MO JOHN FORSYTH: Missing from Cassville, MO - 21 May 2023 - Age 49 *Found Deceased*

1685497945041.png 1685497956408.png 1685497979504.png

Authorities search for Missouri doctor who has been missing more than a week​

Authorities in a small Missouri town are searching for an emergency room physician a week-and-a-half after his mysterious disappearance.

Dr. John Forsyth, 49, was last heard from May 21. Police said he was reported missing when he failed to show up for work that day at Mercy Hospital in Cassville, a town of 3,100 residents deep in the Missouri Ozarks.

Forsyth’s black Infiniti was found in a remote area near an aquatic park in Cassville. The car was unlocked with his wallet, two phones and a laptop inside.

Several law enforcement agencies, including the Missouri State Highway Patrol, have joined in the search using people, dogs and drones. Forsyth’s family set up a Facebook page seeking information.

Richard Forsyth said his brother had been at the Cassville hospital for about 15 years. He described John Forsyth as a doting father who became engaged to his girlfriend just a couple of days before he disappeared.
 
So no one identified the body or was asked to and they wonder now if they were carrying a casket of rocks? WTH? IF he could be recognized by facial recognition by LE then of course he'd be recognizable to do the normal thing and have a family member ID him. This is one freaking weird case and only gets stranger.

So he had an 8th child, possibly, with yet another woman, not his wife and not the one he recently had proposed to who had his 9th child. No paternity determination on that one but one was being sought or only now is being sought? Was he seeing this woman during his marriage or during the time with his final fiance who he had just proposed to? Or was it during the divorce so after the marriage to his wife and their break up and before the one with the 9th child?

The Ozarks. Bitcoin stuff. A prior kidnapping of him. Nine children with three different women. Living in a camper. His odd disappearance.

Then LE found his body but not a single family member saw it or was asked to identify him. WHAT???!!!

STRANGE case. Is someone writing a screenplay here?
Yeah. I was really blown back about the casket comment. This has gone from strange to completely bizarre. The coroner's report still not complete. Huh?. Was only identified by facial recognition. Not by tbe family. You don't do that. The brother's a suspect?. His gun seized after a search warrant. The only thing I really am adamant about, Is this isn't random.
 
The casket of rocks has actually happened. But I can't think of the case. But the comment here just seems way out of the blue. And the case I am thinking of at least. It wasn't discovered until exumation.
 
I watched that video of the brother and then watched another one from someone that’s into cryptocurrency.



The crypto lady doesn’t seem to think it’s off-base to think that someone involved in cryptocurrency would be crazy enough to kill someone.
 
I was watching the brother’s eyes during the interview and he’s not an easy read. Looking down can often mean deception, but he looks down even when he says things that I know are true. Eye language doesn’t always work, and in his case I don’t think it does. Other cases are so much more obvious that someone is lying or feeling uncomfortable, or just plain looks guilty. Teri Horman in the Kyron Horman case, for example. When I watched that first interview she didn’t even speak and I knew she had something to do with it.
 
Yeah. I was really blown back about the casket comment. This has gone from strange to completely bizarre. The coroner's report still not complete. Huh?. Was only identified by facial recognition. Not by tbe family. You don't do that. The brother's a suspect?. His gun seized after a search warrant. The only thing I really am adamant about, Is this isn't random.
Does it have to be a family member that does the facial recognition? Could it be the ex girlfriend, the one who had the baby in between wife and fiancé?
 
Yeah. I was really blown back about the casket comment. This has gone from strange to completely bizarre. The coroner's report still not complete. Huh?. Was only identified by facial recognition. Not by tbe family. You don't do that. The brother's a suspect?. His gun seized after a search warrant. The only thing I really am adamant about, Is this isn't random.
Yeah, no coroner's report and talk of rocks in a casket add up to what are they trying to do, START people thinking of conspiracies? I mean of course LE and the coroner, what are they thinking???
 
The casket of rocks has actually happened. But I can't think of the case. But the comment here just seems way out of the blue. And the case I am thinking of at least. It wasn't discovered until exumation.
I dont' doubt it's been done. There is little that hasn't lol.

Do you remember the reason? That might help trigger your memory. Did someone want to make it seem someone was dead and not missing, planned a funeral and gave reasons for no open casket... Makes me wonder if here there was a funeral director, wouldn't he then be in on it too....? Or the mortician?

I'll bet you there are people out there thinking witness protection on hearing this stuff and that it was rocks.

Makes ya wonder if the family thought the casket to be unusually heavy. Nowadays they aren't generally carried. ..
 
