Proctor was the one who requested the Ring video and access log so when he testifies I'm confident the defense will bring this up in cross.Well, the talking heads know about it.
If it is the same thing I was mentioning, it's because it was part of the trial but the jury will not hear about it.Well, the talking heads know about it.
Oh, how I want him to testify!Proctor was the one who requested the Ring video and access log so when he testifies I'm confident the defense will bring this up in cross.
He said it was a mirror image but that it was accurate.It was not accurate though.
Again, not accurate. There was a reason why "somebody" manipulated a video to a mirror image if it wasn't originally recorded that way, which it seems that that's not the case. Everybody that has been present in that room knows it's backwards.He said it was a mirror image but that it was accurate.
At the very least, it's shows yet again how sloppy this team is.Again, not accurate. There was a reason why "somebody" manipulated a video to a mirror image if it wasn't originally recorded that way, which it seems that that's not the case. Everybody that has been present in that room knows it's backwards.
If that's your interpretation of those texts, Lord help you, lol!I interpreted Read's texts as trying to build Higgin's confidence. IIRC, she turned him down when he asked her to get together.
I don't think anybody "manipulated a video".Again, not accurate. There was a reason why "somebody" manipulated a video to a mirror image if it wasn't originally recorded that way, which it seems that that's not the case. Everybody that has been present in that room knows it's backwards.
If that's your interpretation of those texts, Lord help you, lol!
I'm positive it'll be brought up in direct.Proctor was the one who requested the Ring video and access log so when he testifies I'm confident the defense will bring this up in cross.
I don't think anybody "manipulated a video".
I'm positive it'll be brought up in direct.
Read’s defense team has pointed to a Google search for “ho[w] long to die in cold” — purportedly made by an after-party guest at 2:27 a.m. — as evidence of Read’s innocence.
The timestamp came from a Write Ahead Log (WAL) file, which temporarily stores data before it is written into the database, Lally explained. In fact, phone data actually shows a search for a youth basketball website at 2:27 a.m., according to the memo.
Read’s lawyers have also argued that O’Keefe’s phone data indicates he entered the home and climbed stairs between 12:21 a.m. and 12:24 a.m., though Lally noted that O’Keefe had been using his phone for navigation and didn’t arrive until later.
It wasn't recorded that way originally unless they are even too incompetent to install camera equipment. It's one or the other. Either way, it 100% is another example of their sloppiness.I don't think anybody "manipulated a video".
Well, Bukhenik said he didn't know why it was that way and as for me, I don't care why. lol!How did the video get reversed then? Why did this only come out when the defense asked him about it?
DA responds to defense attorneys' claims in John O'Keefe murder case
Prosecutors pushed back on defense attorneys' claims of a conspiracy to frame Karen Read for the death of her boyfriend, a Boston cop.www.boston.com
Well, Bukhenik said he didn't know why it was that way and as for me, I don't care why. lol!
From what I understand about what's missing from John's Ring camera footage, it's incriminating evidence against Read.That could be right. However, the defense will get to cross him. If he pleads the fifth once, that seriously hurts his testimony. I'm sure his searching for nude photos of Karen will be brought up by the defense. The prosecution may bring it up. Why not try to deflate the harmful evidence first?