I suppose that's what any defense attorney would attempt but this boy didn't kill a squirrel he took the life of a little girl and assaulted her as well. He needs to be off the streets and not in the juvenile system. He had a choice and he made the wrong one. He is older than she was and definitely old enough to get that there are consequences for MURDER.Lily Peters update: Wisconsin teen charged as adult in 10-year-old’s murder wants case in juvenile court
The Wisconsin 14-year-old accused of luring, killing and then sexually assaulting 10-year-old Iliana “Lily” Peters in April returned to court Thursday.www.foxnews.comLily Peters update: Wisconsin teen charged as adult in 10-year-old’s murder wants case in juvenile court
The Wisconsin 14-year-old accused of luring, killing and then sexually assaulting 10-year-old Iliana "Lily" Peters in April waived his right to a preliminary hearing Thursday before his attorney announced he is looking to have the case transferred to juvenile court.
The juvenile suspect is being identified only with his initials, CTB-P. and was initially charged as an adult. He has pleaded not guilty.
Defense Attorney Michael Cohen did not immediately respond to messages seeking comment. In court Thursday, he said he would be filing a reverse waiver, records show. The reverse waiver filing would ask the court to send the 14-year-old's homicide case to juvenile court.
You used to get one substitution in WI no questions asked, automatic, if requested. The way I understood it. Not sure if it is still the case or not. If it is, it will be granted with no arguments necessary. I think that was true in almost all types of cases.Defense asks for new judge in Lily Peters homicide case
CHIPPEWA FALLS — The attorney representing the 14-year-old boy accused of killing 10-year-old Lily Peters on April 24 has requested a substitute judge be appointed.www.leadertelegram.comDefense asks for new judge in Lily Peters homicide case
The attorney representing the 14-year-old boy accused of killing 10-year-old Lily Peters on April 24 has requested a substitute judge be appointed.
Defense attorney Michael Cohen filed the request in Chippewa County Court, seeking that Judge Ben Lane be replaced. Cohen didn’t return calls for comment Friday on why he made the request.
A scheduling conference is slated for Thursday; Newell said he didn’t know if the substitution request will cause that court date to be postponed.
You're right!You used to get one substitution in WI no questions asked, automatic, if requested. The way I understood it. Not sure if it is still the case or not. If it is, it will be granted with no arguments necessary. I think that was true in almost all types of cases.
Wow, honestly no one in life ever tells me I'm right. Feels pretty good to hear those words.You're right!
New judge assigned to Lily Peters homicide case
According to online court records, Judge Steven Gibbs will now handle the case.www.weau.comNew judge assigned to Lily Peters homicide case
A new judge has been assigned to the Lily Peters homicide case.
According to online court records, Steven Gibbs, who was appointed to the Chippewa County Circuit Court by then-Gov. Scott Walker in 2016, is the new judge for the case.
An application for a substitution of judicial assignment filed by the suspect’s attorney, Michael Cohen, was approved on Sept. 21, with Gibbs assigned the case Monday, according to online court records. According to the document filed with the court on Sept. 21, no reason was given for the request. The filing cited Wisconsin Statute 970.20, which allows a defendant to request one judicial substitution.
Yeah, Covid has been quite an excuse for already backed up courts imo. I don't know so much about the court system backing up in WI due to it but I do know some working in or around the system who sure used it as an excuse to not be in the office, responsive to cases, courts lacking their personnel, etc.6 months later: The latest on the Lily Peters case, and the "Lily Alert"
Monday marks six months since the death of 10-year-old Lily Peters of Chippewa Falls.www.wqow.com6 months later: The latest on the Lily Peters case, and the "Lily Alert"
Monday marks six months since the death of 10-year-old Lily Peters of Chippewa Falls.
The 14-year-old teen accused of killing Lily, known to us as C.P.-B., does not have any court hearings scheduled until August of 2023.
Harry Hertel, a criminal defense attorney in Eau Claire who is not connected to the case, said the nearly one-year gap is not unusual for a couple of reasons.
"Back when COVID struck, a lot of cases that would normally have been tried got pushed off down the road," Hertel said.
Hertel said the long wait is likely for preparation for the defense and the state, and crowding of the calendar due to COVID.
News 18 has not been able to confirm what the upcoming five-day hearing in August is about, but Hertel anticipates it will be a reverse waiver hearing to have C.P.-B.'s case transferred to juvenile court.
