not file because she doesn't want him any longer or thinks him guilty. It's protection of assets so they can't go to a private atty, public defenders can come in, victims' FAMILIES can't sue for anything, etc.

Yes i agree that is probably what it is all about. Protecting their assets by transfering them all to her then filing for divorce so he has no assets and can have a PD. Also victim's relatives (some had children) won't be able to sue and get any compensation if she has everything. This seems to be a big loophole and shouldn't be allowed. Public money being used for his defence, because he gave his assets away/sold them for a dollar. That should be illegal.

 

[GrandmaBear]

Yes i agree that is probably what it is all about. Protecting their assets by transfering them all to her then filing for divorce so he has no assets and can have a PD. Also victim's relatives (some had children) won't be able to sue and get any compensation if she has everything. This seems to be a big loophole and shouldn't be allowed. Public money being used for his defence, because he gave his assets away/sold them for a dollar. That should be illegal.

It is a HUGE loophole here. Same like in the Morphew case. I mean it is not proven hub killed wife BUT at least imo half of assets and all of hers should have been frozen. It is absolutely terrible in case after case. Often they are using assets or life insurance from the spouse they killed for a private defense even. I get they are not convicted yet but at LEAST freeze what isn't his if for instance a hub maybe killed a wife or she is just missing.

This case is not hub and wife. But they are leaching assets from the victims suing or getting restitution etc. and then he gets state help. Believe ME noting works here in sync. That would be family or divorce court, not criminal court and one isn't going to look out or do for the other and so on.

The system really does suck and in this case it is being played. And then there is start to state..In Morphew he got an IN court to get control over her assets and all of theirs. Yet they lived in CO...

It is just so wrong.

No different than if Tammy's life insurance in Daybell funded Chad's defense and even some of Lori's. The very woman he was cheating with on his wife.

All these cases differ some but same idea. They do wrong, profit and then use it to get out of the wrong, and so on. Just disgusting.

how does this kind of thing work there? Any better?

 

[Tresir]

It is a HUGE loophole here. Same like in the Morphew case. I mean it is not proven hub killed wife BUT at least imo half of assets and all of hers should have been frozen. It is absolutely terrible in case after case. Often they are using assets or life insurance from the spouse they killed for a private defense even. I get they are not convicted yet but at LEAST freeze what isn't his if for instance a hub maybe killed a wife or she is just missing.

This case is not hub and wife. But they are leaching assets from the victims suing or getting restitution etc. and then he gets state help. Believe ME noting works here in sync. That would be family or divorce court, not criminal court and one isn't going to look out or do for the other and so on.

The system really does suck and in this case it is being played. And then there is start to state..In Morphew he got an IN court to get control over her assets and all of theirs. Yet they lived in CO...

It is just so wrong.

No different than if Tammy's life insurance in Daybell funded Chad's defense and even some of Lori's. The very woman he was cheating with on his wife.

All these cases differ some but same idea. They do wrong, profit and then use it to get out of the wrong, and so on. Just disgusting.

how does this kind of thing work there? Any better?

No it is similar I think. Husband and wife assets can be held joint or separate. You can also hold assets with children.

 

[GrandmaBear]

No it is similar I think. Husband and wife assets can be held joint or separate. You can also hold assets with children.

I'm not sure we are talking about the same thing here. It sure sounded to me like CB owned most of the real estate and he gave it to Asa so It couldn't be taken, I'm sure, or would bet.

Barry Morphew had Suzanne proclaimed was in like a month with no proof she was dead. And then took all their assets wheher joint or separate.

dead in

Neither thing should be allowed imo. ETA, now I see in the post above you did agree he shouldn't be able to do this and get a PD, etc.. I lost track of the conversation lol.