Four students murdered at University of Idaho *ARREST*

1668706399688.png


Got my Masters degree from here. :(

Killer who stabbed 4 Idaho students to death still at large​

The killer — or killers — who stabbed four University of Idaho students to death remained at large Tuesday, prompting many students to leave the campus in the idyllic small town despite police assurances that there was no imminent risk to the community.

So many students had left the scenic tree-lined campus in Moscow, Idaho, by Tuesday that university officials said a candlelight vigil scheduled for the next day would instead be held after the Thanksgiving break.

The students, all close friends, were found dead in an off-campus rental home around noon on Sunday, and officials said they likely were killed several hours earlier. Latah County Coroner Cathy Mabbutt told the Spokane, Washington-based television station KXLY that her preliminary investigation showed the students were stabbed to death. There is no indication that substance use was involved in the deaths, Mabbutt said.
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
SheWhoMustNotBeNamed said:
First of many in this case, I'm sure.

www.ktvb.com

Moscow murders: Professor sues Tik-Toker sleuth for defamation

A Tik Tok crime sleuth accused the professor publicly of committing the murders on her account. It gained millions of views.
www.ktvb.com www.ktvb.com

Moscow murders: Professor sues Tik-Toker sleuth for defamation​

A University of Idaho professor has filed a lawsuit alleging defamation by a Tik Tok crime sleuth, who accused the professor of murdering the four Idaho students on her account -- which later was reposed and viewed by millions.

A Texas based internet sleuth, Ashley Guillard, posted multiple Tik Toks in November and December accusing University of Idaho Professor Rebecca Scofield of the quadruple murder. Scofield later sued when Guillard didn't take the videos down.

The suit, filed Wednesday, was first reported by the University of Idaho Argonaut.

Guillard says she "solves crimes online" through psychic readings, and her videos have gained thousands of views.

In the videos, Guillard says Scofield was having a relationship with one of the victims and then planned the murders with another student because "(the victim) wanted a break in the relationship" and wanted to "keep from making the relationship public" court filings said.

However, Scofield says in the suit that she didn't even have any of the victims in her classes. The lawsuit says that Scofield was not even in Moscow when the homicides occurred -- she and her husband were in Oregon visiting friends, it said, when the quadruple stabbing occurred off King Road on Nov. 13.

The complaint says that Guillard wrote, "I don't care what y'all say, Rebecca Scofield killed (the victims) and she was the one to initiate the plan..."

Scofield reached out to Guillard to ask her to take the defamatory statements down after the posts were shared by the thousands. However, Guillard did not take them down, the suit said.

Guillard kept posting more videos, the lawsuit said, citing a video that stated, "Rebecca Scofield is going to prison for the murder of the 4 University of Idaho students whether you like it or not."

Some videos about Scofield have 2.5 million likes.

Scofield says in the suit that the false statements have damaged her reputation and caused her to fear for her life and family. She was subject to online threats and ridicule from Guillard's followers, the suit said.
Click to expand...
Oh FFS. This case! Just chaos. So much B.S. These people are forgetting the victims. They don't care. They just want to benefit in some way. It's really sickening.
 
Mel70 said:
www.foxnews.com

Idaho murders: Police say university professor suing TikTok cybersleuth not linked to slayings

University of Idaho students Ethan Chapin, 20, Kaylee Goncalves, 21, Xana Kernodle, 20, and Madison Mogen, 21, were stabbed several times and murdered on Nov. 13.
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
Getting sued yet she keeps going. Any lawyer is going to have an impossible time defending her…


The TikTok creator responded to the lawsuit in subsequent TikTok videos in which she said, "I am not stopping."

"Now, I have information about what she’s saying her alibi is. I am going to dig deep into that, too," she said in a video posted Friday.

She then released a different video two days later in which she wrote, "I have physical evidence against [the professor] that validates everything that I have said about her, but I can’t speak on it now because it has to wait for court."
 
SheWhoMustNotBeNamed said:
Getting sued yet she keeps going. Any lawyer is going to have an impossible time defending her…


The TikTok creator responded to the lawsuit in subsequent TikTok videos in which she said, "I am not stopping."

"Now, I have information about what she’s saying her alibi is. I am going to dig deep into that, too," she said in a video posted Friday.

