Karen Read accused of backing into boyfriend and leaving him to die *MISTRIAL*

1691951367971.png

This woman didn't do this. I'd be willing to bet that someone in the house did it. Someone in the house looked up "How long will it take for somebody to die in the cold." Karen couldn't have done that search.

Is there a cover up conspiracy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It looks far more like that than taillight pieces causing it. Taillight pieces works also have his blood and/or tissue on then, yet there were none found on them.

Have you never seen dog scratches or bites? It looks exactly like that from my experience. My experience being related to helping with dog and cat rescue groups and a kid that works for vets. That's exactly what they often look like when bitten/scratched through clothing.
I've also seen rumors that Chloe was a retired police dog but can't find that info now. If that's the case and she was trained to seek, they are also trained to grab onto the arm of the person they are seeking, exactly like in the pic.
 

By Kathy Curran • Published June 20, 2024 • Updated on June 20, 2024 at 9:20 pm​


Massachusetts State Police Trooper Michael Proctor was the lead investigator in the high-profile Karen Read murder trial and has been in the spotlight for his conduct and his handling of this high-profile case.

The conduct revealed during Proctor's testimony in the trial is another stain on the Massachusetts State Police and there could be serious implications for Proctor himself. Proctor took an oath back in 2014 and now, 10 years later, experts say his actions and admissions in this case may have betrayed the badge.

When Proctor took the witness stand, he read some of the vulgar texts he sent from his private cell phone to family, friends and fellow troopers about Karen Read, the woman accused of killing her boyfriend, Boston Police Officer John O’Keefe. Read's defense has maintained she is being framed as part of a large-scale coverup and has pointed to Proctor as a key factor.

Proctor was a member of the Massachusetts SP’s 81st Recruitment Training Troop-graduating in 2014. State Police records obtained by the NBC10 Boston Investigators show that he completed thousands of hours of training throughout the years including skills like smartphone forensics, fair and impartial policing, investigative techniques and crime scene. Since joining the Norfolk County District Attorney’s detective unit in 2019, Proctor has completed additional training on digital cellphone forensics and homicide investigations.

Boston defense attorney Doug Louison has represented law enforcement in criminal and civil cases across the state for decades. When asked about Proctor’s controversial texts, Louison told us he thought any rational person, trained or not, would know that sending those texts was inappropriate behavior.

“The fact that he was the lead investigator and felt so unrestrained in his language shows a stunning lack of judgment and it shows a lack of supervision. The lack of someone jumping in and saying this is inappropriate and that trickles back to the first night he showed up on that scene. As soon as he became aware of who was involved as witnesses he should’ve stepped back and said I can’t take this case," Louison said.

Testimony has also shown that Proctor was familiar with some of the key witnesses in the case.

Several investigations have been launched into the handling of the Read case. Multiple sources tell us an ongoing federal investigation opened the door to Proctor’s personal texts. They also tell us the state’s Peace Officers Standards and Training Commission which certifies police officers is monitoring the case and an internal investigation by state police is underway.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

More at link. ~Summer
"NBC10 Boston Investigators show that he completed thousands of hours of training throughout the years including skills like smartphone forensics, fair and impartial policing, investigative techniques and crime scene"

He either didn't learn much in these thousands of hours or he sure forgot most of it. :sigh:
 

