Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Vinnie Politan and his guests believe that the admission that the video had been inverted, brings the jury a HUGE piece of reasonable doubt.
 
The lawyers on "Closing Arguments" said Proctor's testimony could be compared to Furman's testimony on the stand. If they ask Proctor if he planted evidence and he pleads the fifth. It's over.
 
Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
Well, we know Read drove into John's driveway at some point after Fairview and there's Kerry's testimony (btw, Kerry wasn't cross-examined) that Read pointed out the damage to her taillight in John's driveway, yet there's no ring footage that shows that either event occurred.
 
Last edited:
The answer to whether or not she'll testify seems fairly obvious. If the defense thinks they are behind the eight ball, they may have her take the stand. If they believe that enough reasonable doubt has been presented, they'll rest without having the defendant take the stand.
 
Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
Pretty sure Ring said SHE specifically didn't log in and manipulate anything . I don't recall them saying nobody manipulated it at all. IF it's the one that's missing the 3 minutes (still no power to find my link) they said the link they sent wasn't missing that time in it.
 
He had to have known if he really was there. Otherwise why have him testify at all about it? You know the way it was pulled in if you were there at the time
 
Pretty sure Ring said SHE specifically didn't log in and manipulate anything . I don't recall them saying nobody manipulated it at all. IF it's the one that's missing the 3 minutes (still no power to find my link) they said the link they sent wasn't missing that time in it.
Also, Ring data wouldn't show any manipulation was done if the manipulation was done after they downloaded what was from the link. That, to me, nails it that it was manipulated by whomever made the cd that was given to the defense since Ring said no time was missing in their link they sent. That is IF it's the same video.

Still no power but it looks like they are clearing trees (yes, plural) from the lines up the road. It also took our Internet line so no telling when that will get repaired. :sigh:
 
Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
IF it's the one I was speaking of, they did not say there was no manipulation of the video. They stated there was no manipulation on the Ring system. The video was made by the prosecution from the link Ring gave them and they made the video to give to the defense. They stated there was no missing minutes or manipulation done for the info given in the link. That link conveniently didn't exist any more due to time elapsed before they charged her. Huge difference there.
 
Well, we know Read drove into John's driveway at some point after Fairview and there's Kerry's testimony (btw, Kerry wasn't cross-examined) that Read pointed out the damage to her taillight in John's driveway, yet there's no ring footage that shows that either event occurred.
So since Ring (if cuz is correct on which video is missing 3 minutes) stated that there was no manipulation of the data nor missing minutes when the link was given to the prosecution. That only can mean one thing and that's that they did not include it on the disc they turned over to the defense.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,079
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom