Four students murdered at University of Idaho *ARREST*

1668706399688.png


Got my Masters degree from here. :(

Killer who stabbed 4 Idaho students to death still at large​

The killer — or killers — who stabbed four University of Idaho students to death remained at large Tuesday, prompting many students to leave the campus in the idyllic small town despite police assurances that there was no imminent risk to the community.

So many students had left the scenic tree-lined campus in Moscow, Idaho, by Tuesday that university officials said a candlelight vigil scheduled for the next day would instead be held after the Thanksgiving break.

The students, all close friends, were found dead in an off-campus rental home around noon on Sunday, and officials said they likely were killed several hours earlier. Latah County Coroner Cathy Mabbutt told the Spokane, Washington-based television station KXLY that her preliminary investigation showed the students were stabbed to death. There is no indication that substance use was involved in the deaths, Mabbutt said.
 
Last edited:
Click to expand...
www.newsnationnow.com

Idaho college killings: Remembering victims one year later

A vigil will be held Monday evening to remember the four University of Idaho students.
www.newsnationnow.com www.newsnationnow.com

Idaho college killings: Remembering victims one year later​

Monday marks one year since four University of Idaho students were killed at an off-campus home in the small town of Moscow.

A vigil will be hosted by university students on Monday evening to remember the lives of the four University of Idaho students. University of Idaho alumni across the nation have been encouraged to turn their porch lights on from 6 p.m. to 7 p.m. PST in solidarity.
 
www.dailymail.co.uk

Bryan Kohberger's trial will be live streamed with court cameras

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

By JEN SMITH, CHIEF REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 15:05 EST, 20 November 2023 | UPDATED: 15:29 EST, 20 November 2023

  • Date has still not been set for Kohberger's quadruple murder trial
  • He asked judge to ban news cameras to help him have a fair trial
  • Judge John Judge agreed but will livestream the proceedings using court equipment
News crews and press photographers will not be allowed inside Bryan Kohberger's trial, which will now be livestreamed with court equipment to stop journalists 'zooming in' and 'focusing intensely' on his 'every move'.

The judge made the decision today in a victory for Kohberger, who had appealed to him to ban cameras from the courtroom.

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I hope the court infrastructure is set up to handle the load on its systems! ~Summer
 
Summer_Breeze said:
www.dailymail.co.uk

Bryan Kohberger's trial will be live streamed with court cameras

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

By JEN SMITH, CHIEF REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 15:05 EST, 20 November 2023 | UPDATED: 15:29 EST, 20 November 2023

  • Date has still not been set for Kohberger's quadruple murder trial
  • He asked judge to ban news cameras to help him have a fair trial
  • Judge John Judge agreed but will livestream the proceedings using court equipment
News crews and press photographers will not be allowed inside Bryan Kohberger's trial, which will now be livestreamed with court equipment to stop journalists 'zooming in' and 'focusing intensely' on his 'every move'.

The judge made the decision today in a victory for Kohberger, who had appealed to him to ban cameras from the courtroom.

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I hope the court infrastructure is set up to handle the load on its systems! ~Summer
Click to expand...
I don't know that I'd call it a win for Kohberger as Daily Mail does. I'm sure BK prefer it not be livestreamed at all. Who knows though, I'm sure this is the attorney's preference re pretrial publiciity etc. but he may well love the attention.

Even so there ARE cameras so I wouldn't call it a win for BK. It does, however, keep news cameras off him, from zooming in and such so maybe a partial win.

I consider it a win for an open and public justice system which is what it should be. In every case. Imo.
 
Summer_Breeze said:
www.dailymail.co.uk

Bryan Kohberger's trial will be live streamed with court cameras

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk

By JEN SMITH, CHIEF REPORTER FOR DAILYMAIL.COM
PUBLISHED: 15:05 EST, 20 November 2023 | UPDATED: 15:29 EST, 20 November 2023

  • Date has still not been set for Kohberger's quadruple murder trial
  • He asked judge to ban news cameras to help him have a fair trial
  • Judge John Judge agreed but will livestream the proceedings using court equipment
News crews and press photographers will not be allowed inside Bryan Kohberger's trial, which will now be livestreamed with court equipment to stop journalists 'zooming in' and 'focusing intensely' on his 'every move'.

The judge made the decision today in a victory for Kohberger, who had appealed to him to ban cameras from the courtroom.

In his decision, Judge John C. Judge criticized the way in which journalists continue to cover the case. Kohberger is accused of murdering four Idaho college students last November.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I hope the court infrastructure is set up to handle the load on its systems! ~Summer
Click to expand...
That’s fair. As long as we can actually view these trials, because we are the people. I think they should have cameras in every courtroom, actually.

This is the way they did it in the McStay case, and the problem was that the cameras went down. And then they just used audio. Of course, that was when all the charts and graphs were up! 🤦‍♀️
 
GrandmaBear said:
Click to expand...

