The only reason they cannot tie her down to being present is because they don't have an exact date of death. Just a six week window. I don't really understand how LE don't know exactly when Valerie went missing but i guess these women had nobody to report their absence and LE certainly never gave a toss.
All this going on for years and nobody noticed or heard anything. Makes me wonder about the neighbours too.
Oh I know and totally agree, far as I am concerned they have no idea of date of DEATH with any of them. Now that's not this guy's fault but the freaking messed up investigation through the years, etc. but from the very first day when CB was fir arrested and pressers, they have been saying wife was not home. YEAH may not when went missing. They cannot know the day of death.
There is NO WAY they can clear her that I have seen so far. Her hearing nothing and living in the home is bad enough but yeah, neighbors, one wonders too. I don't think they are likely involved but sometimes people just ignore things and mind their own business who knows...
IMO no one has cleared Asa or any of them and should not be saying that unless they want to provide what proves that. And how they would know the date of death, how long kept and tortured, etc.
You can TELL how close that home is to others from that last pic you put up. It is pretty darned weird. Of course, many just mind their own business.
HER though, hmmm... Not so sure.
I really want the Vergata story confirmed because that most definitely puts her there. I know I've said it before. And lo and behold right after an announcement from her atty that she is moving, we get ANOTHER murder charged, one they can't confirm if she was home or not. Maybe means nothing, hard to say...
I don't know how many have dealt with like a cheating hub but I can tell you if I was gone, like anytime I went anywhere planned, like I went with my mom one time to her relatives in another state and of course he knew it, I ALWAYS came home to something off.. Of course I gave the benefit of the doubt at first, and there was always some explanation but you do pick up on these things. In less years I was over any denial, than the length of their marriage, and from the start of running into such always had suspiccions.
Whether she was involved or not, she was definitely turning a blind eye and she did SEE things, guaranteed or pick up on things.
And that's not even murder, torture, etc.
Maybe it means nothing but I find it very curious the first case said outright that he couldn't confirm if gone or not when a reporter asked that question was Mack and just before that after hearing nothing for quite some time, her atty announced she is selling and moving... Maybe it doesn't mean anything but I'm weird about coincidences and don't believe in many of them.
If she's even totally "innocent", moving to protect all assets, stand beside him and on TOP of it profit, is too much for me. She is a totally dislikable WOMAN and always will be to me. Disgusting, all of it.
The serial killer connection and their daughters, ALL OF IT.
Tierney can say whatever that she was gone when most went missing (last known anyhow) but he cannot say she was not around when they were killed. That's been obvious from the start.
Man I want the Vergata story confirmed.
I think they are going wisely and methodical and there may be reasons.
But not one thing has convinced me this woman did not know or even wasn't part, or condoned.
If I have my time thought right, you are up late or very early lol. DELPHI TOMORROW!
www.crimewatchers.net
