Epstein, Maxwell et al: exposed in child sex trafficking

0_Epstein.jpg

Do we have a Jefferey Epstein thread?

www.nbcnewyork.com

Jeffrey Epstein Confidante Ghislaine Maxwell Arrested on Sex Abuse Charges

Ghislaine Maxwell, the British socialite and heiress who became a confidante of disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and was later implicated in his alleged sexual crimes, has been arrested by the FBI. She was arrested in Bradford, New Hampshire, around 8:30 a.m. Thursday on charges she conspired...
www.nbcnewyork.com www.nbcnewyork.com
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Click to expand...
Tresir said:
Maxwell has not been allowed to have her brother and sister visit by the sound of it. Why would that be? From the article below :-

"Though only able to communicate to her through her lawyers, he confirmed that the suicide watch stories were 'a nonsense' and that there had been 'no evidence of any self-harm intent'."



www.dailymail.co.uk

Ghislaine Maxwell believes Jeffrey Epstein was MURDERED

Ian Maxwell claimed his sister Ghislaine, on trial for sex trafficking charges, believes the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was murdered in his New York jail cell.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
Click to expand...
I see nothing in the article stating she cannot talk with her brother or anyone else per the rules so it could be that is the way Maxwell and her attorneys want it this way or if it is the court that does, there is a reason. Unless I missed it, I saw nothing about them wanting to visit, it merely says they can only communicate through her lawyers.

For some reason, the Daybell case comes to mind. Lori, his client, had contact with an attorney and the LDS church I think and he is raising a fuss about it having occurred without his knowledge and the attempt to influence her or something like that... I just mean there are likely reasons it is this way.

Family is funny. He may talk as if he is close to her but that doesn't mean they want or need what he says or do not worry he may implicate or say something wrong... I mean unless his words are twisted, DM is saying he is sharing info like she is the only one in the family who thinks their dad was murdered, that she thinks Epstein was, etc. Why does he offer this info about her at all? He says he only met Epstein once so clearly he was not close to the couple through these many years although I guess he could have been close to his sister but I'm not convinced... Didn't the brothers face charges along with their father? I know they got off but they did, did they not? If one thing is clear, this family seemed to lack certain morals and it does not appear the children were raised with the examples of any... Jmo though.
 
GrandmaBear said:
I see nothing in the article stating she cannot talk with her brother or anyone else per the rules so it could be that is the way Maxwell and her attorneys want it this way or if it is the court that does, there is a reason. Unless I missed it, I saw nothing about them wanting to visit, it merely says they can only communicate through her lawyers.

For some reason, the Daybell case comes to mind. Lori, his client, had contact with an attorney and the LDS church I think and he is raising a fuss about it having occurred without his knowledge and the attempt to influence her or something like that... I just mean there are likely reasons it is this way.

Family is funny. He may talk as if he is close to her but that doesn't mean they want or need what he says or do not worry he may implicate or say something wrong... I mean unless his words are twisted, DM is saying he is sharing info like she is the only one in the family who thinks their dad was murdered, that she thinks Epstein was, etc. Why does he offer this info about her at all? He says he only met Epstein once so clearly he was not close to the couple through these many years although I guess he could have been close to his sister but I'm not convinced... Didn't the brothers face charges along with their father? I know they got off but they did, did they not? If one thing is clear, this family seemed to lack certain morals and it does not appear the children were raised with the examples of any... Jmo though.
Click to expand...
I got that out of it, too. They only met Epstein once in all of the years she was with him, so he obviously didn't visit her often then, so how would he know of much of anything she was up to during that time?
 
kdg411 said:
www.themarshallproject.org

How Prisons in Each State Are Restricting Visits Due to Coronavirus

As COVID-19 spread earlier this year, prison facilities across the country suspended visits from family and lawyers. Several months into the pandemic, some states are easing those restrictions. We’re rounding up the changes as they occur.
www.themarshallproject.org www.themarshallproject.org
On April 28, 2021, New York's Department of Corrections and Community Supervision resumed non-contact personal visits, starting with maximum security prisons. Visitation was originally suspended on March 14, 2020 though legal visits were allowed. On Aug. 6, 2020 visitation began to resume, but on Dec. 30, personal visits were stopped again at all prisons statewide.
Click to expand...
Thanks. So she could have had visits from 6th Aug 2020 till 30 Dec '20 but none from 30th Dec '20 till now (a year) I was looking at the visiting times specific to where she is incarcerated and it looked like it is restricted to once a month dependant on unit, when it is allowed.
 
GrandmaBear said:
I see nothing in the article stating she cannot talk with her brother or anyone else per the rules so it could be that is the way Maxwell and her attorneys want it this way or if it is the court that does, there is a reason. Unless I missed it, I saw nothing about them wanting to visit, it merely says they can only communicate through her lawyers.

For some reason, the Daybell case comes to mind. Lori, his client, had contact with an attorney and the LDS church I think and he is raising a fuss about it having occurred without his knowledge and the attempt to influence her or something like that... I just mean there are likely reasons it is this way.

Family is funny. He may talk as if he is close to her but that doesn't mean they want or need what he says or do not worry he may implicate or say something wrong... I mean unless his words are twisted, DM is saying he is sharing info like she is the only one in the family who thinks their dad was murdered, that she thinks Epstein was, etc. Why does he offer this info about her at all? He says he only met Epstein once so clearly he was not close to the couple through these many years although I guess he could have been close to his sister but I'm not convinced... Didn't the brothers face charges along with their father? I know they got off but they did, did they not? If one thing is clear, this family seemed to lack certain morals and it does not appear the children were raised with the examples of any... Jmo though.
Click to expand...
She was the youngest, the baby of the family and had nothing to do with his business empire. The brothers were directors but were found not guilty of any wrongdoing. I think Isabel is the oldest. Cannot comment on their morals as I don't know.

This report regarding a new documentary indicates that her father knew Epstein and took him to Israel in the 80's, which is the first I have heard about that. (they were both Jewish). However Robert Maxwell brought all his children up as Anglican. Maybe the brothers did not approve of Epstein if they had met him too. I wonder if they are giving evidence?

nypost.com

‘Chasing Ghislaine’ doc reveals Maxwell’s daddy issues with Jeffrey Epstein

“My father taught me you do whatever it takes to keep your man,” disgraced socialite Ghislaine Maxwell supposedly told a friend according to a new doc.
nypost.com nypost.com
 
Last edited:
Guess Who said:
I got that out of it, too. They only met Epstein once in all of the years she was with him, so he obviously didn't visit her often then, so how would he know of much of anything she was up to during that time?
Click to expand...
Yes and opposed to that is during many of those years it is said she was always by Epstein's side so it is doubtful to me they saw much of her or were very close.

It is interesting to me that her father died and she thinks it was murder and Epstein died and she thinks it was murder (I'm not putting a lot of store into those remarks as it is DM and her brother's words may well be twisted, if true). But if true, both men in separate cases could hurt someone by their trials, flipping, trying to make a deal, coming clean, etc.

In no WAY am I saying the deaths are related but what I am saying is Epstein could tell on others and affect their lives. And in a totally unrelated case, her father could likely identify others on the take and such too. So they could have easily been targets, it is not out of the realm of possibilities in either case.

If Maxwell's father was said to be murdered, who would they look at as possible perps with motives... But he wasn't murdered per the findings...

I'm not as sure with Maxwell but with Epstein many, many men of import had good reason to fear being named and talked about... HIgh up people. It's a thought that can't help but cross one's mind...
 
GrandmaBear said:
Yes and opposed to that is during many of those years it is said she was always by Epstein's side so it is doubtful to me they saw much of her or were very close.

It is interesting to me that her father died and she thinks it was murder and Epstein died and she thinks it was murder (I'm not putting a lot of store into those remarks as it is DM and her brother's words may well be twisted, if true). But if true, both men in separate cases could hurt someone by their trials, flipping, trying to make a deal, coming clean, etc.