For this to happen, his defense team will have to argue several points according to state statute.
Back in June, Rep. Jesse James of Altoona said he was working on draft legislation to bring the "Lily Alert" to fruition because her disappearance did not meet the criteria for an Amber Alert.
The idea for a "Lily Alert" gained attention as a Change.org petition. A Chippewa Falls father asked for the creation of an alert system similar to an Amber Alert, but for cases that do not meet the criteria for an Amber Alert. To date the petition has almost 193,000 signatures.
After Rep. James and Chippewa Falls police met with the Wisconsin Department of Justice in July, the DOJ said there's already an alert that exists that could be utilized, so they are no longer pursuing a bill.
"It's a matter of getting our law enforcement agencies informed and having proper personnel trained on this as a vital tool to help bring resolution to any type of missing or endangered person," James said.
Sad to tell them a year is not a prolonged wait for justice but it is. Even in little ol' Wisconsin. It is awful. And then you watch it go to a year and a half, then two, then two and a half and you've had it each time and are going to scream if another delay, and then three and you don't know anything about the system nor ever expected to be in this position and each time you are hurt again, can't make it through any longer and have to take another let down just adding to the sheer grief of the loss of the victim the defendant getting these delays killed.Lily Peters Case Continues To Inch Along
The legal proceedings in the case involving the teenager accused of the tragic killing of Lily Peters in Chipp...www.seehafernews.comLily Peters Case Continues To Inch Along
The legal proceedings in the case involving the teenager accused of the tragic killing of Lily Peters in Chippewa County are progressing at a notably slow pace.
Towards the end of this month, a judge will make a crucial determination regarding whether the suspect can remain at the local juvenile detention center for their upcoming hearing scheduled for the following month.
The outcome of this hearing will play a significant role in deciding whether the case will remain within the jurisdiction of the juvenile court system or be transferred to adult court.
The accused, who celebrated their 15th birthday in March, stands accused of brutally assaulting, sexually assaulting, and ultimately taking the life of Peters in April 2022.
The family of the victim has expressed their profound anguish, as the prolonged wait for justice in this case has been an unbearable burden.
I'm certainly no attorney but why would it even be a question or there be a limit to the facts in the criminal complaint? Most cases as they are charged make it clear the investigation is continuing so more facts could certainly be amassed after the filing of the criminal complaint no? Or the complaint could be amended to reflect them, not sure. To me, this sounds like new b.s. going on in the justice world because I see no reason they could expect it to be limited to that. Just like probable cause later, you don't have to put everything in the complaint right? Just so all is provided and discoverable.Response filed to motions in Lily Peters case
Chippewa County District Attorney Wade Newell filed a letter with the court Monday.www.weau.comResponse filed to motions in Lily Peters case
The prosecution responds to motions filed by the attorney of a teenage boy accused of killing 10-year-old Lily Peters.
Chippewa County District Attorney Wade Newell filed a letter with the court Monday saying the state does not object to the defendant’s motion to seal any crime scene or autopsy photos or photos or video of the suspect admitted as evidence.
The D.A. does object to defense claims that the state is limited to the facts in the criminal complaint. The motions will be decided at a hearing next week.
A Reverse-Waiver Hearing is scheduled for the week of Aug. 7 for the now 15-year-old boy charged in Peter’s death.
That hearing will decide whether his case gets moved to juvenile court.
Yet another. I'm pretty sure the hearing they just had on this had been on the schedule for some time, meaning all knew it was coming and had plenty of time. There is no reason briefs couldn't be asked for and prepared by now OR at least before the end of the year and the decision made at the end of the year/ NEXT year!Chippewa County judge expected to rule this winter if Lily Peters’ accused killer will be tried as an adult
Chippewa County Circuit Court judge Steve Gibbs is expected to issue a decision this winter whether the 15-year-old accused of killing and raping 10-year-old Lily Peters will be tried aslacrossetribune.comChippewa County judge expected to rule this winter if Lily Peters’ accused killer will be tried as an adult
Chippewa County Circuit Court judge Steve Gibbs is expected to issue a decision this winter whether the 15-year-old accused of killing and raping 10-year-old Lily Peters will be tried as an adult.
After three days of testimony this week, both the prosecution and defense are expected to submit additional briefs by Nov. 17. Responses to the briefs will be due Dec. 8. Gibbs is likely to rule on the reverse waiver late in 2023 or early in 2024.