Updated: 9:27 AM EDT Jun 21, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 9:30 a.m. Defense attorney Elizabeth Little begins cross examining Scordi-Bello by asking about the different kinds of blunt force injuries. Little asks if such injuries could be claws. Scordi-Bello: "Claws? Possibly."
  • 9:24 a.m. Jurors are now seeing a close-up shot of O'Keefe's head. A patch of hair has been shave. Scordo-Bellom says there is a laceration typical of blunt force trauma. This is the most graphic photo. One juror is biting her finger. "They're not the classic pedestrian injuries we've observed," Scordi-Bello says. But she says it is possible they are the result of a fall or car crash.
  • 9:22 a.m. Scordi-Bello says the bruise and two small dots on the back of O'Keefe's right hand could be first attempts by first-responders to insert an IV.
  • 9:20 a.m. Now Lally is showing a close-up of O'Keefe's right arm with what Scordi-Bello describes as superficial abrasions. "I do not know how they came to be," she says. Says they did not contribute to his death.
  • 9:18 a.m. Prosecutor Lally displays a picture of O'Keefe at the hospital. His head, chest and one arm are visible. He's attached to medical equipment. His head injuries are visible. Jurors are looking at the screen and have no visible reaction.
  • 9:15 a.m. Lally hands Scordi-Bello five photos. She says four show O'Keefe's body at the hospital and another shows him during the autopsy.
  • 9:10 a.m. Scordi-Bello says she spoke with Tpr Michael Proctor twice during her investigation. Says she did not feel pressured to come up with a specific reponse.
  • 9 a.m. Dr. Irini Scordi-Bello, the medical examiner who performed an autopsy on O'Keefe, returns to the stand. Says she received the police report then reached out to police for more info. "I did not have all the information I needed to determine the manner (of death)," she says.
 

Updated: 9:27 AM EDT Jun 21, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 9: 55 a.m. Lally begins re-direct questioning. Asks about a minor knee injury O'Keefe suffered. Asks about other possible causes of injuries to his face.
  • 9:45 a.m. Scordi-Bello says O'Keefe's arm injuries could have been caused by "road rash" but agrees with Little that this is not normally how they appear.
  • 9:41 a.m. Scordi-Bello agrees that the skull fracture could have been caused by a blow from a baseball bat or a barbell.
  • 9:40 a.m. Little is showing a photo of O'Keefe's face. Scordi-Bello says it shows him after he has been washed. Scordi-Bello says, "That is a possibility" when asked if his injuries are the result of being punched.
 
It looks far more like that than taillight pieces causing it. Taillight pieces works also have his blood and/or tissue on then, yet there were none found on them.

Have you never seen dog scratches or bites? It looks exactly like that from my experience. My experience being related to helping with dog and cat rescue groups for years and a kid that works for vets. That's exactly what they often look like when bitten/scratched through clothing.
I've seen them all my life thank you lol. They look too raw and deep to be done through clothing. To me it looks like he connected with (by what means I dunno) the raw edge of some lumber. I may have to further explain what I'm saying.
 
I've seen them all my life thank you lol. They look too raw and deep to be done through clothing. To me it looks like he connected with (by what means I dunno) the raw edge of some lumber. I may have to further explain what I'm saying.
The holes in his sweatshirt proves it went through his clothing.

Lumber is not a part of tail lights, either. So I think you are agreeing that these wounds did NOT come from taillight shrapnel.
 


By Alysha Palumbo and Marc Fortier • Published 3 hours ago • Updated 9 seconds ago​


Judge denies motion for directed verdict​

Just before 10:30 a.m., following a brief recess, court resumed with defense attorney Alan Jackson asking for a directed verdict of not guilty, a ruling that can be issued by a judge if they determine there is not sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to find a defendant guilty.

He argued that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt and the court should find Read not guilty without the case going to the jury. He said there must be evidence that Read's vehicle killed O'Keefe, and the prosecution did not provide that or any other medical evidence that proves their case.

"The only evidence that is beofre the court is that the Commonwealth's own medical examiner does not believe this is a homicide, and she went on this morning to say that in her expert opinion, the injuries are not classic pedestrian injuries and they are -- every one of them -- consistent with a physical altercation," Jackson said.

Assistant District Attorney Adam Lally began his argument by saying that "surprisingly," he disagreed with the defense's assertions.

He cited some of the physical evidence, along with testimony from public safety officials about Read's own statements where she said she hit O'Keefe with her vehicle, and asked that the motion be denied.

Cannone, however, said she was satisfied that the prosecution had met its burden and immediately denied the defense's motion.
 

Updated: 9:27 AM EDT Jun 21, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>
  • 11:04 a.m. Loughran says the second pass was at about 3:15am to 3:30am. He says when he came back he saw a Ford Edge parked near the flagpole at the Alberts' residence. "It just stuck out as weird," he says.
  • 11 a.m. Loughran says he passed by the first time with the house on his right, then turned around and came back a second time with it on his left. Says he also saw nothing during the second pass.
  • 10:55 a.m. Loughran says he see "the entire front lawn" as he passed 34 Fairview Road at about 245am. "My attention is focused in front of me and to the sides," he says.
  • 10:51 a.m. Loughran says his regular plow route includes the neighborhood where 34 Fairview Rd is located. Says he started his route about 2:35 a.m.
  • 10:50 a.m. Loughran says from the driver's seat he can see about five feet on either side of the plowtruck. Says it has good lighting. "Almost driving with a spotlight," he says.
  • 10:47 a.m. Loughran says he was told to show up for plow duty at 230am in the morning of Jan 29th. He was driving what's known as "the Franken truck" because it was built with a lot of spare parts.
  • 10:46 a.m. Loughran says he was friendly with the Alberts. Says in 2022 he was working for Canton DPW and often drove a snowplow for the town.
  • 10:44 a.m. First defense witness: Brian Loughran. "I was familiar with all of them," Loughran says of the Albert family. Says he knew Chris Albert the best because he used to deliver pizzas for D&E Pizza.
 
Last edited:

Updated: 9:27 AM EDT Jun 21, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>
  • 11:04 a.m. Loughran says the second pass was at about 3:15am to 3:30am. He says when he came back he saw a Ford Edge parked near the flagpole at the Alberts' residence. "It just stuck out as weird," he says.
  • 11 a.m. Loughran says he passed by the first time with the house on his right, then turned around and came back a second time with it on his left. Says he also saw nothing during the second pass.
  • 10:55 a.m. Loughran says he see "the entire front lawn" as he passed 34 Fairview Road at about 245am. "My attention is focused in front of me and to the sides," he says.
  • 10:51 a.m. Loughran says his regular plow route includes the neighborhood where 34 Fairview Rd is located. Says he started his route about 2:35 a.m.
  • 10:50 a.m. Loughran says from the driver's seat he can see about five feet on either side of the plowtruck. Says it has good lighting. "Almost driving with a spotlight," he says.
  • 10:47 a.m. Loughran says he was told to show up for plow duty at 230am in the morning of Jan 29th. He was driving what's known as "the Franken truck" because it was built with a lot of spare parts.
  • 10:46 a.m. Loughran says he was friendly with the Alberts. Says in 2022 he was working for Canton DPW and often drove a snowplow for the town.
  • 10:44 a.m. First defense witness: Brian Loughran. "I was familiar with all of them," Loughran says of the Albert family. Says he knew Chris Albert the best because he used to deliver pizzas for D&E Pizza.
He says when he came back he saw a Ford Edge parked near the flagpole at the Alberts' residence

Isn't this vehicle owned by one of the Alberts? The son possibly? I can't remember.
 

Updated: 9:27 AM EDT Jun 21, 2024
David Bienick
Reporter

<snip>

  • 11:23 a.m. Lally says Loughran has previously told investigators he went down the road at 12am and 2am. Loughran says that's not true.
  • 11:20 a.m. Loughran says he learned where O'Keefe's body was found through police reports and news reports.
  • 11:15 a.m. Prosecutor Adam Lally begins his first cross-examination of the trial. Shows Loughran a list of the plow routes in Canton.
  • 11:08 a.m. Loughran says when he returned to the neighborhood at about 530am to replow, he noticed first responders and the road was blocked.
  • 11:06 a.m. Loughran says it's policy to report vehicles parked on the street during a snowstorm but says he didn't call it in "as a courtesy to the Albert family."
 

Forum statistics

Threads
3,010
Messages
241,081
Members
970
Latest member
NickGoGetta
Back
Top Bottom