I was watching the brother’s eyes during the interview and he’s not an easy read. Looking down can often mean deception, but he looks down even when he says things that I know are true. Eye language doesn’t always work, and in his case I don’t think it does. Other cases are so much more obvious that someone is lying or feeling uncomfortable, or just plain looks guilty. Teri Horman in the Kyron Horman case, for example. When I watched that first interview she didn’t even speak and I knew she had something to do with it.
I watched it and felt him to be generally truthful and forthcoming. He isn't a type of person I'm familiar nor would his brother be with things he talks of like phlanthropy, bitcoin, kidnappings, etc. lol. And of course it sits in my mind that the cops have looked at him and from the START I found him imo to be out there too much, it was always him, and he always knew everything about his brother, etc.. And some of it was contradictory, he'd say he was well able to pay child suppport and they'd agreed on things and that he was rich, etc. but in the next breath or the next time he'd claim not to of course know about his finances.

Anyhow, I didn't find much in the interview to wonder about NOW and maybe he was just zealous for his brother back when BUT I did notice what you did and I found him a bit evasive and seem to pause with a question or two but I think it may have been just due to what shouldn't be said due to the investigation. One of those times was when asked about his relationship with the fiance... His, not his brother's. He also mentioned John told him he could trust her and he told her she could trust him.... That's back to this stuff of why was he talking of such things, like something was going on in his life and he did and had these talks with the brother and so that brings me back again to the brother who he also allegedly just by word put in charge of his affairs if anything happened to him....

I don't know. Wacky as you say.

Even though he said his brother told him he could trust her, i didn't have the feeling he did or that he necessarily is fond of her or maybe he still just doesn't know here well... Is there suspicion there...? I don't know. Seemed a bit evasive.

He seemed almost more familiar with or comfortable talking of the mother of child #8, or alleged child, than the fiance. Yet that's the one who has to or is trying to get a DNA test. I took that to mean currently didn't you? Why would you need that if he is dead? That brings the thought are any or all of his children his heirs...? If there was a huge chunk of money to be had, that would be a motive. At first I thought if not married, no gain from his death but I guess that would depend on any will (or lack of one) and any life ins. beneficiary (if any).

Don't get me wrong, I don't lean that way BUT I don't lean any real way. I did have focus on the brother for the most part to tell ya the truth and I haven't let that go but he seemed pretty forthright in that interview BUT he also has been looked at and his home searched, they had to have cause. AND we should mention for those that did not watch he failed a polygraph or was told he did. He then went on to say he believes they are just tools didn't he and that they just do and say that, aren't reliable, etc...

So there is still reason to have the brother on the radar....

He TALKS as if he thought the world of him and they were as close as can be..

I'd like to see the Behavior Panel do him but doubt they are even aware of the case or they likely would...

There are other things I wonder. Call it fair or unfair but I have the sense was not a faithful type. There have been hints imo of that even with the hospital and so on. I'd like to know where he met the mothers of child number 8 and 9, when, how long together, etc. Was number 8 a fling while with 9? Things like that. Is there religion here? Have we ever heard that? I can't recall. It isn't always the case of course, anyone can have a lot of children but you see it more with some religions and he had what, seven with his wife of years?

We certainly have seen cases where religion or the twisting of it can be involved.

If there is one thing that is alien to me and is not of my world or those around me at any time in my life it is philanthropy. Before anyone tells me what it means, I KNOW what it means. But he regular calls his brother a philanthropist. In fact constantly almost. I watched a case once with youths that were trying to be philanthropists and deep or at least a couple in the murder case were... None of them were doing anything in life but sitting at coffee shops and such trying to be one. I'm certainly not saying this is the same at all, this guy was a hard worker, but I am saying I don't think most normal folk use that word or refer to the people around them as one constantly. And that doing so is alien to me. Makes me wonder if it is some emphasized thing in their family, beliefs, etc.

Okay, I've wandered on long enough.

And it remains a STRANGE case.
 
Does it have to be a family member that does the facial recognition? Could it be the ex girlfriend, the one who had the baby in between wife and fiancé?
If I have it right, the investigator(s) told the family when asked that he identified him (one of them anyhow) by face. Isn't that what the brother said? Been a few days since I watched it and I've seen other things and other cases since then AND been working hard. So I'd take that to mean that no, no ex gf or other person aside from LE identified the body or were asked to.

I don't know if there is a rule of law or even rule BUT I do think normally of course in a crime they have someone outside LE always identify the body if there IS a way to do so or they have to use DNA. In Daybell, if I recall, Brandon identified didn't he? Now he wouldn't have been a direct relative but he offered to and they were okay with it and that gives the families someone they know outside of LE who knows it. WHAT is it I'm thinking of? Am I mixing something up? Were the kids identifiable? Or am I all mixed up.

Anyhow, I don't think in a crime you'd ever want to chance a grieving family who can lose it coming back and saying my wife is still alive, I never saw her body, no one in my family did, OR you are lying because we never saw the body, any of us. It seems to me it would be law or at least rule of procedure, to use in the case, like even when they've had people identify belongings or just a tattoo if they can't have them ID the body. Or again if too bad to ID or not wanting the family to see, they'd do DNA. There was no mention of that either... That is strange. BUT maybe the brother and family have it wrong... I mean how is it they got the body and buried him... SOMEONE must have put him in a casket.
 
I dont' doubt it's been done. There is little that hasn't lol.

