But he didn't lie.If Bukhenik was lying, it doesn't matter to you?
From what I understand about what's missing from John's Ring camera footage, it's incriminating evidence against Read.
But he didn't lie.
He didn't say he didn't know...Yes, he did. If you want to believe that he really didn't know it was inverted, then you'd be right. I believe he totally knew it had been inverted.
You don't care that they have been proven time and time again of incompetence and sloppiness? I sure do. They aren't even done yet. How much more is going to come to light?Well, Bukhenik said he didn't know why it was that way and as for me, I don't care why. lol!
Add sloppiness and incompetenceIf Bukhenik was lying, it doesn't matter to you?
Yet he had to have known.He didn't say he didn't know...
Well, we know Read drove into John's driveway at some point after Fairview and there's Kerry's testimony (btw, Kerry wasn't cross-examined) that Read pointed out the damage to her taillight in John's driveway, yet there's no ring footage that shows that either event occurred.Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
He said he did!Yet he had to have known.
The video being inverted isn't a big deal for me.Well, Bukhenik said he didn't know why it was that way and as for me, I don't care why. lol!
Pretty sure Ring said SHE specifically didn't log in and manipulate anything . I don't recall them saying nobody manipulated it at all. IF it's the one that's missing the 3 minutes (still no power to find my link) they said the link they sent wasn't missing that time in it.Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
It wouldn't be for me if not for the incessant sloppiness and lack of protocols that have been uncovered so far. It's just another layer of incompetence.The video being inverted isn't a big deal for me.
Also, Ring data wouldn't show any manipulation was done if the manipulation was done after they downloaded what was from the link. That, to me, nails it that it was manipulated by whomever made the cd that was given to the defense since Ring said no time was missing in their link they sent. That is IF it's the same video.Pretty sure Ring said SHE specifically didn't log in and manipulate anything . I don't recall them saying nobody manipulated it at all. IF it's the one that's missing the 3 minutes (still no power to find my link) they said the link they sent wasn't missing that time in it.
IF it's the one I was speaking of, they did not say there was no manipulation of the video. They stated there was no manipulation on the Ring system. The video was made by the prosecution from the link Ring gave them and they made the video to give to the defense. They stated there was no missing minutes or manipulation done for the info given in the link. That link conveniently didn't exist any more due to time elapsed before they charged her. Huge difference there.Ring said that there is no evidence of anyone manipulating the video.
So since Ring (if cuz is correct on which video is missing 3 minutes) stated that there was no manipulation of the data nor missing minutes when the link was given to the prosecution. That only can mean one thing and that's that they did not include it on the disc they turned over to the defense.Well, we know Read drove into John's driveway at some point after Fairview and there's Kerry's testimony (btw, Kerry wasn't cross-examined) that Read pointed out the damage to her taillight in John's driveway, yet there's no ring footage that shows that either event occurred.