In no WAY am I saying the deaths are related but what I am saying is Epstein could tell on others and affect their lives. And in a totally unrelated case, her father could likely identify others on the take and such too. So they could have easily been targets, it is not out of the realm of possibilities in either case.

If Maxwell's father was said to be murdered, who would they look at as possible perps with motives... But he wasn't murdered per the findings...

I'm not as sure with Maxwell but with Epstein many, many men of import had good reason to fear being named and talked about... HIgh up people. It's a thought that can't help but cross one's mind...
Click to expand...
Neither Epstein nor her father were murdered. Epstein changed his will before he died. Only Ghislaine believed the conspiracy theory, as it appears she also believes the Epstein one. Autopsy said her father had a heart attack and fell off the boat so it was classed as accidental. I posted an article up thread. He had a habit of peeing off the side of the boat naked and that is how it happened.
 
Last edited:
kdg411 said:
Does anyone know how Ghislaine Maxwell obtained her wealth?

heavy.com

Ghislaine Maxwell's Net Worth: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

Ghislaine Maxwell is charged with luring girls into sex trafficking for Jeffrey Epstein to abuse. Maxwell and her husband have a net worth of $22.5 million.
heavy.com heavy.com
Click to expand...
I read that she had a $100k pa trust fund.

It is mentioned in this Sky article.

"She reportedly had a trust fund from her father that gave her $100,000 a year and worked selling property in Manhattan."

news.sky.com

Ghislaine Maxwell: The British socialite, tycoon's daughter and friend of Jeffrey Epstein

Court documents allege the 58-year-old, who has been charged by the FBI, helped Epstein procure underage victims.
news.sky.com news.sky.com

She also owns property in Belgravia and Manhattan I believe. The property is mentioned in the bail hearing with the Belgravia property - also mentioned by "Kate" in court - being worth millions of pounds on it's own.

Here's an article about her Belgravia property going up for sale earlier this year to raise legal fees. It's estimated at about $5 million. She bought it for £290k in '97.

metro.co.uk

Ghislaine Maxwell 'selling London home to help pay legal bills'

The house is where Epstein accuser Virginia Roberts Giuffre claims she was taken to have sex with Prince Andrew.
metro.co.uk metro.co.uk
 
Last edited:
Tresir said:
I read that she had a $100k pa trust fund.

It is mentioned in this Sky article.

"She reportedly had a trust fund from her father that gave her $100,000 a year and worked selling property in Manhattan."

news.sky.com

Ghislaine Maxwell: The British socialite, tycoon's daughter and friend of Jeffrey Epstein

Court documents allege the 58-year-old, who has been charged by the FBI, helped Epstein procure underage victims.
news.sky.com news.sky.com
Click to expand...
I had read that as well however given her lifestyle I wouldn't think 100k/yr would go very far.
 
kdg411 said:
Me too!

She has stated that she took care of Epsteins properties. So, would she have had to file taxes?
Click to expand...
I doubt she paid taxes as she had a partner who advised one of the biggest billionaires in the US. Taxes are completely private in the UK, just between the individual and HMRC. I would think she probably had her Trust fund and property registered in the British Virgin Isles, but this is a guess on my part.
 
Tresir said:
I doubt she paid taxes as she had a partner who advised one of the biggest billionaires in the US. Taxes are completely private in the UK, just between the individual and HMRC. I would think she probably had her Trust fund and property registered in the British Virgin Isles, but this is a guess on my part.
Click to expand...
Ok, this would make sense then. Thank you for the explanation.
 
kdg411 said:
Wasn't that just her trust fund though? If Epstein paid his employees then he had to file taxes too, correct?
Click to expand...
He had all his assets and companies registered offshore in the tax haven of the British Virgin Isles. I doubt he paid tax. His employees however would have to file US taxes. So if GMax was an employee she would have to pay taxes but I suspect she was probably a contracted private company (eg. The $7m for the helicopter) and not a direct hire. (Guessing about this though)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,030
Messages
243,756
Members
981
Latest member
Alicerar
Back
Top Bottom