She then released a different video two days later in which she wrote, "I have physical evidence against [the professor] that validates everything that I have said about her, but I can’t speak on it now because it has to wait for court."
Click to expand...
So many people are their own worst enemy. While I admire her tenacity if this is what she REALLY believes, she at least needs to learn how to keep her mouth shut about it.
 
I would like to suggest a scenario that AFAIK, has not been proposed yet. Many people think that K was the target. What if she wasn't? According to her family, K made a very last minute decision to pop over to Moscow and and show her new ride and visit friends.

Just MOO, but I am starting to think X was the target. Here's why. It has been well-documented that X and E were at at a frat party for an hour, if not more, as their are gaps in their timeline past 9 p.m.

Possible scenario based on Occam's Razor:
X and E are at the frat party. Drunk Dude has been at the party for a while. He may not be a frat member, but instead is a friend of a frat member. He was drinking at the football game earlier in the day and continued to do so. He starts hitting on X. She isn't interested and tells him that repeatedly.
" Sorry, no" .
"Not interested".
" I have a steady boyfriend and he is here with me" .
"I told you before-I am NOT interested."
"Stay away from me!!!"

E sees/hears and steps in to help her. Drunk Dude is angry and rage starts building. After all, he is God's gift to women ( in his own mind) and has never been refused before.

E and X leave, either for E's room at the frat or to go somewhere else. Drunk Dude , by now totally enraged, knows or finds out where X lives, follows them home, and then strikes.

All MOO.
 
Last edited:
Sunburst said:
I would like to suggest a scenario that AFAIK, has not been proposed yet. Many people think that K was the target. What if she wasn't? According to her family, K made a very last minute decision to pop over to Moscow and and show her new ride and visit friends.

Just MOO, but I am starting to think X was the target. Here's why. It has been well-documented that X and E were at at a frat party for an hour, if not more, as their are gaps in their timeline past 9 p.m.

Possible scenario based on Occam's Razor:
X and E are at the frat party. Drunk Dude has been at the party for a while. He may not be a frat member, but instead is a friend of a frat member. He was drinking at the football game earlier in the day and continued to do so. He starts hitting on X. She isn't interested and tells him that repeatedly.
" Sorry, no" .
"Not interested".
" I have a steady boyfriend and he is here with me" .
"I told you before-I am NOT interested."
"Stay away from me!!!"

E sees/hears and steps in to help her. Drunk Dude is angry and rage starts building. After all, he is God's gift to women ( in his own mind) and has never been refused before.

E and X leave, either for E's room at the frat or to go somewhere else. Drunk Dude , by now totally enraged, knows or finds out where X lives, follows them home, and then strikes.

All MOO.
Click to expand...

Did that actually happen, or is that just conjecture?
 
Sunburst said:
I would like to suggest a scenario that AFAIK, has not been proposed yet. Many people think that K was the target. What if she wasn't? According to her family, K made a very last minute decision to pop over to Moscow and and show her new ride and visit friends.

Just MOO, but I am starting to think X was the target. Here's why. It has been well-documented that X and E were at at a frat party for an hour, if not more, as their are gaps in their timeline past 9 p.m.

Possible scenario based on Occam's Razor:
X and E are at the frat party. Drunk Dude has been at the party for a while. He may not be a frat member, but instead is a friend of a frat member. He was drinking at the football game earlier in the day and continued to do so. He starts hitting on X. She isn't interested and tells him that repeatedly.
" Sorry, no" .
"Not interested".
" I have a steady boyfriend and he is here with me" .
"I told you before-I am NOT interested."
"Stay away from me!!!"

E sees/hears and steps in to help her. Drunk Dude is angry and rage starts building. After all, he is God's gift to women ( in his own mind) and has never been refused before.

E and X leave, either for E's room at the frat or to go somewhere else. Drunk Dude , by now totally enraged, knows or finds out where X lives, follows them home, and then strikes.

All MOO.
Click to expand...
The only info about who was the “target” has come from her family. LE hasn’t confirmed anyone. And I think it’s possible that any of them, or none of them specifically, were an individual target. I’ve heard speculation and stories how any of them could have been targeted. Without knowing specific info about the investigation, it’s all pointless speculation at this point IMO.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,636
Members
966
Latest member
pizzalover
Back
Top Bottom