I like this judge's take on this and his response to all parties including the media who is not a party. He is balancing it where some judges at this point and how the media has IGNORED orders to not do some judges would just abolish all cameras, easier for them, he has NOT and recognizes the public part and right, BK's rights to a fair trial and all. Good points in his response.

He references ID law, he references Boyce's decision in Daybell, talks of openness for public, defendant's rights to a fair trial, media and all. Not at length but just enough to show this is one of the best balanced decisions I've seen where imo most judges are either all out open to media etc. and probably themselves want the attention to those that abolish ANY even court cameras (WRONG) to those like Boyce who let not a BIT be on camera and all was just voice and delayed which I entirely disagree with as well.
 
Last edited:
Here is Linda with her own unique take on things in this case. Interesting as always. One thing that stands out to me is the DNA of Brian's was 5.37 octillion times any person on the street or any other. She says just one octillion is a one followed by 27 zeroes. This is five times that. When we talk numbers

Also big any longer like national debt, I just say a kazillion these days. Remember when a trillion was unimaginable and huge? I couldn't have told you how many zeroes an octillion has...

Per her norm she also has some other interesting thoughts and some relate to is this guy dumb or this criminal law student/questionnaire guy on committing a crime, etc. playing people and cops or again just dumb? Touches on some other things as well on her fairly short but very dialed in way of doing so.

 
Interesting. I am not a Jay for Justice Fan, she is one of those who have gone off the rails in the past with going overboard on cases with a lot of b.s., haven't seen her name in awhile actually. YT. Don't know of Shonda but regardless the post with the motion and court order is interesting. And defense did not argue. I can't even begin to fathom what the reasons are for this. Any ideas?
 
GrandmaBear said:
Interesting. I am not a Jay for Justice Fan, she is one of those who have gone off the rails in the past with going overboard on cases with a lot of b.s., haven't seen her name in awhile actually. YT. Don't know of Shonda but regardless the post with the motion and court order is interesting. And defense did not argue. I can't even begin to fathom what the reasons are for this. Any ideas?
Click to expand...
I have no idea about either of the people who posted it. I was just wanting to share the court documents.
 
SheWhoMustNotBeNamed said:
I have no idea about either of the people who posted it. I was just wanting to share the court documents.
Click to expand...
I get that.

It has been awhile ago but she is one that really got herself in some deep sh*t on YT going beyond acceptable. A lot of drama and a lot of other creator back and forth sh*t. Many dropped her like a hot potato. BUT she isn't the only or first one.

i have to say I don't encounter much overboard stuff and creators much for months to a year now any longer. I don't know if it is because they don't come up for me or if a ton of them dropped like flies. During certain cases, there were TONS of bad ones or ones that overhype. The West boys case. Petito. Summer Wells big time.
 
They were given/tgifted the home and the property. It isn't 't like anyone prohibited them from operating their campus, etc. They wanted to go ahead previously long before and called a halt only after much outcry and complaints. Then a long time later LE went back to to do a re-creation and thank goodness it had not been demolished. Here they are again. Who knows if it is a big deal or not but just Brian's tweet that they say they "appreciate" some family members may have an emotional connection says it isn't okay with someone/s. It isn't like the U doesn't already have a black eye and it isn't like there is some rush or need by the U, is there? Maybe the U should have just refused the"gift". Because in fact owning it no matter what is done with it is just a reminder of what happened to four students who went to this U. Honestly, what is their desperate need to proceed? This wasn't an asset they even owned previously even though how close to the frat house etc.

It is a grim reminder. Okay. Then why did they accept it in the first place? They can raze the home but it's the same killing ground and spot it happened.

I don't know that it matters but if any family members have issue with it, then it does imo. That's probably why a reconstruction etc. was done by LE recently because the U has not quit wanting to demolish it from the day they received it and their FIRST fast attempt was EXTREMELY cold.

Maybe a better move by the owner would have been to give the families control over it.

And honestly a memorial or park or anything is also going to be a grim reminder. It doesn't change the fact of what happened there.

I'm on the side of the families and also just feel that until there is a trial and conviction, they shouldn't even be worried about it.
 
Last edited:
Whatsnext said:
Wouldn't it be better to wait with the demolition until after the trial? I mean, it's evidence a jury might want to see. I am surprised this is allowed.
Click to expand...
I agree. It is like they are tone deaf and on a mission. It's a building. It's something that could show a jury if they choose to exactly how big, what the layout and distance, etc. is as he went through that house killing people. Not to mention the way cases and defenses go nowadays, yes, evidence and maybe a need to go back to do something because of some defense b.s. to prove otherwiise.

These were THEIR students. This was NOT their asset previously. If one can call itt an asset. What is the need? They should want justice for their students instead of continually trying to demolish something that tthen can never be reconstrcuted. What's their real intent here? They need to just stop, hold the "asset" they were GIVEN and in time they can do with it as they wish.

I'm sure there are bigger concerns they need to deal with than some gift of a murder property they accepted. Smh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,525
Members
965
Latest member
tanya
Back
Top Bottom