Why did nobody see a broken taillight when she was parked? Why is there no video gathered from any of the businesses/doorbell cams on her fairly lengthy trip home that surely at least one of those places would have footage? See, it goes both ways here.
My guess is at FIRST they weren't after her. They were all drinking, they knew each other and so on. As to getting businesses/doorbell cams and heck this is dark and winter, you know that those look like. As far as the tail light come on and do we even KNOW when they saw her parked this was truly after she dropped him off and allegedly hit him? OR before? if you know and can show it then do, I don't know. I know a couple claimed to only see her in the vehicle but we are talking of DRUNK people at night and as far as the tail light, why would it even be a focus of them. She was there thought wasn't she? And claimed later to not even recall going there. Now THAT is INEBRIATED BEYOND.
It does go both ways here. If cops are stupid, lazy or incompetent it sure does not fit some huge conspiracy and smarts. Can't have it both ways. She did go there, apparently drove him there, decided not to get out or go attend with him and that alone doesn't make her guilty but it PLACES her RIGHT THERE. Just like Richard Allen in Delphi. She can't recall going there (but did she... or later did she...) so can't even defend self on that basis. if you can't recall that, how can you recall anything....? Or be a witness for self or defend self. Can't recall one thing but do another... Both ways there too right....
Why was she hysterical? I have a lot another day hopefully to say about the possibilties there. Sure you awake not too many hours later (giving the benefit of the doubt here she went home, quit drinking, went to bed, passed out and woke up without all that much sleep and realized he was not home. Well where DID she thinks she last saw him if she didnt' recall taking him there. And he's a grown man. Yes, there was weather but didn't worry her or him or stop them from the night out. He wouldn't have been driving or had an accident for her to worry about since he didn't drive and she had the vehicle so no worries there. One would think he might still be at the McCabes partying or slept there BUT she did not recall ever going there with him so that's out. She might have been hysterical as she thought him cheating and never came home but really doesn't fit the hysteria, calling people and looking and then screaming she backed over him....Yeah there is PLENTY both ways, I agree, probably not the same both ways you mean. And one thing makes far more sense here than the other. She knew or was hoping a bad dream imo or to wake up from what she did and find it didn't happen but at the same time cared and was scared if she didn't get someone and go find him to save him (worried he was already dead because of course he was) she'd never have him again. I think she knew and dreaded the worst... She was covering self but wanted to see if somehow it was not true and he'd survived, got up, someone found him, helped him.
Yeah, goes both ways. For sure.
I also have a thought about the one googling how long it takes someone to die... I'll save it and think on it, actually just occurred to me for the first time...
You know, these people were all apparently friends and I don't think at first they probably went out of the gate at her AND of course had others that were drinking, out, and over to the party to worry about where it would all go.... Perhaps at first they actually were not on her or into finding things to get her but came to realize it was big enough or going to be with news and outside agencies etc involved they had to... I don't know... There WAS a TURN though... With both sides... Imo.
Anyhow I don't know it all as well as some but I also know much of what is known just like in Delphi is only the defense PR and story they flood the public with...
Let her go, disbar, have a recall if elected, or take down the ones known to be abusing their positions. Let a jury decides, they send her to prison or they don't. I hate to say it but I don't overly care. Again everyone local in this case that night and after I think little of. Her, sorry to say but the deceased, etc. Privileged and connected and expected a pass if pulled over for being over the center line or some such. Winter storm yet out in the bars, driving and hosting a party for all to have to drive to that night. All attendees apparently had sober DDs drop them off , come get them, etc. all except for John driven by Karen. B.S.
And I've said it before and will again, I had a bit of a few years in life where I am lucky I never had anything happen. Tried to pretty much never be totally irresonsible but can't say I never was over the .08. BUT would any of us be cut a pass or be LE out in bars, driving, going to a party, having a death have never faced anything? No. Everyone of them including John and Karen felt immune. Imo. And to go out with the weather forecast and more, now that's different than I'd ever do.
I can only think what the citizens around there saw and thought of this bunch including John and Karen unless they of course schmoozed all so if stopped the woudln't get a DUI etc.
Yeah, it is, I admit it, a big part of my issue with it all. It's like when any types like these with influence, a badge, power, etc. have something happen and nowadays the public learns about it and would have probably helped each other out, even Karen quite possibly, to keep it all shush or at least not get big, and they turn on each other.... A HUGE example of something like this with a lot of privileged people trying to save selves but know if they turn things are known about them from who they turn on is the Murdaugh case.... This is a smaller example...
I'm probably going a bit too far sideways now so I'll stop. Still on this thread and again isn't my foremost and I really wanted to get to a couple I really do know more on and have some things to say about.