Do you remember the reason? That might help trigger your memory. Did someone want to make it seem someone was dead and not missing, planned a funeral and gave reasons for no open casket... Makes me wonder if here there was a funeral director, wouldn't he then be in on it too....? Or the mortician?

I'll bet you there are people out there thinking witness protection on hearing this stuff and that it was rocks.

Makes ya wonder if the family thought the casket to be unusually heavy. Nowadays they aren't generally carried. ..
I'll try to find it later. I don't remember off hand.🤚:thinking:
 
Yeah, no coroner's report and talk of rocks in a casket add up to what are they trying to do, START people thinking of conspiracies? I mean of course LE and the coroner, what are they thinking???
IDK. But the only being identified by facial recognition by the coroner, Not by any family members. And the report still not being completed does seem suspicious. IDKY there would be a conspiracy. But what is going on here?. The circumstances are very suspicious too.
 
I watched it and felt him to be generally truthful and forthcoming. He isn't a type of person I'm familiar nor would his brother be with things he talks of like phlanthropy, bitcoin, kidnappings, etc. lol. And of course it sits in my mind that the cops have looked at him and from the START I found him imo to be out there too much, it was always him, and he always knew everything about his brother, etc.. And some of it was contradictory, he'd say he was well able to pay child suppport and they'd agreed on things and that he was rich, etc. but in the next breath or the next time he'd claim not to of course know about his finances.

Anyhow, I didn't find much in the interview to wonder about NOW and maybe he was just zealous for his brother back when BUT I did notice what you did and I found him a bit evasive and seem to pause with a question or two but I think it may have been just due to what shouldn't be said due to the investigation. One of those times was when asked about his relationship with the fiance... His, not his brother's. He also mentioned John told him he could trust her and he told her she could trust him.... That's back to this stuff of why was he talking of such things, like something was going on in his life and he did and had these talks with the brother and so that brings me back again to the brother who he also allegedly just by word put in charge of his affairs if anything happened to him....

I don't know. Wacky as you say.

Even though he said his brother told him he could trust her, i didn't have the feeling he did or that he necessarily is fond of her or maybe he still just doesn't know here well... Is there suspicion there...? I don't know. Seemed a bit evasive.

He seemed almost more familiar with or comfortable talking of the mother of child #8, or alleged child, than the fiance. Yet that's the one who has to or is trying to get a DNA test. I took that to mean currently didn't you? Why would you need that if he is dead? That brings the thought are any or all of his children his heirs...? If there was a huge chunk of money to be had, that would be a motive. At first I thought if not married, no gain from his death but I guess that would depend on any will (or lack of one) and any life ins. beneficiary (if any).

Don't get me wrong, I don't lean that way BUT I don't lean any real way. I did have focus on the brother for the most part to tell ya the truth and I haven't let that go but he seemed pretty forthright in that interview BUT he also has been looked at and his home searched, they had to have cause. AND we should mention for those that did not watch he failed a polygraph or was told he did. He then went on to say he believes they are just tools didn't he and that they just do and say that, aren't reliable, etc...

So there is still reason to have the brother on the radar....

He TALKS as if he thought the world of him and they were as close as can be..

I'd like to see the Behavior Panel do him but doubt they are even aware of the case or they likely would...

There are other things I wonder. Call it fair or unfair but I have the sense was not a faithful type. There have been hints imo of that even with the hospital and so on. I'd like to know where he met the mothers of child number 8 and 9, when, how long together, etc. Was number 8 a fling while with 9? Things like that. Is there religion here? Have we ever heard that? I can't recall. It isn't always the case of course, anyone can have a lot of children but you see it more with some religions and he had what, seven with his wife of years?

We certainly have seen cases where religion or the twisting of it can be involved.

If there is one thing that is alien to me and is not of my world or those around me at any time in my life it is philanthropy. Before anyone tells me what it means, I KNOW what it means. But he regular calls his brother a philanthropist. In fact constantly almost. I watched a case once with youths that were trying to be philanthropists and deep or at least a couple in the murder case were... None of them were doing anything in life but sitting at coffee shops and such trying to be one. I'm certainly not saying this is the same at all, this guy was a hard worker, but I am saying I don't think most normal folk use that word or refer to the people around them as one constantly. And that doing so is alien to me. Makes me wonder if it is some emphasized thing in their family, beliefs, etc.

Okay, I've wandered on long enough.

And it remains a STRANGE case.
They’re going to need a DNA test for inheritance purposes. If the doctor didn’t mention baby number 8 in a will, then it needs to be addressed by the court.

I could go either way with a brother. He has a unique personality, or he has more knowledge than he’s willing to share. Of course, he could have more knowledge than he’s willing to share with the public because LE said that he needed to keep things quiet.

The brother also mentioned that LE said they know more than what they’re willing to share with the family. Was that a ruse to get him to talk? If so, that’s concerning.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,006
Messages
240,702
Members
967
Latest member
minaji88
Back
Top Bottom